. . . The effort to control information flow seems to have ratcheted up a notch or two – may be more. . . One can hardly be surprised as that catastrophic event continues to unroll – or should it be flow – hardly funny, either, I know, yet that ionization and spillage spreads. Consider what coincidental attention certain social media sites are getting today from a regulatory (information control) frame of reference due to their massive global influence. . .

Unless one has access to remote monitoring devices such as satellites, coastline water check stations, marine life observations, and surface vessel water sampling strategies such as military navy’s and civilian fleets might carry onboard, secondary observers can only speculate about the details. . .

Then President Eisenhower once said to various governmental agency members regarding serious matters of high-strangeness affecting the populace and the country’s citizenry, . . . (to paraphrase) “The American people WILL NOT be stampeded, . . .” Some folks had difficulty with the term ‘stampeded’ at first until they realized that it was President Eisenhower’s term in place of “panicked.” Cattle herds can be made to panic or stampede when riled by noise and hat waving from cowboys on horseback, just as people can panic when ill-informed, misinformed, and disinformed with an under lying agenda attached to scare monger or just to sensationalize an event for points or an undeserved following. . . Perhaps. . . Some folks even suggest that fake news is a diffuser toward reducing a panicked state. . . Unless one has the means to conduct a meaningful investigation, acquire proven data, and somehow, are represented by a majority class such as academia, one is probably going to be ignored or scoffed at. There are quite a few quiet in the background. It’s noticeable, too. . .

The following link below could be taken as fact as well as informed reporting or simply twisted with a word or two in the wrong places to be pointed out as false taking the rest of the story to the trash heap. One question goes begging, “How does one verify claims of toxic ionizing radiation levels without the appropriate gear and authority to represent and address a populace responsibly and with a level of unquestionable credibility, anyway?” Anyone who has seen the damage caused by a panic stricken herd stampeding down a town’s main street knows better than to get in the middle of those stomping hooves while J-walking on foot. . .

I wonder about the means of the photo used by the following news source. . . For instance, is it depicting a responsible level of accuracy? And what about its suggested colour coding to suggest intensity and placement?

[nyeveningnews.com]

. . . It’s clearly unknown territory for any presumed expert. . . There is a lighter side in that some folks from the northeastern seaboard, affected by multiple weather hits by 'nor'easters' can manage the importance of those on the western seaboard having to deal with tainted waters and marine life. The plastic-patches are probably still floating in the Pacific, too, accumulating as before. . .