History :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For the discussion of general and orthodox history from the advent of writing up to mid 20th Century, i.e. 3,200BC up to World War II. 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Read the Anacalypsis... I always thought that pharaoh was rather iranian sounding. I am pondering the Aristotleian account of out of India theory. My thinking-considering abrahamic tradition and accounts-is that they might have been murex dyers/traders displaced by natural disasters, the drying of Saraswati. The first mention is of Apiru or SagAz, "smashers of sinews and brains" which would describe well the activity involved in producing murex dye. I think it was large part of their culture. Many before us realised the similarities of Abraham and Brahman, India used to be called Bharata, the hebrew people were looking for "brt" with "god", and presented their offerings, sheep/wool and IMO murex dye.

KR

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Abraham’s Pharaoh was not King of Egypt 8893 laughin 04-Jan-16 23:45
Mod Note > Topic Moved 950 Dr. Troglodyte 05-Jan-16 00:41
Re: Abraham’s Pharaoh was not King of Egypt 894 lostsheep 27-Jun-17 13:57
Re: Abraham’s Pharaoh was not King of Egypt 833 Rofhessa 11-Jul-17 20:27
Re: Abraham’s Pharaoh was not King of Egypt 687 gulsbo 23-Sep-17 17:41
Re: Abraham’s Pharaoh was not King of Egypt 512 altered-state 28-Mar-18 20:43
Re: Abraham’s Pharaoh was not King of Egypt 278 neilwilkes 10-Dec-18 19:40
Mythology 626 Archaic 15-Oct-17 02:52
Re: Mythology 675 Brian Patterson 15-Oct-17 19:50
Re: Mythology 791 Thanos5150 21-Nov-17 05:06
Re: Mythology 380 gulsbo 26-May-18 17:14
Re: Mythology 499 Brian Patterson 28-May-18 03:26
Re: Abraham’s Pharaoh was not King of Egypt 327 Juha 28-Dec-18 20:36
Re: Abraham’s Pharaoh was not King of Egypt in 1900BC 121 rkmcquillen 20-Jun-19 02:21


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.