Science & Space :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For all that is Scientifically related to Cosmology and Space. (NB: Please take discussions about UFOs, possible Alien contact, Crop-Circles, Alien Abductions, Planet-X and Niburu to the ‘Paranormal and Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
laughin Wrote:

> In real science
> one does not keep "revisiting some assumptions"
> for each new discovery
> and then say "black holes do best fit the data"

Then it should be quite easy for you to find real published, peer-reviewed science that backs your statement. You're asking me to defend the science behind black holes, when you haven't even shown exactly where black hole theory (or whatever you want to call it) falls short. Further, I'm not responsible for that science, but unlike you, I give specialists the benefit of the doubt - in their specialty. I defer to them until I have reason not to.


laughin Wrote:

> of course they would
> when you modify your theory
> to fit every new thingy that comes along
>
> every one of the black hole theories
> from the beginning until now
> have been WRONG
> or else they wouldn't have needed to be modified

Can you explain every one of the black hole theories from the beginning until now? And can you explain how they have each been wrong? Specifically?


laughin Wrote:

> how many times can a theory be wrong
> before someone says "maybe we're going down the
> wrong road"
> and stops and asks for new directions?

Let's work our way through your claim above first, shall we? Because, as of right now, you haven't shown that only one of those "theories" is wrong.


laughin Wrote:

> theories are suppose to PREDICT discoveries
> and not constantly require modifications to the
> assumptions
> making changes to your theory AFTERWARD to make
> things fit
> means you don't know jack about what is really
> going on. PERIOD

Well, we'll see after you explain the specific shortcomings of all of the black hole theories.

Go on, we're waiting.

Brian

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
gravity waves "detected" 1475 laughin 11-Feb-16 16:34
Re: gravity waves "detected" 506 Susan Doris 11-Feb-16 17:44
Re: gravity waves "detected" 397 Sirius7237 11-Feb-16 18:30
Re: gravity waves "detected" 495 laughin 11-Feb-16 21:20
Re: gravity waves "detected" 413 JonnyMcA 12-Feb-16 14:23
Re: gravity waves "detected" 455 laughin 12-Feb-16 15:51
Re: gravity waves "detected" 296 JonnyMcA 12-Feb-16 16:31
Re: gravity waves "detected" 405 laughin 13-Feb-16 18:26
Re: gravity waves "detected" 449 JonnyMcA 13-Feb-16 18:41
Re: gravity waves "detected" 513 Me 15-Feb-16 15:57
Re: gravity waves "detected" 370 laughin 15-Feb-16 20:17
Re: gravity waves "detected" 412 carolb 13-Feb-16 21:53
Re: gravity waves "detected" 306 D-Archer 14-Feb-16 11:16
Re: gravity waves "detected" 333 carolb 14-Feb-16 14:54
Re: gravity waves "detected" 318 Sirius7237 14-Feb-16 20:08
Re: gravity waves "detected" 427 carolb 14-Feb-16 22:31
Re: gravity waves "detected" 438 Aine 15-Feb-16 16:20
Re: gravity waves "detected" 363 D-Archer 15-Feb-16 09:59
Re: gravity waves "detected" 334 JonnyMcA 12-Feb-16 14:31
Re: gravity waves "detected" 380 carolb 13-Feb-16 21:29
Re: gravity waves "detected" 300 laughin 14-Feb-16 15:19
Re: gravity waves "detected" 228 skakos 15-Feb-16 14:07
Re: gravity waves "detected" 328 Pete Vanderzwet 11-Feb-16 21:06
Re: gravity waves "detected" 441 JonnyMcA 12-Feb-16 14:38
Onto Dark Energy waves! 390 Eddie Larry 11-Feb-16 21:34
It took 100 years to discover what Einstein already knew 240 David L 12-Feb-16 12:50
Re: It took 100 years to discover what Einstein already knew 334 Spiros 12-Feb-16 17:09
Re: It took 100 years to discover what Einstein already knew 399 D-Archer 15-Feb-16 12:47
Re: It took 100 years to discover what Einstein already knew 403 Aine 15-Feb-16 16:15
Re: It took 100 years to discover what Einstein already knew 359 D-Archer 15-Feb-16 18:53
Re: It took 100 years to discover what Einstein already knew 377 laughin 15-Feb-16 20:39
Re: It took 100 years to discover what Einstein already knew 319 Aine 16-Feb-16 01:48
Re: gravity waves "detected" 449 dong 12-Feb-16 18:36
Re: gravity waves "detected" 422 laughin 13-Feb-16 03:26
Re: gravity waves "detected" 351 dong 16-Feb-16 07:41
Liego 355 laughin 15-Feb-16 04:17
Gravity Waves of Propaganda the Sequel 333 D-Archer 15-Feb-16 09:48
Re: gravity waves "detected" 431 skakos 15-Feb-16 12:58
Re: gravity waves "detected" 389 Aine 15-Feb-16 22:31
Re: gravity waves "detected" 252 carolb 16-Feb-16 00:57
Re: gravity waves "detected" 340 D-Archer 16-Feb-16 11:47
Re: gravity waves "detected" 461 carolb 16-Feb-16 12:32
Re: gravity waves "detected" 294 D-Archer 16-Feb-16 14:13
Re: gravity waves "detected" 309 carolb 16-Feb-16 14:42
Re: gravity waves "detected" 289 D-Archer 16-Feb-16 15:17
Re: gravity waves "detected" 398 carolb 16-Feb-16 16:27
Re: gravity waves "detected" 417 D-Archer 17-Feb-16 14:08
Really? 309 Sirfiroth 17-Feb-16 15:11
Re: Really? 414 JonnyMcA 17-Feb-16 15:32
Re: Really? 398 D-Archer 17-Feb-16 15:42
Re: gravity waves "detected" 416 carolb 17-Feb-16 18:05
mods! 364 D-Archer 18-Feb-16 11:13
Re: mods! 448 carolb 18-Feb-16 14:14
Re: mods! 429 D-Archer 18-Feb-16 16:02
Re: gravity waves "detected" 529 Sirfiroth 17-Feb-16 01:06
Re: gravity waves "detected" 351 Aine 17-Feb-16 14:48
Re: gravity waves "detected" 386 JonnyMcA 17-Feb-16 15:19
Re: gravity waves "detected" 277 Sirfiroth 17-Feb-16 15:39
Re: gravity waves "detected" 339 JonnyMcA 17-Feb-16 17:37
Re: gravity waves "detected" 437 Aine 17-Feb-16 18:49
Re: gravity waves "detected" 386 laughin 16-Feb-16 20:24
Re: gravity waves "detected" 229 D-Archer 17-Feb-16 16:23
Gravy Waves 542 D-Archer 20-Feb-16 11:39
Playing devil’s advocate on the discovery of gravitational waves 491 laughin 02-Mar-16 18:23
Scientists: we're 100% convinced 315 laughin 07-Mar-16 17:13
Black holes and big bangs can't co-exist 424 laughin 13-Mar-16 04:52
Re: gravity waves "detected" 355 brett z 20-Apr-16 23:42
Re: gravity waves "detected" 359 laughin 21-Apr-16 14:02
Re: gravity waves "detected" 270 OCaptain 10-May-16 12:45
Re: gravity waves "detected" 222 laughin 10-May-16 13:16
Re: gravity waves "detected" 287 OCaptain 10-May-16 13:21
Re: gravity waves "detected" 340 laughin 10-May-16 19:25
Re: gravity waves "detected" 464 OCaptain 10-May-16 22:56
Re: gravity waves "detected" 348 laughin 11-May-16 15:32
Re: gravity waves "detected" 439 JonnyMcA 11-May-16 16:53
Re: gravity waves "detected" 453 laughin 12-May-16 16:26
pompousness "detected" 389 laughin 18-May-16 15:25
bump- 2 weeks 484 laughin 27-May-16 15:02
Re: bump- 3 weeks 421 laughin 02-Jun-16 23:20
Re: bump- 4 weeks and why isn't Carolb patrolling the threads 432 laughin 10-Jun-16 15:42
Gravitational Waves from Black Hole Megamergers Are Weaker Than Predicted 408 laughin 04-May-16 13:15
Re: Gravitational Waves from Black Hole Megamergers Are Weaker Than Predicted 426 D-Archer 09-May-16 19:05
Re: Gravitational Waves from Black Hole Megamergers Are Weaker Than Predicted 230 OCaptain 10-May-16 12:46
Re: Gravitational Waves from Black Hole Megamergers Are Weaker Than Predicted 446 laughin 10-May-16 13:27
Re: Gravitational Waves from Black Hole Megamergers Are Weaker Than Predicted 294 OCaptain 10-May-16 16:39
Re: Gravitational Waves from Black Hole Megamergers Are Weaker Than Predicted 346 laughin 10-May-16 19:10
how many times can you change the rules and still get a black hole 330 laughin 08-Jun-16 14:00
LIGO press conf, June 15 359 brett z 15-Jun-16 11:53
Re: LIGO press conf, June 15 357 D-Archer 15-Jun-16 14:48


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.