Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Origyptian wrote:

> DScribr wrote:
>
> > Perhaps you should read my posts more carefully. I've
> already
> > explained to you about your 'non-claims'. (Another
> diversionary
> > BS post, is this all you have?)
> >
> > To repeat: Your opinions consistently begin w/ "it seems",
> and
> > "it suggests..." which doesn't come close to being 'physical
> > evidence' by ANY definition, and NO facts included, ever!
>
> What are you talking about? A "claim" or "hypothesis" is not
> "evidence". Rather, evidence is what is used to form the basis
> of claims and hypotheses. So if I see what looks like a paint
> run from a vertical block down into the junction with the
> adjacent block, I might state the hypothesis that "it seems
> that the paint was applied after the block was installed in
> situ". The hypothesis is not the evidence, the paint run is the
> evidence.
>
> Likewise, when we see evidence of all kinds of ancient garbage
> at the quarries, and evidence of humans who inhabited the
> place, records of what they ate, when they bathed, and
> instructions to deliver a product, but ZERO physical evidence,
> even in the huge volume of ancient garbage, of any shred of
> tools or equipment related to quarrying at what is widely
> believed to have been one of the largest quarry operations in
> ancient history, that's evidence that allows one to formulate
> hypotheses that maybe, just maybe, things ain't quite what
> we've been told all these years. The hypothesis isn't the
> "evidence", it's the conspicuous lack of specific evidence in
> the midst of all the other evidence found in those excavations
> that spurs the hypothesis.
>
>
>
> > YOUR opinion is NO better than anyone elses, but for some
> > unknown reason, you believe it is, and you believe that your
> > opinions don't require ANY physical evidence, (and the facts
> be
> > dammed...full steam ahead) BUT you insist that ALL others DO
> > provide physical evidence...and when we do, you
> > dismiss/disregard it without a valid reason, every time.
>
> Show me a post where I've said my "opinion" is better than
> anyone else's "opinion". Meanwhile, how is that related to the
> current debate about the quarries? You and yours have not
> expressed an "opinion"; you clearly have expressed a "claim", a
> staunchly held claim, which you not only contend is
> unquestionably true (ergo "indisputable"), but which has pushed
> several of you to become obsessed with issuing incessant
> insults and sarcasm to anyone who disagrees with you.
>
>
>
> > GET REAL Ori, the dbl-standard is obvious to all.
>
> The readers will make their own decision.
>
>
>
> > My tagline IS logical, and it IS a fact....IF you can't
> accept
> > this reality, that's YOUR problem.
>
> I rest my case.
>
>
>
> > (Will the SCA and Mainstream change the currently accepted
> P.
> > dates solely due to YOUR opinions??? NO, they want relevant
> > FACTUAL data, [PROOF] not misconceptions based on
> assumptions
> > and speculations.)
>
> What? I don't expect ANYONE to change their opinion based on my
> opinion, let alone the SCA. I have never tried to change the
> SCA's (or "Mainstream's") opinion. And the SCA hasn't tried to
> change my opinion. You, and a few others here, are the only
> ones obsessed with trying to change someone's opinion.
>
>
>
> > IS telling someone to ignore the issue part of your
> 'scientific method'???
>
> No, but telling someone to ignore me when they insist on
> harrassing me dozens of times each day IS part of my method to
> keep the library quiet so the rest of us can study. When have I
> ever told "someone to ignore the issue"?
>
>
>
> > You are simply unwilling to answer my question.
>
> I don't even know what your question is. You refer to a
> hypothesis as if it was "evidence". First you insist I've made
> several "claims", and then you say I'm too wishy washy to
> commit to anything except polite conditionals like "it seems"
> and "perhaps". Frankly, your repeated illogical questions are a
> moving target and have lost their worthiness for an answer.
>
>
>
> Look, I don't know if you're coming up with this stuff on your
> own or whether you're being coached privately, but you're being
> steered very badly and you're being taken farther off the rails
> with each passing day.
>
> But by all means, keep digging yourself deeper.
>

>
> Post Edited (09-Jul-15 22:34)

As usual, you have no idea.

You think you are the 'Artful Dodger' here, but you aren't fooling anyone.
(You've failed to grasp my main point. or you are simply 'playing' dumb.)

For the LAST time: I WAS NOT and AM NOT involved in the current Quarry discussion IN ANY WAY, (or on the previous one)....I suggest you reread my posts MORE CAREFULLY. (More diversionary BS.)



YOU just told ME the other day to ignore the issue....I suggest YOU reread YOUR OWN posts more carefully....and it would be a good idea IF you REMEMBERED what you said.

Ori, " I don't even know what your question is."
This IS a bold-faced LIE....the 'Artful Dodger' strikes again. (I've asked it SEVERAL times...you're not fooling anyone w/ this BS.)

"Polite conditionals..." Total BS.
Tell it like it IS: you ARE too wimpy to take a stand on anything, as this would require proof for your nonsense.

Your last para. is ALL nonsense, I certainly don't need any coaching, etc.

One 'man's' hole is another man's pile.



Post Edited (10-Jul-15 22:42)

Currently accepted Pyramide dates stand until proven otherwise.
Campbell's Chamber roof blocks are Tura Limestone until proven otherwise.
THE Cartouche in Campbell's Chamber IS Authentic, as are ALL other RC's Glyphs, until proven otherwise.


"This Forgery 'theory' has more holes than a sieve basket."

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 869 JonnyMcA 25-Jun-15 20:33
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 362 Thanos5150 25-Jun-15 23:19
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 383 Corpuscles 26-Jun-15 01:22
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 457 Audrey 26-Jun-15 02:00
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 394 Origyptian 26-Jun-15 02:52
Re: Mons Claudianus Tools 394 MJT 26-Jun-15 17:34
Re: Mons Claudianus Tools 377 Origyptian 26-Jun-15 17:57
Re: Mons Claudianus Tools 441 MJT 26-Jun-15 19:22
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 376 Origyptian 26-Jun-15 04:04
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 365 Audrey 26-Jun-15 05:18
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 370 Jon Ellison 26-Jun-15 10:24
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 396 Origyptian 26-Jun-15 15:26
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 373 Origyptian 26-Jun-15 19:23
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 381 Thanos5150 26-Jun-15 06:28
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 310 Origyptian 26-Jun-15 14:50
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 350 Audrey 27-Jun-15 02:20
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 330 Origyptian 27-Jun-15 04:49
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 374 Origyptian 26-Jun-15 02:33
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 381 Thanos5150 26-Jun-15 07:06
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 370 Origyptian 26-Jun-15 15:06
Example 395 DScribr 26-Jun-15 18:05
Re: Example 331 Origyptian 26-Jun-15 19:04
Re: Example 327 cladking 26-Jun-15 19:21
Re: Example 346 Brian Patterson 26-Jun-15 19:32
Re: Example 412 Origyptian 26-Jun-15 19:43
Re: Example 352 DScribr 26-Jun-15 22:36
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 328 Thanos5150 26-Jun-15 20:24
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 368 Origyptian 26-Jun-15 21:42
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 374 Corpuscles 27-Jun-15 00:19
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 354 Audrey 27-Jun-15 02:26
Same old same old..... 403 DScribr 26-Jun-15 22:48
Re: Same old same old..... 406 Thanos5150 27-Jun-15 05:16
Re: Same old same old..... 367 Jon Ellison 27-Jun-15 16:08
Re: Same old same old..... 383 Origyptian 27-Jun-15 21:18
Re: Same old same old..... 338 Corpuscles 28-Jun-15 00:10
Re: Same old same old..... 314 Jon Ellison 28-Jun-15 01:25
Re: Same old same old..... 389 Corpuscles 28-Jun-15 02:52
Re: Same old same old..... 361 Origyptian 28-Jun-15 01:35
Re: Same old same old..... 385 Audrey 28-Jun-15 00:47
Re: Same old same old..... 414 Origyptian 28-Jun-15 02:56
Re: Same old same old..... 357 Merrell 28-Jun-15 13:20
Only One World of True Believers? 357 cladking 28-Jun-15 15:23
Re: Same old same old..... 333 Thanos5150 28-Jun-15 03:27
Re: Same old same old..... 439 Jon Ellison 28-Jun-15 11:00
Re: Same old same old..... 329 Thanos5150 28-Jun-15 16:53
Re: Same old same old..... 381 Origyptian 28-Jun-15 17:25
Re: Same old same old..... 345 Jon Ellison 28-Jun-15 18:14
Why change??? 333 DScribr 30-Jun-15 22:19
Re: Why change??? 321 Jon Ellison 30-Jun-15 22:52
Re: Why change??? 368 Origyptian 01-Jul-15 04:27
Re: Why change??? 394 Corpuscles 01-Jul-15 06:11
Re: Why change??? 322 Origyptian 01-Jul-15 13:41
Re: Why change??? 330 Jon Ellison 01-Jul-15 14:08
Re: Why change??? 405 Origyptian 01-Jul-15 15:33
Re: Why change??? 333 Jon Ellison 01-Jul-15 15:38
Re: Why change??? 390 Jon Ellison 01-Jul-15 16:03
Re: Why change??? 382 Origyptian 01-Jul-15 16:21
Re: Why care about the facts??? 335 DScribr 02-Jul-15 19:59
Re: Why care about the facts??? 353 Origyptian 02-Jul-15 20:13
Re: Why care about the facts??? 366 Jon Ellison 02-Jul-15 20:52
Mod Warning > Jon Ellison 372 lukehancock 03-Jul-15 11:20
Re: Why should 'we' care about the facts??? 397 DScribr 06-Jul-15 18:17
Re: Why should 'we' care about the facts??? 332 Corpuscles 07-Jul-15 02:26
Re: Why should 'we' care about the facts??? 361 Origyptian 07-Jul-15 03:26
Willful ignorance 420 DScribr 07-Jul-15 18:02
Re: Why care about the facts??? 383 Jon Ellison 02-Jul-15 22:49
Re: NO change of facts 344 DScribr 02-Jul-15 19:54
Re: NO change of facts 372 Origyptian 02-Jul-15 21:55
Re: Why change??? 306 DScribr 02-Jul-15 19:52
Re: Why change??? 396 Origyptian 02-Jul-15 21:54
"Seems to be..." 335 DScribr 06-Jul-15 18:06
Re: "Seems to be..." 328 Origyptian 06-Jul-15 19:03
Re: "Seems to be..." 262 DScribr 07-Jul-15 17:48
Re: "Seems to be..." 365 Origyptian 07-Jul-15 18:19
Re: "Seems to be..." 344 DScribr 07-Jul-15 18:31
Re: "Seems to be..." 365 Origyptian 07-Jul-15 18:35
Re: "Seems to be..." 345 Jon Ellison 07-Jul-15 20:27
Re: Seems to be a Dbl-standard 367 DScribr 08-Jul-15 17:49
Re: Seems to be a Dbl-standard 312 Origyptian 08-Jul-15 17:55
It IS a Dbl-standard!!! 335 DScribr 08-Jul-15 22:49
Re: It IS a Dbl-standard!!! 394 Jon Ellison 09-Jul-15 00:32
Re: It IS a Dbl-standard!!! 391 Origyptian 09-Jul-15 05:55
Same nonsense-different day... 380 DScribr 09-Jul-15 18:13
Re: Same nonsense-different day... 361 Origyptian 09-Jul-15 18:45
Re: Same nonsense-different day... 352 Jon Ellison 09-Jul-15 19:21
Re: Same nonsense-different day....A MUST READ for all Ori "Fans." 342 DScribr 10-Jul-15 19:29
Re: Same nonsense-different day....A MUST READ for all Ori "Fans." 447 Origyptian 10-Jul-15 21:02
Selective memory loss 458 DScribr 10-Jul-15 22:49
Re: Seems to be a Dbl-standard 344 Jon Ellison 09-Jul-15 01:09
English Lesson 368 randompHactor 27-Jun-15 15:46
Re: English Lesson 368 Thanos5150 27-Jun-15 16:33
Re: English Lesson 397 Jon Ellison 27-Jun-15 16:55
Re: English Lesson 409 Origyptian 27-Jun-15 20:25
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 375 Corpuscles 26-Jun-15 04:31
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 291 Audrey 26-Jun-15 05:23
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 305 Corpuscles 26-Jun-15 06:43
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 297 Audrey 27-Jun-15 01:28
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 356 Corpuscles 27-Jun-15 01:56
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 366 Thanos5150 26-Jun-15 17:00
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 462 Origyptian 28-Jun-15 18:58
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 328 Jon Ellison 28-Jun-15 20:05
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 361 Origyptian 29-Jun-15 13:39
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 360 Jon Ellison 29-Jun-15 14:11
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 365 Audrey 30-Jun-15 03:01
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 365 Jon Ellison 30-Jun-15 13:20
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 351 DUNE 27-Jun-15 17:01
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 366 Jon Ellison 27-Jun-15 17:10
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 366 Sirfiroth 27-Jun-15 18:12
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 323 Jon Ellison 27-Jun-15 18:37
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 361 cladking 27-Jun-15 18:47
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 319 Ulrich 28-Jun-15 15:06
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 345 Origyptian 28-Jun-15 15:30
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 334 Jon Ellison 28-Jun-15 16:33
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 305 Audrey 28-Jun-15 17:39
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 332 Jon Ellison 28-Jun-15 18:23
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 378 Ulrich 29-Jun-15 19:20
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 379 Audrey 30-Jun-15 01:26
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 315 Ulrich 30-Jun-15 02:28
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 400 Origyptian 30-Jun-15 03:48
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 362 Ulrich 30-Jun-15 15:53
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 431 Ulrich 30-Jun-15 21:03
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 465 Thanos5150 30-Jun-15 04:12
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 336 Jon Ellison 28-Jun-15 19:11
Re: Giza Pyramids: Order of Construction part 2 364 Thanos5150 29-Jun-15 21:25


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.