Global Village :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For good-natured and mutually-respectful discussions of politics and current affairs. Soap-boxing and the promotion of extremist causes motivated by hate will not be tolerated by our moderators. 
Welcome! Log InRegister
adequatedane Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Hi All
>
> The actions by Flynn's attorney has also
> challenged the Mueller Report which stated Mufsed
> was a Russian asset. This source
> <[www.thegatewaypundit.com]-
> flynns-attorneys-drop-bomb-on-deep-state-suggest-c
> ia-operative-was-spying-on-gen-flynn-back-in-2015/
> pesents not only was Mifsud a CIA asset but was
> also spying on Flynn as early as 2015.
>
> Quotes from source..."Attorney Sidney Powell also
> revealed in court disclosures that CIA asset
> Joseph Mifsud was spying on Flynn back in 2015."
>
> "According to Mr. Mifsudā€™s attorneys their
> client was working for the CIA and was NOT a
> Russian operative as reported by the Mueller witch
> hunt team of liars."
>
>
> Also from this
> source<[www.redstate.com]
> 019/09/12/game-changer-doj-memo-exonerating-michae
> l-flynn-russian-collusion-withheld-prosecutors-put
> s-james-comey-hot-seat/> we get this information
> concerning Comey's actions.
>
> Quote from source...."So, during this pivotal
> meeting on February 14, 2017, Comey was likely
> aware of three crucial pieces of information. He
> knew that Flynn had been cleared of both colluding
> with Russians and of Logan Act violations. And he
> probably knew that the British government
> considered Steele to be untrustworthy. Yet he
> withheld this information from the President. Most
> importantly, knowing this, he opened an
> obstruction case against Trump."
>
> Thank you, Dane


Dane,

In case you didn't hear: the IG report cleared Comey. He has been completely and totally exonerated of any prosecutable crimes.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
New Developments in Flynn's Case 415 adequatedane 11-Sep-19 14:13
Re: New Developments in Flynn's Case 76 ldennyjr 11-Sep-19 17:34
Walk or Jail 79 Barbelo 11-Sep-19 20:06
Re: Walk or Jail 81 Archaic 11-Sep-19 20:35
Re: Walk or Jail 82 OCaptain 11-Sep-19 21:52
Re: Walk or Jail 64 Archaic 14-Sep-19 03:09
Re: Walk or Jail 58 OCaptain 14-Sep-19 12:46
I don't understand 71 Racho 12-Sep-19 02:26
Re: I don't understand 66 Barbelo 12-Sep-19 11:32
This is assume 67 Warwick 12-Sep-19 16:54
Re: This is assume 67 Barbelo 12-Sep-19 18:35
Re: This is assume 64 Warwick 12-Sep-19 19:08
Re: New Developments in Flynn's Case 72 Archaic 11-Sep-19 20:29
Hypocrite 70 Warwick 11-Sep-19 20:34
Re: Hypocrite 73 Archaic 11-Sep-19 20:36
Re: Hypocrite 68 Archaic 14-Sep-19 03:27
Re: Hypocrite 87 Warwick 16-Sep-19 16:01
Re: New Developments in Flynn's Case 73 ldennyjr 12-Sep-19 03:27
New Article from Sara Carter 61 adequatedane 12-Sep-19 13:51
Re: New Article from Sara Carter 71 Warwick 12-Sep-19 16:51
Re: New Article from Sara Carter 69 Racho 12-Sep-19 17:10
Re: New Article from Sara Carter 67 Warwick 12-Sep-19 17:33
Re: New Article from Sara Carter 73 Eddie Larry 12-Sep-19 17:18
Re: New Article from Sara Carter 69 adequatedane 12-Sep-19 23:46
Re: New Developments in Flynn's Case 68 adequatedane 13-Sep-19 11:43
Re: New Developments in Flynn's Case 83 OCaptain 13-Sep-19 11:56
Re: New Developments in Flynn's Case 74 Barbelo 13-Sep-19 21:00
Re: New Developments in Flynn's Case 73 Archaic 14-Sep-19 03:26
Re: New Developments in Flynn's Case 66 OCaptain 14-Sep-19 12:49
Re: New Developments in Flynn's Case 68 adequatedane 14-Sep-19 13:30


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.