> De Scriber said that Ori is not entitled to his opinion by
> saying that the problem arises when Ori "Presents them as
The opposite of this is true:
You [Origyptian] are entitled to your opinions, BUT, you think you have the option, (and the right) to ignore any and all facts that conflict w/ your crack-pot 'Theories' while presenting your version of the facts....but you do not.
> I have no idea what Describer is talking about because as far
> as I am aware Ori has not presented any "Facts".
> He's asking questions, not answering them.
You are correct about one thing-he has not presented any facts nor answered questions asked.
But who cares at this point. This matter should be closed as these threads clearly speak for themselves.
Post Edited (23-Jun-15 22:44)