> Well, there is the internal ramp theory of that French
> And if you have evidence of lifting that kind of weight nearly
> 1300 years before the Parthenon, please share it.
The internal ramp theory can't be excluded strictly by logic and evidence alone like ALL the other ramp theories but the internal rtamp theory has the greatest flaw of all of them; there is even less room to work for each man. This is the root of the problem with ramp theories and this one has it in spades. If you could show there was enough room on the ramps it would be viable as an hypothsis but then the problemn becomes that there's no evidence for it. An infrared scan could prove its existence but the authorities won't allow science on the plateau any longer.
I didn't say I had the answer for how they were built just that ramps are debunked. I can say that all of the evidence suggests the stones were lifted one step at a time probably using the weight of water driven above the surface of the ground by high CO2 levels. The fact that this is where all the evidence points strongly suggests this is how it was done despite the relative lack of physical evidence.
It should be noted that the same source that led me to be able to debunk ramps appears to be in total agreement that they used decarbonating water to lift the stones by means of its weight.