Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
From The Indenpendent TV review, by Robert Hanks:

"A feature about the origins od civilisation, and a documentary about a padephile: on the surface there wasn't a lot to connect Channel 4's Flooded Kingdom of the Ice Age, and The Double Life of Jonathan King. But both were deeply depressing, and oddly for the same reasons."

--------------


I recall that when the BBC Horizon 'Atlantis Reborn' programme came out in November 1999, I pointed out that at least two senior members of CSICOP, the self-appointed Paradigm Police that makes it its task to debunk anything they deem to be ''pseudo-science' and detrimental to the 'uneducated public' ( or 'ignorant masses', as one Ma'at regular recently refered to the public), had infiltrated the making of the programme at the time. And although the BBC vehemently denied any collusion with CSICOP, they could not explain why, out of the thousands of academics available, they had only chosen to bring in two CSICOP members to criticise Hancock's anf my work. Even more difficult for the BBC was for them to explain why certain debunking techniques typical of CSICOP were used in the attack against Graham Hancock, one such attacks being an attempt to present Hancock as a sort of neo-SS Nazi who might cause another Holocaust.

I also was to discover that one of the CSICOP members who participated in the programme was also a member of CSICOP's so-called Media Integrity Council, a sinister unofficial censoring body whose task is to bring into the CSICOP fold editors of magazines and newspapers and TV that seal with science and factual programmes. These include the journals Nature, The New Scientist, The Scientific American and so on.

Today, in The Independent, a freelance critic, Robert Hanks, has written a disgusting review of Hancock's TV documentary Underworld shown on Channel 4 last night. Hanks duly reminding the readers of the 'excellent Horizon of few years back' that 'thoroughly debunked' Hancock, and went about attempting to present Hancock as a pedophile like Jonathan King. Now if that isn't the craziest of cheap shots so reminiscent of the 'SS Nazi' comparison by Horizon in 1999, then God didn't make those little green apples and it don't rain in Indianapolis in the summer time. To be sure, Robert Hanks is a TV critic, and we all expect him to do precisely that: criticise. Fair enough. But when such irresponsible comments are made in the press, then such criticism become something else altogether more sinister and worrying

Part One of Underworld shown last night was mainly to make three important points (1) that millions of square miles of submerged land was once habitable by humans in prehistory. (2) that there is evidence of possible artificial structures under the sea that are suggestive of an older civilisation (3) that thousands of prehistoric human bones that were found on the island of Malta were 'lost' either through amazing 'incompetence' by the archaeologists. Now there are no 'if and buts' about these three points. They are facts. Yet in a knee-jerking reaction that oozes undiluted bias, Robert Hanks quick accused Hancock of 'one-sided presentation of evidence' and 'blind dogma'... with, of course, the pedophile thingy thrown in the start of his review to help the 'uneducated public' in formulating their perception of Hancock.

Honestly, where do these ''Robert Hanks' jerks come from? Who commissions these 'freelance critics' to write such irresponsible verbiage?


RB

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
A Media gone Gaga 247 Robert Bauval 12-Feb-02 13:52
Re: A Media gone Gaga 57 Robert Bauval 12-Feb-02 14:13
Re: A Media gone Gaga 66 Robert Bauval 12-Feb-02 14:16
Re: A Media gone Gaga 61 Jason Colavito 12-Feb-02 14:16
Re: A Media gone Gaga 41 mephisto 12-Feb-02 14:37
Re: A Media gone Gaga 70 Mercury Rapids 12-Feb-02 14:41
Re: A Media gone Gaga 50 Stephen Tonkin 12-Feb-02 19:29
Re: A Media gone Gaga 50 Mercury Rapids 12-Feb-02 20:06
Re: A Media gone Gaga 59 Stephen Tonkin 12-Feb-02 22:57
Re: A Media gone Gaga 68 Mercury Rapids 12-Feb-02 23:01
Re: A Media gone Gaga 67 Stephen Tonkin 12-Feb-02 23:39
Re: A Media gone Gaga 50 Mercury Rapids 12-Feb-02 23:57
Re: A Media gone Gaga 54 Stephen Tonkin 13-Feb-02 01:36
Re: A Media gone Gaga 54 Mercury Rapids 13-Feb-02 08:32
Re: A Media gone Gaga 60 Stephen Tonkin 13-Feb-02 11:20
Re: A Media gone Gaga 51 Mercury Rapids 13-Feb-02 11:41
Re: A Media gone Gaga 59 Stephen Tonkin 13-Feb-02 12:01
Re: A Media gone Gaga 56 Robert Bauval 12-Feb-02 14:45
Re: A Media gone Gaga 54 Jason Colavito 12-Feb-02 15:49
Re: A Media gone Gaga 51 Jason Colavito 12-Feb-02 15:49
Re: A Media gone Gaga 59 Robert Bauval 12-Feb-02 17:26
Re: A Media gone Gaga 46 Adrian Straights 12-Feb-02 18:16
Re: A Media gone Gaga 54 Sherman Peabody 12-Feb-02 18:40
Character assassination 56 Star Traveler 13-Feb-02 10:34
Re: A Media gone Gaga- neo-SS Nazi? 69 Bradmandu 12-Feb-02 14:16
Re: A Media gone Gaga- neo-SS Nazi? 74 Robert Bauval 12-Feb-02 14:42
Re: Reaction does not fit matter presented 59 Paul Mallon 12-Feb-02 15:03
Re: Reaction does not fit matter presented 66 ananda 12-Feb-02 15:17
Re: Reaction does not fit matter presented 57 Robert Bauval 12-Feb-02 17:19
Re: Reaction does not fit matter presented 50 Bradmandu 12-Feb-02 15:22
Re: Reaction does not fit matter presented 42 Dave M. 12-Feb-02 18:34
Re: The NAZI Flag 67 JohnDM 12-Feb-02 16:42
Re: The NAZI Flag 58 SomeString 22-Jul-02 13:35
Re: Reaction does not fit matter presented 49 Robert Bauval 12-Feb-02 17:15
Re: Reaction does not fit matter presented 43 Dave M. 12-Feb-02 18:33
Re: Reaction does not fit matter presented 52 Mercury Rapids 12-Feb-02 20:09
Re: Reaction does not fit matter presented 56 Dave M. 12-Feb-02 21:15
Re: Reaction does not fit matter presented 52 Mercury Rapids 12-Feb-02 22:31
Re: Reaction does not fit matter presented 66 Dave M. 13-Feb-02 17:48
Re: Reaction does not fit matter presented 63 Mercury Rapids 13-Feb-02 20:29
Re: Reaction does not fit matter presented 42 Dave M. 13-Feb-02 22:17
Re: Reaction does not fit matter presented 56 Mercury Rapids 14-Feb-02 00:39
Re: Reaction does not fit matter presented 57 Dave M. 12-Feb-02 21:16
Re: Reaction does not fit matter presented 51 Mercury Rapids 12-Feb-02 22:33
Re: Reaction does not fit matter presented 46 Dave M. 13-Feb-02 17:49
Re: Reaction does not fit matter presented 50 Mercury Rapids 13-Feb-02 20:36
Re: A Media gone Gaga- neo-SS Nazi? 67 ananda 12-Feb-02 15:09
Re: A Media gone Gaga- neo-SS Nazi? 67 Anonymous User 12-Feb-02 15:36
Re: A Media gone Gaga- neo-SS Nazi? 61 ananda 12-Feb-02 15:42
Re: A Media gone Gaga- neo-SS Nazi? 63 Anonymous User 12-Feb-02 16:09
Re: A Media gone Gaga- neo-SS Nazi? 77 Dave M. 12-Feb-02 18:37
"loons and the crackpots" 68 Graham Hancock 12-Feb-02 18:46
Re: "loons and the crackpots" 59 agnostic 12-Feb-02 18:56
Re: "loons and the crackpots" 62 Stephen Tonkin 12-Feb-02 19:24
Re: "loons and the crackpots" 76 Dave M. 12-Feb-02 21:13
Re: "loons and the crackpots" 67 Mercury Rapids 12-Feb-02 22:38
Re: "loons and the crackpots" 53 Robert Bauval 13-Feb-02 10:03
Re: "loons and the crackpots" 73 Dave M. 13-Feb-02 17:50
Re: "loons and the crackpots" 60 ZigZak 13-Feb-02 19:46
Re: "loons and the crackpots" 51 Dave M. 13-Feb-02 22:18
Re: "loons and the crackpots" 63 Dave M. 13-Feb-02 17:49
Re: A Media gone Gaga 50 Rayw 13-Feb-02 00:57
Re: A Media gone Gaga 53 Rayw 13-Feb-02 00:57
Re: A Media gone Gaga 42 Mercury Rapids 13-Feb-02 08:34
Re: A Media gone Gaga 41 Dave M. 13-Feb-02 17:53
Re: A Media gone Gaga- neo-SS Nazi? 77 Adrian Straights 12-Feb-02 18:44
Re: A Media gone Gaga- neo-SS Nazi? 72 Dave M. 12-Feb-02 21:19
to: Bradmandu 56 ananda 12-Feb-02 16:25
Filling Space 71 Robert Bauval 12-Feb-02 17:17
Re: Filling Space 58 ananda 12-Feb-02 17:35
Re: Filling Space 61 agnostic 13-Feb-02 19:20
Re: Filling Space 50 ananda 13-Feb-02 21:07
Re: Filling Space 51 Adrian Straights 12-Feb-02 18:22
Re: Filling Space 52 Ian Alex Blease 13-Feb-02 20:53
Re: A Media gone Gaga 51 Dave Mac 12-Feb-02 18:11
Re: A Media gone Gaga 55 Dave M. 12-Feb-02 18:29
Re: A Media gone Gaga 57 Robert Bauval 12-Feb-02 18:53
Re: A Media gone Gaga 59 Dave M. 12-Feb-02 21:20
Re: A Media gone Gaga 49 JohnDM 12-Feb-02 19:26
Re: A Media gone Gaga 50 Atlantida 12-Feb-02 19:13
Re: A Media gone Gaga 48 Adrian Straights 12-Feb-02 19:14
Best yet to come 57 Ward Sanford 12-Feb-02 19:20
Cool down...Controversy 52 Harry 12-Feb-02 21:29
Full Text of Hanks' review.... 58 Mercury Rapids 12-Feb-02 22:55
Why the inquisition Robert? 72 Jaimi 13-Feb-02 03:31
Re: Full Text of Hanks' review.... 64 Adrian Straights 14-Feb-02 16:42
Copyright 51 Stephen Tonkin 14-Feb-02 19:25
Re: Copyright 57 Adrian Straights 14-Feb-02 19:34
Re: A Media gone Gaga 59 Edward 13-Feb-02 11:12
Re: Character assassination 63 Biruni 13-Feb-02 14:57
Re: Character assassination 62 Dave M. 13-Feb-02 17:55
Dave M, A Tiresome individual 46 Ian Alex Blease 14-Feb-02 18:49
What to do with tiresome individuals 62 ananda 14-Feb-02 21:17
More insults 54 Bryan 15-Feb-02 00:41
To Obssesso and Astroboy 70 R Avry Wilson 14-Feb-02 00:09


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.