wordsmyth wrote:

> So much for Stocks, I guess...

I am not very impressed with Stocks either, though I commend him for the effort, but a lot of what he shows is so untenable to the greater picture he ends up proving himself wrong. It takes 14hrs to cut 1.2" on granite with a copper saw using abrasives and this means what? Isn't it logical that because this method is so pathetic that this was actually NOT how it was done? Stock's work reminds me of the Nova pyramid building experiment that was so woefully inadequate to the whole yet in spite itself still held up as proof of how it was done yet it actually only accomplished the exact opposite.