Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Origyptian wrote:

> DScribr wrote:
>
> > Perhaps you should read my posts more carefully. I've
> already
> > explained to you about your 'non-claims'. (Another
> diversionary
> > BS post, is this all you have?)
> >
> > To repeat: Your opinions consistently begin w/ "it seems",
> and
> > "it suggests..." which doesn't come close to being 'physical
> > evidence' by ANY definition, and NO facts included, ever!
>
> What are you talking about? A "claim" or "hypothesis" is not
> "evidence". Rather, evidence is what is used to form the basis
> of claims and hypotheses. So if I see what looks like a paint
> run from a vertical block down into the junction with the
> adjacent block, I might state the hypothesis that "it seems
> that the paint was applied after the block was installed in
> situ". The hypothesis is not the evidence, the paint run is the
> evidence.
>
> Likewise, when we see evidence of all kinds of ancient garbage
> at the quarries, and evidence of humans who inhabited the
> place, records of what they ate, when they bathed, and
> instructions to deliver a product, but ZERO physical evidence,
> even in the huge volume of ancient garbage, of any shred of
> tools or equipment related to quarrying at what is widely
> believed to have been one of the largest quarry operations in
> ancient history, that's evidence that allows one to formulate
> hypotheses that maybe, just maybe, things ain't quite what
> we've been told all these years. The hypothesis isn't the
> "evidence", it's the conspicuous lack of specific evidence in
> the midst of all the other evidence found in those excavations
> that spurs the hypothesis.
>
>
>
> > YOUR opinion is NO better than anyone elses, but for some
> > unknown reason, you believe it is, and you believe that your
> > opinions don't require ANY physical evidence, (and the facts
> be
> > dammed...full steam ahead) BUT you insist that ALL others DO
> > provide physical evidence...and when we do, you
> > dismiss/disregard it without a valid reason, every time.
>
> Show me a post where I've said my "opinion" is better than
> anyone else's "opinion". Meanwhile, how is that related to the
> current debate about the quarries? You and yours have not
> expressed an "opinion"; you clearly have expressed a "claim", a
> staunchly held claim, which you not only contend is
> unquestionably true (ergo "indisputable"), but which has pushed
> several of you to become obsessed with issuing incessant
> insults and sarcasm to anyone who disagrees with you.
>
>
>
> > GET REAL Ori, the dbl-standard is obvious to all.
>
> The readers will make their own decision.
>
>
>
> > My tagline IS logical, and it IS a fact....IF you can't
> accept
> > this reality, that's YOUR problem.
>
> I rest my case.
>
>
>
> > (Will the SCA and Mainstream change the currently accepted
> P.
> > dates solely due to YOUR opinions??? NO, they want relevant
> > FACTUAL data, [PROOF] not misconceptions based on
> assumptions
> > and speculations.)
>
> What? I don't expect ANYONE to change their opinion based on my
> opinion, let alone the SCA. I have never tried to change the
> SCA's (or "Mainstream's") opinion. And the SCA hasn't tried to
> change my opinion. You, and a few others here, are the only
> ones obsessed with trying to change someone's opinion.
>
>
>
> > IS telling someone to ignore the issue part of your
> 'scientific method'???
>
> No, but telling someone to ignore me when they insist on
> harrassing me dozens of times each day IS part of my method to
> keep the library quiet so the rest of us can study. When have I
> ever told "someone to ignore the issue"?
>
>
>
> > You are simply unwilling to answer my question.
>
> I don't even know what your question is. You refer to a
> hypothesis as if it was "evidence". First you insist I've made
> several "claims", and then you say I'm too wishy washy to
> commit to anything except polite conditionals like "it seems"
> and "perhaps". Frankly, your repeated illogical questions are a
> moving target and have lost their worthiness for an answer.
>
>
>
> Look, I don't know if you're coming up with this stuff on your
> own or whether you're being coached privately, but you're being
> steered very badly and you're being taken farther off the rails
> with each passing day.
>
> But by all means, keep digging yourself deeper.
>

>
> Post Edited (09-Jul-15 22:34)

As usual, you have no idea.

You think you are the 'Artful Dodger' here, but you aren't fooling anyone.
(You've failed to grasp my main point. or you are simply 'playing' dumb.)

For the LAST time: I WAS NOT and AM NOT involved in the current Quarry discussion IN ANY WAY, (or on the previous one)....I suggest you reread my posts MORE CAREFULLY. (More diversionary BS.)



YOU just told ME the other day to ignore the issue....I suggest YOU reread YOUR OWN posts more carefully....and it would be a good idea IF you REMEMBERED what you said.

Ori, " I don't even know what your question is."
This IS a bold-faced LIE....the 'Artful Dodger' strikes again. (I've asked it SEVERAL times...you're not fooling anyone w/ this BS.)

"Polite conditionals..." Total BS.
Tell it like it IS: you ARE too wimpy to take a stand on anything, as this would require proof for your nonsense.

Your last para. is ALL nonsense, I certainly don't need any coaching, etc.

One 'man's' hole is another man's pile.



Post Edited (10-Jul-15 22:42)

Currently accepted Pyramide dates stand until proven otherwise.
Campbell's Chamber roof blocks are Tura Limestone until proven otherwise.
THE Cartouche in Campbell's Chamber IS Authentic, as are ALL other RC's Glyphs, until proven otherwise.


"This Forgery 'theory' has more holes than a sieve basket."

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 821 JonnyMcA 25-Jun-15 20:33
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 348 Thanos5150 25-Jun-15 23:19
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 373 Corpuscles 26-Jun-15 01:22
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 444 Audrey 26-Jun-15 02:00
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 385 Origyptian 26-Jun-15 02:52
Re: Mons Claudianus Tools 383 MJT 26-Jun-15 17:34
Re: Mons Claudianus Tools 366 Origyptian 26-Jun-15 17:57
Re: Mons Claudianus Tools 417 MJT 26-Jun-15 19:22
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 368 Origyptian 26-Jun-15 04:04
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 348 Audrey 26-Jun-15 05:18
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 355 Jon Ellison 26-Jun-15 10:24
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 384 Origyptian 26-Jun-15 15:26
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 359 Origyptian 26-Jun-15 19:23
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 367 Thanos5150 26-Jun-15 06:28
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 301 Origyptian 26-Jun-15 14:50
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 343 Audrey 27-Jun-15 02:20
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 318 Origyptian 27-Jun-15 04:49
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 365 Origyptian 26-Jun-15 02:33
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 369 Thanos5150 26-Jun-15 07:06
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 361 Origyptian 26-Jun-15 15:06
Example 375 DScribr 26-Jun-15 18:05
Re: Example 304 Origyptian 26-Jun-15 19:04
Re: Example 318 cladking 26-Jun-15 19:21
Re: Example 326 Brian Patterson 26-Jun-15 19:32
Re: Example 404 Origyptian 26-Jun-15 19:43
Re: Example 331 DScribr 26-Jun-15 22:36
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 318 Thanos5150 26-Jun-15 20:24
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 355 Origyptian 26-Jun-15 21:42
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 360 Corpuscles 27-Jun-15 00:19
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 336 Audrey 27-Jun-15 02:26
Same old same old..... 385 DScribr 26-Jun-15 22:48
Re: Same old same old..... 396 Thanos5150 27-Jun-15 05:16
Re: Same old same old..... 348 Jon Ellison 27-Jun-15 16:08
Re: Same old same old..... 374 Origyptian 27-Jun-15 21:18
Re: Same old same old..... 328 Corpuscles 28-Jun-15 00:10
Re: Same old same old..... 303 Jon Ellison 28-Jun-15 01:25
Re: Same old same old..... 372 Corpuscles 28-Jun-15 02:52
Re: Same old same old..... 337 Origyptian 28-Jun-15 01:35
Re: Same old same old..... 354 Audrey 28-Jun-15 00:47
Re: Same old same old..... 381 Origyptian 28-Jun-15 02:56
Re: Same old same old..... 337 Merrell 28-Jun-15 13:20
Only One World of True Believers? 348 cladking 28-Jun-15 15:23
Re: Same old same old..... 323 Thanos5150 28-Jun-15 03:27
Re: Same old same old..... 419 Jon Ellison 28-Jun-15 11:00
Re: Same old same old..... 323 Thanos5150 28-Jun-15 16:53
Re: Same old same old..... 362 Origyptian 28-Jun-15 17:25
Re: Same old same old..... 335 Jon Ellison 28-Jun-15 18:14
Why change??? 320 DScribr 30-Jun-15 22:19
Re: Why change??? 292 Jon Ellison 30-Jun-15 22:52
Re: Why change??? 359 Origyptian 01-Jul-15 04:27
Re: Why change??? 385 Corpuscles 01-Jul-15 06:11
Re: Why change??? 313 Origyptian 01-Jul-15 13:41
Re: Why change??? 309 Jon Ellison 01-Jul-15 14:08
Re: Why change??? 386 Origyptian 01-Jul-15 15:33
Re: Why change??? 319 Jon Ellison 01-Jul-15 15:38
Re: Why change??? 370 Jon Ellison 01-Jul-15 16:03
Re: Why change??? 371 Origyptian 01-Jul-15 16:21
Re: Why care about the facts??? 325 DScribr 02-Jul-15 19:59
Re: Why care about the facts??? 343 Origyptian 02-Jul-15 20:13
Re: Why care about the facts??? 347 Jon Ellison 02-Jul-15 20:52
Mod Warning > Jon Ellison 364 lukehancock 03-Jul-15 11:20
Re: Why should 'we' care about the facts??? 387 DScribr 06-Jul-15 18:17
Re: Why should 'we' care about the facts??? 317 Corpuscles 07-Jul-15 02:26
Re: Why should 'we' care about the facts??? 353 Origyptian 07-Jul-15 03:26
Willful ignorance 402 DScribr 07-Jul-15 18:02
Re: Why care about the facts??? 375 Jon Ellison 02-Jul-15 22:49
Re: NO change of facts 335 DScribr 02-Jul-15 19:54
Re: NO change of facts 364 Origyptian 02-Jul-15 21:55
Re: Why change??? 294 DScribr 02-Jul-15 19:52
Re: Why change??? 377 Origyptian 02-Jul-15 21:54
"Seems to be..." 327 DScribr 06-Jul-15 18:06
Re: "Seems to be..." 320 Origyptian 06-Jul-15 19:03
Re: "Seems to be..." 252 DScribr 07-Jul-15 17:48
Re: "Seems to be..." 357 Origyptian 07-Jul-15 18:19
Re: "Seems to be..." 326 DScribr 07-Jul-15 18:31
Re: "Seems to be..." 355 Origyptian 07-Jul-15 18:35
Re: "Seems to be..." 336 Jon Ellison 07-Jul-15 20:27
Re: Seems to be a Dbl-standard 345 DScribr 08-Jul-15 17:49
Re: Seems to be a Dbl-standard 303 Origyptian 08-Jul-15 17:55
It IS a Dbl-standard!!! 317 DScribr 08-Jul-15 22:49
Re: It IS a Dbl-standard!!! 385 Jon Ellison 09-Jul-15 00:32
Re: It IS a Dbl-standard!!! 381 Origyptian 09-Jul-15 05:55
Same nonsense-different day... 359 DScribr 09-Jul-15 18:13
Re: Same nonsense-different day... 350 Origyptian 09-Jul-15 18:45
Re: Same nonsense-different day... 333 Jon Ellison 09-Jul-15 19:21
Re: Same nonsense-different day....A MUST READ for all Ori "Fans." 334 DScribr 10-Jul-15 19:29
Re: Same nonsense-different day....A MUST READ for all Ori "Fans." 421 Origyptian 10-Jul-15 21:02
Selective memory loss 449 DScribr 10-Jul-15 22:49
Re: Seems to be a Dbl-standard 326 Jon Ellison 09-Jul-15 01:09
English Lesson 358 randompHactor 27-Jun-15 15:46
Re: English Lesson 356 Thanos5150 27-Jun-15 16:33
Re: English Lesson 374 Jon Ellison 27-Jun-15 16:55
Re: English Lesson 397 Origyptian 27-Jun-15 20:25
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 357 Corpuscles 26-Jun-15 04:31
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 275 Audrey 26-Jun-15 05:23
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 295 Corpuscles 26-Jun-15 06:43
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 282 Audrey 27-Jun-15 01:28
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 348 Corpuscles 27-Jun-15 01:56
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 350 Thanos5150 26-Jun-15 17:00
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 451 Origyptian 28-Jun-15 18:58
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 317 Jon Ellison 28-Jun-15 20:05
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 352 Origyptian 29-Jun-15 13:39
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 340 Jon Ellison 29-Jun-15 14:11
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 345 Audrey 30-Jun-15 03:01
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 357 Jon Ellison 30-Jun-15 13:20
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 340 DUNE 27-Jun-15 17:01
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 348 Jon Ellison 27-Jun-15 17:10
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 355 Sirfiroth 27-Jun-15 18:12
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 316 Jon Ellison 27-Jun-15 18:37
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 352 cladking 27-Jun-15 18:47
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 308 Ulrich 28-Jun-15 15:06
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 327 Origyptian 28-Jun-15 15:30
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 326 Jon Ellison 28-Jun-15 16:33
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 295 Audrey 28-Jun-15 17:39
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 321 Jon Ellison 28-Jun-15 18:23
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 370 Ulrich 29-Jun-15 19:20
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 354 Audrey 30-Jun-15 01:26
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 306 Ulrich 30-Jun-15 02:28
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 392 Origyptian 30-Jun-15 03:48
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 350 Ulrich 30-Jun-15 15:53
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 406 Ulrich 30-Jun-15 21:03
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 443 Thanos5150 30-Jun-15 04:12
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 328 Jon Ellison 28-Jun-15 19:11
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 352 Thanos5150 29-Jun-15 21:25


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.