Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Scott Creighton wrote:

> SC: And I’ll be bumping these gums of mine for a long time to
> come. Look out for my next book, 'Ark of the Gods' - gives a
> bit more info on those old Belzoni bull bones. I'm sure you'll
> hate it.

Not that you’re showing here and elsewhere in your post any sign of ego-involvement.

If you know all about the bones, then why tell readers of this board that it was “plain old earth”? (But I see that you’ve mentioned the bones elsewhere.)

The one thing you could find which would be of interest is that the bones are extant and have been dated. Robert Bauval looked into this, without result. Did you get further? Go on, you old tease, tell us.

> SC: If you want real knowledge then that comes from REAL
> EVIDENCE like the evidence that was actually found in the stone
> box of G2 and not the theorized evidence that Belzoni and you
> imagine musta

Musta?

> been there. To quote you again:

Let’s not quote me again.

> SC: Nothing strange about it. There is very much a growing
> consensus from alternative thinkers that the one thing this
> broad church can agree on is that consensus Egyptology is wrong

[snip]

See what I mean. Consensus is good, when it suits you.

> SC: No – I am advancing a theory that actually has some
> empirical evidence to support it.

Proving if proof were needed that your views on theory and evidence remain as primitive and rhetoric-laden as before.

> SC: It has been ASSUMED by Belzoni and every Egyptologist and
> Egypt-apologist since that the body of the king musta

[snip]

Musta?

Yada yada ya. Same tired old rhetoric.

Look what happens when there really is a case for things having been found exactly as the builders left them, as with the “graffiti” found by Vyse. The sainted consensus of “alternative thinkers” bends over backwards to deny it. Pardon my being unimpressed.

What this has to do with Menkaure escapes me.

M.


Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Inconsistencies 1593 Morten 25-Feb-13 08:44
Re: Inconsistencies 390 Scott Creighton 25-Feb-13 12:31
Re: Inconsistencies 343 Bobajot 25-Feb-13 12:47
Re: Inconsistencies 373 Scott Creighton 25-Feb-13 12:53
Re: Inconsistencies 325 Bobajot 26-Feb-13 00:14
Re: Inconsistencies 381 Titus Livius 26-Feb-13 10:46
Re: Inconsistencies 413 Morten 26-Feb-13 11:10
Re: Inconsistencies 420 Titus Livius 26-Feb-13 16:39
Re: Inconsistencies 322 cladking 26-Feb-13 16:52
Re: Inconsistencies 381 Mr.Ward 27-Feb-13 14:08
Re: Inconsistencies 369 Archae Solenhofen 28-Feb-13 04:19
Re: Inconsistencies 667 Scott Creighton 28-Feb-13 10:26
Re: Inconsistencies 420 Thanos5150 28-Feb-13 19:21
Re: Inconsistencies 453 Archae Solenhofen 28-Feb-13 22:17
Re: Inconsistencies 346 WoDoJo 03-Mar-13 22:47
Inconsistency #2 and #3 342 Morten 25-Feb-13 15:22
Re: Inconsistency #2 and #3 305 cladking 25-Feb-13 16:02
Re: Inconsistency #2 and #3 343 Morten 25-Feb-13 19:57
Re: Inconsistency #2 and #3 370 Scott Creighton 25-Feb-13 16:11
Re: Inconsistency #2 and #3 364 Thunderbird 25-Feb-13 17:52
Re: Inconsistency #2 and #3 361 Scott Creighton 25-Feb-13 18:32
A Further Question 307 loveritas 26-Feb-13 01:41
Let's Try A Third Time 328 loveritas 28-Feb-13 12:30
Re: Let's Try A Third Time 337 Scott Creighton 28-Feb-13 12:56
Re: Let's Try A Third Time 373 loveritas 28-Feb-13 20:53
Re: Let's Try A Third Time 349 Scott Creighton 28-Feb-13 21:08
Re: Let's Try A Third Time 356 loveritas 28-Feb-13 21:26
Re: Let's Try A Third Time 354 Scott Creighton 28-Feb-13 21:39
This Is the Table 383 loveritas 28-Feb-13 23:18
Re: This Is the Table 339 Scott Creighton 01-Mar-13 13:08
Re: This Is the Table 373 loveritas 01-Mar-13 23:15
Re: This Is the Table 342 Scott Creighton 01-Mar-13 23:48
Re: Inconsistency #2 and #3 367 Morten 25-Feb-13 19:50
Re: Inconsistency #2 and #3 333 Scott Creighton 25-Feb-13 20:10
Re: Inconsistency #2 and #3 374 Morten 25-Feb-13 21:04
Re: The Western Flowing Nile 401 Thunderbird 25-Feb-13 21:55
Re: The Western Flowing Nile 394 Morten 25-Feb-13 22:19
Re: The Western Flowing Nile 500 cladking 25-Feb-13 23:15
Re: The Western Flowing Nile 537 Thunderbird 26-Feb-13 03:43
Re: The Western Flowing Nile 408 cladking 26-Feb-13 04:29
Re: The Great Rift..... 300 Thunderbird 26-Feb-13 05:08
Re: The Great Rift..... 410 cladking 26-Feb-13 05:22
Re: The Western Flowing Nile 336 loveritas 26-Feb-13 06:04
Re: The Western Flowing Nile 355 cladking 26-Feb-13 16:28
Re: Cladking/Lover 359 Thunderbird 26-Feb-13 22:38
Re: Cladking/Lover 337 cladking 27-Feb-13 01:56
Re: Inconsistency #2 and #3 335 MJT 25-Feb-13 22:31
Re: Inconsistency #2 and #3 358 Morten 25-Feb-13 23:11
Re: Inconsistency #2 and #3 351 Scott Creighton 26-Feb-13 11:40
Re: Inconsistency #2 and #3 352 Morten 26-Feb-13 12:00
Re: Inconsistency #2 and #3 357 Scott Creighton 26-Feb-13 12:59
Re: Inconsistency #2 and #3 376 Morten 26-Feb-13 13:33
Re: Inconsistency #2 and #3 382 Scott Creighton 26-Feb-13 13:58
Re: Inconsistency #2 and #3 353 Morten 26-Feb-13 20:00
Re: Inconsistency #2 and #3 326 Scott Creighton 26-Feb-13 20:16
Re: Inconsistency #2 and #3 378 Spiros 26-Feb-13 21:27
Re: Inconsistency #2 and #3 418 Morten 26-Feb-13 21:53
Re: Inconsistency #2 and #3 349 Scott Creighton 26-Feb-13 22:44
Re: Inconsistency #2 and #3 432 Thanos5150 27-Feb-13 00:58
Re: Inconsistency #2 and #3 314 Scott Creighton 27-Feb-13 11:16
Re: Inconsistency #2 and #3 339 Morten 02-Mar-13 16:32
Re: Inconsistency #2 and #3 368 Scott Creighton 02-Mar-13 20:27
Re: Inconsistency #2 and #3 347 Morten 02-Mar-13 22:02
Re: Inconsistency #2 and #3 339 Scott Creighton 02-Mar-13 22:10
Re: Inconsistency #2 and #3 369 MJT 02-Mar-13 23:27
Re: Inconsistency #2 and #3 269 Scott Creighton 03-Mar-13 09:44
Re: Inconsistency #2 and #3 362 Morten 03-Mar-13 04:26
Re: Inconsistency #2 and #3 337 Scott Creighton 03-Mar-13 10:01
Re: Inconsistency #2 and #3 354 Morten 03-Mar-13 20:53
Re: Inconsistency #2 and #3 374 Scott Creighton 04-Mar-13 00:53
Re: Inconsistency #2 and #3 350 MJT 04-Mar-13 02:00
Re: Inconsistency #2 and #3 370 Scott Creighton 04-Mar-13 10:35
Re: Why allways....thru the eye's of the Egyptologist 356 Thunderbird 03-Mar-13 02:58
Re: Inconsistency #2 and #3 373 Thunderbird 25-Feb-13 20:39
Inconsistency #4 363 Morten 26-Feb-13 08:23
Menkaure ? 350 loveritas 26-Feb-13 11:04
Re: Menkaure ? 322 Morten 26-Feb-13 11:40
Re: Menkaure ? 377 loveritas 26-Feb-13 20:56
Re: Menkaure ? 319 MJT 26-Feb-13 22:38
Re: Menkaure ? 363 loveritas 26-Feb-13 22:58
Re: Menkaure ? 336 MJT 27-Feb-13 00:05
Re: Menkaure ? 318 loveritas 27-Feb-13 01:33
Re: Menkaure ? 372 MJT 28-Feb-13 17:25
Re: Menkaure ? 328 cladking 28-Feb-13 17:35
Re: Menkaure ? 381 MJT 28-Feb-13 17:54
Re: Menkaure ? 366 cladking 28-Feb-13 21:50
Re: Menkaure ? 385 loveritas 28-Feb-13 20:58
Re: Menkaure ? 381 MJT 28-Feb-13 22:05
Re: Menkaure ? 355 loveritas 28-Feb-13 23:28
Re: Menkaure ? 352 MJT 01-Mar-13 00:44
Re: Menkaure ? 367 loveritas 01-Mar-13 01:15
Re: Menkaure ? 407 MJT 01-Mar-13 07:36
A Flight of Fancy 397 loveritas 01-Mar-13 10:50
Re: A Flight of Fancy 337 MJT 01-Mar-13 13:37
Re: A Flight of Fancy 403 loveritas 01-Mar-13 23:09
Re: A Flight of Fancy 363 MJT 02-Mar-13 01:53
Re: A Flight of Fancy 373 loveritas 02-Mar-13 06:54
Re: A Flight of Fancy 320 MJT 02-Mar-13 11:00
Re: A Flight of Fancy 353 loveritas 02-Mar-13 11:26
Re: A Flight of Fancy 359 MJT 02-Mar-13 12:23
Re: A Flight of Fancy 415 loveritas 02-Mar-13 20:57
Re: A Flight of Fancy 369 Scott Creighton 02-Mar-13 21:03
Re: A Flight of Fancy 383 MJT 02-Mar-13 22:52
Re: A Flight of Fancy 339 Thanos5150 03-Mar-13 01:46
Re: A Flight of Fancy 342 MJT 03-Mar-13 02:23
Re: A Flight of Fancy 419 MJT 03-Mar-13 02:38
Re: A Flight of Fancy 378 Thanos5150 03-Mar-13 18:08
Re: A Flight of Fancy 357 MJT 03-Mar-13 19:09
Re: A Flight of Fancy 368 Thanos5150 03-Mar-13 20:20
Re: A Flight of Fancy 316 MJT 08-Mar-13 00:14
Re: A Flight of Fancy 352 Thanos5150 08-Mar-13 05:10
Re: A Flight of Fancy 373 charly 08-Mar-13 19:30
Re: A Flight of Fancy 378 Thanos5150 08-Mar-13 23:18
Re: A Flight of Fancy 370 cladking 08-Mar-13 23:35
Re: A Flight of Fancy 346 Thanos5150 09-Mar-13 06:24
Re: Menkaure ? 342 cladking 01-Mar-13 15:34
Re: Menkaure ? 331 MJT 01-Mar-13 20:41
Re: Menkaure ? 351 cladking 01-Mar-13 21:03
Re: I don't bother to read the post itself. 373 Thunderbird 01-Mar-13 21:48
Re: I don't bother to read the post itself. 365 MJT 01-Mar-13 23:48
Re: I don't bother to read the post itself. 387 Scott Creighton 01-Mar-13 23:55
Re: I don't bother to read the post itself. 377 MJT 02-Mar-13 00:48
Re: I don't bother to read the post itself. 354 Scott Creighton 02-Mar-13 06:16
Re: Menkaure ? 373 Martin Stower 02-Mar-13 15:48
Re: Menkaure ? 357 loveritas 02-Mar-13 21:10
Re: Menkaure ? 326 Scott Creighton 02-Mar-13 21:54
Re: Menkaure ? 376 Martin Stower 04-Mar-13 15:57
Re: Menkaure ? 380 loveritas 04-Mar-13 20:39
Re: Menkaure ? 372 Martin Stower 06-Mar-13 14:45
Re: Menkaure ? 394 loveritas 06-Mar-13 20:22
Re: Menkaure ? 444 Martin Stower 08-Mar-13 18:14
Re: Menkaure ? 363 Scott Creighton 08-Mar-13 18:23
Re: Menkaure ? 373 Martin Stower 08-Mar-13 18:49
Re: Menkaure ? 411 Scott Creighton 08-Mar-13 19:46
Re: Menkaure ? 413 Martin Stower 09-Mar-13 14:20
Re: Menkaure ? 390 Scott Creighton 09-Mar-13 14:43
Re: Menkaure ? 378 Martin Stower 09-Mar-13 15:38
Re: Menkaure ? 390 Scott Creighton 09-Mar-13 15:43
Re: Menkaure ? 370 Martin Stower 09-Mar-13 15:49
Re: Menkaure ? 383 Scott Creighton 09-Mar-13 15:59
Re: Menkaure ? 379 Martin Stower 11-Mar-13 15:29
Re: Menkaure ? 353 Scott Creighton 11-Mar-13 15:48
Re: Menkaure ? 371 Martin Stower 11-Mar-13 18:37
Re: Menkaure ? 341 Scott Creighton 11-Mar-13 18:47
Re: Menkaure ? 387 Martin Stower 11-Mar-13 18:53
Re: Menkaure ? 399 cladking 09-Mar-13 16:40
Re: evidence of the intentions or actions of the builders. 378 Thunderbird 08-Mar-13 19:48
Re: evidence of the intentions or actions of the builders. 319 Martin Stower 09-Mar-13 14:28
Re: ? 325 cladking 08-Mar-13 21:14
Re: ? 285 Martin Stower 09-Mar-13 14:25
Re: Menkaure ? 361 Archae Solenhofen 04-Mar-13 18:27
Re: Menkaure ? 360 loveritas 05-Mar-13 06:52
Re: Menkaure ? 366 Archae Solenhofen 05-Mar-13 19:51
Re: Menkaure ? 372 loveritas 05-Mar-13 20:47
Re: The View 425 Thunderbird 06-Mar-13 21:35
Re: Inconsistency #4 374 Scott Creighton 26-Feb-13 11:40
Re: Inconsistency #4 351 Morten 26-Feb-13 12:30
Re: Inconsistency #4 362 Scott Creighton 26-Feb-13 12:59
Re: Inconsistency #4 339 Morten 26-Feb-13 13:22
Re: Inconsistency #4 332 Scott Creighton 26-Feb-13 14:00
Re: Inconsistency #4 372 Morten 26-Feb-13 20:17
Re: Inconsistency #4 289 Scott Creighton 26-Feb-13 20:19
Re: Inconsistency #4 376 Martin Stower 02-Mar-13 15:21
Re: Inconsistency #4 374 cladking 26-Feb-13 16:11
The phrase hr mr 324 Martin Stower 02-Mar-13 13:53
Re: The phrase hr mr 372 Martin Stower 02-Mar-13 15:15
Re: The phrase hr mr 439 Martin Stower 02-Mar-13 15:34
Re: The phrase hr mr 321 Merrell 02-Mar-13 16:11
Mod Note > Link Edit(s) 389 Dr. Troglodyte 02-Mar-13 16:58
Mod Note > Link Edit(s) - Update 365 Dr. Troglodyte 03-Mar-13 19:26
Re: Mod Note > Link Edit(s) - Update 362 Martin Stower 05-Mar-13 17:12
Re: Mod Note > Link Edit(s) - Update 362 Bobajot 05-Mar-13 18:20
Re: Mod Note > Link Edit(s) - Update 360 Martin Stower 05-Mar-13 18:23
Re: The phrase hr mr 360 Morten 02-Mar-13 16:06


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.