Science & Space :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For all that is Scientifically related to Cosmology and Space. (NB: Please take discussions about UFOs, possible Alien contact, Crop-Circles, Alien Abductions, Planet-X and Niburu to the ‘Paranormal and Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Susan Doris Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Well, I have managed to find out that this post is
> in response to mine immediately above it, but I
> really would appreciate your quoting me if you are
> responding to me otherwise it really is very
> difficult for me.
>
Quote

Can you not see the paradox of your own
> position? Pseudo-Skeptics claim, they support
> Science,
> Correction: sceptics usually do support science. I
> don't know what a pseudo-sceptic is - it seems to
> be a term used by those who wish to avoid a
> possibility that their faith beliefs are entirely
> subjective.
>
Quote

according to the methodology of Science
>
> Which methodology are you referring to here?
>
Quote

which is Science in it's purest form,
> Science says Psi effects are proven,
> Please cite the objective evidence for this.
>
Quote

so Skeptics turn on Science.
> Which ones? Where? How?
>
> Susan

Your first statement says that you do not associate a methodology to science. Science by definition is a method of enquiry with a series of protocols, and statistical analyses.

For over a century this methodology has been applied to claims or suspicion of conscious or unconscious knowledge which bypasses the recognised senses. An example of this is at the top of the initial post of the thread, and replicated here: [www.deanradin.com]

Dean Radin's Presentiment experiments and their Meta-analysis over thousands of examples of replicated experiment. The classic example is of course arch-skeptic Richard Wiseman oft-quoted as admitting that psi was proven by the normal standards of science. He didn't like the result so he then demands that Science change it's parameters and protocols until the results match his beliefs. The classic pseudo-Skeptic.


I have a good idea of your response to this, only reputable scientists can be accepted in their results and the definition of an accepted scientist is that he must not produce results supporting psi.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Very curious experiment in unconscious prediction 1579 Me 24-Jun-19 20:39
Re: Very curious experiment in unconscious prediction 145 Susan Doris 25-Jun-19 06:56
Re: Very curious experiment in unconscious prediction 153 Me 25-Jun-19 11:51
Re: Very curious experiment in unconscious prediction 118 D-Archer 25-Jun-19 12:47
Re: Very curious experiment in unconscious prediction 125 Me 25-Jun-19 18:52
Re: Very curious experiment in unconscious prediction 135 Susan Doris 26-Jun-19 07:20
Re: Very curious experiment in unconscious prediction 115 cloister 26-Jun-19 08:24
Re: Very curious experiment in unconscious prediction 116 D-Archer 26-Jun-19 09:50
Re: Very curious experiment in unconscious prediction 115 cloister 26-Jun-19 14:31
Re: Very curious experiment in unconscious prediction 121 D-Archer 27-Jun-19 10:20
Re: Very curious experiment in unconscious prediction 123 ianw16 26-Jun-19 11:04
Re: Very curious experiment in unconscious prediction 128 Me 26-Jun-19 12:14
Re: Very curious experiment in unconscious prediction 130 cloister 26-Jun-19 14:00
Re: Very curious experiment in unconscious prediction 122 Me 26-Jun-19 14:41
Re: Very curious experiment in unconscious prediction 108 Susan Doris 27-Jun-19 11:12
Re: Very curious experiment in unconscious prediction 135 Me 28-Jun-19 19:06
Re: Very curious experiment in unconscious prediction 127 Susan Doris 29-Jun-19 05:36
Re: Very curious experiment in unconscious prediction 122 Me 29-Jun-19 16:30
Re: Very curious experiment in unconscious prediction 106 Susan Doris 29-Jun-19 17:28
Re: Very curious experiment in unconscious prediction 118 Susan Doris 26-Jun-19 14:05
Re: Very curious experiment in unconscious prediction 111 cloister 26-Jun-19 14:15
Re: Very curious experiment in unconscious prediction 116 Me 26-Jun-19 12:08
Re: Very curious experiment in unconscious prediction 111 Me 26-Jun-19 12:22
Re: Very curious experiment in unconscious prediction 102 Susan Doris 26-Jun-19 14:22
Re: Very curious experiment in unconscious prediction 119 Me 26-Jun-19 14:35
Re: Very curious experiment in unconscious prediction 112 Susan Doris 27-Jun-19 11:15
Re: Very curious experiment in unconscious prediction 108 drrayeye 29-Jun-19 12:44
Re: Very curious experiment in unconscious prediction 118 Me 29-Jun-19 15:21
Re: Very curious experiment in unconscious prediction 108 Susan Doris 29-Jun-19 15:53
Re: Very curious experiment in unconscious prediction 120 Me 29-Jun-19 16:45
General concerns 123 drrayeye 29-Jun-19 22:33
Re: General concerns 119 Me 01-Jul-19 00:39
Re: General concerns 134 paxton 02-Jul-19 15:19
Re: General concerns 111 drrayeye 02-Jul-19 22:35
Re: General concerns 181 Me 12-Jul-19 16:03
Re: Very curious experiment in unconscious prediction 113 Susan Doris 29-Jun-19 15:45
Re: Very curious experiment in unconscious prediction 123 D-Archer 26-Jun-19 09:46
Re: Very curious experiment in unconscious prediction 143 Me 26-Jun-19 12:02


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.