> You still don't get it. Ori refuses to accept the truth, and is
> too wishy-washy to claim ANYTHING definitively.
> Let me spell it out for you: you have NOT DEFINITIVELY or
> specifically claimed ANYTHING from day one,
And yet several of you have spent the past few days throwing dozens of insulting posts at me insisting I've made so many claims. Very interesting.
> .....you are simply playing word games because you are too
> WIMPY to claim anything definitively, and, in your mind, this
> little game absolves you from EVER having to provide valid
> evidence, e.g. 'it seems'....'evidence suggests'.
So now you are decreeing that we're not allowed to ask questions and discuss other people's comments at GHMB unless we can come up with some claims of our own? Do you not see how silly that is?
> YOU were NOT there, YOU only have viewed pis. The 3
> eye-witnesses have been there, examined the real thing with
> their own eyes, and, unlike you, these 3 KNOW what they are
> talking about. YOUR opinion is based solely on YOUR
> speculations of pics of YOUR choice. The 3 eye-witness accounts
> ARE THE EVIDENCE.
Baloney. I absolutely do not accept their conclusions until they can belly up with proof. Period. I have no reason to believe that Vyse, Houdin, or Romer have any qualifications to comment on physics or geology to the point that I should trust their conclusions without verification. You have no idea whatsoever how much training I've had in physics, engineering, and geology. Having three guys conclude something within a discipline in which they have questionable expertise may be enough evidence for YOU, but I have a different standard of proof. You need to get over that simple fact.
> Why don't you apply YOUR standard of proof to YOUR 'non-claims'???
> The proof of this is here for ALL to see.
I totally agree.
Post Edited (07-Jul-15 19:48)
How can any of us ever know, when all we can do is think?