Science & Space :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For all that is Scientifically related to Cosmology and Space. (NB: Please take discussions about UFOs, possible Alien contact, Crop-Circles, Alien Abductions, Planet-X and Niburu to the ‘Paranormal and Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
laughin Wrote:

> In real science
> one does not keep "revisiting some assumptions"
> for each new discovery
> and then say "black holes do best fit the data"

Then it should be quite easy for you to find real published, peer-reviewed science that backs your statement. You're asking me to defend the science behind black holes, when you haven't even shown exactly where black hole theory (or whatever you want to call it) falls short. Further, I'm not responsible for that science, but unlike you, I give specialists the benefit of the doubt - in their specialty. I defer to them until I have reason not to.


laughin Wrote:

> of course they would
> when you modify your theory
> to fit every new thingy that comes along
>
> every one of the black hole theories
> from the beginning until now
> have been WRONG
> or else they wouldn't have needed to be modified

Can you explain every one of the black hole theories from the beginning until now? And can you explain how they have each been wrong? Specifically?


laughin Wrote:

> how many times can a theory be wrong
> before someone says "maybe we're going down the
> wrong road"
> and stops and asks for new directions?

Let's work our way through your claim above first, shall we? Because, as of right now, you haven't shown that only one of those "theories" is wrong.


laughin Wrote:

> theories are suppose to PREDICT discoveries
> and not constantly require modifications to the
> assumptions
> making changes to your theory AFTERWARD to make
> things fit
> means you don't know jack about what is really
> going on. PERIOD

Well, we'll see after you explain the specific shortcomings of all of the black hole theories.

Go on, we're waiting.

Brian

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
gravity waves "detected" 1501 laughin 11-Feb-16 16:34
Re: gravity waves "detected" 523 Susan Doris 11-Feb-16 17:44
Re: gravity waves "detected" 415 Sirius7237 11-Feb-16 18:30
Re: gravity waves "detected" 518 laughin 11-Feb-16 21:20
Re: gravity waves "detected" 435 JonnyMcA 12-Feb-16 14:23
Re: gravity waves "detected" 474 laughin 12-Feb-16 15:51
Re: gravity waves "detected" 321 JonnyMcA 12-Feb-16 16:31
Re: gravity waves "detected" 422 laughin 13-Feb-16 18:26
Re: gravity waves "detected" 473 JonnyMcA 13-Feb-16 18:41
Re: gravity waves "detected" 529 Me 15-Feb-16 15:57
Re: gravity waves "detected" 392 laughin 15-Feb-16 20:17
Re: gravity waves "detected" 429 carolb 13-Feb-16 21:53
Re: gravity waves "detected" 324 D-Archer 14-Feb-16 11:16
Re: gravity waves "detected" 341 carolb 14-Feb-16 14:54
Re: gravity waves "detected" 341 Sirius7237 14-Feb-16 20:08
Re: gravity waves "detected" 440 carolb 14-Feb-16 22:31
Re: gravity waves "detected" 449 Aine 15-Feb-16 16:20
Re: gravity waves "detected" 377 D-Archer 15-Feb-16 09:59
Re: gravity waves "detected" 355 JonnyMcA 12-Feb-16 14:31
Re: gravity waves "detected" 394 carolb 13-Feb-16 21:29
Re: gravity waves "detected" 308 laughin 14-Feb-16 15:19
Re: gravity waves "detected" 246 skakos 15-Feb-16 14:07
Re: gravity waves "detected" 339 Pete Vanderzwet 11-Feb-16 21:06
Re: gravity waves "detected" 460 JonnyMcA 12-Feb-16 14:38
Onto Dark Energy waves! 402 Eddie Larry 11-Feb-16 21:34
It took 100 years to discover what Einstein already knew 261 David L 12-Feb-16 12:50
Re: It took 100 years to discover what Einstein already knew 347 Spiros 12-Feb-16 17:09
Re: It took 100 years to discover what Einstein already knew 411 D-Archer 15-Feb-16 12:47
Re: It took 100 years to discover what Einstein already knew 421 Aine 15-Feb-16 16:15
Re: It took 100 years to discover what Einstein already knew 374 D-Archer 15-Feb-16 18:53
Re: It took 100 years to discover what Einstein already knew 390 laughin 15-Feb-16 20:39
Re: It took 100 years to discover what Einstein already knew 327 Aine 16-Feb-16 01:48
Re: gravity waves "detected" 462 dong 12-Feb-16 18:36
Re: gravity waves "detected" 440 laughin 13-Feb-16 03:26
Re: gravity waves "detected" 372 dong 16-Feb-16 07:41
Liego 373 laughin 15-Feb-16 04:17
Gravity Waves of Propaganda the Sequel 360 D-Archer 15-Feb-16 09:48
Re: gravity waves "detected" 439 skakos 15-Feb-16 12:58
Re: gravity waves "detected" 409 Aine 15-Feb-16 22:31
Re: gravity waves "detected" 279 carolb 16-Feb-16 00:57
Re: gravity waves "detected" 354 D-Archer 16-Feb-16 11:47
Re: gravity waves "detected" 490 carolb 16-Feb-16 12:32
Re: gravity waves "detected" 313 D-Archer 16-Feb-16 14:13
Re: gravity waves "detected" 326 carolb 16-Feb-16 14:42
Re: gravity waves "detected" 303 D-Archer 16-Feb-16 15:17
Re: gravity waves "detected" 427 carolb 16-Feb-16 16:27
Re: gravity waves "detected" 428 D-Archer 17-Feb-16 14:08
Really? 326 Sirfiroth 17-Feb-16 15:11
Re: Really? 434 JonnyMcA 17-Feb-16 15:32
Re: Really? 419 D-Archer 17-Feb-16 15:42
Re: gravity waves "detected" 429 carolb 17-Feb-16 18:05
mods! 378 D-Archer 18-Feb-16 11:13
Re: mods! 463 carolb 18-Feb-16 14:14
Re: mods! 456 D-Archer 18-Feb-16 16:02
Re: gravity waves "detected" 540 Sirfiroth 17-Feb-16 01:06
Re: gravity waves "detected" 363 Aine 17-Feb-16 14:48
Re: gravity waves "detected" 404 JonnyMcA 17-Feb-16 15:19
Re: gravity waves "detected" 289 Sirfiroth 17-Feb-16 15:39
Re: gravity waves "detected" 369 JonnyMcA 17-Feb-16 17:37
Re: gravity waves "detected" 456 Aine 17-Feb-16 18:49
Re: gravity waves "detected" 401 laughin 16-Feb-16 20:24
Re: gravity waves "detected" 249 D-Archer 17-Feb-16 16:23
Gravy Waves 557 D-Archer 20-Feb-16 11:39
Playing devil’s advocate on the discovery of gravitational waves 505 laughin 02-Mar-16 18:23
Scientists: we're 100% convinced 333 laughin 07-Mar-16 17:13
Black holes and big bangs can't co-exist 436 laughin 13-Mar-16 04:52
Re: gravity waves "detected" 370 brett z 20-Apr-16 23:42
Re: gravity waves "detected" 380 laughin 21-Apr-16 14:02
Re: gravity waves "detected" 292 OCaptain 10-May-16 12:45
Re: gravity waves "detected" 233 laughin 10-May-16 13:16
Re: gravity waves "detected" 309 OCaptain 10-May-16 13:21
Re: gravity waves "detected" 359 laughin 10-May-16 19:25
Re: gravity waves "detected" 474 OCaptain 10-May-16 22:56
Re: gravity waves "detected" 374 laughin 11-May-16 15:32
Re: gravity waves "detected" 461 JonnyMcA 11-May-16 16:53
Re: gravity waves "detected" 470 laughin 12-May-16 16:26
pompousness "detected" 405 laughin 18-May-16 15:25
bump- 2 weeks 513 laughin 27-May-16 15:02
Re: bump- 3 weeks 446 laughin 02-Jun-16 23:20
Re: bump- 4 weeks and why isn't Carolb patrolling the threads 441 laughin 10-Jun-16 15:42
Gravitational Waves from Black Hole Megamergers Are Weaker Than Predicted 425 laughin 04-May-16 13:15
Re: Gravitational Waves from Black Hole Megamergers Are Weaker Than Predicted 435 D-Archer 09-May-16 19:05
Re: Gravitational Waves from Black Hole Megamergers Are Weaker Than Predicted 249 OCaptain 10-May-16 12:46
Re: Gravitational Waves from Black Hole Megamergers Are Weaker Than Predicted 459 laughin 10-May-16 13:27
Re: Gravitational Waves from Black Hole Megamergers Are Weaker Than Predicted 306 OCaptain 10-May-16 16:39
Re: Gravitational Waves from Black Hole Megamergers Are Weaker Than Predicted 360 laughin 10-May-16 19:10
how many times can you change the rules and still get a black hole 351 laughin 08-Jun-16 14:00
LIGO press conf, June 15 393 brett z 15-Jun-16 11:53
Re: LIGO press conf, June 15 378 D-Archer 15-Jun-16 14:48


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.