Science & Space :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For all that is Scientifically related to Cosmology and Space. (NB: Please take discussions about UFOs, possible Alien contact, Crop-Circles, Alien Abductions, Planet-X and Niburu to the ‘Paranormal and Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Susan Doris Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Well, I have managed to find out that this post is
> in response to mine immediately above it, but I
> really would appreciate your quoting me if you are
> responding to me otherwise it really is very
> difficult for me.
>
Quote

Can you not see the paradox of your own
> position? Pseudo-Skeptics claim, they support
> Science,
> Correction: sceptics usually do support science. I
> don't know what a pseudo-sceptic is - it seems to
> be a term used by those who wish to avoid a
> possibility that their faith beliefs are entirely
> subjective.
>
Quote

according to the methodology of Science
>
> Which methodology are you referring to here?
>
Quote

which is Science in it's purest form,
> Science says Psi effects are proven,
> Please cite the objective evidence for this.
>
Quote

so Skeptics turn on Science.
> Which ones? Where? How?
>
> Susan

Your first statement says that you do not associate a methodology to science. Science by definition is a method of enquiry with a series of protocols, and statistical analyses.

For over a century this methodology has been applied to claims or suspicion of conscious or unconscious knowledge which bypasses the recognised senses. An example of this is at the top of the initial post of the thread, and replicated here: [www.deanradin.com]

Dean Radin's Presentiment experiments and their Meta-analysis over thousands of examples of replicated experiment. The classic example is of course arch-skeptic Richard Wiseman oft-quoted as admitting that psi was proven by the normal standards of science. He didn't like the result so he then demands that Science change it's parameters and protocols until the results match his beliefs. The classic pseudo-Skeptic.


I have a good idea of your response to this, only reputable scientists can be accepted in their results and the definition of an accepted scientist is that he must not produce results supporting psi.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Very curious experiment in unconscious prediction 1465 Me 24-Jun-19 20:39
Re: Very curious experiment in unconscious prediction 100 Susan Doris 25-Jun-19 06:56
Re: Very curious experiment in unconscious prediction 94 Me 25-Jun-19 11:51
Re: Very curious experiment in unconscious prediction 80 D-Archer 25-Jun-19 12:47
Re: Very curious experiment in unconscious prediction 79 Me 25-Jun-19 18:52
Re: Very curious experiment in unconscious prediction 93 Susan Doris 26-Jun-19 07:20
Re: Very curious experiment in unconscious prediction 81 cloister 26-Jun-19 08:24
Re: Very curious experiment in unconscious prediction 77 D-Archer 26-Jun-19 09:50
Re: Very curious experiment in unconscious prediction 74 cloister 26-Jun-19 14:31
Re: Very curious experiment in unconscious prediction 77 D-Archer 27-Jun-19 10:20
Re: Very curious experiment in unconscious prediction 83 ianw16 26-Jun-19 11:04
Re: Very curious experiment in unconscious prediction 75 Me 26-Jun-19 12:14
Re: Very curious experiment in unconscious prediction 78 cloister 26-Jun-19 14:00
Re: Very curious experiment in unconscious prediction 75 Me 26-Jun-19 14:41
Re: Very curious experiment in unconscious prediction 74 Susan Doris 27-Jun-19 11:12
Re: Very curious experiment in unconscious prediction 83 Me 28-Jun-19 19:06
Re: Very curious experiment in unconscious prediction 76 Susan Doris 29-Jun-19 05:36
Re: Very curious experiment in unconscious prediction 71 Me 29-Jun-19 16:30
Re: Very curious experiment in unconscious prediction 72 Susan Doris 29-Jun-19 17:28
Re: Very curious experiment in unconscious prediction 81 Susan Doris 26-Jun-19 14:05
Re: Very curious experiment in unconscious prediction 72 cloister 26-Jun-19 14:15
Re: Very curious experiment in unconscious prediction 72 Me 26-Jun-19 12:08
Re: Very curious experiment in unconscious prediction 75 Me 26-Jun-19 12:22
Re: Very curious experiment in unconscious prediction 67 Susan Doris 26-Jun-19 14:22
Re: Very curious experiment in unconscious prediction 72 Me 26-Jun-19 14:35
Re: Very curious experiment in unconscious prediction 75 Susan Doris 27-Jun-19 11:15
Re: Very curious experiment in unconscious prediction 67 drrayeye 29-Jun-19 12:44
Re: Very curious experiment in unconscious prediction 68 Me 29-Jun-19 15:21
Re: Very curious experiment in unconscious prediction 70 Susan Doris 29-Jun-19 15:53
Re: Very curious experiment in unconscious prediction 74 Me 29-Jun-19 16:45
General concerns 87 drrayeye 29-Jun-19 22:33
Re: General concerns 69 Me 01-Jul-19 00:39
Re: General concerns 71 paxton 02-Jul-19 15:19
Re: General concerns 73 drrayeye 02-Jul-19 22:35
Re: General concerns 106 Me 12-Jul-19 16:03
Re: Very curious experiment in unconscious prediction 74 Susan Doris 29-Jun-19 15:45
Re: Very curious experiment in unconscious prediction 88 D-Archer 26-Jun-19 09:46
Re: Very curious experiment in unconscious prediction 88 Me 26-Jun-19 12:02


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.