Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Archae Solenhofen wrote:

> Moores (1991) presents evidence that they were used at Giza
> from the tool marks on the basalt pavement.

He presents a theory from the marks to match the saw he invented for them. There is evidence of saw marks but not his saw. These saws would certainly have been quite the spectacle with saw overseers and the like. No carvings, paintings, titles, or evidence of the saw itself or the workers? I'm not saying they couldn't have had a saw as he envisions, but you are stating it as point of fact when it simply is not, and the point is that it does not explain the different kinds of cuts that are seen as I said.

> Why is it unlikely.....

For a corner cut to have been made with a pendulum drag saw?

> A drag saw blade shaped like the curve of a circle on a single
> pendulum could produce curricular arcs too when drawn back and
> forth........ Hey, I am not against small hand-powered circular
> saws, it's a pretty simple concept...... it's the absurd 11
> meter in diameter pyramid-powered ones of Dunn (2008) that I
> have a problem with. That is what that second image you posted
> is trying to suggest..... since it is from that article.

Come on Archae. Be honest with yourself. When you ignore the obvious just to save face so you can debunk anything and everything it doesn't make you seem very intellectually honest. Those cuts are made from a circular saw as is what is seen at Abu Roash. Instead of pretending it didn't exist why not figure out how it did? A circular wet saw solves a lot of problems, as does hand powered circular grinding wheels, and is a very simple concept so there shouldn't be much of a hang up about it. I am not part of the Dunn discussion-I just saw that you presented the lamest pictures possible to prove your point and offered a more honest alternative so that a real discussion could be had.

> So...... 10 years of work on granite casing stone (they would
> work on stone casing procurement and dressing while the pyramid
> was being built) yields 30 blocks one meter cubed for the
> first-time amateur team that never improves. Do you really
> think the multible teams of workers were not better trained and
> better skilled than Stocks (2001) was?

Of course-so it only took the Egyptians 1 month to cut one block with a copper saw instead of 4 months? Absurd. Replace copper with bronze and it at least makes a little more sense. I don't understand the insistence at every turn of imposing the most impractical means on the AE requiring the most amount of effort when it is completely unnecessary to do so given we already know they used bronze and had the wheel. The number one thought on any craftsman's mind is to find the right tool for the job to eliminate as much unnecessary effort as possible while maximizing proficiency for the task which is the opposite of what is being imposed on the Egyptians whom we know were highly intelligent and innovative. I really don't see what the big deal is about a circular saw especially considering that is what the saw marks require.

> Other than hollowing sarcophagi, door sockets, and a few other
> tasks the coring of granite and other hardrocks was not that
> widely used in masonry. It was used mostly in stone vessel
> manufacturing.

So, because it wasn't used much it was ok to be as inefficient and time consuming as possible by insisting on using the worst material possible for job?

> Where does he claim this because in Lehner (1997 p211) he
> states hundred to thousand were needed to finely dress the Tura
> limestone casing on the 4th dynasty pyramids (copper and copper
> alloy chisels don't work on granite)? The vast majority of the
> core limestone masonry is not finely dressed so chisels were
> not much used there either.......

I thought this is what he said on a recent Nova special regarding carving the Sphinx. I believe he said millions but I reduced it to hundreds of thousands so I guess I misquoted him.

Pounding stones are even more inefficient not to mention back breaking labor. They obviously used pounders, but I find it hard to believe they would have used them to a fraction of the extent that would have been required in lieu of other tools better suited for the task.

Copper and copper alloy chisels don't work on granite and yet there is Stocks and Moores telling us they used copper drills and saws?

> >we are to add hundreds if not thousands of 13ft copper saws
> >to this total?
>
> So....... it's not like it was a wasted.

But the point is that they would have needed too much of it. And the wood constantly reshape them.

> The technological level to produce them was know and the marks
> they produce are evidenced on artifact, after artifact, after
> artifact. It is pretty clear that the coring drill arose out of
> stone mace and vessel manufacturing that was going on for about
> 500-1000 year before the Great Pyramids was built.

But once again the tool itself is nowhere to be found which is the point-the tools are gone.

> >And why is it the carpentry tool kit is present since
> >pre-dynastic times in relative abundance either physically or
> >pictorially, and yet this same tool kit Egyptologists modify
> to
> >try and impose on stone working is nowhere to be found?
>
> Some of it is..... for example the hieroglyphic symbol for
> "craft/art" during the Old Kingdom is a stone boring tool
> (Stocks 1993).

So basically none of it is, like I said. And this is for bead, vase making, and the like is it not and has nothing to do with construction stone masonry.

> No, it's based on the fact that the ancient Egyptian understood
> what a saw was and the hieroglyphic above indicated that they
> understood that rock could be cut by grinding...... it's not
> that much of a leap to imaging they had the intellect to put
> these 2 simple concepts together to produce the cut rocks with
> tool marks that are completely consistent with such.

So, they have the intellect to support the use of the tools you want them to use despite the fact they were not invented in China for several hundred years later, but not the intellect to use the tools you don't want them to use? None of these tools have been found and regardless are not indicative of what is seen in many of the saw marks.

> It's not all missing a lot of the other less expensive tools
> are still around.... At least the ancient Egyptians understood
> what saws and drills were and how to make copper and bronze
> tools during the 4th dynasty. There is absolutely no evidence
> other than the blocks themselves that 11 m in diameter
> mega-saws, powered by the pyramid, and made of advance metals
> ever existed at all...... absolutely nothing.

Where did I say anything about these tools being "powered by the pyramid"? In fact you quote me directly below where I clearly state I do not support the use of "power tools"? Is bronze or iron an "advanced metal"? I'm not going to argue with you about something that is not my argument again so if this is what you are all about all the time I guess the best thing to do is just ignore you. But regardless, by your own admission other than the marks on the block there is no evidence for the circular saw but there is also no evidence for your pendulum or bow saw either other than the cuts so what is your point? Yes, they understood drills and saws and they also understood the wheel. If these cuts were made by a circular saw then that is what it was. Not that difficult all things considered.

> There are known bronze and arsenic copper alloy tools and other
> artifacts from the Old Kingdom, and a depiction of a wheeled
> scaling ladder (with axle) from the 5th dynasty as well.

But they say all they used were copper tools and did not use the wheel or beasts of burden.....

> No one believes what Petrie claimed in his early book in this
> regards and since he never claimed that again, even in his
> other books on rock worked objects, one would think he no
> longer did either. Petrie makes a number of other claims in
> that early book in regards to worked rocks, some of them are
> not correct......

No one? You mean no pseudoskeptic.

Let's see what Petrie says:

"The methods employed by the Egyptians in cutting the hard stones which they so frequently worked, have long remained undetermined. Various suggestions have been made, some very impractical; but no actual proofs of the tools employed, or the manner of using them, have been obtained..."

"The typical method of working hard stones - such as granite, diorite, basalt, etc.- was by means of bronze tools; these were set with cutting points, far harder than the quartz which was operated on. The material of these cutting points is yet undetermined; but only five substances are possible - beryl, topaz, chrysoberyl, corindum or sapphire, and diamond. The character of the work would certainly seem to point to diamond as being the cutting jewel; and only the considerations of its rarity in general,...interfer with this conclusion."

" Many nations,..., are in the habit of cutting hard materials by mean of a soft substance (as copper, wood, horn etc.), with a hard powder applied to it; the powder sticks in the basis employed, and this being scraped over the stone to be cut, so wears it away. Many persons have therefore very readily assumed(as I myself did at first) that this method must necessarily have been used by the Egyptians; and that it would suffice to produce all the examples now collected. Such, however, is far from being the case; though no doubt in alabastar, and other soft stones, this method was employed."

"That the Egyptians were acquainted with a cutting jewel far harder than quartz, and that they used this jewel as a sharp pointed graver, is put beyond doubt by the diorite bowls with inscriptions of the fourth dynasty, of which I found fragments at Gizeh; as well as the scratches on polished granite of Ptolemaic age at San. The hieroglyphs are incised, with a very fre-cutting point; they are not scraped or ground out, but are ploughed through the diorite, with rough edges to the line. As the lines are only 1/150 inch wide (the figures being about .2 long), it is evidence that the cutting point must have been much harder than quartz; and tough enough not to splinter when so fine an edge was being employed, probably only 1/200 inch wide. Parallel lines are graved only 1/30 inch apart from centre to centre."

"We therefore need have no hesitation in allowing that the graving out of lines in hard stones by jewel points, was a well known art. And when we find on the surfaces of the saw-cuts in diorite, grooves as deep as 1/100 inch, it appears far more likely that such were produced by fixed jewel points in the saw, than by any fortuitous rubbing about of a loose powder. And when, further, it is seen that these deep grooves are almost always regular and uniform in depth, and equidistant, their production by the successive cuts of the jewel teeth of a saw appears to be beyond question..."

"That the blades of the saw were of bronze, we know from the green staining on the sides of the saw cuts, and on grains of sand left in a saw cut.
The forms of the tools were straight saws, circular saws, tubular drills, and lathes.
The straight saws varied from .03 to .2 inch thick, according to the work; the largest were 8 feet or more in length..." "...No. 6, a slice of diorite bearing equidistant and regular grooves of circular arcs, parallel to one another; these grooves have been nearly polished out by cross grinding, but are still visible. The only feasible explanation of this piece is that it was produced by a circular saw."

"These tubular drills vary in thickness from 1/4 inch to 5 inches in diameter, and from 1/30 to 1/5 inch thick. The smallest hole yet found in granite is 2 inch diameter."

"At El Bersheh... there is a still larger example, where a platform of limestone rock has been dressed down, by cutting it away with tube drills about 18 inches diameter; the circular grooves occasionally intersecting, prove that it was done merely to remove the rock."

"...the lathe appears to have been as familiar an instrument in the fourth dynasty, as it is in the modern workshops. The diorite bowls and vases of the Old Kingdom are frequently met with, and show great technical skill. One piece found at Gizeh, No 14, shows that the method employed was true turning, and not any process of grinding, since the bowl has been knocked off of its centring, recentred imperfectly, and the old turning not quite turned out; thus there are two surfaces belonging to different centrings, and meeting in a cusp. Such an appearance could not be produced by any grinding or rubbing process which pressed on the surface. Another detail is shown by fragment No 15; here the curves of the bowl are spherical, and must have therefore been cut by a tool sweeping an arc from a fixed centre while the bowl rotated. This centre or hinging of the tool was in the axis of the lathe for the general surface of the bowl, right up to the edge of it; but as a lip was wanted, the centring of the tool was shifted, but with exactly the same radius of its arc, and a fresh cut made to leave a lip to the bowl. That this was certainly not a chance result of hand-work is shown, not only by the exact circularity of the curves, and their equality, but also by the cusp left where they meet. This has not been at all rounded off, as would certainly be the case in hand-work, and it is clear proof of the rigidly mechanical method of striking the curves."

Sounds reasonable enough to me. I'm sticking with Petrie on this one.

> Pounded quartz..... how is that suppose to work?

Coating the blade. Just spitballing as an alternative to "jewels".

> Bronze may help a bit with the limestone chisels.

Just a "bit"? If Lehner shows you get 5-10 minutes chisel time on limestone per copper chisel then how many copper chisels does one bronze chisel replace? And wood to heat the furnace to make and constantly them?

>Lapidary saws
> work well with copper, it's an ideal lapping material still
> used today. Do you really think that extreme added expense is
> going to help that much here? Remember, it's not the metal that
> does the cutting it's the abrasive that the metal drags along
> with it that does.

Does it look like the AE were too worried about the "extreme added expense" to you? And this isn't just one construction job we are talking about but hundreds of years of monumental stone working before this technology supposedly appears around 2000BC. All things considered this is a wise if not required investment and in the long run would save an infinite amount of "expense". They imported the finest most expensive cedar wood boats yet couldn't cough up the extra dough for some bronze to haul back on these boats from the people they were already trading with who had bronze knowing full well it would make their job of monumental stone working infinitely easier? Come on. The Egyptians were notorious for taking the technologies of others and making them better so it stands to reason they easily understood the value and potential of bronze which would have been pennies on the dollar compared to manufacturing and maintaining copper tools alone. And how is it more expensive to import say, 1000 bronze chisels (or the raw material to make them) than it is to mine, forge, and gather the tons of wood (in a desert) to make 10,000 copper ones? Figure 9 [www.oocities.org] you show a bronze chisel found at Medum that the placard says "was probably lost by workmen of Rameses II when stripping the pyramid", but why Rameses II? Just because its bronze? Maybe it was used by the workers at Medum and is an example of one of these "lost" tools. And concerning abrasive materials, this obviously accomplishes next to nothing as Stocks has plainly shown. All it does is make the copper able to be used at all but its still absurdly inefficient if the tool is copper.

> They are not..... since stone precaution tools can be used for
> most of the rough dressing of rocks (and in some cases fine
> dressing...... this has been shown by a number of experimental
> researchers such as Stock (2003) and Zuber (1956). The chisels
> were mostly used for fine dressing of limestone.

But they are. Insisting on pounders and copper implements alone with no wheel or beasts of burden is untenable and the simple fact is they didn't have to and must have used more efficient tools and methods.

> >How many copper chisels does one bronze chisel replace? 10?
> >100? 1000?

Seriously-how many? I would be interested to know.

> It's called a flint pecking hammer (its a simple version of the
> modern bush hammer used in stone carving) and the AEs used that
> simple but effective tool as well as others to finely carve
> statues, hieroglyphics. etc..

What does a flint pecking hammer have to do with replacing copper tools with bronze, the wheel, or beasts of burden?

> I suggest you read Nicholson & Shaw (2000) it will help you
> fine tune your common sense since it discusses in considerable
> detail the material and technologies known to the ancient
> Egyptian civilization.
>
> Nicholson, P.T. & Shaw, I. (2000) Ancient Egyptian materials
> and techniques. Cambridge University Press, New York, 702 p.

You mean like on p.7 where they talk about the uncertainty of the tools used and the problems with the theory of copper chisels and the controversy surrounding what tools were used for the extraction of granite and other hard stones, and that there is evidence of some form of pick axe among other now missing tools?



Post Edited (23-Feb-13 21:24)

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 1601 Richard Fusniak 04-Jan-13 20:02
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 343 Citizen Attorney 05-Jan-13 00:24
Debunker debunked? 386 drrayeye 05-Jan-13 05:15
Aliens is making people re-evaluate certain paradigms 463 Ratcho 05-Jan-13 06:22
How is it possible? 351 gulsbo 05-Jan-13 16:16
Entertainment industry rules OK; thumbs down to education 301 Richard Fusniak 05-Jan-13 16:57
Re: Entertainment industry rules OK; thumbs down to education 411 gulsbo 06-Jan-13 08:03
Re: Entertainment industry rules OK; thumbs down to education 359 Richard Fusniak 06-Jan-13 08:59
Re: Entertainment industry rules OK; thumbs down to education 368 gulsbo 07-Jan-13 21:07
Re: Entertainment industry rules OK; thumbs down to education 403 Richard Fusniak 08-Jan-13 00:36
Fuzzy 311 Dan Mc F 08-Jan-13 12:49
Re: Fuzzy 381 Richard Fusniak 08-Jan-13 13:12
Re: Entertainment industry rules OK; thumbs down to education 313 gulsbo 09-Jan-13 21:36
Re: Smithsonian never lies.... 520 Thunderbird 23-Mar-13 03:39
who said aliens 360 Citizen Attorney 05-Jan-13 16:42
Re: who said aliens 358 David L 05-Jan-13 17:42
Re: who said aliens 403 Citizen Attorney 05-Jan-13 21:23
Agreed 382 NetWorkAngel 05-Jan-13 22:05
Re: Agreed 345 Citizen Attorney 06-Jan-13 19:16
Re: who said aliens 386 David L 07-Jan-13 01:16
Re: who said aliens 425 Thanos5150 06-Jan-13 18:38
Re: who said aliens 332 Citizen Attorney 06-Jan-13 19:17
Re: who said aliens 426 Thanos5150 06-Jan-13 22:45
Ancient Aliens' Debunked - Review 709 Thanos5150 07-Jan-13 02:23
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 396 MJT 08-Jan-13 13:58
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 383 Susan Doris 08-Jan-13 14:33
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 401 Richard Fusniak 08-Jan-13 15:19
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 434 Bobajot 10-Jan-13 04:01
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 428 wordsmyth 13-Jan-13 03:26
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 368 Archae Solenhofen 13-Jan-13 04:53
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 366 wordsmyth 15-Jan-13 01:44
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 406 richarddullum 15-Jan-13 03:28
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 338 wordsmyth 15-Jan-13 07:12
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 385 michael seabrook 15-Jan-13 10:48
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 405 Merrell 15-Jan-13 10:55
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 421 Archae Solenhofen 15-Jan-13 05:21
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 448 wordsmyth 15-Jan-13 08:24
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 363 Merrell 15-Jan-13 09:55
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 426 wordsmyth 15-Jan-13 10:26
Re: Archae Solenhofen = "Ancient Limestone" 435 Thanos5150 15-Jan-13 17:39
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 420 Archae Solenhofen 15-Jan-13 19:09
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 389 wordsmyth 15-Jan-13 22:26
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 357 Archae Solenhofen 16-Jan-13 03:29
Re: So...its very time consuming 348 Thunderbird 16-Jan-13 05:22
Re: So...its very time consuming 377 wordsmyth 16-Jan-13 06:32
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 433 Thunderbird 15-Jan-13 18:30
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 362 Martin Stower 23-Feb-13 15:38
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 335 wordsmyth 23-Feb-13 22:10
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 442 Thanos5150 24-Feb-13 00:33
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 407 wordsmyth 24-Feb-13 03:42
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 361 Thanos5150 24-Feb-13 06:16
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 367 wordsmyth 24-Feb-13 22:48
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 375 Scott Creighton 24-Feb-13 20:05
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 412 wordsmyth 24-Feb-13 22:36
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 382 Ratcho 24-Feb-13 22:49
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 399 Thanos5150 24-Feb-13 23:50
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 370 Scott Creighton 25-Feb-13 00:18
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 457 Martin Stower 25-Feb-13 17:57
Re: desperation.... 413 Thunderbird 25-Feb-13 21:20
Re: desperation.... 335 Martin Stower 26-Feb-13 15:47
Re: Khufu cartouche Cambell's chamber 437 Thunderbird 18-Mar-13 17:33
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 378 wordsmyth 25-Feb-13 22:25
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 378 Martin Stower 26-Feb-13 15:59
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 372 wordsmyth 26-Feb-13 21:41
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 391 Thanos5150 26-Feb-13 18:57
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 399 Martin Stower 27-Feb-13 18:46
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 313 Thanos5150 27-Feb-13 21:26
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 386 Martin Stower 28-Feb-13 16:57
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 363 Thanos5150 28-Feb-13 17:19
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 368 Martin Stower 28-Feb-13 18:08
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 400 Merrell 28-Feb-13 09:33
Re: Can we seriously believe that Alford has a clue.... 388 Thunderbird 25-Feb-13 16:41
Re: Can we seriously believe that Alford has a clue.... 431 Martin Stower 25-Feb-13 18:29
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 391 Archae Solenhofen 15-Jan-13 18:41
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 364 Thanos5150 15-Jan-13 22:13
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 359 Archae Solenhofen 15-Jan-13 22:44
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 442 Thanos5150 16-Jan-13 04:40
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 357 Archae Solenhofen 16-Jan-13 06:02
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 399 Thanos5150 16-Jan-13 06:54
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 419 Archae Solenhofen 16-Jan-13 09:09
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 365 Thanos5150 16-Jan-13 17:52
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 394 Archae Solenhofen 16-Jan-13 20:21
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 410 Thanos5150 16-Jan-13 21:21
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 312 Archae Solenhofen 17-Jan-13 04:57
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 395 Thanos5150 17-Jan-13 05:42
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 389 Archae Solenhofen 17-Jan-13 07:05
Fingerprints 1996 - 200 ton blocks 470 Merrell 17-Jan-13 11:22
Re: Fingerprints 1996 - 200 ton blocks 339 Archae Solenhofen 17-Jan-13 16:18
Re: Fingerprints 1996 - 200 ton blocks 365 Merrell 17-Jan-13 16:39
Re: Fingerprints 1996 - 200 ton blocks 389 Archae Solenhofen 17-Jan-13 17:44
Re: Fingerprints 1996 - 200 ton blocks 230 Archae Solenhofen 17-Jan-13 22:41
Re: Fingerprints 1996 - 200 ton blocks 398 Merrell 17-Jan-13 23:38
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 423 Thanos5150 17-Jan-13 23:46
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 392 wordsmyth 18-Jan-13 03:45
Mod Warning #2 > wordsmyth – Name-calling 431 Dr. Troglodyte 18-Jan-13 15:12
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 383 Archae Solenhofen 18-Jan-13 03:57
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 364 Thanos5150 18-Jan-13 05:32
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 300 Archae Solenhofen 18-Jan-13 06:04
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 337 Thanos5150 18-Jan-13 06:40
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 360 Archae Solenhofen 18-Jan-13 07:31
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 370 Thanos5150 18-Jan-13 18:02
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 270 Archae Solenhofen 18-Jan-13 18:19
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 357 Bobajot 20-Jan-13 02:08
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 351 Archae Solenhofen 20-Jan-13 03:16
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 408 Susan Doris 03-Feb-13 06:49
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 408 Thanos5150 05-Feb-13 20:00
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 414 Susan Doris 06-Feb-13 06:50
Mod Caution > Language Edit - Thanos5150 375 Dr. Troglodyte 16-Jan-13 20:39
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 329 David L 18-Jan-13 15:40
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 397 Thanos5150 18-Jan-13 17:59
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 379 wordsmyth 16-Jan-13 06:30
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 402 Thanos5150 16-Jan-13 07:03
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 364 richarddullum 17-Jan-13 03:42
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 375 Archae Solenhofen 17-Jan-13 05:10
Mod Caution > Language Edit - wordsmyth 391 Dr. Troglodyte 16-Jan-13 00:30
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 394 wordsmyth 15-Jan-13 22:23
Mod Warning #1 > wordsmyth 414 Dr. Troglodyte 16-Jan-13 00:44
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 352 Archae Solenhofen 16-Jan-13 03:11
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 371 wordsmyth 16-Jan-13 05:56
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 376 Archae Solenhofen 16-Jan-13 08:06
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 361 cladking 16-Jan-13 15:54
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 389 Archae Solenhofen 16-Jan-13 17:11
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 388 cladking 16-Jan-13 17:40
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 384 Archae Solenhofen 16-Jan-13 17:58
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 372 cladking 16-Jan-13 21:06
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 307 Archae Solenhofen 16-Jan-13 21:17
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 384 cladking 16-Jan-13 21:31
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 360 wordsmyth 20-Jan-13 01:56
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 373 Archae Solenhofen 21-Jan-13 02:36
Re: Considerations..... 354 Thunderbird 16-Jan-13 20:27
Re: Considerations..... 412 cladking 16-Jan-13 21:12
Re: Considerations..... 386 Thanos5150 16-Jan-13 21:48
Re: what bumpkins ...could do : ) 402 Thunderbird 17-Jan-13 05:05
Re: Considerations..... 445 loveritas 16-Jan-13 22:46
Re: design specs 371 Thunderbird 17-Jan-13 04:29
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 411 Anomalies 16-Jan-13 18:19
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 335 Workjay 18-Jan-13 19:16
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 373 Susan Doris 20-Jan-13 07:00
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 349 wordsmyth 20-Jan-13 08:08
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 396 Susan Doris 20-Jan-13 08:58
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 345 wordsmyth 20-Jan-13 18:31
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 372 Thanos5150 20-Jan-13 19:10
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 378 wordsmyth 22-Jan-13 16:38
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 366 Workjay 22-Jan-13 21:16
Artificial Moon 365 Thanos5150 25-Jan-13 05:28
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 346 wordsmyth 25-Jan-13 07:54
Mod Warning #1 > Language - Thanos5150 368 Dr. Troglodyte 25-Jan-13 14:04
REALLY REALLY EXCEPTIONAL POST 378 drrayeye 25-Jan-13 14:37
Re: REALLY REALLY EXCEPTIONAL POST 370 Thanos5150 25-Jan-13 19:38
Re: REALLY REALLY EXCEPTIONAL POST 480 drrayeye 26-Jan-13 07:46
Re: REALLY REALLY EXCEPTIONAL POST 445 wordsmyth 26-Jan-13 19:51
Re: REALLY REALLY EXCEPTIONAL POST 422 Thanos5150 26-Jan-13 22:27
Re: REALLY REALLY EXCEPTIONAL POST 442 wordsmyth 27-Jan-13 02:41
Re: REALLY REALLY EXCEPTIONAL POST 434 Thanos5150 27-Jan-13 05:06
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 352 carolb 25-Jan-13 21:26
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 251 Thanos5150 26-Jan-13 00:56
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 410 carolb 26-Jan-13 02:23
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 355 Thanos5150 27-Jan-13 04:50
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 532 carolb 28-Jan-13 00:31
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 351 Thanos5150 28-Jan-13 03:12
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 358 Aine 28-Jan-13 12:38
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 327 Thanos5150 28-Jan-13 20:18
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 379 Aine 28-Jan-13 20:25
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 408 Thanos5150 28-Jan-13 22:09
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 380 carolb 28-Jan-13 20:28
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 353 Thanos5150 28-Jan-13 23:41
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 377 carolb 29-Jan-13 01:23
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 405 wordsmyth 29-Jan-13 01:31
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 345 carolb 29-Jan-13 02:11
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 341 wordsmyth 29-Jan-13 03:08
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 371 wordsmyth 29-Jan-13 05:31
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 400 Thanos5150 29-Jan-13 22:53
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 393 Susan Doris 26-Jan-13 06:55
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 372 ray wakila 28-Jan-13 18:30
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 385 wordsmyth 29-Jan-13 00:39
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 331 Susan Doris 13-Feb-13 06:48
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 352 wordsmyth 13-Feb-13 23:04
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 407 Archae Solenhofen 14-Feb-13 15:37
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 372 wordsmyth 19-Feb-13 01:29
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 372 Archae Solenhofen 19-Feb-13 04:29
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 361 wordsmyth 19-Feb-13 07:25
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 358 Thanos5150 20-Feb-13 00:25
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 325 Bobajot 20-Feb-13 02:09
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 337 Archae Solenhofen 20-Feb-13 03:54
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 356 Bobajot 20-Feb-13 13:35
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 368 Archae Solenhofen 20-Feb-13 18:01
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 351 Bobajot 20-Feb-13 23:29
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 363 Archae Solenhofen 21-Feb-13 16:17
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 367 Bobajot 22-Feb-13 23:08
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 348 Archae Solenhofen 22-Feb-13 23:55
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 347 wordsmyth 23-Feb-13 00:24
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 354 cladking 23-Feb-13 00:41
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 324 wordsmyth 23-Feb-13 05:10
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 320 cladking 23-Feb-13 05:40
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 368 Bobajot 23-Feb-13 01:04
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 357 Archae Solenhofen 23-Feb-13 04:49
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 398 Bobajot 23-Feb-13 12:31
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 378 Archae Solenhofen 23-Feb-13 20:25
Science Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 371 cladking 23-Feb-13 21:29
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 363 Bobajot 24-Feb-13 02:34
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 365 Archae Solenhofen 25-Feb-13 20:21
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 368 Bobajot 26-Feb-13 03:01
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 307 wordsmyth 23-Feb-13 21:21
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 340 Thanos5150 23-Feb-13 21:32
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 308 Thanos5150 23-Feb-13 22:10
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 348 wordsmyth 23-Feb-13 22:18
We would probably be amazed 283 Ratcho 24-Feb-13 00:52
Re: We would probably be amazed 273 wordsmyth 24-Feb-13 03:48
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 355 Archae Solenhofen 24-Feb-13 01:50
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 356 wordsmyth 24-Feb-13 02:44
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 336 wordsmyth 23-Feb-13 05:18
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 321 Archae Solenhofen 23-Feb-13 04:41
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 280 Archae Solenhofen 20-Feb-13 02:11
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 365 cladking 20-Feb-13 04:08
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 399 Thanos5150 22-Feb-13 05:31
I've tried hardened steel chisels 344 Ratcho 22-Feb-13 06:15
Re: I've tried hardened steel chisels 317 Susan Doris 22-Feb-13 07:15
Re: I've tried hardened steel chisels 372 Ratcho 22-Feb-13 17:51
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 360 Archae Solenhofen 23-Feb-13 05:15
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 360 cladking 23-Feb-13 15:13
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 205 Thanos5150 23-Feb-13 20:57
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 490 Archae Solenhofen 25-Feb-13 20:14
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 353 Susan Doris 24-Feb-13 15:49
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 365 wordsmyth 24-Feb-13 22:30
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 384 wordsmyth 20-Feb-13 02:22
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 370 Archae Solenhofen 20-Feb-13 03:47
How many swings would it take 381 Ratcho 20-Feb-13 06:29
Re: How many swings would it take 319 Susan Doris 20-Feb-13 17:31
Re: How many swings would it take 373 cladking 20-Feb-13 21:24
If you have the time... 330 Ratcho 22-Feb-13 22:48
Re: How many swings would it take 383 Archae Solenhofen 20-Feb-13 18:14
Re: How many swings would it take 303 cladking 20-Feb-13 21:30
Re: How many swings would it take 391 wordsmyth 21-Feb-13 08:39
Re: How many swings would it take 402 Scott Creighton 21-Feb-13 08:45
Re: How many swings would it take 329 Archae Solenhofen 21-Feb-13 17:32
Re: How many swings would it take 356 Scott Creighton 21-Feb-13 18:04
Re: How many swings would it take 318 Archae Solenhofen 21-Feb-13 19:55
Re: How many swings would it take 337 Scott Creighton 21-Feb-13 21:40
I'd still like to know 335 Ratcho 21-Feb-13 22:02
Re: I'd still like to know 366 Archae Solenhofen 21-Feb-13 22:43
Re: I'd still like to know 325 wordsmyth 21-Feb-13 23:47
Re: I'd still like to know 320 wordsmyth 22-Feb-13 00:10
Re: I'd still like to know 356 Archae Solenhofen 22-Feb-13 00:11
Re: Unfortunately, I'd still don't care... 346 wordsmyth 22-Feb-13 00:31
Re: Unfortunately, I'd still don't care... 363 Archae Solenhofen 22-Feb-13 00:47
Re: Unfortunately, I'd still don't care... 342 wordsmyth 22-Feb-13 07:47
Re: Unfortunately, I'd still don't care... 344 Archae Solenhofen 22-Feb-13 16:42
Re: How many swings would it take 386 wordsmyth 22-Feb-13 00:20
Re: How many swings would it take 284 Susan Doris 21-Feb-13 13:44
Re: How many swings would it take 293 Archae Solenhofen 21-Feb-13 16:09
Re: How many swings would it take 343 Scott Creighton 21-Feb-13 18:59
Re: How many swings would it take 355 Archae Solenhofen 21-Feb-13 20:06
Re: How many swings would it take 340 Scott Creighton 21-Feb-13 21:43
Re: How many swings would it take 349 Archae Solenhofen 21-Feb-13 22:22
Re: How many swings would it take 340 Scott Creighton 21-Feb-13 22:30
Re: How many swings would it take 337 Archae Solenhofen 21-Feb-13 22:48
Re: How many swings would it take 353 Morten 22-Feb-13 10:52
Re: How many swings would it take 340 wordsmyth 22-Feb-13 23:30
Re: How many swings would it take 460 Scott Creighton 21-Feb-13 22:55
Mod Note > Off Topic Sub-Thread 225 Dr. Troglodyte 22-Feb-13 00:01
Re: How many swings would it take 356 richarddullum 22-Feb-13 03:20
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 294 Audrey 13-Feb-13 23:21
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 357 Susan Doris 14-Feb-13 14:59
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 309 cladking 14-Feb-13 16:07
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 367 Archae Solenhofen 14-Feb-13 15:29
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 356 cladking 14-Feb-13 16:14
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 382 Archae Solenhofen 14-Feb-13 16:41
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 330 cladking 14-Feb-13 18:57
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 349 Thanos5150 20-Jan-13 19:04
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 283 Workjay 21-Jan-13 02:42
Re: Myth and Truth 352 Thunderbird 20-Jan-13 17:33
Re: Myth and Truth 359 wordsmyth 20-Jan-13 18:34
Re: Myth and Truth 368 cladking 20-Jan-13 22:30
Re: Myth and Truth 403 Glorious 20-Jan-13 23:31
Re: Myth and Truth 366 cladking 21-Jan-13 00:26
Re: Perception 474 Thunderbird 21-Jan-13 04:15
Re: Perception 372 Glorious 21-Jan-13 05:34
Re: Perception 313 Chris Jordan 21-Jan-13 07:45
Re: Perception 355 loveritas 21-Jan-13 11:32
Re: Change of Perception 381 Chris Jordan 21-Jan-13 16:20
Re: words/music /NT 286 Thunderbird 21-Jan-13 04:45
Re: words/music /NT 360 wordsmyth 23-Jan-13 08:14
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 361 Anomalies 21-Jan-13 16:53
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 348 Workjay 21-Jan-13 17:59
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 344 Anomalies 21-Jan-13 18:13
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 398 Susan Doris 28-Jan-13 16:29
Who knew? 366 cladking 28-Jan-13 22:07
Re: Who knew? 488 Susan Doris 01-Feb-13 18:25
Re: Who knew? 346 cladking 01-Feb-13 20:42
Egyptology Debunked; they wouldn't know a snake if it bit them. 400 cladking 28-Jan-13 21:04
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 334 cladking 21-Jan-13 18:16
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 334 Anomalies 22-Jan-13 15:09
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 282 cladking 22-Jan-13 15:39
'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 349 Anomalies 22-Jan-13 15:54
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 368 Workjay 22-Jan-13 16:10
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 260 Anomalies 22-Jan-13 16:32
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 317 Workjay 22-Jan-13 21:06
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 381 Anomalies 23-Jan-13 14:53
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 345 Workjay 23-Jan-13 21:10
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 348 Anomalies 23-Jan-13 21:51
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 337 Workjay 23-Jan-13 22:58
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 304 richarddullum 24-Jan-13 02:21
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 331 Workjay 24-Jan-13 02:46
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 265 richarddullum 24-Jan-13 14:33
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 361 Aine 24-Jan-13 13:00
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 339 richarddullum 25-Jan-13 01:57
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 308 Susan Doris 27-Jan-13 13:02
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 369 Susan Doris 02-Feb-13 14:01
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 337 Anomalies 05-Feb-13 15:41
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 324 Workjay 05-Feb-13 17:39
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 348 Anomalies 05-Feb-13 21:25
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 355 Workjay 06-Feb-13 17:31
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 346 Ratcho 06-Feb-13 19:02
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 319 Anomalies 06-Feb-13 21:54
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 307 Workjay 06-Feb-13 22:19
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 236 cladking 22-Jan-13 16:29
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 239 Anomalies 21-Jan-13 16:07
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 242 Workjay 21-Jan-13 16:13
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 227 carolb 21-Jan-13 17:52
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 220 Anomalies 21-Jan-13 18:00
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 239 carolb 21-Jan-13 18:05
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 225 Anomalies 21-Jan-13 19:01
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 247 carolb 21-Jan-13 19:07
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 234 Anomalies 21-Jan-13 19:21
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 274 carolb 21-Jan-13 19:42
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 234 Anomalies 21-Jan-13 19:58
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 245 carolb 21-Jan-13 20:17
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 215 Anomalies 21-Jan-13 20:27
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 239 Susan Doris 14-Feb-13 14:42
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 228 Anomalies 22-Jan-13 14:50
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 199 wordsmyth 23-Jan-13 08:35
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 243 Workjay 22-Jan-13 02:20
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 241 richarddullum 22-Jan-13 14:31
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 278 Aine 22-Jan-13 14:49
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 246 Anomalies 22-Jan-13 14:56
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 289 Aine 22-Jan-13 15:29
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 302 Aine 22-Jan-13 15:47
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 221 Anomalies 22-Jan-13 16:08
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 314 Aine 22-Jan-13 16:23
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 293 Aine 22-Jan-13 16:24
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 278 richarddullum 23-Jan-13 04:50
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 238 wordsmyth 23-Jan-13 08:52
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 246 richarddullum 23-Jan-13 14:28
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 270 wordsmyth 23-Jan-13 15:19
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 306 Aine 23-Jan-13 15:42
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 236 richarddullum 24-Jan-13 02:03
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 270 Aine 23-Jan-13 14:39
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 266 wordsmyth 23-Jan-13 15:09
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 299 Aine 24-Jan-13 13:19
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 248 wordsmyth 25-Jan-13 05:08
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 245 Glorious 25-Jan-13 05:49
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 312 Susan Doris 25-Jan-13 06:47
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 231 wordsmyth 25-Jan-13 07:03
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 240 Glorious 25-Jan-13 07:32
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 218 wordsmyth 25-Jan-13 08:09
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 199 cladking 25-Jan-13 16:32
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 240 Susan Doris 23-Jan-13 06:54
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 251 Glorious 23-Jan-13 07:43
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 294 Aine 23-Jan-13 14:47
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 270 BobbyH 22-Jan-13 19:21
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 274 Aine 22-Jan-13 19:41
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 240 BobbyH 22-Jan-13 19:56
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 285 Aine 22-Jan-13 19:59
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 308 Aine 22-Jan-13 20:09
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 273 Glorious 22-Jan-13 20:52
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 242 BobbyH 22-Jan-13 14:57
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 238 Workjay 22-Jan-13 15:08
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 261 BobbyH 22-Jan-13 15:41
Episode: "Destination Orion" was very well done 244 David L 17-Jan-13 17:35
Re: Episode: "Destination Orion" was very well done 234 Thomas Brophy 03-Mar-13 23:30
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 149 wordsmyth 23-Jan-13 08:10
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 281 Archae Solenhofen 25-Jan-13 03:28
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 265 wordsmyth 25-Jan-13 06:32
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 332 Thanos5150 25-Jan-13 18:22
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 245 Sangreal Sea 25-Jan-13 19:11
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 248 Warwick 11-Feb-13 22:32
The latest episode "Alien Abductions" is the most absurd yet 221 David L 23-Feb-13 23:41
Re: The latest episode "Alien Abductions" is the most absurd yet 255 Anomalies 25-Feb-13 19:00
Re: The latest episode "Alien Abductions" is the most absurd yet 180 David L 26-Feb-13 01:44
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 173 LanceHall 23-Mar-13 00:28


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.