Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Archae Solenhofen wrote:

> Moores (1991) presents evidence that they were used at Giza
> from the tool marks on the basalt pavement.

He presents a theory from the marks to match the saw he invented for them. There is evidence of saw marks but not his saw. These saws would certainly have been quite the spectacle with saw overseers and the like. No carvings, paintings, titles, or evidence of the saw itself or the workers? I'm not saying they couldn't have had a saw as he envisions, but you are stating it as point of fact when it simply is not, and the point is that it does not explain the different kinds of cuts that are seen as I said.

> Why is it unlikely.....

For a corner cut to have been made with a pendulum drag saw?

> A drag saw blade shaped like the curve of a circle on a single
> pendulum could produce curricular arcs too when drawn back and
> forth........ Hey, I am not against small hand-powered circular
> saws, it's a pretty simple concept...... it's the absurd 11
> meter in diameter pyramid-powered ones of Dunn (2008) that I
> have a problem with. That is what that second image you posted
> is trying to suggest..... since it is from that article.

Come on Archae. Be honest with yourself. When you ignore the obvious just to save face so you can debunk anything and everything it doesn't make you seem very intellectually honest. Those cuts are made from a circular saw as is what is seen at Abu Roash. Instead of pretending it didn't exist why not figure out how it did? A circular wet saw solves a lot of problems, as does hand powered circular grinding wheels, and is a very simple concept so there shouldn't be much of a hang up about it. I am not part of the Dunn discussion-I just saw that you presented the lamest pictures possible to prove your point and offered a more honest alternative so that a real discussion could be had.

> So...... 10 years of work on granite casing stone (they would
> work on stone casing procurement and dressing while the pyramid
> was being built) yields 30 blocks one meter cubed for the
> first-time amateur team that never improves. Do you really
> think the multible teams of workers were not better trained and
> better skilled than Stocks (2001) was?

Of course-so it only took the Egyptians 1 month to cut one block with a copper saw instead of 4 months? Absurd. Replace copper with bronze and it at least makes a little more sense. I don't understand the insistence at every turn of imposing the most impractical means on the AE requiring the most amount of effort when it is completely unnecessary to do so given we already know they used bronze and had the wheel. The number one thought on any craftsman's mind is to find the right tool for the job to eliminate as much unnecessary effort as possible while maximizing proficiency for the task which is the opposite of what is being imposed on the Egyptians whom we know were highly intelligent and innovative. I really don't see what the big deal is about a circular saw especially considering that is what the saw marks require.

> Other than hollowing sarcophagi, door sockets, and a few other
> tasks the coring of granite and other hardrocks was not that
> widely used in masonry. It was used mostly in stone vessel
> manufacturing.

So, because it wasn't used much it was ok to be as inefficient and time consuming as possible by insisting on using the worst material possible for job?

> Where does he claim this because in Lehner (1997 p211) he
> states hundred to thousand were needed to finely dress the Tura
> limestone casing on the 4th dynasty pyramids (copper and copper
> alloy chisels don't work on granite)? The vast majority of the
> core limestone masonry is not finely dressed so chisels were
> not much used there either.......

I thought this is what he said on a recent Nova special regarding carving the Sphinx. I believe he said millions but I reduced it to hundreds of thousands so I guess I misquoted him.

Pounding stones are even more inefficient not to mention back breaking labor. They obviously used pounders, but I find it hard to believe they would have used them to a fraction of the extent that would have been required in lieu of other tools better suited for the task.

Copper and copper alloy chisels don't work on granite and yet there is Stocks and Moores telling us they used copper drills and saws?

> >we are to add hundreds if not thousands of 13ft copper saws
> >to this total?
>
> So....... it's not like it was a wasted.

But the point is that they would have needed too much of it. And the wood constantly reshape them.

> The technological level to produce them was know and the marks
> they produce are evidenced on artifact, after artifact, after
> artifact. It is pretty clear that the coring drill arose out of
> stone mace and vessel manufacturing that was going on for about
> 500-1000 year before the Great Pyramids was built.

But once again the tool itself is nowhere to be found which is the point-the tools are gone.

> >And why is it the carpentry tool kit is present since
> >pre-dynastic times in relative abundance either physically or
> >pictorially, and yet this same tool kit Egyptologists modify
> to
> >try and impose on stone working is nowhere to be found?
>
> Some of it is..... for example the hieroglyphic symbol for
> "craft/art" during the Old Kingdom is a stone boring tool
> (Stocks 1993).

So basically none of it is, like I said. And this is for bead, vase making, and the like is it not and has nothing to do with construction stone masonry.

> No, it's based on the fact that the ancient Egyptian understood
> what a saw was and the hieroglyphic above indicated that they
> understood that rock could be cut by grinding...... it's not
> that much of a leap to imaging they had the intellect to put
> these 2 simple concepts together to produce the cut rocks with
> tool marks that are completely consistent with such.

So, they have the intellect to support the use of the tools you want them to use despite the fact they were not invented in China for several hundred years later, but not the intellect to use the tools you don't want them to use? None of these tools have been found and regardless are not indicative of what is seen in many of the saw marks.

> It's not all missing a lot of the other less expensive tools
> are still around.... At least the ancient Egyptians understood
> what saws and drills were and how to make copper and bronze
> tools during the 4th dynasty. There is absolutely no evidence
> other than the blocks themselves that 11 m in diameter
> mega-saws, powered by the pyramid, and made of advance metals
> ever existed at all...... absolutely nothing.

Where did I say anything about these tools being "powered by the pyramid"? In fact you quote me directly below where I clearly state I do not support the use of "power tools"? Is bronze or iron an "advanced metal"? I'm not going to argue with you about something that is not my argument again so if this is what you are all about all the time I guess the best thing to do is just ignore you. But regardless, by your own admission other than the marks on the block there is no evidence for the circular saw but there is also no evidence for your pendulum or bow saw either other than the cuts so what is your point? Yes, they understood drills and saws and they also understood the wheel. If these cuts were made by a circular saw then that is what it was. Not that difficult all things considered.

> There are known bronze and arsenic copper alloy tools and other
> artifacts from the Old Kingdom, and a depiction of a wheeled
> scaling ladder (with axle) from the 5th dynasty as well.

But they say all they used were copper tools and did not use the wheel or beasts of burden.....

> No one believes what Petrie claimed in his early book in this
> regards and since he never claimed that again, even in his
> other books on rock worked objects, one would think he no
> longer did either. Petrie makes a number of other claims in
> that early book in regards to worked rocks, some of them are
> not correct......

No one? You mean no pseudoskeptic.

Let's see what Petrie says:

"The methods employed by the Egyptians in cutting the hard stones which they so frequently worked, have long remained undetermined. Various suggestions have been made, some very impractical; but no actual proofs of the tools employed, or the manner of using them, have been obtained..."

"The typical method of working hard stones - such as granite, diorite, basalt, etc.- was by means of bronze tools; these were set with cutting points, far harder than the quartz which was operated on. The material of these cutting points is yet undetermined; but only five substances are possible - beryl, topaz, chrysoberyl, corindum or sapphire, and diamond. The character of the work would certainly seem to point to diamond as being the cutting jewel; and only the considerations of its rarity in general,...interfer with this conclusion."

" Many nations,..., are in the habit of cutting hard materials by mean of a soft substance (as copper, wood, horn etc.), with a hard powder applied to it; the powder sticks in the basis employed, and this being scraped over the stone to be cut, so wears it away. Many persons have therefore very readily assumed(as I myself did at first) that this method must necessarily have been used by the Egyptians; and that it would suffice to produce all the examples now collected. Such, however, is far from being the case; though no doubt in alabastar, and other soft stones, this method was employed."

"That the Egyptians were acquainted with a cutting jewel far harder than quartz, and that they used this jewel as a sharp pointed graver, is put beyond doubt by the diorite bowls with inscriptions of the fourth dynasty, of which I found fragments at Gizeh; as well as the scratches on polished granite of Ptolemaic age at San. The hieroglyphs are incised, with a very fre-cutting point; they are not scraped or ground out, but are ploughed through the diorite, with rough edges to the line. As the lines are only 1/150 inch wide (the figures being about .2 long), it is evidence that the cutting point must have been much harder than quartz; and tough enough not to splinter when so fine an edge was being employed, probably only 1/200 inch wide. Parallel lines are graved only 1/30 inch apart from centre to centre."

"We therefore need have no hesitation in allowing that the graving out of lines in hard stones by jewel points, was a well known art. And when we find on the surfaces of the saw-cuts in diorite, grooves as deep as 1/100 inch, it appears far more likely that such were produced by fixed jewel points in the saw, than by any fortuitous rubbing about of a loose powder. And when, further, it is seen that these deep grooves are almost always regular and uniform in depth, and equidistant, their production by the successive cuts of the jewel teeth of a saw appears to be beyond question..."

"That the blades of the saw were of bronze, we know from the green staining on the sides of the saw cuts, and on grains of sand left in a saw cut.
The forms of the tools were straight saws, circular saws, tubular drills, and lathes.
The straight saws varied from .03 to .2 inch thick, according to the work; the largest were 8 feet or more in length..." "...No. 6, a slice of diorite bearing equidistant and regular grooves of circular arcs, parallel to one another; these grooves have been nearly polished out by cross grinding, but are still visible. The only feasible explanation of this piece is that it was produced by a circular saw."

"These tubular drills vary in thickness from 1/4 inch to 5 inches in diameter, and from 1/30 to 1/5 inch thick. The smallest hole yet found in granite is 2 inch diameter."

"At El Bersheh... there is a still larger example, where a platform of limestone rock has been dressed down, by cutting it away with tube drills about 18 inches diameter; the circular grooves occasionally intersecting, prove that it was done merely to remove the rock."

"...the lathe appears to have been as familiar an instrument in the fourth dynasty, as it is in the modern workshops. The diorite bowls and vases of the Old Kingdom are frequently met with, and show great technical skill. One piece found at Gizeh, No 14, shows that the method employed was true turning, and not any process of grinding, since the bowl has been knocked off of its centring, recentred imperfectly, and the old turning not quite turned out; thus there are two surfaces belonging to different centrings, and meeting in a cusp. Such an appearance could not be produced by any grinding or rubbing process which pressed on the surface. Another detail is shown by fragment No 15; here the curves of the bowl are spherical, and must have therefore been cut by a tool sweeping an arc from a fixed centre while the bowl rotated. This centre or hinging of the tool was in the axis of the lathe for the general surface of the bowl, right up to the edge of it; but as a lip was wanted, the centring of the tool was shifted, but with exactly the same radius of its arc, and a fresh cut made to leave a lip to the bowl. That this was certainly not a chance result of hand-work is shown, not only by the exact circularity of the curves, and their equality, but also by the cusp left where they meet. This has not been at all rounded off, as would certainly be the case in hand-work, and it is clear proof of the rigidly mechanical method of striking the curves."

Sounds reasonable enough to me. I'm sticking with Petrie on this one.

> Pounded quartz..... how is that suppose to work?

Coating the blade. Just spitballing as an alternative to "jewels".

> Bronze may help a bit with the limestone chisels.

Just a "bit"? If Lehner shows you get 5-10 minutes chisel time on limestone per copper chisel then how many copper chisels does one bronze chisel replace? And wood to heat the furnace to make and constantly them?

>Lapidary saws
> work well with copper, it's an ideal lapping material still
> used today. Do you really think that extreme added expense is
> going to help that much here? Remember, it's not the metal that
> does the cutting it's the abrasive that the metal drags along
> with it that does.

Does it look like the AE were too worried about the "extreme added expense" to you? And this isn't just one construction job we are talking about but hundreds of years of monumental stone working before this technology supposedly appears around 2000BC. All things considered this is a wise if not required investment and in the long run would save an infinite amount of "expense". They imported the finest most expensive cedar wood boats yet couldn't cough up the extra dough for some bronze to haul back on these boats from the people they were already trading with who had bronze knowing full well it would make their job of monumental stone working infinitely easier? Come on. The Egyptians were notorious for taking the technologies of others and making them better so it stands to reason they easily understood the value and potential of bronze which would have been pennies on the dollar compared to manufacturing and maintaining copper tools alone. And how is it more expensive to import say, 1000 bronze chisels (or the raw material to make them) than it is to mine, forge, and gather the tons of wood (in a desert) to make 10,000 copper ones? Figure 9 [www.oocities.org] you show a bronze chisel found at Medum that the placard says "was probably lost by workmen of Rameses II when stripping the pyramid", but why Rameses II? Just because its bronze? Maybe it was used by the workers at Medum and is an example of one of these "lost" tools. And concerning abrasive materials, this obviously accomplishes next to nothing as Stocks has plainly shown. All it does is make the copper able to be used at all but its still absurdly inefficient if the tool is copper.

> They are not..... since stone precaution tools can be used for
> most of the rough dressing of rocks (and in some cases fine
> dressing...... this has been shown by a number of experimental
> researchers such as Stock (2003) and Zuber (1956). The chisels
> were mostly used for fine dressing of limestone.

But they are. Insisting on pounders and copper implements alone with no wheel or beasts of burden is untenable and the simple fact is they didn't have to and must have used more efficient tools and methods.

> >How many copper chisels does one bronze chisel replace? 10?
> >100? 1000?

Seriously-how many? I would be interested to know.

> It's called a flint pecking hammer (its a simple version of the
> modern bush hammer used in stone carving) and the AEs used that
> simple but effective tool as well as others to finely carve
> statues, hieroglyphics. etc..

What does a flint pecking hammer have to do with replacing copper tools with bronze, the wheel, or beasts of burden?

> I suggest you read Nicholson & Shaw (2000) it will help you
> fine tune your common sense since it discusses in considerable
> detail the material and technologies known to the ancient
> Egyptian civilization.
>
> Nicholson, P.T. & Shaw, I. (2000) Ancient Egyptian materials
> and techniques. Cambridge University Press, New York, 702 p.

You mean like on p.7 where they talk about the uncertainty of the tools used and the problems with the theory of copper chisels and the controversy surrounding what tools were used for the extraction of granite and other hard stones, and that there is evidence of some form of pick axe among other now missing tools?



Post Edited (23-Feb-13 21:24)

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 1572 Richard Fusniak 04-Jan-13 20:02
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 335 Citizen Attorney 05-Jan-13 00:24
Debunker debunked? 375 drrayeye 05-Jan-13 05:15
Aliens is making people re-evaluate certain paradigms 444 Ratcho 05-Jan-13 06:22
How is it possible? 345 gulsbo 05-Jan-13 16:16
Entertainment industry rules OK; thumbs down to education 293 Richard Fusniak 05-Jan-13 16:57
Re: Entertainment industry rules OK; thumbs down to education 392 gulsbo 06-Jan-13 08:03
Re: Entertainment industry rules OK; thumbs down to education 350 Richard Fusniak 06-Jan-13 08:59
Re: Entertainment industry rules OK; thumbs down to education 360 gulsbo 07-Jan-13 21:07
Re: Entertainment industry rules OK; thumbs down to education 394 Richard Fusniak 08-Jan-13 00:36
Fuzzy 304 Dan Mc F 08-Jan-13 12:49
Re: Fuzzy 369 Richard Fusniak 08-Jan-13 13:12
Re: Entertainment industry rules OK; thumbs down to education 301 gulsbo 09-Jan-13 21:36
Re: Smithsonian never lies.... 512 Thunderbird 23-Mar-13 03:39
who said aliens 352 Citizen Attorney 05-Jan-13 16:42
Re: who said aliens 352 David L 05-Jan-13 17:42
Re: who said aliens 387 Citizen Attorney 05-Jan-13 21:23
Agreed 373 NetWorkAngel 05-Jan-13 22:05
Re: Agreed 336 Citizen Attorney 06-Jan-13 19:16
Re: who said aliens 376 David L 07-Jan-13 01:16
Re: who said aliens 417 Thanos5150 06-Jan-13 18:38
Re: who said aliens 325 Citizen Attorney 06-Jan-13 19:17
Re: who said aliens 419 Thanos5150 06-Jan-13 22:45
Ancient Aliens' Debunked - Review 691 Thanos5150 07-Jan-13 02:23
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 383 MJT 08-Jan-13 13:58
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 374 Susan Doris 08-Jan-13 14:33
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 394 Richard Fusniak 08-Jan-13 15:19
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 426 Bobajot 10-Jan-13 04:01
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 421 wordsmyth 13-Jan-13 03:26
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 360 Archae Solenhofen 13-Jan-13 04:53
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 359 wordsmyth 15-Jan-13 01:44
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 396 richarddullum 15-Jan-13 03:28
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 330 wordsmyth 15-Jan-13 07:12
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 378 michael seabrook 15-Jan-13 10:48
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 399 Merrell 15-Jan-13 10:55
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 415 Archae Solenhofen 15-Jan-13 05:21
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 439 wordsmyth 15-Jan-13 08:24
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 356 Merrell 15-Jan-13 09:55
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 416 wordsmyth 15-Jan-13 10:26
Re: Archae Solenhofen = "Ancient Limestone" 412 Thanos5150 15-Jan-13 17:39
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 407 Archae Solenhofen 15-Jan-13 19:09
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 381 wordsmyth 15-Jan-13 22:26
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 345 Archae Solenhofen 16-Jan-13 03:29
Re: So...its very time consuming 339 Thunderbird 16-Jan-13 05:22
Re: So...its very time consuming 368 wordsmyth 16-Jan-13 06:32
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 426 Thunderbird 15-Jan-13 18:30
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 355 Martin Stower 23-Feb-13 15:38
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 326 wordsmyth 23-Feb-13 22:10
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 432 Thanos5150 24-Feb-13 00:33
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 394 wordsmyth 24-Feb-13 03:42
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 353 Thanos5150 24-Feb-13 06:16
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 355 wordsmyth 24-Feb-13 22:48
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 367 Scott Creighton 24-Feb-13 20:05
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 403 wordsmyth 24-Feb-13 22:36
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 376 Ratcho 24-Feb-13 22:49
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 390 Thanos5150 24-Feb-13 23:50
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 364 Scott Creighton 25-Feb-13 00:18
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 445 Martin Stower 25-Feb-13 17:57
Re: desperation.... 402 Thunderbird 25-Feb-13 21:20
Re: desperation.... 328 Martin Stower 26-Feb-13 15:47
Re: Khufu cartouche Cambell's chamber 415 Thunderbird 18-Mar-13 17:33
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 371 wordsmyth 25-Feb-13 22:25
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 371 Martin Stower 26-Feb-13 15:59
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 364 wordsmyth 26-Feb-13 21:41
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 382 Thanos5150 26-Feb-13 18:57
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 391 Martin Stower 27-Feb-13 18:46
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 302 Thanos5150 27-Feb-13 21:26
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 380 Martin Stower 28-Feb-13 16:57
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 351 Thanos5150 28-Feb-13 17:19
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 362 Martin Stower 28-Feb-13 18:08
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 392 Merrell 28-Feb-13 09:33
Re: Can we seriously believe that Alford has a clue.... 379 Thunderbird 25-Feb-13 16:41
Re: Can we seriously believe that Alford has a clue.... 415 Martin Stower 25-Feb-13 18:29
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 381 Archae Solenhofen 15-Jan-13 18:41
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 351 Thanos5150 15-Jan-13 22:13
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 354 Archae Solenhofen 15-Jan-13 22:44
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 433 Thanos5150 16-Jan-13 04:40
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 346 Archae Solenhofen 16-Jan-13 06:02
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 389 Thanos5150 16-Jan-13 06:54
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 410 Archae Solenhofen 16-Jan-13 09:09
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 355 Thanos5150 16-Jan-13 17:52
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 385 Archae Solenhofen 16-Jan-13 20:21
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 402 Thanos5150 16-Jan-13 21:21
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 303 Archae Solenhofen 17-Jan-13 04:57
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 383 Thanos5150 17-Jan-13 05:42
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 379 Archae Solenhofen 17-Jan-13 07:05
Fingerprints 1996 - 200 ton blocks 455 Merrell 17-Jan-13 11:22
Re: Fingerprints 1996 - 200 ton blocks 332 Archae Solenhofen 17-Jan-13 16:18
Re: Fingerprints 1996 - 200 ton blocks 335 Merrell 17-Jan-13 16:39
Re: Fingerprints 1996 - 200 ton blocks 382 Archae Solenhofen 17-Jan-13 17:44
Re: Fingerprints 1996 - 200 ton blocks 223 Archae Solenhofen 17-Jan-13 22:41
Re: Fingerprints 1996 - 200 ton blocks 388 Merrell 17-Jan-13 23:38
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 401 Thanos5150 17-Jan-13 23:46
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 384 wordsmyth 18-Jan-13 03:45
Mod Warning #2 > wordsmyth – Name-calling 423 Dr. Troglodyte 18-Jan-13 15:12
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 375 Archae Solenhofen 18-Jan-13 03:57
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 355 Thanos5150 18-Jan-13 05:32
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 277 Archae Solenhofen 18-Jan-13 06:04
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 322 Thanos5150 18-Jan-13 06:40
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 353 Archae Solenhofen 18-Jan-13 07:31
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 361 Thanos5150 18-Jan-13 18:02
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 261 Archae Solenhofen 18-Jan-13 18:19
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 350 Bobajot 20-Jan-13 02:08
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 345 Archae Solenhofen 20-Jan-13 03:16
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 398 Susan Doris 03-Feb-13 06:49
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 400 Thanos5150 05-Feb-13 20:00
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 405 Susan Doris 06-Feb-13 06:50
Mod Caution > Language Edit - Thanos5150 369 Dr. Troglodyte 16-Jan-13 20:39
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 320 David L 18-Jan-13 15:40
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 386 Thanos5150 18-Jan-13 17:59
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 371 wordsmyth 16-Jan-13 06:30
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 381 Thanos5150 16-Jan-13 07:03
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 353 richarddullum 17-Jan-13 03:42
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 361 Archae Solenhofen 17-Jan-13 05:10
Mod Caution > Language Edit - wordsmyth 384 Dr. Troglodyte 16-Jan-13 00:30
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 384 wordsmyth 15-Jan-13 22:23
Mod Warning #1 > wordsmyth 381 Dr. Troglodyte 16-Jan-13 00:44
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 343 Archae Solenhofen 16-Jan-13 03:11
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 361 wordsmyth 16-Jan-13 05:56
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 368 Archae Solenhofen 16-Jan-13 08:06
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 349 cladking 16-Jan-13 15:54
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 380 Archae Solenhofen 16-Jan-13 17:11
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 380 cladking 16-Jan-13 17:40
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 378 Archae Solenhofen 16-Jan-13 17:58
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 365 cladking 16-Jan-13 21:06
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 297 Archae Solenhofen 16-Jan-13 21:17
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 377 cladking 16-Jan-13 21:31
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 350 wordsmyth 20-Jan-13 01:56
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 357 Archae Solenhofen 21-Jan-13 02:36
Re: Considerations..... 345 Thunderbird 16-Jan-13 20:27
Re: Considerations..... 403 cladking 16-Jan-13 21:12
Re: Considerations..... 380 Thanos5150 16-Jan-13 21:48
Re: what bumpkins ...could do : ) 397 Thunderbird 17-Jan-13 05:05
Re: Considerations..... 439 loveritas 16-Jan-13 22:46
Re: design specs 362 Thunderbird 17-Jan-13 04:29
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 404 Anomalies 16-Jan-13 18:19
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 323 Workjay 18-Jan-13 19:16
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 367 Susan Doris 20-Jan-13 07:00
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 341 wordsmyth 20-Jan-13 08:08
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 389 Susan Doris 20-Jan-13 08:58
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 337 wordsmyth 20-Jan-13 18:31
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 364 Thanos5150 20-Jan-13 19:10
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 372 wordsmyth 22-Jan-13 16:38
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 360 Workjay 22-Jan-13 21:16
Artificial Moon 341 Thanos5150 25-Jan-13 05:28
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 340 wordsmyth 25-Jan-13 07:54
Mod Warning #1 > Language - Thanos5150 359 Dr. Troglodyte 25-Jan-13 14:04
REALLY REALLY EXCEPTIONAL POST 369 drrayeye 25-Jan-13 14:37
Re: REALLY REALLY EXCEPTIONAL POST 363 Thanos5150 25-Jan-13 19:38
Re: REALLY REALLY EXCEPTIONAL POST 473 drrayeye 26-Jan-13 07:46
Re: REALLY REALLY EXCEPTIONAL POST 437 wordsmyth 26-Jan-13 19:51
Re: REALLY REALLY EXCEPTIONAL POST 408 Thanos5150 26-Jan-13 22:27
Re: REALLY REALLY EXCEPTIONAL POST 428 wordsmyth 27-Jan-13 02:41
Re: REALLY REALLY EXCEPTIONAL POST 428 Thanos5150 27-Jan-13 05:06
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 346 carolb 25-Jan-13 21:26
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 247 Thanos5150 26-Jan-13 00:56
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 400 carolb 26-Jan-13 02:23
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 348 Thanos5150 27-Jan-13 04:50
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 525 carolb 28-Jan-13 00:31
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 346 Thanos5150 28-Jan-13 03:12
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 352 Aine 28-Jan-13 12:38
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 316 Thanos5150 28-Jan-13 20:18
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 373 Aine 28-Jan-13 20:25
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 401 Thanos5150 28-Jan-13 22:09
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 363 carolb 28-Jan-13 20:28
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 347 Thanos5150 28-Jan-13 23:41
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 370 carolb 29-Jan-13 01:23
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 398 wordsmyth 29-Jan-13 01:31
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 340 carolb 29-Jan-13 02:11
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 326 wordsmyth 29-Jan-13 03:08
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 367 wordsmyth 29-Jan-13 05:31
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 395 Thanos5150 29-Jan-13 22:53
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 386 Susan Doris 26-Jan-13 06:55
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 367 ray wakila 28-Jan-13 18:30
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 379 wordsmyth 29-Jan-13 00:39
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 325 Susan Doris 13-Feb-13 06:48
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 346 wordsmyth 13-Feb-13 23:04
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 398 Archae Solenhofen 14-Feb-13 15:37
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 366 wordsmyth 19-Feb-13 01:29
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 367 Archae Solenhofen 19-Feb-13 04:29
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 354 wordsmyth 19-Feb-13 07:25
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 352 Thanos5150 20-Feb-13 00:25
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 320 Bobajot 20-Feb-13 02:09
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 329 Archae Solenhofen 20-Feb-13 03:54
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 347 Bobajot 20-Feb-13 13:35
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 362 Archae Solenhofen 20-Feb-13 18:01
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 345 Bobajot 20-Feb-13 23:29
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 358 Archae Solenhofen 21-Feb-13 16:17
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 360 Bobajot 22-Feb-13 23:08
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 340 Archae Solenhofen 22-Feb-13 23:55
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 341 wordsmyth 23-Feb-13 00:24
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 346 cladking 23-Feb-13 00:41
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 317 wordsmyth 23-Feb-13 05:10
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 314 cladking 23-Feb-13 05:40
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 359 Bobajot 23-Feb-13 01:04
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 333 Archae Solenhofen 23-Feb-13 04:49
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 386 Bobajot 23-Feb-13 12:31
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 372 Archae Solenhofen 23-Feb-13 20:25
Science Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 364 cladking 23-Feb-13 21:29
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 354 Bobajot 24-Feb-13 02:34
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 350 Archae Solenhofen 25-Feb-13 20:21
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 363 Bobajot 26-Feb-13 03:01
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 302 wordsmyth 23-Feb-13 21:21
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 333 Thanos5150 23-Feb-13 21:32
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 301 Thanos5150 23-Feb-13 22:10
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 344 wordsmyth 23-Feb-13 22:18
We would probably be amazed 273 Ratcho 24-Feb-13 00:52
Re: We would probably be amazed 268 wordsmyth 24-Feb-13 03:48
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 336 Archae Solenhofen 24-Feb-13 01:50
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 352 wordsmyth 24-Feb-13 02:44
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 330 wordsmyth 23-Feb-13 05:18
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 316 Archae Solenhofen 23-Feb-13 04:41
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 273 Archae Solenhofen 20-Feb-13 02:11
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 356 cladking 20-Feb-13 04:08
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 393 Thanos5150 22-Feb-13 05:31
I've tried hardened steel chisels 340 Ratcho 22-Feb-13 06:15
Re: I've tried hardened steel chisels 312 Susan Doris 22-Feb-13 07:15
Re: I've tried hardened steel chisels 356 Ratcho 22-Feb-13 17:51
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 355 Archae Solenhofen 23-Feb-13 05:15
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 348 cladking 23-Feb-13 15:13
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 198 Thanos5150 23-Feb-13 20:57
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 460 Archae Solenhofen 25-Feb-13 20:14
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 347 Susan Doris 24-Feb-13 15:49
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 358 wordsmyth 24-Feb-13 22:30
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 377 wordsmyth 20-Feb-13 02:22
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 365 Archae Solenhofen 20-Feb-13 03:47
How many swings would it take 375 Ratcho 20-Feb-13 06:29
Re: How many swings would it take 316 Susan Doris 20-Feb-13 17:31
Re: How many swings would it take 355 cladking 20-Feb-13 21:24
If you have the time... 323 Ratcho 22-Feb-13 22:48
Re: How many swings would it take 378 Archae Solenhofen 20-Feb-13 18:14
Re: How many swings would it take 298 cladking 20-Feb-13 21:30
Re: How many swings would it take 383 wordsmyth 21-Feb-13 08:39
Re: How many swings would it take 396 Scott Creighton 21-Feb-13 08:45
Re: How many swings would it take 325 Archae Solenhofen 21-Feb-13 17:32
Re: How many swings would it take 348 Scott Creighton 21-Feb-13 18:04
Re: How many swings would it take 310 Archae Solenhofen 21-Feb-13 19:55
Re: How many swings would it take 331 Scott Creighton 21-Feb-13 21:40
I'd still like to know 327 Ratcho 21-Feb-13 22:02
Re: I'd still like to know 358 Archae Solenhofen 21-Feb-13 22:43
Re: I'd still like to know 316 wordsmyth 21-Feb-13 23:47
Re: I'd still like to know 317 wordsmyth 22-Feb-13 00:10
Re: I'd still like to know 348 Archae Solenhofen 22-Feb-13 00:11
Re: Unfortunately, I'd still don't care... 341 wordsmyth 22-Feb-13 00:31
Re: Unfortunately, I'd still don't care... 359 Archae Solenhofen 22-Feb-13 00:47
Re: Unfortunately, I'd still don't care... 335 wordsmyth 22-Feb-13 07:47
Re: Unfortunately, I'd still don't care... 338 Archae Solenhofen 22-Feb-13 16:42
Re: How many swings would it take 380 wordsmyth 22-Feb-13 00:20
Re: How many swings would it take 279 Susan Doris 21-Feb-13 13:44
Re: How many swings would it take 287 Archae Solenhofen 21-Feb-13 16:09
Re: How many swings would it take 329 Scott Creighton 21-Feb-13 18:59
Re: How many swings would it take 349 Archae Solenhofen 21-Feb-13 20:06
Re: How many swings would it take 333 Scott Creighton 21-Feb-13 21:43
Re: How many swings would it take 344 Archae Solenhofen 21-Feb-13 22:22
Re: How many swings would it take 333 Scott Creighton 21-Feb-13 22:30
Re: How many swings would it take 323 Archae Solenhofen 21-Feb-13 22:48
Re: How many swings would it take 345 Morten 22-Feb-13 10:52
Re: How many swings would it take 333 wordsmyth 22-Feb-13 23:30
Re: How many swings would it take 452 Scott Creighton 21-Feb-13 22:55
Mod Note > Off Topic Sub-Thread 220 Dr. Troglodyte 22-Feb-13 00:01
Re: How many swings would it take 337 richarddullum 22-Feb-13 03:20
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 289 Audrey 13-Feb-13 23:21
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 350 Susan Doris 14-Feb-13 14:59
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 305 cladking 14-Feb-13 16:07
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 359 Archae Solenhofen 14-Feb-13 15:29
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 351 cladking 14-Feb-13 16:14
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 376 Archae Solenhofen 14-Feb-13 16:41
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 324 cladking 14-Feb-13 18:57
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 344 Thanos5150 20-Jan-13 19:04
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 277 Workjay 21-Jan-13 02:42
Re: Myth and Truth 334 Thunderbird 20-Jan-13 17:33
Re: Myth and Truth 354 wordsmyth 20-Jan-13 18:34
Re: Myth and Truth 364 cladking 20-Jan-13 22:30
Re: Myth and Truth 394 Glorious 20-Jan-13 23:31
Re: Myth and Truth 351 cladking 21-Jan-13 00:26
Re: Perception 465 Thunderbird 21-Jan-13 04:15
Re: Perception 366 Glorious 21-Jan-13 05:34
Re: Perception 306 Chris Jordan 21-Jan-13 07:45
Re: Perception 348 loveritas 21-Jan-13 11:32
Re: Change of Perception 370 Chris Jordan 21-Jan-13 16:20
Re: words/music /NT 280 Thunderbird 21-Jan-13 04:45
Re: words/music /NT 352 wordsmyth 23-Jan-13 08:14
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 356 Anomalies 21-Jan-13 16:53
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 336 Workjay 21-Jan-13 17:59
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 337 Anomalies 21-Jan-13 18:13
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 391 Susan Doris 28-Jan-13 16:29
Who knew? 359 cladking 28-Jan-13 22:07
Re: Who knew? 478 Susan Doris 01-Feb-13 18:25
Re: Who knew? 341 cladking 01-Feb-13 20:42
Egyptology Debunked; they wouldn't know a snake if it bit them. 373 cladking 28-Jan-13 21:04
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 316 cladking 21-Jan-13 18:16
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 325 Anomalies 22-Jan-13 15:09
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 275 cladking 22-Jan-13 15:39
'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 341 Anomalies 22-Jan-13 15:54
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 359 Workjay 22-Jan-13 16:10
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 254 Anomalies 22-Jan-13 16:32
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 298 Workjay 22-Jan-13 21:06
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 374 Anomalies 23-Jan-13 14:53
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 335 Workjay 23-Jan-13 21:10
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 341 Anomalies 23-Jan-13 21:51
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 330 Workjay 23-Jan-13 22:58
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 298 richarddullum 24-Jan-13 02:21
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 313 Workjay 24-Jan-13 02:46
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 260 richarddullum 24-Jan-13 14:33
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 351 Aine 24-Jan-13 13:00
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 332 richarddullum 25-Jan-13 01:57
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 300 Susan Doris 27-Jan-13 13:02
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 363 Susan Doris 02-Feb-13 14:01
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 330 Anomalies 05-Feb-13 15:41
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 314 Workjay 05-Feb-13 17:39
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 344 Anomalies 05-Feb-13 21:25
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 346 Workjay 06-Feb-13 17:31
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 339 Ratcho 06-Feb-13 19:02
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 314 Anomalies 06-Feb-13 21:54
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 299 Workjay 06-Feb-13 22:19
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 229 cladking 22-Jan-13 16:29
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 233 Anomalies 21-Jan-13 16:07
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 233 Workjay 21-Jan-13 16:13
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 210 carolb 21-Jan-13 17:52
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 215 Anomalies 21-Jan-13 18:00
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 233 carolb 21-Jan-13 18:05
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 220 Anomalies 21-Jan-13 19:01
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 238 carolb 21-Jan-13 19:07
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 226 Anomalies 21-Jan-13 19:21
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 257 carolb 21-Jan-13 19:42
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 225 Anomalies 21-Jan-13 19:58
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 230 carolb 21-Jan-13 20:17
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 210 Anomalies 21-Jan-13 20:27
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 233 Susan Doris 14-Feb-13 14:42
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 216 Anomalies 22-Jan-13 14:50
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 192 wordsmyth 23-Jan-13 08:35
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 231 Workjay 22-Jan-13 02:20
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 235 richarddullum 22-Jan-13 14:31
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 264 Aine 22-Jan-13 14:49
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 233 Anomalies 22-Jan-13 14:56
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 280 Aine 22-Jan-13 15:29
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 287 Aine 22-Jan-13 15:47
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 213 Anomalies 22-Jan-13 16:08
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 302 Aine 22-Jan-13 16:23
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 286 Aine 22-Jan-13 16:24
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 272 richarddullum 23-Jan-13 04:50
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 231 wordsmyth 23-Jan-13 08:52
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 236 richarddullum 23-Jan-13 14:28
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 260 wordsmyth 23-Jan-13 15:19
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 297 Aine 23-Jan-13 15:42
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 222 richarddullum 24-Jan-13 02:03
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 267 Aine 23-Jan-13 14:39
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 259 wordsmyth 23-Jan-13 15:09
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 292 Aine 24-Jan-13 13:19
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 241 wordsmyth 25-Jan-13 05:08
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 239 Glorious 25-Jan-13 05:49
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 302 Susan Doris 25-Jan-13 06:47
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 211 wordsmyth 25-Jan-13 07:03
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 235 Glorious 25-Jan-13 07:32
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 210 wordsmyth 25-Jan-13 08:09
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 193 cladking 25-Jan-13 16:32
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 235 Susan Doris 23-Jan-13 06:54
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 244 Glorious 23-Jan-13 07:43
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 287 Aine 23-Jan-13 14:47
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 253 BobbyH 22-Jan-13 19:21
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 266 Aine 22-Jan-13 19:41
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 232 BobbyH 22-Jan-13 19:56
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 279 Aine 22-Jan-13 19:59
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 297 Aine 22-Jan-13 20:09
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 265 Glorious 22-Jan-13 20:52
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 232 BobbyH 22-Jan-13 14:57
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 229 Workjay 22-Jan-13 15:08
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 254 BobbyH 22-Jan-13 15:41
Episode: "Destination Orion" was very well done 231 David L 17-Jan-13 17:35
Re: Episode: "Destination Orion" was very well done 226 Thomas Brophy 03-Mar-13 23:30
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 145 wordsmyth 23-Jan-13 08:10
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 264 Archae Solenhofen 25-Jan-13 03:28
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 257 wordsmyth 25-Jan-13 06:32
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 324 Thanos5150 25-Jan-13 18:22
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 240 Sangreal Sea 25-Jan-13 19:11
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 242 Warwick 11-Feb-13 22:32
The latest episode "Alien Abductions" is the most absurd yet 214 David L 23-Feb-13 23:41
Re: The latest episode "Alien Abductions" is the most absurd yet 229 Anomalies 25-Feb-13 19:00
Re: The latest episode "Alien Abductions" is the most absurd yet 173 David L 26-Feb-13 01:44
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 166 LanceHall 23-Mar-13 00:28


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.