Science & Space :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For all that is Scientifically related to Cosmology and Space. (NB: Please take discussions about UFOs, possible Alien contact, Crop-Circles, Alien Abductions, Planet-X and Niburu to the ‘Paranormal and Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Hi Merc!

Here's what I see: a composite picture made with science cameras, that is, cameras that are using filters to see in specific wavelength, extending beyond that of the human eye. Using this data to create an approximately "true color" image is actually rather difficult, and depending on which filters were used, it may not even be possible to get very close to what an eye would see.

The real problem I think is that nasa does not spend much time educating people about the process involved in making (not taking) these color pictures. What people want is what their personal camera does, they want to see on the picture what their own eye would see if it was there, but it all comes down to a choice of priority: do you drop one (possibly several) of the science filters so that you can make prettier pictures, or do you keep the science filters and tweak your way into making (necessarilly) approximate color corrections ?

I think we should keep all the scientific filters we can fit in these "science machines". What I would like to see is another mission, dedicated to the human aspects of mars. ie, taking pictures in the human visible range, recording the sounds of mars, perhaps even reviving the idea of the mars glider, which has been scrapped a year ago or so. I'm sure there is a ton of fascinating and beautiful things we can do on mars that have no scientific interest whatsoever.

It would be a hard one to fund, of course, but I think that'd be the way to go. In the meantime all we can do is have crude approximations of the colors of mars. That's not to say that some approximations aren't better than others, and certainly, some of the picture composite that have been made by others than nasa/jpl tend to be better corrected (as the calibration target confirms).

If there was a big conspiracy about it tho, I wouldn't expect jpl to make the raw pictures available at all... everybody who's been making their own "true color" versions of the mars panoramas has been using these.

I'll grant you this, It does looks like there isn't much motivation at nasa/jpl to get color perfect composites. Perhaps that is because they know that's not possible anyway with the dataset they have, so maybe they just get it to look familiar enough... clearly they could try harder... it _is_ important to the layman, and by not doing so, they open the door for Hoaxland & al to cry conspiracy.

Francis.
ps: Congrats on your new book, btw :-)

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
NASA doctors Mars images... 468 Mercury Rapids 26-Feb-04 15:10
Re: NASA doctors Mars images... 144 Kees 26-Feb-04 17:11
Re: NASA doctors Mars images... 157 Mercury Rapids 26-Feb-04 17:21
Re: NASA doctors Mars images... 155 Kees 26-Feb-04 17:31
Re: NASA doctors Mars images... 152 lone 26-Feb-04 19:00
Re: NASA doctors Mars images... 157 Mercury Rapids 26-Feb-04 19:37
Re: NASA doctors Mars images... 175 lone 26-Feb-04 20:28
They are doing it all the time 157 Nejc 27-Feb-04 08:29
See also: 148 Nejc 27-Feb-04 13:45
Re: They are doing it all the time 166 gates and variations 28-Feb-04 02:17
Interesting...n/t 135 Nejc 28-Feb-04 06:21
Watch out there! 152 Nejc 28-Feb-04 07:36
Re: Watch out there! 252 ArmchairObserver 01-Mar-04 16:15
Re: NASA doctors Mars images... 140 cardinal guzman 26-Feb-04 22:36
Re: NASA doctors Mars images... 153 ArmchairObserver 27-Feb-04 07:30
Re: NASA doctors Mars images... 140 Brew99 27-Feb-04 13:27
So it IS BLUE!n/t 162 Nejc 27-Feb-04 13:37
Re: NASA doctors Mars images... 121 ArmchairObserver 27-Feb-04 16:20
Re: NASA doctors Mars images... 137 Nejc 27-Feb-04 17:49
Re: NASA doctors Mars images... 143 Zosimos 27-Feb-04 23:38
Re: NASA doctors Mars images... 115 gates and variations 28-Feb-04 02:11
Re: NASA doctors Mars images... 154 Zosimos 28-Feb-04 03:22
Yes Vonnegut was gut..n/t 157 Nejc 28-Feb-04 06:24
Re: NASA doctors Mars images... 165 gates and variations 28-Feb-04 12:59
Re: NASA and deception 132 Thunderbird 29-Feb-04 04:06
Re: NASA and deception 121 Nejc 29-Feb-04 09:26
Off topic 158 Richard Fusniak 29-Feb-04 15:20
Sometimes... 145 Nejc 29-Feb-04 16:33


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.