Science & Space :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For all that is Scientifically related to Cosmology and Space. (NB: Please take discussions about UFOs, possible Alien contact, Crop-Circles, Alien Abductions, Planet-X and Niburu to the ‘Paranormal and Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Here is an interesting article on Erik Verlinde’s theory of emergent gravity: [www.astronomy.com]

From the article:
“Albert Einstein’s theory of general relativity is just over 100 years old, and so far it has predicted the interaction between celestial objects and the space-time field very well. There are a few troublesome spots, however, in which the theory of general relativity doesn’t agree with quantum mechanics. These gaps have confounded researchers for decades, and have sprouted a handful of hypotheses attempting to explain the dissonance.

Dark matter and dark energy are the prevailing stand-in answers for this problem, but they are, as of yet, merely stand-ins. And there are some physicists that do not buy into these explanations. Erik Verlinde, a professor of science mathematics, and informatics at the University of Amsterdam, is one of them. He’s developing a theory that takes another look at the mechanics of gravity, and it seems to have struck a nerve in the world of physics.”

Verlinde’s theory is summarized as: “Emergent gravity,” as Verlinde calls it, is the idea that gravity is not a fundamental governance of our universe, but instead a reaction to the makeup of a given environment. Rather than thinking of gravity as a fundamental force, something that “just is,” is it possible that gravity is actually the result of the positions of quantum bodies, similar to the way temperature is derived from the motions of individual particles?“

From my point of view, this is a valuable development. Verlinde doesn’t do away with all the dark matter/energy concepts. “Dark energy is quite an important part of my theory,” Verlinde says. “I don’t do away with everything that’s called ‘dark,’ I just explain what is what we now call ‘dark matter’ by thinking about what the influence of dark energy would be, and that [dark energy] actually gives the same effect.”

Since, physicists have not been able to show dark matter, Verlinde might be on the right track. Enjoy!



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 22-Jun-18 23:14 by Eddie Larry.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
The case against dark matter 1521 Eddie Larry 22-Jun-18 23:13
Dark matter and dark energy 265 Race Jackson 22-Jun-18 23:55
Re: Dark matter and dark energy 328 Eddie Larry 23-Jun-18 04:35
Re: The case against dark matter 174 ianw16 27-Aug-18 13:26
Re: The case against dark matter 161 Eddie Larry 28-Aug-18 18:24
Re: The case against dark matter 305 ianw16 28-Aug-18 19:08


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.