Science & Space :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For all that is Scientifically related to Cosmology and Space. (NB: Please take discussions about UFOs, possible Alien contact, Crop-Circles, Alien Abductions, Planet-X and Niburu to the ‘Paranormal and Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
jeffreyw Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Correct. There are no "black holes" or "gravitons"
> or expansion of the universe. All three concepts
> are pseudoscience.
>
> Pseudoscience: a collection of beliefs, statements
> or practices that claim to conform to the
> scientific method, but do not.

All three may or may not be true - but they are not pseudoscience.
Black holes - predicted both by general relativity theory and by observation of no suns beyond a certain size. Doesn't mean they exist - there may be other factors that cause a limit to the size and mass of suns. But it is not pseudoscience to assert their existence, because evidence is both theory and observation.
Gravitons - concept is all other known forces have "particles", therefore it is logical (although not proven) that gravity does also. Me personally, I don't think gravity needs to have gravitons if it is understood to be warping of space itself - in that context it is not a force like other forces. But assuming gravitons is not pseudoscience, it may simply be wrong.
Universal expansion - I have posted elsewhere an alternative perspective that describes the red shift (which is one basis for the expansion theory). So expansion may be wrong, but it is not pseudoscience, as it is based on observation AND experiments on light.

Now - if you limit "science" only to that category which involves repeating and replicating experiments - fine. A lot of what is considered "science" would then need to be reclassified as "natural philosophy" which was the original category anyway. I'm fine with that, but I don't think most scientists would support it

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
SuperConductor Black Holes??????? 1382 Lowelldw64 07-Sep-18 21:24
Re: SuperConductor Black Holes??????? 231 D-Archer 08-Sep-18 08:49
Re: SuperConductor Black Holes??????? 224 ianw16 08-Sep-18 10:26
Re: SuperConductor Black Holes??????? 229 Lost_In_Place 08-Sep-18 11:13
Re: SuperConductor Black Holes??????? 200 ianw16 08-Sep-18 12:09
Re: SuperConductor Black Holes??????? 203 Lost_In_Place 08-Sep-18 13:50
Re: SuperConductor Black Holes??????? 195 D-Archer 09-Sep-18 11:01
Re: SuperConductor Black Holes??????? 197 ianw16 13-Sep-18 10:16
Re: SuperConductor Black Holes??????? 195 D-Archer 14-Sep-18 07:51
Re: SuperConductor Black Holes??????? 196 D-Archer 09-Sep-18 10:55
To Summarize 222 Race Jackson 08-Sep-18 21:28
Re: To Summarize 192 Lost_In_Place 09-Sep-18 01:12
Re: To Summarize 185 D-Archer 09-Sep-18 11:02
Belief 198 Race Jackson 11-Sep-18 01:29
Re: Belief 207 D-Archer 11-Sep-18 07:36
Re: Belief 184 ianw16 13-Sep-18 10:32
Re: Belief 195 D-Archer 14-Sep-18 07:54
Re: Belief 194 Lost_In_Place 11-Sep-18 18:23
Re: Belief 194 D-Archer 12-Sep-18 08:59
Re: Belief 196 jeffreyw 12-Sep-18 16:37
Black Holes, Gravitons, and Expansion 192 Race Jackson 12-Sep-18 18:37
Re: Black Holes, Gravitons, and Expansion 190 Lost_In_Place 13-Sep-18 03:24
Re: Black Holes, Gravitons, and Expansion 199 D-Archer 13-Sep-18 09:50
Re: Belief 187 ianw16 13-Sep-18 10:24
Re: Belief 190 ianw16 13-Sep-18 10:27
Re: To Summarize 192 ianw16 13-Sep-18 10:19
Re: To Summarize 362 D-Archer 14-Sep-18 07:57


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.