> "An I wrong in my observation that Pete
> - Yes. You're wrong. The only "grandstanding"
> that occurs here comes from the cult of WW,
> Audrey, Ray, Aine, and a few others. Their OP's
> fit the definition as evidenced by the applause
> given by the other cultists. When Pete OP's, he's
> not met with a simple flood of, 'you go girl' BS.
> Instead the flood consists of name-calling and
> snide elitism, looking at you Ray.
> "with no interest in engaging with forum
> - That he posts shows interest in engaging...
> It's not his fault that the respondents are
> window-lickers. For those few, and I mean extreme
> few, who can breathe with their mouth closed have
> forgotten, if ever learned, how to discuss and/or
> debate. Instead we have professional goalpost
> Pete's been the boards "Goldstein" for years, just
> like Trump is presently for the cultists, but I am
> glad he's still here. That he still engages with
> some of these cultists is amazing and in fairness,
> could be evidence of some other motive, OCaptain.
> However, by continuing to engage he does shine a
> light on the psychos, assholes, and fallen. Which
> brings me back to being thankful that he's still
Well, of course you're thankful he's still around. You've made that abundantly clear.
He doesn't engage them. He talks at them. UNLESS they agree with him.
Like when he accused me straight up of being an anti-Semite! He just preaches at me, without being affected by my half of the conversation. He continues to hammer away at his point, without providing proof of his accusation.
He didn't used to be this way. He used to be more reasonable, at least, without having to push everyone into his own interpretation of "far left" and "conservative". That's new, and I'm curious to know if you think it's good for everyone on the board for him to behave that way?
Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 03-Jun-19 01:55 by OCaptain.