MS: On that basis, until you post the images, we may fairly regard you as withholding evidence — and misinforming actively with you dodgy drawings.
SC: You can push your weasel words to try and twist this around all you like, Stower but I doubt anyone, other than you, will give a hee-haw in what you are attempting to do.
YOU had information for the best part of 20 years (that's 16 to you and me) and you just sat on it. YOU allowed a skewed impression of your cropped page to spread across the internet. STILL you said nothing.
On the other side, I presented ALL the information from the relevant page (the information YOU concealed) because I happen to believe in giving people all the relevant material. The other cartouche on that page was entirely relevant TO that page--but YOU withheld it. We are all still waiting to hear why you did that. Explain yourself. Why did you allow a false impression of your partially scanned page to continue without correcting it, without properly informing people of its true content? Let's hear what you have to say for yourself.
Now, I have NO intention of withholding relevant information, as YOU did. I certainly have no intention of publishing every page from Vyse's journal, most of which is not relevant to this particular question, as well you know.
And, unlike YOU, I have told people where the information is to be found in order that they can, if so motivated, go and see it for themselves. What did you do? Jack!
As I told you before, Stower, your actions in this long saga are nothing short of disgraceful and if you consider yourself to be an honest seeker and teacher of truth, then you should hang your head in shame.
Post Edited (05-Jun-14 14:18)