Global Village :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For good-natured and mutually-respectful discussions of politics and current affairs. Soap-boxing and the promotion of extremist causes motivated by hate will not be tolerated by our moderators. 
Welcome! Log InRegister
adequatedane Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Hi OC
>
> Here I'll spoon feed you on this since your so
> inept at understanding what is documentation.
>
> From the first source RS
>
> "I can confirm to you tonight that the Ukrainian
> government was planning to reopen the Burisma
> investigation. This was long before the President
> ever imagined having a call with President
> Zelensky. In fact, it was before President
> Zelensky was even elected. This is a significant
> shift in the factual timeline. This is information
> that was omitted from the whistleblower’s
> complaint. Let me tell you what we learned today.
>
> The U.S. government had open source intelligence
> and was aware that NABU [National Anti-Corruption
> Bureau of Ukraine], an FBI-like agency in Ukraine
> that fights corruption – in fact, it was started
> by Joe Biden – that it had reopened an
> investigation into Burisma, its owner Zlochevsky
> and unusual transactions in the Burisma accounts
> in February 2019. On March 28, 2019, the
> Prosecutor General’s office agreed to that
> request to open an investigation and they filed a
> 15-page notice of suspicion alleging that there
> may be illicit funds that were running through
> Burisma from 2010 all the way through 2015,
> that’s important, because Hunter Biden’s on
> the board for two of those years, 2014-2015. And
> specifically, that notice of suspicion said they
> were looking at the possibility that the $3.4
> million paid to Hunter Biden’s firm may have
> been part of the illicit funds that were moving
> through the company. A month later, in April, the
> Prosecutor’s Office, open source intelligence
> again, the U.S. government officials confirming
> they were aware of this request of another
> investigative agency in Ukraine for assistance in
> going through these bank records. That is a
> significant change in the timeline. It was omitted
> from the whistleblower’s complaint and the
> question is, did he not know it or did he exclude
> it because it didn’t fit the narrative he was
> trying to write. That’s a question for Congress
> to answer."
>
> Second source:"During his testimony, he outlined
> how he thought there were legitimate conflict of
> interest concerns about Hunter Biden being on the
> board of Burisma in 2015 and he said that he
> raised those concerns with the staff of the
> then-Vice President Joe Biden."
>
> "That certainly raises questions again about what
> Joe Biden knew about Hunter’s business and why
> nothing was done about addressing the concern
> about Hunter’s conflicts by the Obama
> administration.
>
> Kent also testified that he and other U.S.
> officials had long and abiding concerns about
> Burisma and corruption."
>
> 3rd source is almost all documented here are
> couple of highlights:"Hunter Biden and his
> Ukrainian gas firm colleagues had multiple
> contacts with the Obama State Department during
> the 2016 election cycle, including one just a
> month before Vice President Joe Biden forced
> Ukraine to fire the prosecutor investigating his
> son’s company for corruption, newly released
> memos show."
>
> "Hunter Biden’s name, in fact, was specifically
> invoked by the Burisma representative as a reason
> the State Department should help, according to a
> series of email exchanges among U.S. officials
> trying to arrange the meeting. The subject line
> for the email exchanges read simply
> “Burisma.”
>
> 4th source is again almost all documented stuff,
> such as...."There also was a December 2015 New
> York Times story that raised the question of
> whether Hunter Biden’s role at Burisma posed a
> conflict of interest for the vice president,
> especially when Joe Biden was leading the fight
> against Ukrainian corruption while Hunter
> Biden’s firm was under investigation by
> Ukrainian prosecutors."
>
> So as I presented there is evidence.
>
> dane


Allan,

Goddamn it, but the quotes that you have cut and pasted are claims, not evidence for those claims. It doesn't matter how many different ways your sources say Biden is corrupt, repeating the same claims again and again, doesn't magically create evidence. It makes the claims more repeated.

You know this.

Brian

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
The Nunes ploy 596 drrayeye 10-Nov-19 06:33
Re: The Nunez ploy 60 Archaic 10-Nov-19 06:46
Re: The Nunez ploy 43 drrayeye 10-Nov-19 07:12
Re: The Nunez ploy 49 Barbelo 10-Nov-19 11:19
Re: The Nunez ploy 47 adequatedane 10-Nov-19 14:56
Re: The Nunez ploy 39 drrayeye 10-Nov-19 22:44
Re: The Nunez ploy 39 adequatedane 11-Nov-19 14:10
Re: The Nunez ploy 38 WhoWeird 11-Nov-19 16:29
What Blue Wave? 37 adequatedane 11-Nov-19 22:13
Re: What Blue Wave? 34 WhoWeird 11-Nov-19 23:14
Re: What Blue Wave? 33 adequatedane 12-Nov-19 12:53
Re: What Blue Wave? 29 WhoWeird 12-Nov-19 13:20
Re: What Blue Wave? 32 adequatedane 13-Nov-19 16:30
Good analysis 30 drrayeye 11-Nov-19 17:47
Re: Good analysis 34 adequatedane 12-Nov-19 13:56
Republican Senator John Kennedy 34 drrayeye 12-Nov-19 16:35
Re: Republican Senator John Kennedy 32 adequatedane 13-Nov-19 17:15
Intent 33 drrayeye 13-Nov-19 17:36
I haven't watched any of the hearing...only read a few articles so far. 29 Racho 13-Nov-19 19:21
Re: I haven't watched any of the hearing...only read a few articles so far. 25 drrayeye 13-Nov-19 20:49
Re: Intent 33 adequatedane 13-Nov-19 23:55
Re: Intent 23 drrayeye 14-Nov-19 02:10
Re: Intent 26 Brian Patterson 14-Nov-19 02:15
Re: Intent 23 drrayeye 14-Nov-19 02:56
Re: Intent 22 OCaptain 14-Nov-19 12:54
Its a SCAM 28 adequatedane 14-Nov-19 13:41
Re: Its a SCAM 24 OCaptain 14-Nov-19 13:46
Re: Its a SCAM 24 adequatedane 14-Nov-19 23:51
Wrong Again 28 Barbelo 14-Nov-19 02:54
Tell that to Senator Kennedy 29 drrayeye 14-Nov-19 03:02
Re: Tell that to Senator Kennedy 30 adequatedane 14-Nov-19 14:27
Re: Tell that to Senator Kennedy 22 drrayeye 14-Nov-19 15:51
You Need To Know What Words Mean 23 adequatedane 15-Nov-19 13:51
Re: Tell that to Senator Kennedy 24 WhoWeird 14-Nov-19 16:58
Re: Tell that to Senator Kennedy 22 OCaptain 14-Nov-19 17:05
Re: Tell that to Senator Kennedy 26 adequatedane 15-Nov-19 14:03
Re: Wrong Again 25 OCaptain 14-Nov-19 12:57
Re: Wrong Again 24 Barbelo 14-Nov-19 19:36
Re: Wrong Again 22 WhoWeird 14-Nov-19 19:47
Re: Intent 23 OCaptain 14-Nov-19 12:44
Re: Intent 24 adequatedane 15-Nov-19 00:01
Makes sense to me 20 drrayeye 15-Nov-19 07:00
Repos Can't Present the Evidence 34 adequatedane 14-Nov-19 13:26
Re: Repos Can't Present the Evidence 26 OCaptain 14-Nov-19 13:47
Re: Repos Can't Present the Evidence 38 adequatedane 14-Nov-19 14:39
Re: Repos Can't Present the Evidence 27 OCaptain 14-Nov-19 15:00
Re: Repos Can't Present the Evidence 18 drrayeye 14-Nov-19 17:49
Re: Repos Can't Present the Evidence 19 WhoWeird 14-Nov-19 17:58
Re: Repos Can't Present the Evidence 28 adequatedane 14-Nov-19 23:52
Re: Repos Can't Present the Evidence 21 OCaptain 16-Nov-19 22:02
Just a Liar Then 28 adequatedane 17-Nov-19 15:25
Re: Just a Liar Then 22 OCaptain 20-Nov-19 23:10
Re: Just a Liar Then 25 adequatedane 21-Nov-19 11:28
Re: Just a Liar Then 20 OCaptain 21-Nov-19 12:38
Re: Just a Liar Then 21 adequatedane 21-Nov-19 15:42
Re: Just a Liar Then 29 OCaptain 21-Nov-19 16:28
Are you This Stupid 25 adequatedane 23-Nov-19 15:35
Re: Are you This Stupid 19 Warwick 24-Nov-19 05:05
Re: Are you This Stupid 19 adequatedane 24-Nov-19 15:25
sauce for the goose 21 Warwick 24-Nov-19 19:03
Re: sauce for the goose 24 adequatedane 25-Nov-19 12:31
That's deplorable 18 Warwick 25-Nov-19 18:16
Re: That's deplorable 14 WhoWeird 25-Nov-19 18:23
Re: That's deplorable 17 Warwick 25-Nov-19 18:31
Re: That's deplorable 20 adequatedane 25-Nov-19 19:55
Re: That's deplorable 24 Warwick 25-Nov-19 22:39
Diversions and Distractions 39 drrayeye 11-Nov-19 07:58
Re: Diversions and Distractions 47 Barbelo 11-Nov-19 10:46
Re: Diversions and Distractions 38 drrayeye 11-Nov-19 13:19
I Googled And Got This 41 Barbelo 12-Nov-19 03:16
Re: I Googled And Got This 59 Brian Patterson 12-Nov-19 03:29
figures 39 drrayeye 12-Nov-19 04:43
Send it to Jim Jordan 48 drrayeye 12-Nov-19 04:42
Re: Diversions and Distractions 57 adequatedane 12-Nov-19 13:59
Looks like Nunes got lost 31 drrayeye 22-Nov-19 15:45


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.