> @ Origyptisan, Don't be blind to the magic of photoshop. The
> Schoch pic w/ the imaginary paint drips, is modified, and you
> are welcome to call it enhancement.
> NOT baseless, true. Of the 3 pics I had checked, all were
> modified, I don't have time to check them all for you, mod info
> contained in image data. (And search pics for yourself, 'shop
> and compare' many variations avail).
> Modification is OK when it's just for personal use. Not OK when
> presenting as possible proof to support your claims.
I hope you don't honestly expect people to decry Dowell's photos just because you claim they somehow have been artificially sprayed with dots. This is a scientific discussion which requires contentions to be evidence based. Please offer a basis for your claims of defrauded photos.