Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Origyptian wrote:

> DScribr wrote:
>
> > Perhaps you should read my posts more carefully. I've
> already
> > explained to you about your 'non-claims'. (Another
> diversionary
> > BS post, is this all you have?)
> >
> > To repeat: Your opinions consistently begin w/ "it seems",
> and
> > "it suggests..." which doesn't come close to being 'physical
> > evidence' by ANY definition, and NO facts included, ever!
>
> What are you talking about? A "claim" or "hypothesis" is not
> "evidence". Rather, evidence is what is used to form the basis
> of claims and hypotheses. So if I see what looks like a paint
> run from a vertical block down into the junction with the
> adjacent block, I might state the hypothesis that "it seems
> that the paint was applied after the block was installed in
> situ". The hypothesis is not the evidence, the paint run is the
> evidence.
>
> Likewise, when we see evidence of all kinds of ancient garbage
> at the quarries, and evidence of humans who inhabited the
> place, records of what they ate, when they bathed, and
> instructions to deliver a product, but ZERO physical evidence,
> even in the huge volume of ancient garbage, of any shred of
> tools or equipment related to quarrying at what is widely
> believed to have been one of the largest quarry operations in
> ancient history, that's evidence that allows one to formulate
> hypotheses that maybe, just maybe, things ain't quite what
> we've been told all these years. The hypothesis isn't the
> "evidence", it's the conspicuous lack of specific evidence in
> the midst of all the other evidence found in those excavations
> that spurs the hypothesis.
>
>
>
> > YOUR opinion is NO better than anyone elses, but for some
> > unknown reason, you believe it is, and you believe that your
> > opinions don't require ANY physical evidence, (and the facts
> be
> > dammed...full steam ahead) BUT you insist that ALL others DO
> > provide physical evidence...and when we do, you
> > dismiss/disregard it without a valid reason, every time.
>
> Show me a post where I've said my "opinion" is better than
> anyone else's "opinion". Meanwhile, how is that related to the
> current debate about the quarries? You and yours have not
> expressed an "opinion"; you clearly have expressed a "claim", a
> staunchly held claim, which you not only contend is
> unquestionably true (ergo "indisputable"), but which has pushed
> several of you to become obsessed with issuing incessant
> insults and sarcasm to anyone who disagrees with you.
>
>
>
> > GET REAL Ori, the dbl-standard is obvious to all.
>
> The readers will make their own decision.
>
>
>
> > My tagline IS logical, and it IS a fact....IF you can't
> accept
> > this reality, that's YOUR problem.
>
> I rest my case.
>
>
>
> > (Will the SCA and Mainstream change the currently accepted
> P.
> > dates solely due to YOUR opinions??? NO, they want relevant
> > FACTUAL data, [PROOF] not misconceptions based on
> assumptions
> > and speculations.)
>
> What? I don't expect ANYONE to change their opinion based on my
> opinion, let alone the SCA. I have never tried to change the
> SCA's (or "Mainstream's") opinion. And the SCA hasn't tried to
> change my opinion. You, and a few others here, are the only
> ones obsessed with trying to change someone's opinion.
>
>
>
> > IS telling someone to ignore the issue part of your
> 'scientific method'???
>
> No, but telling someone to ignore me when they insist on
> harrassing me dozens of times each day IS part of my method to
> keep the library quiet so the rest of us can study. When have I
> ever told "someone to ignore the issue"?
>
>
>
> > You are simply unwilling to answer my question.
>
> I don't even know what your question is. You refer to a
> hypothesis as if it was "evidence". First you insist I've made
> several "claims", and then you say I'm too wishy washy to
> commit to anything except polite conditionals like "it seems"
> and "perhaps". Frankly, your repeated illogical questions are a
> moving target and have lost their worthiness for an answer.
>
>
>
> Look, I don't know if you're coming up with this stuff on your
> own or whether you're being coached privately, but you're being
> steered very badly and you're being taken farther off the rails
> with each passing day.
>
> But by all means, keep digging yourself deeper.
>

>
> Post Edited (09-Jul-15 22:34)

As usual, you have no idea.

You think you are the 'Artful Dodger' here, but you aren't fooling anyone.
(You've failed to grasp my main point. or you are simply 'playing' dumb.)

For the LAST time: I WAS NOT and AM NOT involved in the current Quarry discussion IN ANY WAY, (or on the previous one)....I suggest you reread my posts MORE CAREFULLY. (More diversionary BS.)



YOU just told ME the other day to ignore the issue....I suggest YOU reread YOUR OWN posts more carefully....and it would be a good idea IF you REMEMBERED what you said.

Ori, " I don't even know what your question is."
This IS a bold-faced LIE....the 'Artful Dodger' strikes again. (I've asked it SEVERAL times...you're not fooling anyone w/ this BS.)

"Polite conditionals..." Total BS.
Tell it like it IS: you ARE too wimpy to take a stand on anything, as this would require proof for your nonsense.

Your last para. is ALL nonsense, I certainly don't need any coaching, etc.

One 'man's' hole is another man's pile.



Post Edited (10-Jul-15 22:42)

Currently accepted Pyramide dates stand until proven otherwise.
Campbell's Chamber roof blocks are Tura Limestone until proven otherwise.
THE Cartouche in Campbell's Chamber IS Authentic, as are ALL other RC's Glyphs, until proven otherwise.


"This Forgery 'theory' has more holes than a sieve basket."

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 935 JonnyMcA 25-Jun-15 20:33
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 394 Thanos5150 25-Jun-15 23:19
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 416 Corpuscles 26-Jun-15 01:22
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 484 Audrey 26-Jun-15 02:00
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 415 Origyptian 26-Jun-15 02:52
Re: Mons Claudianus Tools 415 MJT 26-Jun-15 17:34
Re: Mons Claudianus Tools 397 Origyptian 26-Jun-15 17:57
Re: Mons Claudianus Tools 470 MJT 26-Jun-15 19:22
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 409 Origyptian 26-Jun-15 04:04
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 402 Audrey 26-Jun-15 05:18
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 400 Jon Ellison 26-Jun-15 10:24
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 428 Origyptian 26-Jun-15 15:26
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 401 Origyptian 26-Jun-15 19:23
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 404 Thanos5150 26-Jun-15 06:28
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 332 Origyptian 26-Jun-15 14:50
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 368 Audrey 27-Jun-15 02:20
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 352 Origyptian 27-Jun-15 04:49
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 398 Origyptian 26-Jun-15 02:33
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 424 Thanos5150 26-Jun-15 07:06
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 404 Origyptian 26-Jun-15 15:06
Example 429 DScribr 26-Jun-15 18:05
Re: Example 369 Origyptian 26-Jun-15 19:04
Re: Example 346 cladking 26-Jun-15 19:21
Re: Example 385 Brian Patterson 26-Jun-15 19:32
Re: Example 435 Origyptian 26-Jun-15 19:43
Re: Example 387 DScribr 26-Jun-15 22:36
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 369 Thanos5150 26-Jun-15 20:24
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 409 Origyptian 26-Jun-15 21:42
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 401 Corpuscles 27-Jun-15 00:19
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 404 Audrey 27-Jun-15 02:26
Same old same old..... 459 DScribr 26-Jun-15 22:48
Re: Same old same old..... 430 Thanos5150 27-Jun-15 05:16
Re: Same old same old..... 400 Jon Ellison 27-Jun-15 16:08
Re: Same old same old..... 406 Origyptian 27-Jun-15 21:18
Re: Same old same old..... 359 Corpuscles 28-Jun-15 00:10
Re: Same old same old..... 337 Jon Ellison 28-Jun-15 01:25
Re: Same old same old..... 416 Corpuscles 28-Jun-15 02:52
Re: Same old same old..... 390 Origyptian 28-Jun-15 01:35
Re: Same old same old..... 411 Audrey 28-Jun-15 00:47
Re: Same old same old..... 445 Origyptian 28-Jun-15 02:56
Re: Same old same old..... 381 Merrell 28-Jun-15 13:20
Only One World of True Believers? 398 cladking 28-Jun-15 15:23
Re: Same old same old..... 364 Thanos5150 28-Jun-15 03:27
Re: Same old same old..... 467 Jon Ellison 28-Jun-15 11:00
Re: Same old same old..... 348 Thanos5150 28-Jun-15 16:53
Re: Same old same old..... 431 Origyptian 28-Jun-15 17:25
Re: Same old same old..... 376 Jon Ellison 28-Jun-15 18:14
Why change??? 363 DScribr 30-Jun-15 22:19
Re: Why change??? 361 Jon Ellison 30-Jun-15 22:52
Re: Why change??? 390 Origyptian 01-Jul-15 04:27
Re: Why change??? 431 Corpuscles 01-Jul-15 06:11
Re: Why change??? 374 Origyptian 01-Jul-15 13:41
Re: Why change??? 372 Jon Ellison 01-Jul-15 14:08
Re: Why change??? 434 Origyptian 01-Jul-15 15:33
Re: Why change??? 371 Jon Ellison 01-Jul-15 15:38
Re: Why change??? 428 Jon Ellison 01-Jul-15 16:03
Re: Why change??? 405 Origyptian 01-Jul-15 16:21
Re: Why care about the facts??? 357 DScribr 02-Jul-15 19:59
Re: Why care about the facts??? 376 Origyptian 02-Jul-15 20:13
Re: Why care about the facts??? 393 Jon Ellison 02-Jul-15 20:52
Mod Warning > Jon Ellison 395 lukehancock 03-Jul-15 11:20
Re: Why should 'we' care about the facts??? 420 DScribr 06-Jul-15 18:17
Re: Why should 'we' care about the facts??? 387 Corpuscles 07-Jul-15 02:26
Re: Why should 'we' care about the facts??? 400 Origyptian 07-Jul-15 03:26
Willful ignorance 447 DScribr 07-Jul-15 18:02
Re: Why care about the facts??? 405 Jon Ellison 02-Jul-15 22:49
Re: NO change of facts 371 DScribr 02-Jul-15 19:54
Re: NO change of facts 394 Origyptian 02-Jul-15 21:55
Re: Why change??? 331 DScribr 02-Jul-15 19:52
Re: Why change??? 434 Origyptian 02-Jul-15 21:54
"Seems to be..." 359 DScribr 06-Jul-15 18:06
Re: "Seems to be..." 370 Origyptian 06-Jul-15 19:03
Re: "Seems to be..." 284 DScribr 07-Jul-15 17:48
Re: "Seems to be..." 386 Origyptian 07-Jul-15 18:19
Re: "Seems to be..." 373 DScribr 07-Jul-15 18:31
Re: "Seems to be..." 388 Origyptian 07-Jul-15 18:35
Re: "Seems to be..." 378 Jon Ellison 07-Jul-15 20:27
Re: Seems to be a Dbl-standard 395 DScribr 08-Jul-15 17:49
Re: Seems to be a Dbl-standard 336 Origyptian 08-Jul-15 17:55
It IS a Dbl-standard!!! 367 DScribr 08-Jul-15 22:49
Re: It IS a Dbl-standard!!! 440 Jon Ellison 09-Jul-15 00:32
Re: It IS a Dbl-standard!!! 413 Origyptian 09-Jul-15 05:55
Same nonsense-different day... 430 DScribr 09-Jul-15 18:13
Re: Same nonsense-different day... 412 Origyptian 09-Jul-15 18:45
Re: Same nonsense-different day... 395 Jon Ellison 09-Jul-15 19:21
Re: Same nonsense-different day....A MUST READ for all Ori "Fans." 364 DScribr 10-Jul-15 19:29
Re: Same nonsense-different day....A MUST READ for all Ori "Fans." 490 Origyptian 10-Jul-15 21:02
Selective memory loss 484 DScribr 10-Jul-15 22:49
Re: Seems to be a Dbl-standard 373 Jon Ellison 09-Jul-15 01:09
English Lesson 392 randompHactor 27-Jun-15 15:46
Re: English Lesson 405 Thanos5150 27-Jun-15 16:33
Re: English Lesson 424 Jon Ellison 27-Jun-15 16:55
Re: English Lesson 445 Origyptian 27-Jun-15 20:25
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 413 Corpuscles 26-Jun-15 04:31
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 328 Audrey 26-Jun-15 05:23
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 328 Corpuscles 26-Jun-15 06:43
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 317 Audrey 27-Jun-15 01:28
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 378 Corpuscles 27-Jun-15 01:56
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 389 Thanos5150 26-Jun-15 17:00
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 499 Origyptian 28-Jun-15 18:58
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 362 Jon Ellison 28-Jun-15 20:05
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 401 Origyptian 29-Jun-15 13:39
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 387 Jon Ellison 29-Jun-15 14:11
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 403 Audrey 30-Jun-15 03:01
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 385 Jon Ellison 30-Jun-15 13:20
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 374 DUNE 27-Jun-15 17:01
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 390 Jon Ellison 27-Jun-15 17:10
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 391 Sirfiroth 27-Jun-15 18:12
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 344 Jon Ellison 27-Jun-15 18:37
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 402 cladking 27-Jun-15 18:47
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 352 Ulrich 28-Jun-15 15:06
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 373 Origyptian 28-Jun-15 15:30
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 358 Jon Ellison 28-Jun-15 16:33
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 336 Audrey 28-Jun-15 17:39
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 374 Jon Ellison 28-Jun-15 18:23
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 419 Ulrich 29-Jun-15 19:20
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 444 Audrey 30-Jun-15 01:26
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 333 Ulrich 30-Jun-15 02:28
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 425 Origyptian 30-Jun-15 03:48
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 383 Ulrich 30-Jun-15 15:53
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 467 Ulrich 30-Jun-15 21:03
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 501 Thanos5150 30-Jun-15 04:12
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 355 Jon Ellison 28-Jun-15 19:11
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 394 Thanos5150 29-Jun-15 21:25


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.