Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Scott Creighton wrote:

> SC: And I’ll be bumping these gums of mine for a long time to
> come. Look out for my next book, 'Ark of the Gods' - gives a
> bit more info on those old Belzoni bull bones. I'm sure you'll
> hate it.

Not that you’re showing here and elsewhere in your post any sign of ego-involvement.

If you know all about the bones, then why tell readers of this board that it was “plain old earth”? (But I see that you’ve mentioned the bones elsewhere.)

The one thing you could find which would be of interest is that the bones are extant and have been dated. Robert Bauval looked into this, without result. Did you get further? Go on, you old tease, tell us.

> SC: If you want real knowledge then that comes from REAL
> EVIDENCE like the evidence that was actually found in the stone
> box of G2 and not the theorized evidence that Belzoni and you
> imagine musta

Musta?

> been there. To quote you again:

Let’s not quote me again.

> SC: Nothing strange about it. There is very much a growing
> consensus from alternative thinkers that the one thing this
> broad church can agree on is that consensus Egyptology is wrong

[snip]

See what I mean. Consensus is good, when it suits you.

> SC: No – I am advancing a theory that actually has some
> empirical evidence to support it.

Proving if proof were needed that your views on theory and evidence remain as primitive and rhetoric-laden as before.

> SC: It has been ASSUMED by Belzoni and every Egyptologist and
> Egypt-apologist since that the body of the king musta

[snip]

Musta?

Yada yada ya. Same tired old rhetoric.

Look what happens when there really is a case for things having been found exactly as the builders left them, as with the “graffiti” found by Vyse. The sainted consensus of “alternative thinkers” bends over backwards to deny it. Pardon my being unimpressed.

What this has to do with Menkaure escapes me.

M.


Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Inconsistencies 1644 Morten 25-Feb-13 08:44
Re: Inconsistencies 408 Scott Creighton 25-Feb-13 12:31
Re: Inconsistencies 365 Bobajot 25-Feb-13 12:47
Re: Inconsistencies 391 Scott Creighton 25-Feb-13 12:53
Re: Inconsistencies 345 Bobajot 26-Feb-13 00:14
Re: Inconsistencies 411 Titus Livius 26-Feb-13 10:46
Re: Inconsistencies 459 Morten 26-Feb-13 11:10
Re: Inconsistencies 453 Titus Livius 26-Feb-13 16:39
Re: Inconsistencies 346 cladking 26-Feb-13 16:52
Re: Inconsistencies 402 Mr.Ward 27-Feb-13 14:08
Re: Inconsistencies 394 Archae Solenhofen 28-Feb-13 04:19
Re: Inconsistencies 707 Scott Creighton 28-Feb-13 10:26
Re: Inconsistencies 442 Thanos5150 28-Feb-13 19:21
Re: Inconsistencies 472 Archae Solenhofen 28-Feb-13 22:17
Re: Inconsistencies 366 WoDoJo 03-Mar-13 22:47
Inconsistency #2 and #3 363 Morten 25-Feb-13 15:22
Re: Inconsistency #2 and #3 322 cladking 25-Feb-13 16:02
Re: Inconsistency #2 and #3 362 Morten 25-Feb-13 19:57
Re: Inconsistency #2 and #3 406 Scott Creighton 25-Feb-13 16:11
Re: Inconsistency #2 and #3 381 Thunderbird 25-Feb-13 17:52
Re: Inconsistency #2 and #3 380 Scott Creighton 25-Feb-13 18:32
A Further Question 346 loveritas 26-Feb-13 01:41
Let's Try A Third Time 346 loveritas 28-Feb-13 12:30
Re: Let's Try A Third Time 360 Scott Creighton 28-Feb-13 12:56
Re: Let's Try A Third Time 392 loveritas 28-Feb-13 20:53
Re: Let's Try A Third Time 367 Scott Creighton 28-Feb-13 21:08
Re: Let's Try A Third Time 375 loveritas 28-Feb-13 21:26
Re: Let's Try A Third Time 379 Scott Creighton 28-Feb-13 21:39
This Is the Table 401 loveritas 28-Feb-13 23:18
Re: This Is the Table 357 Scott Creighton 01-Mar-13 13:08
Re: This Is the Table 392 loveritas 01-Mar-13 23:15
Re: This Is the Table 363 Scott Creighton 01-Mar-13 23:48
Re: Inconsistency #2 and #3 390 Morten 25-Feb-13 19:50
Re: Inconsistency #2 and #3 352 Scott Creighton 25-Feb-13 20:10
Re: Inconsistency #2 and #3 395 Morten 25-Feb-13 21:04
Re: The Western Flowing Nile 430 Thunderbird 25-Feb-13 21:55
Re: The Western Flowing Nile 414 Morten 25-Feb-13 22:19
Re: The Western Flowing Nile 518 cladking 25-Feb-13 23:15
Re: The Western Flowing Nile 574 Thunderbird 26-Feb-13 03:43
Re: The Western Flowing Nile 429 cladking 26-Feb-13 04:29
Re: The Great Rift..... 333 Thunderbird 26-Feb-13 05:08
Re: The Great Rift..... 429 cladking 26-Feb-13 05:22
Re: The Western Flowing Nile 369 loveritas 26-Feb-13 06:04
Re: The Western Flowing Nile 373 cladking 26-Feb-13 16:28
Re: Cladking/Lover 394 Thunderbird 26-Feb-13 22:38
Re: Cladking/Lover 356 cladking 27-Feb-13 01:56
Re: Inconsistency #2 and #3 354 MJT 25-Feb-13 22:31
Re: Inconsistency #2 and #3 380 Morten 25-Feb-13 23:11
Re: Inconsistency #2 and #3 371 Scott Creighton 26-Feb-13 11:40
Re: Inconsistency #2 and #3 377 Morten 26-Feb-13 12:00
Re: Inconsistency #2 and #3 381 Scott Creighton 26-Feb-13 12:59
Re: Inconsistency #2 and #3 394 Morten 26-Feb-13 13:33
Re: Inconsistency #2 and #3 402 Scott Creighton 26-Feb-13 13:58
Re: Inconsistency #2 and #3 374 Morten 26-Feb-13 20:00
Re: Inconsistency #2 and #3 347 Scott Creighton 26-Feb-13 20:16
Re: Inconsistency #2 and #3 414 Spiros 26-Feb-13 21:27
Re: Inconsistency #2 and #3 438 Morten 26-Feb-13 21:53
Re: Inconsistency #2 and #3 404 Scott Creighton 26-Feb-13 22:44
Re: Inconsistency #2 and #3 451 Thanos5150 27-Feb-13 00:58
Re: Inconsistency #2 and #3 340 Scott Creighton 27-Feb-13 11:16
Re: Inconsistency #2 and #3 355 Morten 02-Mar-13 16:32
Re: Inconsistency #2 and #3 387 Scott Creighton 02-Mar-13 20:27
Re: Inconsistency #2 and #3 367 Morten 02-Mar-13 22:02
Re: Inconsistency #2 and #3 375 Scott Creighton 02-Mar-13 22:10
Re: Inconsistency #2 and #3 404 MJT 02-Mar-13 23:27
Re: Inconsistency #2 and #3 306 Scott Creighton 03-Mar-13 09:44
Re: Inconsistency #2 and #3 400 Morten 03-Mar-13 04:26
Re: Inconsistency #2 and #3 357 Scott Creighton 03-Mar-13 10:01
Re: Inconsistency #2 and #3 385 Morten 03-Mar-13 20:53
Re: Inconsistency #2 and #3 395 Scott Creighton 04-Mar-13 00:53
Re: Inconsistency #2 and #3 368 MJT 04-Mar-13 02:00
Re: Inconsistency #2 and #3 392 Scott Creighton 04-Mar-13 10:35
Re: Why allways....thru the eye's of the Egyptologist 378 Thunderbird 03-Mar-13 02:58
Re: Inconsistency #2 and #3 392 Thunderbird 25-Feb-13 20:39
Inconsistency #4 381 Morten 26-Feb-13 08:23
Menkaure ? 370 loveritas 26-Feb-13 11:04
Re: Menkaure ? 346 Morten 26-Feb-13 11:40
Re: Menkaure ? 392 loveritas 26-Feb-13 20:56
Re: Menkaure ? 339 MJT 26-Feb-13 22:38
Re: Menkaure ? 396 loveritas 26-Feb-13 22:58
Re: Menkaure ? 370 MJT 27-Feb-13 00:05
Re: Menkaure ? 334 loveritas 27-Feb-13 01:33
Re: Menkaure ? 389 MJT 28-Feb-13 17:25
Re: Menkaure ? 346 cladking 28-Feb-13 17:35
Re: Menkaure ? 417 MJT 28-Feb-13 17:54
Re: Menkaure ? 384 cladking 28-Feb-13 21:50
Re: Menkaure ? 406 loveritas 28-Feb-13 20:58
Re: Menkaure ? 422 MJT 28-Feb-13 22:05
Re: Menkaure ? 371 loveritas 28-Feb-13 23:28
Re: Menkaure ? 383 MJT 01-Mar-13 00:44
Re: Menkaure ? 390 loveritas 01-Mar-13 01:15
Re: Menkaure ? 425 MJT 01-Mar-13 07:36
A Flight of Fancy 430 loveritas 01-Mar-13 10:50
Re: A Flight of Fancy 354 MJT 01-Mar-13 13:37
Re: A Flight of Fancy 426 loveritas 01-Mar-13 23:09
Re: A Flight of Fancy 385 MJT 02-Mar-13 01:53
Re: A Flight of Fancy 393 loveritas 02-Mar-13 06:54
Re: A Flight of Fancy 338 MJT 02-Mar-13 11:00
Re: A Flight of Fancy 372 loveritas 02-Mar-13 11:26
Re: A Flight of Fancy 380 MJT 02-Mar-13 12:23
Re: A Flight of Fancy 435 loveritas 02-Mar-13 20:57
Re: A Flight of Fancy 415 Scott Creighton 02-Mar-13 21:03
Re: A Flight of Fancy 413 MJT 02-Mar-13 22:52
Re: A Flight of Fancy 356 Thanos5150 03-Mar-13 01:46
Re: A Flight of Fancy 363 MJT 03-Mar-13 02:23
Re: A Flight of Fancy 449 MJT 03-Mar-13 02:38
Re: A Flight of Fancy 397 Thanos5150 03-Mar-13 18:08
Re: A Flight of Fancy 376 MJT 03-Mar-13 19:09
Re: A Flight of Fancy 393 Thanos5150 03-Mar-13 20:20
Re: A Flight of Fancy 335 MJT 08-Mar-13 00:14
Re: A Flight of Fancy 379 Thanos5150 08-Mar-13 05:10
Re: A Flight of Fancy 394 charly 08-Mar-13 19:30
Re: A Flight of Fancy 402 Thanos5150 08-Mar-13 23:18
Re: A Flight of Fancy 386 cladking 08-Mar-13 23:35
Re: A Flight of Fancy 363 Thanos5150 09-Mar-13 06:24
Re: Menkaure ? 364 cladking 01-Mar-13 15:34
Re: Menkaure ? 347 MJT 01-Mar-13 20:41
Re: Menkaure ? 384 cladking 01-Mar-13 21:03
Re: I don't bother to read the post itself. 389 Thunderbird 01-Mar-13 21:48
Re: I don't bother to read the post itself. 395 MJT 01-Mar-13 23:48
Re: I don't bother to read the post itself. 408 Scott Creighton 01-Mar-13 23:55
Re: I don't bother to read the post itself. 394 MJT 02-Mar-13 00:48
Re: I don't bother to read the post itself. 372 Scott Creighton 02-Mar-13 06:16
Re: Menkaure ? 390 Martin Stower 02-Mar-13 15:48
Re: Menkaure ? 371 loveritas 02-Mar-13 21:10
Re: Menkaure ? 354 Scott Creighton 02-Mar-13 21:54
Re: Menkaure ? 392 Martin Stower 04-Mar-13 15:57
Re: Menkaure ? 401 loveritas 04-Mar-13 20:39
Re: Menkaure ? 390 Martin Stower 06-Mar-13 14:45
Re: Menkaure ? 413 loveritas 06-Mar-13 20:22
Re: Menkaure ? 490 Martin Stower 08-Mar-13 18:14
Re: Menkaure ? 381 Scott Creighton 08-Mar-13 18:23
Re: Menkaure ? 394 Martin Stower 08-Mar-13 18:49
Re: Menkaure ? 443 Scott Creighton 08-Mar-13 19:46
Re: Menkaure ? 433 Martin Stower 09-Mar-13 14:20
Re: Menkaure ? 409 Scott Creighton 09-Mar-13 14:43
Re: Menkaure ? 407 Martin Stower 09-Mar-13 15:38
Re: Menkaure ? 411 Scott Creighton 09-Mar-13 15:43
Re: Menkaure ? 390 Martin Stower 09-Mar-13 15:49
Re: Menkaure ? 418 Scott Creighton 09-Mar-13 15:59
Re: Menkaure ? 399 Martin Stower 11-Mar-13 15:29
Re: Menkaure ? 372 Scott Creighton 11-Mar-13 15:48
Re: Menkaure ? 387 Martin Stower 11-Mar-13 18:37
Re: Menkaure ? 358 Scott Creighton 11-Mar-13 18:47
Re: Menkaure ? 403 Martin Stower 11-Mar-13 18:53
Re: Menkaure ? 417 cladking 09-Mar-13 16:40
Re: evidence of the intentions or actions of the builders. 400 Thunderbird 08-Mar-13 19:48
Re: evidence of the intentions or actions of the builders. 358 Martin Stower 09-Mar-13 14:28
Re: ? 342 cladking 08-Mar-13 21:14
Re: ? 305 Martin Stower 09-Mar-13 14:25
Re: Menkaure ? 393 Archae Solenhofen 04-Mar-13 18:27
Re: Menkaure ? 376 loveritas 05-Mar-13 06:52
Re: Menkaure ? 384 Archae Solenhofen 05-Mar-13 19:51
Re: Menkaure ? 391 loveritas 05-Mar-13 20:47
Re: The View 443 Thunderbird 06-Mar-13 21:35
Re: Inconsistency #4 413 Scott Creighton 26-Feb-13 11:40
Re: Inconsistency #4 369 Morten 26-Feb-13 12:30
Re: Inconsistency #4 380 Scott Creighton 26-Feb-13 12:59
Re: Inconsistency #4 367 Morten 26-Feb-13 13:22
Re: Inconsistency #4 352 Scott Creighton 26-Feb-13 14:00
Re: Inconsistency #4 401 Morten 26-Feb-13 20:17
Re: Inconsistency #4 307 Scott Creighton 26-Feb-13 20:19
Re: Inconsistency #4 396 Martin Stower 02-Mar-13 15:21
Re: Inconsistency #4 395 cladking 26-Feb-13 16:11
The phrase hr mr 353 Martin Stower 02-Mar-13 13:53
Re: The phrase hr mr 405 Martin Stower 02-Mar-13 15:15
Re: The phrase hr mr 457 Martin Stower 02-Mar-13 15:34
Re: The phrase hr mr 347 Merrell 02-Mar-13 16:11
Mod Note > Link Edit(s) 428 Dr. Troglodyte 02-Mar-13 16:58
Mod Note > Link Edit(s) - Update 382 Dr. Troglodyte 03-Mar-13 19:26
Re: Mod Note > Link Edit(s) - Update 378 Martin Stower 05-Mar-13 17:12
Re: Mod Note > Link Edit(s) - Update 379 Bobajot 05-Mar-13 18:20
Re: Mod Note > Link Edit(s) - Update 384 Martin Stower 05-Mar-13 18:23
Re: The phrase hr mr 385 Morten 02-Mar-13 16:06


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.