Global Village :
The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For good-natured and mutually-respectful discussions of politics and current affairs. Soap-boxing and the promotion of extremist causes motivated by hate will not be tolerated by our moderators.
Race
Your answer sounds like pure diversion to me. You are calling for temporary sterilization, and have no rational reason to not include both genders. Then again, perhaps you don't quite know why...
Not only are vasectomy procedures highly effective, "in a recently published report[2] 95% of men with a vasovasostomy had motile sperm in the ejaculate within 1 year after vasectomy reversal. Almost 80% of these men achieved sperm motility within 3 months of vasectomy reversal."
So, Race, you have a medically approved procedure that works 99 percent of the time, and has a 95 percent success rate when temporary sterilization is ended.
Can you intelligently rebut this, or is this angle something you've never considered before?
Your answer sounds like pure diversion to me. You are calling for temporary sterilization, and have no rational reason to not include both genders. Then again, perhaps you don't quite know why...
Not only are vasectomy procedures highly effective, "in a recently published report[2] 95% of men with a vasovasostomy had motile sperm in the ejaculate within 1 year after vasectomy reversal. Almost 80% of these men achieved sperm motility within 3 months of vasectomy reversal."
So, Race, you have a medically approved procedure that works 99 percent of the time, and has a 95 percent success rate when temporary sterilization is ended.
Can you intelligently rebut this, or is this angle something you've never considered before?
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.