Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Ridiculous! If you let your spouse and children know right form the beginning that you have taken an oath to hold certain things secret and that your are loyal to a certain group...that is completely open and honest about it. This doesn't even only apply to secret societies, take the clearance in government. My father worked at oak ridge national laboratories for may years. He had a top secret clearance, and even now there are some things he still required to be silent about things he did there. Did that affect our relationship? Of course not, most of the things he did had absolutely no bearing on that relationship. Did it mean he was dishonest? Of course not since he was clear that certain aspect of his job were under a certain level of clearance. It is not a lack of honesty to keep silent on subjects that don't concern you. No one knows every detail of another person's life regardless. As a former soldier with a top secret clearance there are some aspects of that job that I was required to keep silent about, and that didn't affect the relationship of me and my fiance or my family. This doesn't even about government jobs either, you see this in business as well. Is a lawyer a incapaible of a honest and open relationship because of confidential information with a client? How about doctors? CEOs of businesses? The world is full of groups where loyalty oaths and secrecy are imperative for the success of that group, does that mean they are inherently wrong for that secrecy? Only people who are paranoid worry excessively about secrets they don't know. This even goes for friendships as well. If a friend tells you something in confidence, should you go and automatically tell your spouse and family what was said? If you do have a open and honest relationship with them you won't tell and they won't ask because they understand that there are different levels of loyalty. Everyone is sworn to secrecy and loyalty to something whether it be spouse, job, friends, whathaveyou, and to suggest that someone can't do an exceptional job because of other loyalties is ridiculous in the extreme. There will always be exceptions, but exceptions are not the rule. It comes down to the person always. If the person is dishonest, they will act dishonest, and if they are honest, the will behave honestly.



"A thing must be understood as certain and true in order to be known without any doubt. But for this reason, that finite knowledge had faults and defects in thy design, therefore hast thou been strangled in thine own doubts" (Paracelsus)

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Robert: Masonic attacks unwarranted 489 Neal 08-Feb-02 08:29
Re: Robert: Masonic attacks unwarranted 1061 Robert Bauval 08-Feb-02 10:56
Re: Robert: Masonic attacks unwarranted 298 Neal 08-Feb-02 15:55
Re: Robert: Masonic attacks unwarranted 329 Robert Bauval 08-Feb-02 16:45
Re: Robert: Masonic attacks unwarranted 339 MikeS 08-Feb-02 18:08
Re: Robert: Masonic attacks unwarranted 317 Mike B 08-Feb-02 18:55
Re: Robert: Masonic attacks unwarranted 322 Neal 08-Feb-02 20:16
Re: Robert: Masonic attacks unwarranted 378 kaos 09-Feb-02 10:08
The US Dollar Bill and D.C. Street Layout 425 Tripp 09-Feb-02 02:54
Re: The US Dollar Bill and D.C. Street Layout 259 Robert Bauval 09-Feb-02 07:30
Re: The US Dollar Bill and D.C. Street Layout 242 Tripp 09-Feb-02 08:47
Re: Robert: Masonic attacks unwarranted 340 Harry 09-Feb-02 09:00
Re: Robert: Masonic attacks unwarranted 422 Broker 12-Feb-02 08:31
Re: Robert: Masonic attacks unwarranted 341 surfwar 20-Feb-02 04:44
Re: Robert: Masonic attacks unwarranted 347 surfwar 20-Feb-02 04:45
Royal Fanatics 264 theoferrum 01-Nov-06 20:41
Re: Robert: Masonic attacks unwarranted 327 P Mac 12-Nov-06 10:57
Moderator note 304 Richard Fusniak 12-Nov-06 17:45
Re: Robert: Masonic attacks unwarranted 370 Milo 08-Feb-02 18:45
Re: Robert: Masonic attacks unwarranted 342 Mike B 08-Feb-02 19:10
Re: Robert: Masonic attacks unwarranted 335 Milo 08-Feb-02 19:24
Re: Robert: Masonic attacks unwarranted 334 Milo 08-Feb-02 20:30
Re: Robert: Masonic attacks unwarranted 337 Milo 09-Feb-02 16:13
Re: Robert: Masonic attacks unwarranted 373 Tripp 09-Feb-02 20:19
Re: Robert: Masonic attacks unwarranted 344 Milo 09-Feb-02 22:36
AOL & U.S. 1$ Seal 279 Tripp 09-Feb-02 23:19
Re: Robert: Masonic attacks unwarranted 329 Milo 09-Feb-02 22:42
Re: AOL & U.S. 1$ Seal 216 Milo 10-Feb-02 04:54
Re:Mr. Bauval's article 244 amccloskey84 06-Nov-06 20:05
Good post 204 RaVaN 07-Nov-06 01:44
Re:Mr. Bauval's article 247 Gengus 07-Nov-06 12:55
Re:Mr. Bauval's article 271 RaVaN 09-Nov-06 00:12
Re:Mr. Bauval's article 238 amccloskey84 12-Nov-06 06:49


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.