> How ridiculous.
> The entire reason I'm WITHHOLDING my hypothesis is its lack of
> enough physical evidence at this point, unlike several others
> here who insist on proselytizing things like tombs, stonework
> capabilities, and the ability to divine the intentions of the
> designers without having any real basis for doing so.
> And you wonder why I didn't embrace your little game.
> What "hard evidence" do YOU have that G1 was first on
Are you responding to me or Loveritas? What is "all true" is your behavior.
I am not playing a game nor have I said G1 was built 1st. In fact, in the OP which I doubt anyone will read, I said I don;t know and that was the point of the thread. But instead of talking about the subject at hand it devolves into more stupidity about the Romans.