History :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For the discussion of general and orthodox history from the advent of writing up to mid 20th Century, i.e. 3,200BC up to World War II. 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Eddie Larry wrote:

> I don't know who would have won Ameth. But I suggest
> considering all the
> trouble Hannibal gave Rome. With proper siege equipment, some
> historians
> think he could have taken Rome.
> I guess it would all depend on timing and whether Rome would
> have had a
> general to match Alexander at he time of the war.

Isn't it utterly amazing that after all this time, a general the likes of Alexander, has not been born?

We can have our Eisenhowers, Pattons and McArthurs, Colin Powells, and Montgomerys but no one like Alexander.


"Sic itur ad astra" Virgil

Dovahkiin, Dovahkiin,
Naal ok zin los vahriin
"Dragonish, Skyrim by Jeremy Soulle

Options: ReplyQuote

Subject Views Written By Posted
Alexander and Rome 940 Aneth 03-Sep-14 17:40
Re: Alexander and Rome 370 Nolondil 03-Sep-14 18:10
Re: Alexander and Rome 303 Aneth 03-Sep-14 18:44
Re: Alexander and Rome 260 Eddie Larry 04-Sep-14 02:26
Re: Alexander and Rome 337 s-d.adrain 04-Sep-14 08:36
Re: Alexander and Rome 294 Eddie Larry 05-Sep-14 03:15
Re: Alexander and Rome 284 Aneth 04-Sep-14 17:57
Re: Alexander and Rome 338 Eddie Larry 05-Sep-14 00:15
Re: Alexander and Rome 279 Aneth 05-Sep-14 16:03
Re: Alexander and Rome 293 s-d.adrain 08-Sep-14 06:38
Alexander was actually 32 when he died. 250 ananda 13-Sep-14 13:22
Re: Alexander was actually 32 when he died. 355 Spiros 16-Sep-14 01:45
Richard III was 32 when he died 314 Eddie Larry 17-Sep-14 02:58
Re: Richard III was 32 when he died 575 Brian Patterson 18-Sep-14 04:26
Re: Alexander and Rome 374 Skatha 08-Sep-14 17:37
Re: Alexander and Rome 331 Titus Livius 09-Sep-14 16:25

Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.