Mysteries :
The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board).
Jon Ellison wrote:
> How the hell do you know I know nothing about columns.
> More speculation.????????
Your own words Jon. Not only asking the questions of what these things mean but getting it completely wrong even after your are told and presumably read something on the subject. But hopefully at least now you know something about columns....
Do you see me speculating?
> I was keeping it simple .
> You said it was a roman column
> I stated that it was not a Roman column .
> Meaning it could not be positively identified as a roman
> column.
It is a Roman column and can easily be identified as a Roman column in the context in which it is found in the quarry and what is found used in construction. It is your proven and repeated lack of understanding of Greek and Roman columns that raises any doubt where otherwise there is none.
> And now you're as per usual trying to photobomb your way out of
> the corner you photobombed your way into.
Lololo. Yes-Thanos "cornered" once again with only bombs made of photos to blast his way to freedom! And I only photobomb myself into a corner to place the dunce cap on your head.
You do not understand words, now pictures offend you. Other than making drawings in crayon I've run out of options. But you are not really worth it anyways and the point of posting to you when you go off on these tangents is for the readers who might actually believe a word you say for some reason.
> Over and out.
Good idea.
> How the hell do you know I know nothing about columns.
> More speculation.????????
Your own words Jon. Not only asking the questions of what these things mean but getting it completely wrong even after your are told and presumably read something on the subject. But hopefully at least now you know something about columns....
Do you see me speculating?
> I was keeping it simple .
> You said it was a roman column
> I stated that it was not a Roman column .
> Meaning it could not be positively identified as a roman
> column.
It is a Roman column and can easily be identified as a Roman column in the context in which it is found in the quarry and what is found used in construction. It is your proven and repeated lack of understanding of Greek and Roman columns that raises any doubt where otherwise there is none.
> And now you're as per usual trying to photobomb your way out of
> the corner you photobombed your way into.
Lololo. Yes-Thanos "cornered" once again with only bombs made of photos to blast his way to freedom! And I only photobomb myself into a corner to place the dunce cap on your head.
You do not understand words, now pictures offend you. Other than making drawings in crayon I've run out of options. But you are not really worth it anyways and the point of posting to you when you go off on these tangents is for the readers who might actually believe a word you say for some reason.
> Over and out.
Good idea.
Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.