Global Village :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For good-natured and mutually-respectful discussions of politics and current affairs. Soap-boxing and the promotion of extremist causes motivated by hate will not be tolerated by our moderators. 
Welcome! Log InRegister
adequatedane Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Hi OC
>
> Here I'll spoon feed you on this since your so
> inept at understanding what is documentation.
>
> From the first source RS
>
> "I can confirm to you tonight that the Ukrainian
> government was planning to reopen the Burisma
> investigation. This was long before the President
> ever imagined having a call with President
> Zelensky. In fact, it was before President
> Zelensky was even elected. This is a significant
> shift in the factual timeline. This is information
> that was omitted from the whistleblower’s
> complaint. Let me tell you what we learned today.
>
> The U.S. government had open source intelligence
> and was aware that NABU [National Anti-Corruption
> Bureau of Ukraine], an FBI-like agency in Ukraine
> that fights corruption – in fact, it was started
> by Joe Biden – that it had reopened an
> investigation into Burisma, its owner Zlochevsky
> and unusual transactions in the Burisma accounts
> in February 2019. On March 28, 2019, the
> Prosecutor General’s office agreed to that
> request to open an investigation and they filed a
> 15-page notice of suspicion alleging that there
> may be illicit funds that were running through
> Burisma from 2010 all the way through 2015,
> that’s important, because Hunter Biden’s on
> the board for two of those years, 2014-2015. And
> specifically, that notice of suspicion said they
> were looking at the possibility that the $3.4
> million paid to Hunter Biden’s firm may have
> been part of the illicit funds that were moving
> through the company. A month later, in April, the
> Prosecutor’s Office, open source intelligence
> again, the U.S. government officials confirming
> they were aware of this request of another
> investigative agency in Ukraine for assistance in
> going through these bank records. That is a
> significant change in the timeline. It was omitted
> from the whistleblower’s complaint and the
> question is, did he not know it or did he exclude
> it because it didn’t fit the narrative he was
> trying to write. That’s a question for Congress
> to answer."
>
> Second source:"During his testimony, he outlined
> how he thought there were legitimate conflict of
> interest concerns about Hunter Biden being on the
> board of Burisma in 2015 and he said that he
> raised those concerns with the staff of the
> then-Vice President Joe Biden."
>
> "That certainly raises questions again about what
> Joe Biden knew about Hunter’s business and why
> nothing was done about addressing the concern
> about Hunter’s conflicts by the Obama
> administration.
>
> Kent also testified that he and other U.S.
> officials had long and abiding concerns about
> Burisma and corruption."
>
> 3rd source is almost all documented here are
> couple of highlights:"Hunter Biden and his
> Ukrainian gas firm colleagues had multiple
> contacts with the Obama State Department during
> the 2016 election cycle, including one just a
> month before Vice President Joe Biden forced
> Ukraine to fire the prosecutor investigating his
> son’s company for corruption, newly released
> memos show."
>
> "Hunter Biden’s name, in fact, was specifically
> invoked by the Burisma representative as a reason
> the State Department should help, according to a
> series of email exchanges among U.S. officials
> trying to arrange the meeting. The subject line
> for the email exchanges read simply
> “Burisma.”
>
> 4th source is again almost all documented stuff,
> such as...."There also was a December 2015 New
> York Times story that raised the question of
> whether Hunter Biden’s role at Burisma posed a
> conflict of interest for the vice president,
> especially when Joe Biden was leading the fight
> against Ukrainian corruption while Hunter
> Biden’s firm was under investigation by
> Ukrainian prosecutors."
>
> So as I presented there is evidence.
>
> dane


Allan,

Goddamn it, but the quotes that you have cut and pasted are claims, not evidence for those claims. It doesn't matter how many different ways your sources say Biden is corrupt, repeating the same claims again and again, doesn't magically create evidence. It makes the claims more repeated.

You know this.

Brian

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
The Nunes ploy 783 drrayeye 10-Nov-19 06:33
Re: The Nunez ploy 98 Archaic 10-Nov-19 06:46
Re: The Nunez ploy 81 drrayeye 10-Nov-19 07:12
Re: The Nunez ploy 90 Barbelo 10-Nov-19 11:19
Re: The Nunez ploy 87 adequatedane 10-Nov-19 14:56
Re: The Nunez ploy 78 drrayeye 10-Nov-19 22:44
Re: The Nunez ploy 79 adequatedane 11-Nov-19 14:10
Re: The Nunez ploy 84 WhoWeird 11-Nov-19 16:29
What Blue Wave? 77 adequatedane 11-Nov-19 22:13
Re: What Blue Wave? 82 WhoWeird 11-Nov-19 23:14
Re: What Blue Wave? 64 adequatedane 12-Nov-19 12:53
Re: What Blue Wave? 65 WhoWeird 12-Nov-19 13:20
Re: What Blue Wave? 66 adequatedane 13-Nov-19 16:30
Good analysis 65 drrayeye 11-Nov-19 17:47
Re: Good analysis 72 adequatedane 12-Nov-19 13:56
Republican Senator John Kennedy 74 drrayeye 12-Nov-19 16:35
Re: Republican Senator John Kennedy 67 adequatedane 13-Nov-19 17:15
Intent 67 drrayeye 13-Nov-19 17:36
I haven't watched any of the hearing...only read a few articles so far. 68 Racho 13-Nov-19 19:21
Re: I haven't watched any of the hearing...only read a few articles so far. 59 drrayeye 13-Nov-19 20:49
Re: Intent 69 adequatedane 13-Nov-19 23:55
Re: Intent 53 drrayeye 14-Nov-19 02:10
Re: Intent 60 Brian Patterson 14-Nov-19 02:15
Re: Intent 59 drrayeye 14-Nov-19 02:56
Re: Intent 58 OCaptain 14-Nov-19 12:54
Its a SCAM 67 adequatedane 14-Nov-19 13:41
Re: Its a SCAM 62 OCaptain 14-Nov-19 13:46
Re: Its a SCAM 61 adequatedane 14-Nov-19 23:51
Wrong Again 63 Barbelo 14-Nov-19 02:54
Tell that to Senator Kennedy 64 drrayeye 14-Nov-19 03:02
Re: Tell that to Senator Kennedy 69 adequatedane 14-Nov-19 14:27
Re: Tell that to Senator Kennedy 57 drrayeye 14-Nov-19 15:51
You Need To Know What Words Mean 64 adequatedane 15-Nov-19 13:51
Re: Tell that to Senator Kennedy 64 WhoWeird 14-Nov-19 16:58
Re: Tell that to Senator Kennedy 59 OCaptain 14-Nov-19 17:05
Re: Tell that to Senator Kennedy 76 adequatedane 15-Nov-19 14:03
Re: Wrong Again 59 OCaptain 14-Nov-19 12:57
Re: Wrong Again 63 Barbelo 14-Nov-19 19:36
Re: Wrong Again 60 WhoWeird 14-Nov-19 19:47
Re: Intent 65 OCaptain 14-Nov-19 12:44
Re: Intent 58 adequatedane 15-Nov-19 00:01
Makes sense to me 55 drrayeye 15-Nov-19 07:00
Repos Can't Present the Evidence 70 adequatedane 14-Nov-19 13:26
Re: Repos Can't Present the Evidence 63 OCaptain 14-Nov-19 13:47
Re: Repos Can't Present the Evidence 74 adequatedane 14-Nov-19 14:39
Re: Repos Can't Present the Evidence 62 OCaptain 14-Nov-19 15:00
Re: Repos Can't Present the Evidence 56 drrayeye 14-Nov-19 17:49
Re: Repos Can't Present the Evidence 57 WhoWeird 14-Nov-19 17:58
Re: Repos Can't Present the Evidence 64 adequatedane 14-Nov-19 23:52
Re: Repos Can't Present the Evidence 62 OCaptain 16-Nov-19 22:02
Just a Liar Then 67 adequatedane 17-Nov-19 15:25
Re: Just a Liar Then 71 OCaptain 20-Nov-19 23:10
Re: Just a Liar Then 68 adequatedane 21-Nov-19 11:28
Re: Just a Liar Then 57 OCaptain 21-Nov-19 12:38
Re: Just a Liar Then 55 adequatedane 21-Nov-19 15:42
Re: Just a Liar Then 88 OCaptain 21-Nov-19 16:28
Are you This Stupid 63 adequatedane 23-Nov-19 15:35
Re: Are you This Stupid 59 Warwick 24-Nov-19 05:05
Re: Are you This Stupid 53 adequatedane 24-Nov-19 15:25
sauce for the goose 67 Warwick 24-Nov-19 19:03
Re: sauce for the goose 71 adequatedane 25-Nov-19 12:31
That's deplorable 59 Warwick 25-Nov-19 18:16
Re: That's deplorable 68 WhoWeird 25-Nov-19 18:23
Re: That's deplorable 60 Warwick 25-Nov-19 18:31
Re: That's deplorable 68 adequatedane 25-Nov-19 19:55
Re: That's deplorable 112 Warwick 25-Nov-19 22:39
Diversions and Distractions 79 drrayeye 11-Nov-19 07:58
Re: Diversions and Distractions 84 Barbelo 11-Nov-19 10:46
Re: Diversions and Distractions 76 drrayeye 11-Nov-19 13:19
I Googled And Got This 78 Barbelo 12-Nov-19 03:16
Re: I Googled And Got This 103 Brian Patterson 12-Nov-19 03:29
figures 75 drrayeye 12-Nov-19 04:43
Send it to Jim Jordan 94 drrayeye 12-Nov-19 04:42
Re: Diversions and Distractions 91 adequatedane 12-Nov-19 13:59
Looks like Nunes got lost 62 drrayeye 22-Nov-19 15:45


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.