To be clear, I reported your post, I did not report you, nor did I request or demand that any action be taken against you. With or without a warning you should not have posted the image to manipulate others into responding to your topic. That is gratuitous, disgusting and emotionally manipulative. This is and remains my opinion which you and Dane are trying to censor with continued unfounded accusations about my intent while simultaniously claiming that I am trying to censor you. Kind of ridiculous don't ya think?
Re: Your Candle Burns to Brightly.
Author: eli stills ()
Date: April 10, 2017 04:26PM
Well since you ask, yes those were from a pre-suspension OP that he started and intended to update daily with the latest terrorist atrocity. This reminder was post-suspension [grahamhancock.com]. You might take note that their is a long history of soap boxing to draw from.
Mind you of course I’m not biased for Archaic and do not engage him anymore but I do take issue with someone who responds to being ignored with a graphic picture of the victim of the violence he is obsessively fixated on with the demand that we take his issue more seriously.
My suggestion if asked would be that probably given his history I would choose to freely comment on the topic of terrorism but not rush to be the first to create a new OP with every new attack. So you see it is not my intent to censor him but I do wish to be able to ignore him without being emotionally manipulated or charged with insensitivity to the issue.
As I wrote to Dane, if your tired of this dead horse being beaten then quit dragging it's carcass back out onto the boards by challenging my intent and integrity.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 17-Apr-17 15:54 by eli stills.