DUNE Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Martin Stower Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Jon Ellison Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Hi Colette/Dune
> > > I agree.
> > > A large portion of the underside of the upper
> > > chamber ceiling blocks seems to be coated in
> > > plaster varying from large gobs applied into
> > and
> > > around the block joints down to a few mm to
> > zero
> > > on the block surfaces. It looks like the
> rafter
> > > blocks were placed unevenly and then rendered
> > to
> > > provide a smooth and even interior surface.
> > > The render could not have been applied to the
> > > blocks prior to their installation.
> > > The cartouche is on top of the render,
> > indicating
> > > that it was applied in situ.
> > > It's good that Colette confirms this.
> >
> > Which, of course, she doesn’t.
> >
> > Try reading again and properly this time—and
> not
> > misrepresenting, for all that this requires you
> to
> > shake off your Creighton clique habits.
> >
> > M.
>
> Hi Martin,
>
> Yes your right in that she is not confirming the
> "in situ"application of the Khufu cartouche, but
> one might construed that its being implied by her
> statement of there being plaster on the ceiling
> blocks, ergo cartouche over plaster , to which the
> implications are obvious .
>
> As Colette went on to say .
>
> ".I later found out that I WAS CORRECT, that there
> was indeed plaster on the ceilings AND in THAT
> particular chamber.…"
>
> ___________________
>
> Me
>
> The only other possible way out of the cartouche
> being applied in situ is for the plaster to have
> been applied before the block got installed, would
> they have done that ?
>
>
> DPP

Of course, you fail to acknowledge that Colette was NOT in C's Chamber when she felt the plaster.
(Schoch said, "Granite.")