Global Village :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For good-natured and mutually-respectful discussions of politics and current affairs. Soap-boxing and the promotion of extremist causes motivated by hate will not be tolerated by our moderators. 
Welcome! Log InRegister
I don't have time to read it in detail right now, but one key point is that for some thing to be considered scientifically credible, the papers should be published in peer-reviewed scientific journals in such a way that any researcher (ie. preferrably not an internal 'researcher' with a specific aganda) could duplicate the experiments and see if the same results are produced. This does not appear to be the case.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
A Field Theory of Consciousness..#1 206 Astikapati 07-Jul-02 09:54
A Field Theory of Consciousness...#2..#1 147 Astikapati 07-Jul-02 10:00
Re: A Field Theory of Consciousness...#3(conclusion) 155 Astikapati 07-Jul-02 10:06
Exerpt from a book 80 Fuzzy 07-Jul-02 10:35
Fuzzy 80 Astikapati 07-Jul-02 13:02
This is not science 82 B L Zeebub 07-Jul-02 12:48
Zee, bub it looks like Science to me :)) 95 Astikapati 08-Jul-02 04:39
Scientific rigour 80 B L Zeebub 08-Jul-02 09:47
Re: Scientific rigour 73 Hoppy 08-Jul-02 11:47
Re: Scientific rigour 71 B L Zeebub 08-Jul-02 13:41
Re: Scientific rigour 74 mephisto 09-Jul-02 02:50
Re: Scientific rigour 96 B L Zeebub 13-Jul-02 12:25
Re: Scientific rigour 74 Hoppy 14-Jul-02 21:43
Re: Scientific rigour 59 B L Zeebub 14-Jul-02 22:30
Re: Scientific rigour 156 Astikapati 09-Jul-02 06:02


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.