I didn't prejudicially edit anything and definitely not being dishonest. I simply provided your reply to Deep 1's reply to Aine. Lets go back and put this all into context.
Here was Deeps first posting under the subject of " Can we get back on the topic."
"This is ridiculous, a topic derailed. Archaic was trying to post about a truck bombing in Sweden. Instead, I see stuff about Islam, about outrage about the image (waah!) and connections to porn. Really??
Think about it, you supposedly intelligent people..."
Aine replies here...."You might notice that it was Pete himself who derailed the thread, Deep. He wasn't getting what he wanted so he provoked a response. That photo was over the top. This isn't Faces of Death, and it wasn't necessary to prove a point. No one said the incident wasn't horrific or denied it happened. Ergo, completely unnecessary and intended for shock value only.
It added nothing of value to the thread. That's trolling."
Deep replies...."Fair enough, Kristen. But the point is, let's get back on the topic. Trolls or not. It's a valid topic."
What was your response to Deep's response to Aine? EXACTLY what Deep 1 was commenting about as someone derailing the topic and something about Islam.
Talk about dishonesty. What is Deep's topic in the above quote to Aine? It was "Lets get back on topic. Troll or not. Its a valid topic." Obviously meaning let's get back to original topic by the author.
So how did you reply to Deep 1? Well here it is again.
"This is yet again another topic about a terrorist attack from a poster with a history of conflating and soapboxing on the issue of Radical Muslim terrorist attacks, immigration and the practice of Islam."
You didn't return to topic. Instead you offer up EXACTLY what Deep commented about as derailing the topic.
But you even went further than derailing the topic. You used it as a opportunity to strike at Archaic. Why do I present this? Because you follow up your claim with the warning by the mod and try to tie the warning and the thread together as Archaic breaking the warning. Your biased against him and want further action taken against him by the site.
Its blatantly obvious.
You can spin it all you want, blame me, play the victim or deny it. But its right there to see. All one has to do is follow the thread.