> > De Scriber said that Ori is not entitled to his opinion by
> > saying that the problem arises when Ori "Presents them as
> > facts".
> The opposite of this is true:
You [Origyptian] are entitled to your opinions, BUT, you
> think you have the option, (and the right) to ignore any and
> all facts that conflict w/ your crack-pot 'Theories' while
> presenting your version of the facts....but you do not.
> > I have no idea what Describer is talking about because as
> > as I am aware Ori has not presented any "Facts".
> > He's asking questions, not answering them.
> You are correct about one thing-he has not presented any facts
> nor answered questions asked.
> But who cares at this point. This matter should be closed as
> these threads clearly speak for themselves.
> Post Edited (23-Jun-15 22:44)
Actually, I'm correct about everything .
As you say .. He has not presented any facts.. He is asking questions .. There is a difference.
I am also questioning everything .
Post Edited (23-Jun-15 23:13)