> The relative sizing and spacing of the glyphs in the cartouche
> suggests strongly that there is only one glyph - whatever you
> might interpret it to have been.
> I prefer not to "keep in mind" outlandish speculation which is
> not supported by the physical evidence, thanks.
Well then you must also consider that there may have been another complete glyph UNDER the horned viper, eh? After all, we don't want to resort to any "outlandish speculation" that the incompetent painters made a silly mistake by putting the viper too high, do we?