Consider we have McCabe presenting that unelected officials of the government talked about removing an elected President because they thought he was a Russian asset. Now consider what they were probably using as evidence? Does this evidence still stand? Probably not. If it doesn't then some people have a lot of explaining to do since we now know different officials were being fed the same info from what appeared to be different sources.
Consider this article [thehill.com]
Quotes from source..."By his own account, senior Department of Justice (DOJ) official Bruce Ohr played an essential — and unorthodox — role, carrying politically tainted allegations of Donald Trump-Russia collusion to the FBI during the 2016 election."
"The way Ohr described it, his wife’s research was like an additional dossier assembled from Fusion GPS research to augment what Steele was separately providing the FBI."
Now who do you think is probably going to jail?