Do you respect his right for free speech, while at the same time condemning what he says?"
- What does one have to do with the other? If he agrees with him, does that lessen the case of the first? What if he doesn't? Does that mean you can take the first serious now? In either case, what does that make a person who bases their debate of the first question on the answering of the second? And again, if it's not based on the second, then what relevance does the second question have to the first?