Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
I've had it.

You have driven me to the point of absolute lividity.

You couldn't possibly conceive of how upset I am right now.

I gave a part of my heart and soul in a public apology on this MB a few months ago, and you have smeared it in my face.

You have no respect for other people's feelings. None whatsoever. You think you are funny while exploiting the psychlogical expense of other people. Thinking this is jovial shows that you are in serious need of either psychological help or a good 'talk' in a back alley on a dark and stormy night.

Nothing you say or do will vindicate what you've done and continue to do. I don't even want to hear or see an apology from you - it would be meaningless. In fact, don't reply at all; any note from you is libel to make me even angrier (therefore a reply would be taken as a deliberate attempt to infuriate me more - provocation after a warning against such is defencable with extreme measures).

This last straw of yours is nothing compared to anything Duncan Edlin, Garrett Fagan, Derek Barnett, Ian Alex Blease, John Carlo, Mike Brass, John Wall or anyone has ever said or done.

You are rude and inconsiderate to the point of infinite, abyssmal sickness.

Had you conducted yourself in this manner at a public conference - heck, even a local pub - how do you think you'd be treated? You seem to think that the internet is a place that isn't real; that it can't affect people in the same way. You seem completely ignorant of etiquette, common sense, and compassion.

Further testimony of games is that you report to have some sort of machine in your garage that can move massive weight with incredible ease. Well if it works as confidently as you say it does, then why weren't you sharing this information with the emergency crews of New York City in the aftermath of Sept 11, 2001? Within hours, there could have been a system in place that could have cleared the rubble faster and probably saved the lives of many people. Conclusion: you're machine is a lie - another game - or you are perhaps the lowest form of human life on the planet.

Given how you continue to abuse this online community, I don't know which conclusion is the right one; I only know that one of them must be right. What's scary? I even suggested you go help NYC in this way... you never even gave a reply. Should I contact the FBI, NSA, CIA, and Offices of the President to tell them you deliberatly ignored a chance to save innocent people in a time of crisis?

You sir, are in serious trouble. I don't think you realize <I>how</I> serious this situation is, or the crystal-pure clarity of your social ineptitude.

I am giving you fair warning: Do not play with me.

Or I will play with you.

Do I make myself perfectly clear, Mr. Sakovitch?


One last note:

Do not make the mistake of thinking I am a child or that my resources are limited.

Good DAY to you,

R.A.Wilson

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
ANTHONY SAKOVITCH 71 R Avry Wilson 26-Oct-01 08:36
Temper Temper 28 John Wall 26-Oct-01 08:49
Re: ANTHONY SAKOVITCH 35 eddie 26-Oct-01 09:01
Re: ANTHONY SAKOVITCH 25 lcfc 26-Oct-01 10:52
Apology... LCFC IS right... Threats issued 27 Anthony 26-Oct-01 11:15
Re: Apology... LCFC IS right... Threats issued 23 JoeRoyle 26-Oct-01 11:33
Re: Apology demanded from Joe ! n/t 34 lcfc 26-Oct-01 11:40
Re: Apology demanded from Joe ! n/t 30 JoeRoyle 26-Oct-01 11:45
Re: Apology demanded from Joe ! n/t 32 lcfc 26-Oct-01 11:49
Good morning, Avry 35 Anthony 26-Oct-01 11:05
Re: ANTHONY SAKOVITCH 49 Levanah 26-Oct-01 11:28
Re: ANTHONY SAKOVITCH 34 Robert Bauval 26-Oct-01 11:44
Internal Inconsistency 25 Anthony 26-Oct-01 12:03
Re: Internal Inconsistency 29 Lee McGiffen 26-Oct-01 12:09
Re: Internal Inconsistency 30 Anthony 26-Oct-01 12:13
Thanks Robert 14 John Carlo 26-Oct-01 13:33
A Raving Wilson 25 Derek Barnett 26-Oct-01 12:12
Derek 22 Anthony 26-Oct-01 12:23
Mr Barnett and others 31 R Avry Wilson 26-Oct-01 13:26
Re: Mr Barnett and others 16 ISHMAEL 26-Oct-01 13:57
Criticism Taken, Chris 28 Anthony 26-Oct-01 14:04
Re: Mr Barnett and others 26 Katherine 26-Oct-01 14:18
Avry 17 Lee McGiffen 26-Oct-01 14:05
Re: Avry 30 Seymour Butts 26-Oct-01 14:12
Re: Avry 28 Katherine 26-Oct-01 14:14
Re: Mr Barnett and others 26 Derek Barnett 26-Oct-01 15:19
Re: Mr Barnett and others 27 Katherine 26-Oct-01 15:31
Re: Mr Barnett and others 25 Derek Barnett 26-Oct-01 16:08
Re: Mr Barnett and others 30 Anthony 26-Oct-01 16:20
Re: Mr Barnett and others 24 Katherine 26-Oct-01 16:29
And who used 'blatherskite' first? 28 ananda 27-Oct-01 01:28
There is much good going on here 26 ananda 26-Oct-01 17:14
Re: Mr Barnett and others 29 Shawn ( not an imposter) 28-Oct-01 06:57
Re: ANTHONY SAKOVITCH 33 Sri Kowtha 26-Oct-01 17:31
You are so wonderful, Sri 26 ananda 26-Oct-01 17:36
Re: ANTHONY SAKOVITCH 27 khufutut2 26-Oct-01 21:10
Re: ANTHONY SAKOVITCH 30 khufutut2 28-Oct-01 00:08
Re: ANTHONY SAKOVITCH 31 Harry 27-Oct-01 08:53
Re: ANTHONY SAKOVITCH 26 PosterChild 27-Oct-01 04:59


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.