> Pete Vanderzwet wrote:
> > Do you know how many times I've had this discussion? Your
> > rants aren't original. People watch a few episodes of
> > is on the History Channel then read a book or three and form
> > some grand theory that requires the discrediting of 100 years
> > of excavation, understanding, and scholarship. It's like you
> > guys read 3 pages in a 500 page book, then try to give a book
> > report and state that the author didn't know what he was
> > talking about. The articles I have written were written
> > because I was addressing the same thing over, and over, and
> > over, to different people so I wrote something up that could
> > linked to for the intellectually honest and curious to read
> > have their questions answered. You have literally provided
> > nothing. At all. Not a single thing. All you have done is
> > rant on the people who have. Give them an honest read and
> > positive some of your questions will be answered.
> It doesn't matter how many times you've "had this discussion".
> What matters (to me at least) is how many times you've
> discussed the EVIDENCE.
> From what I can tell so far, you've discussed the evidence zero
Now you're projecting your own shortcommings on someone else, YOU haven't discussed the evidence. But you have a good excuse I must admit, since there is no evidence for lost advanced civilisations you can't discuss it ;)
Pete on the other hand has provided tons of evidence regarding AE culture and timeline. But clearly you're not interested in that, you just rant against people who threaten your self created illusion of a lost advanced civilisation.
Nothing new realy, we've seen it all before...