> You keep bringing up the quadruped nonsense and claimed it was
> "eerily like Khnum."
> All I did was point out your actual lack of knowledge about the
> glyphs required for "Khnum" which serves to make your point
> baseless and redundant, and you respond by suggesting I am
> being sarcastic.
> I was simply correcting your ignorance.
Anyone with eyes who has been keeping up with these discussions knows what the "Khnum-Khfu", vs. the "Khufu" cartouche looks like. That's not the point. Stop treat poeple like they're idiots and like you are the all knowing. So I neglected to say "as in" Khnum"! Big deal. Sorry I took a wild chance using short hand to make a point. I'll try to go slower and more clearly for you next time.
If my comment was merely "quadraped" nonsense, then please share why you believe the viper is so high and why there are relatively red dots under it that are far more prominent than the other stray dots, especially right there insight a "royal cartouche". Why would such loyal "companions of Khufu" allow such stray dots to reside inside their highly loved and respected king's very own cartouche?