> Really don't want to reignite this whole thing,
> but I believe you're 100% accurate.
> I never received a reason for my suspension
> despite asking three times in a mass-mod email
> exchange for the reasons and links to the
> warnings. It was a general sense that the
> community suffered, and that's about it. Oh, and
> one mod threatened me:
If there is any message from you other
> than "sorry" or "thanks for bring lenient "
> I will personally end your account and am willing
> to give up my spot as a moderator to do so if need
> Because when my suspension was reduced to 3 months
> I asked why I was suspended to begin with, and
> again asked for links to violations.
> In fact, here is my email in response to the
> suspension being reduced:
Since no breaches of the CoC have yet been
> cited with regard to my suspension, it still seems
> rather odd. The other two were given warnings and
> severely breached the Code of the Conduct so
> their suspension seems warranted. However, I did
> not - at least that I'm aware of. If you could
> provide examples of my horrendous contributions
> within the last 6 months that warranted a
> multi-month suspension it would be
> The response to that was the above quoted threat.
> I'll keep the name of the mod out of it -- I'll
> just say I hadn't heard of him before.
> There seems to be an agreed upon MEME of who I am
> with a group of 5 year, and the reality of who I
> am based on an overall contextual understanding of
> my posts. My position is reduced to a single point
> to paint me with entirely, as a person, since it's
> easier to dismiss than debate on the issues and
> sources themselves.
> I actually think you've hit the nail on the head.
> Again, wasn't intended to fan flames, but I do
> think you're accurate.
Go on then Pete I'll bite. (A testament possibly to your great trolling abilities.)
I do not take offence to your views, as different as they are to mine the world is full of different people.
I take offence to the fact that you can state that people with different views to you are either evil,subhuman or willing stooges to whatever it is you are standing for in that thread.
I very rarely put in a complaint but your previous slating to the board on the subject of Omar Mateen possibly being gay as below, was reprehensible and in today's monitoring standards should have earned you a ban on that alone imv.
Instead of dealing with this topic objectively, the left and many of you here have spastically leaped to make this tragedy about you. It's disgusting. His sexuality had nothing to do with it, nor did his rifle. He wasn't a "Lone Wolf" either, but a participant in a "Leaderless Jihad" overtaking western civilisation through the inept and weak leadership of numb minds infected with leftism afraid to move into the modern era.