Global Village :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For good-natured and mutually-respectful discussions of politics and current affairs. Soap-boxing and the promotion of extremist causes motivated by hate will not be tolerated by our moderators. 
Welcome! Log InRegister
adequatedane Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Will it be science which solves the problem?
>
> Ask yourself does government control science or
> science control government?

In some instances govm't seems to be in control. But it can be argued that science drives govm't. Science will solve the food, water, and resource shortages. ie; advancements in farming, desalination, constructing high rise homes, mass transportation, etc. However, as long as govm't protects the petroleum industry, advancement in alternative fuels will not develope and we will have a future fuel problem until the strong arm of the richest industry in the world is broken. Which comes down to the wealthy petroleum investors giving up their castles.

> discovery of Evolution of fertility rates means this...
> evolution defined as..."the gradual development of
> something, especially from a simple to a more
> complex form."
>
> Fertility rate is defined as..."The number of
> children who would be born per woman (or per 1,000
> women) if she/they were to pass through the
> childbearing years bearing children according to a
> current schedule of age-specific fertility
> rates."

You could have just explained it in your own words. I don't see how "evolution" applies to the birth rate. Impregnation has evolved thanks to medical advancements.

> Some believe the declining trend in the "evolution
> of fertility rate" to the current 2.5 per woman
> slows but doesn't stop the upward trend in
> population growth.
>
> In the USA for example the fertility rate has
> evolved to 1.76 which is below the replacement
> rate of 2.1.
>
> Now this raises a lot of problems and questions.
>
> For example if this decline continues should the
> U.S. government reduce abortions to increase a
> declining fertility rate?

Sorry to break this to you, but the govm't will never be able to reduce abortions. They will never control the woman's decision to that degree. Now if they increase contraception availability, then yes abortions will lower. The decrease in family size is solely a result of finances. Couples can no longer afford for mom to stay home with the kids which means less kids. She has to work and so cannot have as many kids. And even if dad has a high enough income to support a family, women are deciding to have careers to pursue their own purpose in life which is fast becoming a purpose outside of the home.

> Which raises the question can the U.S. government
> take this action without one or both parties
> suffering defeats in elections if they support
> this action?

Nope, I don't think so.

> Which circles around to the question is our
> present forms of government or ideas of governing
> adequate to meet possible or probable futures?

The govm't is inadequate simply because it is male dominated. When there is an equal number of women in govm't, there will be changes. Only then will the govm't be able to address the problems.

BUT whatever point you're trying to address is lost in confusion. You talk of overpopulation depleting the resources necessary to sustain the numbers, but then cite a decline in birth rate. If no one procreated from this day forward the population would decrease. So I guess you're asking how is birth controlled so as not to exceed our CURRENT resource production. You are presuming our current methods of production (food etc) will remain as is and the population will increase thereby creating a problem. But our methods of production have never been stagnant. Basic ex: we needed steel in the industrial age and science complied. Science gave us steel, then made it stronger and easier to produce.

You underestimate our production capability. And you assume the balance of govm't power will remain on the male side.

He who knows all the answers has not been asked all the questions - Confucius

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
A Future Question 733 adequatedane 06-Feb-19 00:57
Re: A Future Question 88 drrayeye 06-Feb-19 13:04
Re: A Future Question 93 adequatedane 06-Feb-19 21:49
Re: A Future Question 86 WhoWeird 06-Feb-19 23:04
Re: A Future Question 129 adequatedane 06-Feb-19 23:52
Ask a real question, and . . . 78 drrayeye 12-Feb-19 04:00
Alternatively 82 Poster Boy 12-Feb-19 19:53
Re: Alternatively 69 Warwick 12-Feb-19 23:13
Re: Alternatively 68 adequatedane 12-Feb-19 23:15
Re: Alternatively 67 Poster Boy 12-Feb-19 23:20
Re: Alternatively 78 Aine 12-Feb-19 23:34
Re: Alternatively 64 WhoWeird 13-Feb-19 12:26
Answering the Question for USA Only 76 Race Jackson 12-Feb-19 23:59
Re: Answering the Question for USA Only 71 WhoWeird 13-Feb-19 00:06
Re: Answering the Question for USA Only 69 Aine 13-Feb-19 00:20
Re: Answering the Question for USA Only 67 WhoWeird 13-Feb-19 00:28
Re: Answering the Question for USA Only 67 Race Jackson 13-Feb-19 16:25
Re: Answering the Question for USA Only 65 Poster Boy 13-Feb-19 16:30
Re: Answering the Question for USA Only 63 WhoWeird 13-Feb-19 16:39
Re: Answering the Question for USA Only 76 Aine 13-Feb-19 00:11
Re: Answering the Question for USA Only 68 Poster Boy 13-Feb-19 00:16
Re: Answering the Question for USA Only 74 Aine 13-Feb-19 00:22
Re: Answering the Question for USA Only 69 Poster Boy 13-Feb-19 01:54
Re: Answering the Question for USA Only 72 WhoWeird 13-Feb-19 01:55
Re: Answering the Question for USA Only 67 Poster Boy 13-Feb-19 02:18
Re: Answering the Question for USA Only 70 WhoWeird 13-Feb-19 02:33
Woah!!! 74 Poster Boy 13-Feb-19 02:42
Re: Woah!!! 69 WhoWeird 13-Feb-19 02:48
Re: Woah!!! 67 Poster Boy 13-Feb-19 02:52
Re: Woah!!! 66 WhoWeird 13-Feb-19 02:58
Re: Woah!!! 63 Poster Boy 13-Feb-19 03:04
Re: Woah!!! 88 Brian Patterson 13-Feb-19 03:16
Re: Woah!!! 69 Poster Boy 13-Feb-19 03:27
A suggestion 70 Poster Boy 13-Feb-19 03:42
Re: A suggestion 80 Brian Patterson 13-Feb-19 04:10
Re: A suggestion 64 Poster Boy 13-Feb-19 04:14
I knew this was going to happen Brian... 72 Racho 13-Feb-19 08:49
Re: I knew this was going to happen Brian... 64 WhoWeird 13-Feb-19 11:31
Re: I knew this was going to happen Brian... 67 Poster Boy 13-Feb-19 14:40
Re: I knew this was going to happen Brian... 71 Racho 13-Feb-19 17:12
Re: I knew this was going to happen Brian... 71 Poster Boy 13-Feb-19 17:31
Re: I knew this was going to happen Brian... 65 WhoWeird 13-Feb-19 17:41
Re: I knew this was going to happen Brian... 66 Aine 13-Feb-19 18:57
Re: Woah!!! 71 Audrey 13-Feb-19 04:06
Re: Answering the Question for USA Only 71 Race Jackson 13-Feb-19 16:35
Re: Answering the Question for USA Only 63 Poster Boy 13-Feb-19 17:05
Re: Answering the Question for USA Only 66 Aine 13-Feb-19 19:23
Re: Answering the Question for USA Only 68 Race Jackson 13-Feb-19 23:09
Re: Answering the Question for USA Only 61 WhoWeird 13-Feb-19 23:13
Re: Answering the Question for USA Only 54 Race Jackson 14-Feb-19 23:00
Re: Answering the Question for USA Only 56 Aine 14-Feb-19 16:52
Re: Answering the Question for USA Only 60 Poster Boy 14-Feb-19 17:17
Re: Answering the Question for USA Only 61 Aine 14-Feb-19 18:32
Re: Answering the Question for USA Only 60 Poster Boy 14-Feb-19 18:34
Re: Answering the Question for USA Only 61 Aine 14-Feb-19 19:06
Re: Answering the Question for USA Only 61 Poster Boy 14-Feb-19 19:23
Re: Answering the Question for USA Only 56 Aine 14-Feb-19 22:10
Re: Answering the Question for USA Only 57 Poster Boy 14-Feb-19 22:41
Re: Answering the Question for USA Only 57 WhoWeird 14-Feb-19 20:57
Re: Answering the Question for USA Only 57 Aine 14-Feb-19 22:11
Re: Answering the Question for USA Only 54 WhoWeird 14-Feb-19 22:53
Re: Answering the Question for USA Only 56 Aine 14-Feb-19 23:25
Re: Answering the Question for USA Only 116 WhoWeird 14-Feb-19 23:43
Re: Answering the Question for USA Only 63 Audrey 14-Feb-19 20:03
Re: Answering the Question for USA Only 59 Poster Boy 14-Feb-19 22:44
Re: Answering the Question for USA Only 58 Aine 14-Feb-19 23:18
Re: Answering the Question for USA Only 55 Race Jackson 14-Feb-19 22:56
Re: Answering the Question for USA Only 53 Aine 14-Feb-19 23:22
Re: Answering the Question for USA Only 60 Poster Boy 16-Feb-19 17:05
Re: Answering the Question for USA Only 67 Race Jackson 13-Feb-19 16:38
Re: Answering the Question for USA Only 65 Aine 13-Feb-19 18:40
Re: Answering the Question for USA Only 70 Race Jackson 13-Feb-19 16:31
Re: Answering the Question for USA Only 66 Aine 13-Feb-19 18:36
Re: A Future Question 82 Brian Patterson 13-Feb-19 04:21
Re: A Future Question 67 Poster Boy 13-Feb-19 04:35
Re: A Future Question 68 WhoWeird 13-Feb-19 04:53
Re: A Future Question 84 Brian Patterson 13-Feb-19 05:27
Re: A Future Question 74 Audrey 13-Feb-19 04:50
Re: A Future Question 69 adequatedane 13-Feb-19 15:42
Re: A Future Question 68 WhoWeird 13-Feb-19 15:55
Re: A Future Question 68 adequatedane 13-Feb-19 18:58
Re: A Future Question 61 WhoWeird 13-Feb-19 19:03
Re: A Future Question 71 Aine 13-Feb-19 19:06
Re: A Future Question 65 WhoWeird 13-Feb-19 19:08
Re: A Future Question 70 Poster Boy 13-Feb-19 19:59
Robots, AI, and Workflow Automation, Oh My! 71 Race Jackson 13-Feb-19 23:16
Re: A Future Question 69 Audrey 13-Feb-19 22:55
Re: A Future Question 65 adequatedane 14-Feb-19 15:29
Re: Another Question 91 adequatedane 16-Feb-19 17:45


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.