Science & Space :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For all that is Scientifically related to Cosmology and Space. (NB: Please take discussions about UFOs, possible Alien contact, Crop-Circles, Alien Abductions, Planet-X and Niburu to the ‘Paranormal and Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
O. K., Dokey, I agree with you about having major doubts about the electric universe theory as presented currently. However, I may be able to contribute toward an answer for some of your questions.

How is there a difference of potential between two planets? Theoretically, it's not unreasonable, when one considers the environment of space. While it is currently agreed that space is a relative, as opposed to an absolute, vacuum, this means that there is some material/matter in the void between bodies; this makes sense, because there must be SOMETHING, of some kind, for radio waves to propagate..a propagation medium, or something for the waves charge/act upon. Depending on the density/composition of this matter/material, a body passing through it will pick up or lose a charge due to friction, as well as imparted from the ionization of the matter, and radiation in the area. Also, space is FULL of ELECTRO-MAGNETIC radiation (radio, microwave, xrays, etc), all of which are striking planets, asteroids, nebulae, etc. constantly.

Now, after the dryness of the above paragraph, have some examples; in the dry winter air, or fresh out of the dryer, clothes tend to build up a static charge, sometimes quite a high one. The static cling of you clothes is built up due to friction...same thing with aircraft...static build up due to the friction with the air, and even moreso when flying through highly charged storm areas; you've seen the lightning storms, with an electrical arc several thousand feet long, and all due to movement/friction of air, and airborne particles. Similarly, in space, there are ionized (charged) regions of space, and all that elecro-magnetic radiation with its ionizing effects, all acting on any planetary body present in that environment.

I think it probably depends on the planet's own magnetic field strength, and whether it is strong enough to protect the planet from being turned into a terminal for a discharge. Depending also on the planet's structure, it may be able to slowly release a static charge back into it's local environment, much like aircraft do...if you've noticed, on the trailing edge of an aircraft's wing and tail/rudder, you can see little 'whiskers' pointing backwards...these are static discharge wicks, to prevent the build-up of harmful potentials in the aircraft's skin/airframe.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
'Electric cosmos' theory 684 rainman 10-Jan-04 21:58
Re: text only... 233 rainman 10-Jan-04 22:00
Re: text only... 217 OakeyDokey 10-Jan-04 23:34
Re: text only... 230 cardinal guzman 11-Jan-04 00:33
Re: text only... 218 scimitar 11-Jan-04 19:20
Re: Gravametric distortions 224 Thunderbird 12-Jan-04 05:06
Re: Gravametric distortions 177 Jergat 15-Jan-04 20:58
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 230 coggas 11-Jan-04 02:49
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 246 ArmchairObserver 11-Jan-04 09:42
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 211 OakeyDokey 11-Jan-04 13:16
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 195 Diomede 11-Jan-04 13:24
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 202 rainman 11-Jan-04 15:00
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 206 Diomede 16-Jan-04 06:57
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 183 Anne-Marie 16-Jan-04 07:53
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 196 Diomede 16-Jan-04 08:26
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 208 Diomede 16-Jan-04 09:13
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 197 Anne-Marie 16-Jan-04 17:27
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 222 cardinal guzman 16-Jan-04 19:46
Re: PS 208 rainman 11-Jan-04 18:18
Re: PS 194 Diomede 12-Jan-04 12:41
Re: PS 195 rainman 12-Jan-04 16:36
Re: PS 206 SunSword 12-Jan-04 21:05
Re: PS 203 Diomede 13-Jan-04 19:14
Re: Electrical Machining 188 Thunderbird 12-Jan-04 03:35
Re: Electrical Machining 211 Diomede 12-Jan-04 10:36
Re: Uniformity...the B.S. Benchmark 205 Thunderbird 13-Jan-04 16:53
Re: Uniformity...the B.S. Benchmark 225 Anne-Marie 14-Jan-04 19:22
Re: Uniformity...the B.S. Benchmark 215 Diomede 15-Jan-04 07:37
Re: Uniformity...the B.S. Benchmark 222 scimitar 15-Jan-04 10:51
Re: Electrical Machining 190 Anne-Marie 12-Jan-04 18:44
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 199 Richard Essame 11-Jan-04 22:03
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 255 rainman 11-Jan-04 23:21
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 235 cardinal guzman 11-Jan-04 23:45
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 197 scimitar 12-Jan-04 09:57
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 189 Geoff 12-Jan-04 00:26
Digital elevation mode.. 160 Geoff 12-Jan-04 00:41
Perspective........ 197 Geoff 12-Jan-04 03:32
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 210 Richard Essame 12-Jan-04 01:22
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 223 Richard Essame 12-Jan-04 01:35
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 253 Geoff 12-Jan-04 02:03
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 225 OakeyDokey 16-Jan-04 19:06
Re: Entry and Exit wounds 208 Thunderbird 16-Jan-04 20:12
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 204 scimitar 16-Jan-04 21:13
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 230 cardinal guzman 17-Jan-04 01:23
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 202 Melusine 12-Jan-04 03:41
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 213 Richard Essame 12-Jan-04 05:05
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 210 wirelessguru1 14-Jan-04 05:01
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 209 Richard Essame 14-Jan-04 07:29
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 199 Diomede 15-Jan-04 12:34
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 188 OakeyDokey 16-Jan-04 19:33
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 181 scimitar 16-Jan-04 22:04
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 205 cardinal guzman 17-Jan-04 00:48
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 205 OakeyDokey 17-Jan-04 23:43
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 165 scimitar 18-Jan-04 14:10
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 207 Anne-Marie 17-Jan-04 07:02
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 205 Anne-Marie 17-Jan-04 18:37
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 231 OakeyDokey 17-Jan-04 23:45
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 199 cardinal guzman 18-Jan-04 01:08
P.S. 161 scimitar 16-Jan-04 22:12
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 259 wirelessguru1 16-Jan-04 23:38
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 173 scimitar 17-Jan-04 00:56
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 206 wirelessguru1 17-Jan-04 08:16
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 191 Diomede 17-Jan-04 20:29
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 188 OakeyDokey 18-Jan-04 00:08
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 159 scimitar 18-Jan-04 14:24
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 204 OakeyDokey 18-Jan-04 14:42
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 297 Diomede 18-Jan-04 15:25
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 228 OakeyDokey 18-Jan-04 17:49
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 217 wirelessguru1 18-Jan-04 20:20
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 224 OakeyDokey 18-Jan-04 21:44
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 223 wirelessguru1 19-Jan-04 03:59
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 218 OakeyDokey 19-Jan-04 17:38
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 269 wirelessguru1 19-Jan-04 22:36
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 200 OakeyDokey 20-Jan-04 00:04
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 201 wirelessguru1 20-Jan-04 03:46
Re: Phase variance,matter,Nanomagnetism.... Ping for Diomede 207 Thunderbird 20-Jan-04 04:27
Re: Phase variance,matter,Nanomagnetism... . Ping for Diomede 166 Diomede 21-Jan-04 14:19
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 205 Diomede 19-Jan-04 19:12
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 181 OakeyDokey 19-Jan-04 19:23
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 206 cardinal guzman 18-Jan-04 19:21
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 174 Diomede 19-Jan-04 19:28
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 201 OakeyDokey 19-Jan-04 19:35
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 178 Diomede 20-Jan-04 16:49
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 192 OakeyDokey 20-Jan-04 17:12
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 211 OakeyDokey 18-Jan-04 18:01
grand canyon pic 207 cardinal guzman 05-Feb-04 02:08
Re: grand canyon pic 438 Thunderbird 05-Feb-04 05:45


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.