> DScribr wrote:
> > Total BS Ori, your opinions consistently begin w/ "it seems",
> > and "it suggests..." which doesn't come close to being
> > 'physical evidence' by ANY definition.
> > The proof of this IS in EVERY thread you post in.
> Um, that's why I said "it seems" instead of "it IS", and why I
> said "it suggests" instead of "it PROVES".
> You, on the other hand, constantly make definitive claims, such
> as your illogical tagline, that have no basis in physical
> evidence whatsoever.
> Go ahead and keep digging yourself deeper.
> > Do you understand it's considered rude to NOT answer a
> > question???
> Man, that takes a lot of nerve. How many times have I asked you
> to point out where I've ever denied that Vyse, Houdin, or Romer
> claimed the roof blocks in Campbell's Chamber were made of
> Tura, or where I've ever claimed that the roof blocks in
> Campbell's Chamber "are NOT Tura"? You have yet to post a
> single link to any such comment from me.
> You have accused me of making claim after claim, and in every
> single case I have challenged you to belly up with a link to
> any of the claims you have accused me of making and you have
> produced ZERO, not a single shred of evidence for any claim you
> insist I've made.
> I simply do not acknowledge your demand for any answer from me.
Perhaps you should read my posts more carefully. I've already explained to you about your 'non-claims'. (Another diversionary BS post, is this all you have?)
To repeat: Your opinions consistently begin w/ "it seems", and "it suggests..." which doesn't come close to being 'physical evidence' by ANY definition, and NO facts included, ever!
YOUR opinion is NO better than anyone elses, but for some unknown reason, you believe it is, and you believe that your opinions don't require ANY physical evidence, (and the facts be dammed...full steam ahead) BUT you insist that ALL others DO provide physical evidence...and when we do, you dismiss/disregard it without a valid reason, every time.
GET REAL Ori, the dbl-standard is obvious to all.
My tagline IS logical, and it IS a fact....IF you can't accept this reality, that's YOUR problem.
(Will the SCA and Mainstream change the currently accepted P. dates solely due to YOUR opinions??? NO, they want relevant FACTUAL data, [PROOF] not misconceptions based on assumptions and speculations.)
You are simply unwilling to answer my question.
IS telling someone to ignore the issue part of your 'scientific method'???
Campbell's Chamber roof blocks are Tura Limestone until proven otherwise.
THE Cartouche in Campbell's Chamber IS Authentic, as are ALL other RC's Glyphs, until proven otherwise.
"This Forgery 'theory' has more holes than a sieve basket."