My opinion is that If you seriously believe that, you'll seriously believe anything!
Take for instance this following extract from his article ~
"In furtherance of these ends, five U.S. presidents were assassinated for the benefit of Great Britain and the Vatican/the Jesuits."
This is simply a broad, sweeping and unsubstantiated allegation. Nothing more. What proof is offered other than conjecture? None.
In actual fact ~
The Kennedy family dealt with two mafia gangs, one Italian, the other Jewish, from whom JFK's grandfather secured financial backing for JFK's presidential campaign with the promise of personal favours from the White House (JFK) in return. JFK renigged on the deal when he commissioned drug and alcohol reforms as well as tightening financial institution scrutiny to prevent money laundering by organised crime, effectively double crossing both mafia syndicates. JFK was also refusing to escalate the Vietnam conflict and was looking for a way out. Approaches had already been made to Vietnam in this regard. But US arms manufacturing have a huge investment in conflict. Arms manufacturers need war to prosper. As soon as JFK was dead, LBJ escalated the war effort and began the now infamous "carpet bombing" strategy. Funnily enough, LBJ had close links with arms manufacturers. Even after eventually signing the peace treaty, LBJ authorised continued bombing of Hanoi because the treaty didn't come into effect for another 2 weeks. In that 2 weeks, the US discharged more ordnance on Hanoi than was discharged in the entire course of WW2. Which begs the question ~ Why?