> DScribr wrote:
> > He's made many claims, but denies having made them every time
> > someone requests valid evidence.
> Again, I'm not sure what "claims" you think I'm making, but by
> all means disagree and ignore them all. I have no interest in
> convincing you of anything other than what you believe. But
> that doesn't lessen the fact that neither you, loveritas,
> Thanos or anyone else has validated the claim that the Romans
> quarried those stones circa 1st c. AD. And so far, as I read
> these documents written by the luminary investigators, it's not
> at all clear that the evidence supports only your "accepted
> view" vs. others, such as what's being revealed at Baalbek.
> Try as hard as you want to deflect this discussion, but I will
> simply bring it back to this simple focus to seek answers about
> what really happened back then. I'm not like others here who
> apparently feel so passionately compelled to brow beat the rest
> of us into believing their ideology.
Extremely difficult to validate anything to YOUR satisfaction when you imm. dismiss/disregard any and ALL valid facts we present on EVERY post in EVERY thread.
(I haven't tried to validate this...I suggest you reread.)
More hypocrisy, but you try to dupe ppl into believing w/ your non-stop misleading and false statements-get over yourself.
Campbell's Chamber roof blocks are Tura Limestone until proven otherwise.
THE Cartouche in Campbell's Chamber IS Authentic, as are ALL other RC's Glyphs, until proven otherwise.
"This Forgery 'theory' has more holes than a sieve basket."