Science & Space :
The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For all that is Scientifically related to Cosmology and Space. (NB: Please take discussions about UFOs, possible Alien contact, Crop-Circles, Alien Abductions, Planet-X and Niburu to the ‘Paranormal and Supernatural’ Message Board).
D-Archer Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Experimental galaxy formation > W.H. Bostick,
> Plasma interaction
> ([www.plasma-universe.com]
>
> Quote:"Physicist 'Creates' Universe in a Test
> Tube; Atom Gun Produces Galaxies and Gives Clues
> to Creation. Cosmos 'Created' in a Test Tube"
>
> Galaxies are formed by real matter and real
> physical processes, not unseen matter abd
> unobserved processes.
>
> Regards,
> Daniel
Lol. Quotes a headline from 1956! The model was junk. As was Peratt's. Which is why nobody takes them seriously. They explain precisely nothing. They don't explain galaxy rotation curves, they don't explain the orbits of stars. Completely useless.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Experimental galaxy formation > W.H. Bostick,
> Plasma interaction
> ([www.plasma-universe.com]
>
> Quote:"Physicist 'Creates' Universe in a Test
> Tube; Atom Gun Produces Galaxies and Gives Clues
> to Creation. Cosmos 'Created' in a Test Tube"
>
> Galaxies are formed by real matter and real
> physical processes, not unseen matter abd
> unobserved processes.
>
> Regards,
> Daniel
Lol. Quotes a headline from 1956! The model was junk. As was Peratt's. Which is why nobody takes them seriously. They explain precisely nothing. They don't explain galaxy rotation curves, they don't explain the orbits of stars. Completely useless.
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.