One way this blueprint may have fit is the precise moment when they roped the area off using the Eye of Horus template; yet now the minor discrepancy for G2 remains, because Continental drift may have had minuscule differences. Over time elevation and weight of each pyramid may have had minor movement differences. Pure speculation, I know and only a scientist could account for this who knows plate tectonics. Slopes of elevations of each pyramid may have come into play here over time. Also earthquakes too as we must understand that the Pyramids of Giza span thousands of years since its inception.
What we are looking at today obviously would not allow for the precision of the original blueprint.
“…it has been correctly argued that tectonic movement of the earth’s plates is a major factor against theories of orientation like Spence’s or in general using precession. According to geologists and specialists in this field there are results published on this topic by NASA as well as similar tectonic movements that have been also proved by recent geophysical studies, and by recent space studies using laser and GPSs in artificial satellite observations for geodesy studies. These results would therefore imply an overall movement of about 100 m for the Gizeh Plateau at the Moqqatam Formation, and possibly some significant rotation. Giza is moving especially fast, because of its location at the contact point of the African, Arabian and Eurasian tectonic plates, a fact, which also maximises potential rotation. Another issue is the possible impact of the sea on the Gizeh Plateau. The level of the Mediterranean has raised about 2 m during the last 5000 years, a fact, which has perhaps affected the tilt of the plateau. In addition there have been several tidal waves in the broader area of the SE Mediterranean. The one that inflicted Cleopatra’s VII Alexandria was massive enough, by probably not as big as the one resulting from the volcano eruption in the island of Thera at 1500 BC.”
Speak Truth To Power