> > Jon Ellison wrote:
> > > De Scriber said that Ori is not entitled to his opinion by
> > > saying that the problem arises when Ori "Presents them as
> > > facts".
> > The opposite of this is true:
> > DScribr:
You [Origyptian] are entitled to your opinions, BUT,
> > think you have the option, (and the right) to ignore any and
> > all facts that conflict w/ your crack-pot 'Theories' while
> > presenting your version of the facts....but you do not.
> > > I have no idea what Describer is talking about because as
> > far
> > > as I am aware Ori has not presented any "Facts".
> > > He's asking questions, not answering them.
> > You are correct about one thing-he has not presented any
> > nor answered questions asked.
> > But who cares at this point. This matter should be closed as
> > these threads clearly speak for themselves.
> > Post Edited (23-Jun-15 22:44)
> Actually, I'm correct about everything .
> As you say .. He has not presented any facts.. He is asking
> questions .. There is a difference.
> I am also questioning everything .
> Post Edited (23-Jun-15 23:13)
You are not, you just think you are...LOL
Campbell's Chamber roof blocks are Tura Limestone until proven otherwise.
THE Cartouche in Campbell's Chamber IS Authentic, as are ALL other RC's Glyphs, until proven otherwise.
"This Forgery 'theory' has more holes than a sieve basket."