> Typical of the hypocritical stance of the Orthos towards the
> GP and Khufu burial scenario is this.
> A well known piece of typical ma'at [. . .]
This as usual is the point of Ian's post. I thought attacks on the Ma'at board as such were against stated GHMB policy. Moderator?
> [. . .] double standards is the
> fact they love to state that absence of evidence is not proof
> of anything.
Try to be coherent, Ian. Cite examples of people saying this. You'll have no trouble if `they' love to say it.
> Yet to support their contention of the GP being Khufu's tomb,
> lacking any tangible evidence to support this notion, [. . .]
It's all tangible evidence, Ian. They (unlike you) are not in the habit of citing their supposed spiritual insights as evidence. All the evidence lacks is the honest appraisal you refuse to give it.
> [. . .] they
> revert to the use of lack of evidence to support their lack
> of proof, so they are cynical users of what they decry.
Try to be coherent. The signs of depredation at the site are very tangible indeed.
> Actually, apart from the dubious graffitti in the so-called
> relieving chambers,
Justify `dubious', Ian.
> there is not one iota of anything from
> the GP to link with Khufu, not the tiniest fragment of
Only the radiocarbon dates and the built-in sarcophagus (of Old Kingdom style) and architectural features like the corbelled Grand Gallery (which fits the line of development) - all of which tie it to its context, a Dyn. 4 pyramid complex in a Dyn. 4 cemetery, containing the tombs of Khufu's relatives and Khufu's officials and Khufu's priests, priests of a Khufu cult centred on the pyramid and typical of ancient Egyptian funerary foundations in general.
> In fact the only known representation of the mighty Khufu is
> one little statue from Abydos................
Actually, Ian, there's at least one fragmentary relief from the area of the mortuary temple, as well as sundry statues (elsewhere mentioned) which current opinion assigns to Khufu - as well as the Wadi Maghara tablet and various other instances of his names and titles.
You wouldn't just be sounding off in ignorance of relevant facts, would you?
> Oh what
> compelling evidence they have at their disposal.
> Clear evidence in my view that you should disegard these
> hypocrites and the false and insipid dehumanising picture
> they would like us to believe in............Reject them and
> lifeless dead picture of the past they want you to see.
Clear evidence in my view that we should disregard your posturing.