Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Thanos5150 wrote:

> carolb wrote:
>
> > Carol: Why are you assuming the moon was ‘placed’ in orbit
> by
> > an extraterrestrial agency? Which is more likely to have
> > happened – a group of aliens maneuvered a 2,160-mile
> diameter
> > body into orbit around earth, or it was formed by collision
> > with a Mars-sized body early in the history of the solar
> > system, when such collisions were commonplace, as evidenced
> by
> > the pock-marked surfaces of all the rocky planets, moons and
> > asteroids?
>
> I am not "assuming" anything, so please do not put words in my
> mouth.

Carol: I’m not ‘putting words into your mouth’. I’m paraphrasing your argument. After all, it was you, not me who stated: “how would one put an orbiting body around a planet?” This suggests you assume it was indeed placed there, and is not natural.

I am offering an alternative hypothesis to the woefully
> inadequate explanation offered by science.
> A collision from a double mass Mars size body (Theia) that hit
> perfectly once, swung back in the reverse direction and hit
> perfectly again leaving no trace of its existence on the Moon,
> Earth, or neighboring space, despite this theory requiring at
> least 40% of the Moon to be made up of this body. If another
> body was responsible for the Moon it would have its own unique
> material signature but it is simply not there.
> [news.uchicago.edu].
> The Giant Impact theory is all but dead leaving no viable
> scientific explanation. If there is a perfectly natural
> explanation for the moon, the "Big Whack" theory is not it.

Carol: It’s still a theory, but it’s the one that best suits the facts as they are known at present. It’ll be refined as more knowledge comes to light, as is always the case in astronomy. Just because it’s not 100% accurate right now doesn’t mean that it never will be, nor that the extraterrestrial hypothesis is the right one.

> What is more likely; that the Earth is the center of the solar
> system or the Sun?
> What is more likely; that megalithic culture dates back to at
> least 9,000BC or is "impossible" it existed prior to 3,500BC?
>
> > As the moon’s composition is similar to earth’s, though in
> > different distributions, are we to assume the aliens knew
> the
> > earth’s composition beforehand, and manufactured or found a
> > moon that would match the earth in composition?
>
> Why would they need to know "beforehand"? It was obviously
> formed from material in the Earth zone so I'm not sure what you
> are asking unless you are putting words in my mouth again
> assuming it was towed in from outside the solar system.

Carol: I’m not ‘putting words into your mouth’. I’m paraphrasing your argument. It was you, not I that suggested “the introduction of the Moon into Earth’s orbit, …..the product of a concerted extraterrestrial effort to terraform the Earth.” That would suggest ‘towing’.

> > Are you sure that Mars is going to be ‘terraformed’ 100
> years
> > from now? Are you sure we have anything like the
> technologies,
> > resources or will to do such a thing? Mars orbit is already
> > stable – why would it need another moon to stabilize what is
> > already stable? Where would we get a large moon from?
>
> Are you sure it won't be? Are you sure we won't have this
> technology in 100yrs? What would you have said 100yrs ago when
> you were driving into town on your horse and buggy because you
> couldn't afford one of them newfangled Ford Model T "motor
> cars" if I told you 60yrs later man would be walking on the
> Moon? And don't forget that the first Wright brothers flight
> was only 10yrs earlier and that Model T you couldn't afford was
> only available 5yrs before. You would have thought I was crazy.
> Why don't you educate yourself and look back 100-150yrs ago and
> see what advancements are possible so that you won't make such
> shallow arguments. Regardless, I give "100yrs" as an example,
> but once again you focus on the straw-man argument. Make it
> 200yrs if that makes you feel better. You do know that
> scientists theorize this same exact scenario right? This isn't
> science fiction.

Carol: I wouldn’t hold my breath. We haven’t been back to the moon in over 40 years, and there’s no intention of putting a man on Mars, let alone terraforming the planet, anytime soon. There’s a vast difference between modernizing modes of transport here on earth over a 100 year period, and developing, testing, inventing, experimenting, running trials, etc. on something as daring as sending a group of astronauts on a dangerous journey of six months’ duration to another planet….and that’s only the first visit I’m talking about.

Terraforming a planet one-third the size of Earth is an undertaking far greater than that. I still find it hard to imagine there’s the will, the resources and, most important, the money to do such a thing, given the economic dire straits of most countries here on Earth. What would be the point of it?

It’s funding that’s keeping us from returning to the moon. Where’s the funding going to come from to terraform Mars, an undertaking vastly more demanding and expensive?

> Sorry, but Mars has a very eccentric orbit, though it is the
> rotation that is relevant here not orbit; but an adequately
> sized moon is required to terraform Mars for the same reasons
> the Earth is required to have such a moon. Life can't exist on
> Earth as we know it without the Moon and yet you can't
> understand if we terraformed Mars why it would need to have a
> moon?
>
> > As for ‘who’ maneuvered the moon into position, no, I didn’t
> > expect you knew who did.
>
> So I was right to question your motives.

Carol: If you suggest something as ‘Hoaglandesque’ as steering a giant moon into orbit, it’s not unreasonable to ask who you thought did it.

> > Carol: The point of what?
>
> Oyyy.

Carol: I have no idea what that means.

> > Carol: Yes, a total eclipse, but not an annular one.
>
> So what? Who said anything about it needing to be annular?

Carol: You originally said: “it is this phenomenon (the phenomenon of the moon and the sun being approximately the same angular size) that allows the Moon to perfectly cover the Sun during an eclipse allowing us to view the corona.”

You didn’t specify what type of eclipse you meant, and didn’t mention (or didn’t know) that the ‘cover’ isn’t perfect during an annular eclipse. As the moon continues to recede from earth, there’ll come a time when total eclipses will no longer be visible. Annular and partial will be the only types we see.

> > Carol: The moon’s albedo is only about 7% - it’s not really
> > very reflective at all.
>
> Yes, but its proximity to Earth makes it very "luminous", a
> better choice of words, to us down here which is a great
> benefit to life.

Carol: A full moon, yes, but the other phases aren’t all that luminous.

> > The Moon is in the exact spot it is required to be, no
> > > other place it could be, for Earth to be what it is. The
> Moon
> > > is also the only orbiting body in the solar system with a
> > > stationary ( one side perpetually facing its host) and
> > > near-perfect circular orbit.
> >
> >
> > Carol: No, not true. Most moons are in synchronous orbit
> > around their parent planet. The exceptions are the
> irregular
> > outer moons of the giant planets. And the moon's orbit is
> > elliptical, not near-perfectly circular.
>
> Who said synchronous? I said "stationary" meaning only one side
> faces Earth.

Carol: The correct term to describe the rotation of a moon that presents the same face to its parent planet is indeed ‘synchronous’.

A stationary orbit is something different – it’s also called a geostationary orbit. It refers to a body, such as a satellite, that orbits the earth in the same period as the earth rotates, thus appearing to hover above the same location on earth all the time: [www.thefreedictionary.com] The moon doesn't do this.

And you’ve ignored the fact that the moon is not unique in having a synchronous orbit. I pointed out to you that all the moons of the planets, with the exception of the outer, irregular moons of the giant planets, have synchronous orbits.

And no, wrong again, the Moon's orbit is "nearly
> circular"
> [www.windows2universe.org]

Carol: OK, but ‘nearly circular’ is still elliptical. When I wrote that I had in mind the fact that apogee and perigee moons are notably different in size to an astronomer, and the ‘supermoon’ phenomenon that gets the media all excited each year wouldn’t make the news if the orbit were circular.

> > Carol: The origins of life on earth aren’t dependent only on
> > the moon. Conditions on earth itself have to be taken into
> > account.
>
> Oyyy. At best life as was present prior to 600,000,000yrs could
> exist without the Moon, which is the point I am making which
> you ignore, but complex life as it exists after the
> Pre-Cambrian explosion could not.

Carol: I won’t argue that point, as I don’t know enough about biology to do so.

> > Carol: Which law of the universe is earth breaking by being
> > alone among the rocky planets in having such a moon?
>
> I never said it was breaking the laws of physics, once again
> putting words in my mouth, but obviously it is highly unusual
> isn't it? Hmmm, gas giants all have many moons, but except for
> Earth rocky planets have none. Aren't we lucky.

Carol: I didn’t put words into your mouth, and didn’t even mention the word ‘physics’. I could say that it’s you that’s putting words in my mouth! Again, I was paraphrasing your argument.

So what if we’re the only rocky planet with a large moon? Your sense of incredulity that we do have such a moon seems to suggest you think there was design and intent in placing it there, rather than it happening naturally.

> > Carol: It’s complex, but not impossible, and although it
> leaves
> > some questions unanswered, it’s a lot more plausible than
> > ‘aliens did it’. Some supporting evidence:
> >
> >
> [en.wikipedia.org]
>
> Yes, I like to say "aliens did it" for every anomaly because
> I'm just a dumb alien lover. Give me a moment while I adjust my
> tin-foil hat.
> Wikipedia-that explains a lot.

Carol: Sneering sarcasm doesn’t advance your argument one bit. In fact, it does the opposite. It weakens it, and makes the arguer look foolish.

> But here is direct evidence (again) against
> it:[news.uchicago.edu]
>
>
> > Carol: But you're suggesting that the aliens set it up for
> > capture. How did they push it there then, slow it down and
> > make sure earth captured it and held it in its present orbit?
>
> > Its sheer size would make this difficult, if not impossible,
> > according to what you’ve just quoted above.
>
> How do we do it with any object? Its only a matter of scale. In
> reference to Asimov's statement, which is true, this excludes a
> "controlled" capture, i.e. placement. But once again you limit
> your thinking to what is possible based on what we are capable
> of doing today as if this is just it and yet scientists as we
> speak are theorizing how to accomplish these exact same things.
> Ironic don't you think? Glad everyone doesn't think like you
> otherwise you'd still be driving around in that horse and
> buggy.

Carol: See my comment on sarcasm above.

Again, you’re assuming that the moon being where it is cannot be natural, and that someone must have ‘put’ it there, without offering any evidence that this is true, or any proposed means to do such a thing.

> Regardless, I offered an alternative hypothesis which you can
> take it for what its worth, don't really care, and as other
> posters have suggested if this discussion is to continue it
> should be done in its own thread.
>

I replied only to defend myself against your arguments and point out your errors. If you don’t want to respond any further, that’s OK with me.

Carol


Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 1592 Richard Fusniak 04-Jan-13 20:02
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 339 Citizen Attorney 05-Jan-13 00:24
Debunker debunked? 383 drrayeye 05-Jan-13 05:15
Aliens is making people re-evaluate certain paradigms 459 Ratcho 05-Jan-13 06:22
How is it possible? 349 gulsbo 05-Jan-13 16:16
Entertainment industry rules OK; thumbs down to education 297 Richard Fusniak 05-Jan-13 16:57
Re: Entertainment industry rules OK; thumbs down to education 406 gulsbo 06-Jan-13 08:03
Re: Entertainment industry rules OK; thumbs down to education 355 Richard Fusniak 06-Jan-13 08:59
Re: Entertainment industry rules OK; thumbs down to education 365 gulsbo 07-Jan-13 21:07
Re: Entertainment industry rules OK; thumbs down to education 400 Richard Fusniak 08-Jan-13 00:36
Fuzzy 309 Dan Mc F 08-Jan-13 12:49
Re: Fuzzy 373 Richard Fusniak 08-Jan-13 13:12
Re: Entertainment industry rules OK; thumbs down to education 311 gulsbo 09-Jan-13 21:36
Re: Smithsonian never lies.... 517 Thunderbird 23-Mar-13 03:39
who said aliens 357 Citizen Attorney 05-Jan-13 16:42
Re: who said aliens 355 David L 05-Jan-13 17:42
Re: who said aliens 394 Citizen Attorney 05-Jan-13 21:23
Agreed 380 NetWorkAngel 05-Jan-13 22:05
Re: Agreed 340 Citizen Attorney 06-Jan-13 19:16
Re: who said aliens 380 David L 07-Jan-13 01:16
Re: who said aliens 421 Thanos5150 06-Jan-13 18:38
Re: who said aliens 330 Citizen Attorney 06-Jan-13 19:17
Re: who said aliens 424 Thanos5150 06-Jan-13 22:45
Ancient Aliens' Debunked - Review 702 Thanos5150 07-Jan-13 02:23
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 391 MJT 08-Jan-13 13:58
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 378 Susan Doris 08-Jan-13 14:33
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 399 Richard Fusniak 08-Jan-13 15:19
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 432 Bobajot 10-Jan-13 04:01
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 425 wordsmyth 13-Jan-13 03:26
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 364 Archae Solenhofen 13-Jan-13 04:53
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 363 wordsmyth 15-Jan-13 01:44
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 403 richarddullum 15-Jan-13 03:28
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 335 wordsmyth 15-Jan-13 07:12
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 383 michael seabrook 15-Jan-13 10:48
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 403 Merrell 15-Jan-13 10:55
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 420 Archae Solenhofen 15-Jan-13 05:21
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 445 wordsmyth 15-Jan-13 08:24
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 361 Merrell 15-Jan-13 09:55
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 421 wordsmyth 15-Jan-13 10:26
Re: Archae Solenhofen = "Ancient Limestone" 428 Thanos5150 15-Jan-13 17:39
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 414 Archae Solenhofen 15-Jan-13 19:09
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 385 wordsmyth 15-Jan-13 22:26
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 353 Archae Solenhofen 16-Jan-13 03:29
Re: So...its very time consuming 343 Thunderbird 16-Jan-13 05:22
Re: So...its very time consuming 373 wordsmyth 16-Jan-13 06:32
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 429 Thunderbird 15-Jan-13 18:30
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 360 Martin Stower 23-Feb-13 15:38
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 331 wordsmyth 23-Feb-13 22:10
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 437 Thanos5150 24-Feb-13 00:33
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 401 wordsmyth 24-Feb-13 03:42
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 359 Thanos5150 24-Feb-13 06:16
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 360 wordsmyth 24-Feb-13 22:48
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 374 Scott Creighton 24-Feb-13 20:05
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 407 wordsmyth 24-Feb-13 22:36
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 380 Ratcho 24-Feb-13 22:49
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 395 Thanos5150 24-Feb-13 23:50
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 367 Scott Creighton 25-Feb-13 00:18
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 452 Martin Stower 25-Feb-13 17:57
Re: desperation.... 412 Thunderbird 25-Feb-13 21:20
Re: desperation.... 332 Martin Stower 26-Feb-13 15:47
Re: Khufu cartouche Cambell's chamber 425 Thunderbird 18-Mar-13 17:33
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 375 wordsmyth 25-Feb-13 22:25
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 375 Martin Stower 26-Feb-13 15:59
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 367 wordsmyth 26-Feb-13 21:41
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 387 Thanos5150 26-Feb-13 18:57
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 395 Martin Stower 27-Feb-13 18:46
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 311 Thanos5150 27-Feb-13 21:26
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 385 Martin Stower 28-Feb-13 16:57
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 356 Thanos5150 28-Feb-13 17:19
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 367 Martin Stower 28-Feb-13 18:08
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 396 Merrell 28-Feb-13 09:33
Re: Can we seriously believe that Alford has a clue.... 384 Thunderbird 25-Feb-13 16:41
Re: Can we seriously believe that Alford has a clue.... 421 Martin Stower 25-Feb-13 18:29
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 386 Archae Solenhofen 15-Jan-13 18:41
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 355 Thanos5150 15-Jan-13 22:13
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 357 Archae Solenhofen 15-Jan-13 22:44
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 440 Thanos5150 16-Jan-13 04:40
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 351 Archae Solenhofen 16-Jan-13 06:02
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 395 Thanos5150 16-Jan-13 06:54
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 417 Archae Solenhofen 16-Jan-13 09:09
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 361 Thanos5150 16-Jan-13 17:52
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 390 Archae Solenhofen 16-Jan-13 20:21
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 407 Thanos5150 16-Jan-13 21:21
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 307 Archae Solenhofen 17-Jan-13 04:57
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 387 Thanos5150 17-Jan-13 05:42
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 384 Archae Solenhofen 17-Jan-13 07:05
Fingerprints 1996 - 200 ton blocks 466 Merrell 17-Jan-13 11:22
Re: Fingerprints 1996 - 200 ton blocks 336 Archae Solenhofen 17-Jan-13 16:18
Re: Fingerprints 1996 - 200 ton blocks 353 Merrell 17-Jan-13 16:39
Re: Fingerprints 1996 - 200 ton blocks 387 Archae Solenhofen 17-Jan-13 17:44
Re: Fingerprints 1996 - 200 ton blocks 227 Archae Solenhofen 17-Jan-13 22:41
Re: Fingerprints 1996 - 200 ton blocks 395 Merrell 17-Jan-13 23:38
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 413 Thanos5150 17-Jan-13 23:46
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 387 wordsmyth 18-Jan-13 03:45
Mod Warning #2 > wordsmyth – Name-calling 427 Dr. Troglodyte 18-Jan-13 15:12
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 379 Archae Solenhofen 18-Jan-13 03:57
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 359 Thanos5150 18-Jan-13 05:32
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 287 Archae Solenhofen 18-Jan-13 06:04
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 332 Thanos5150 18-Jan-13 06:40
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 358 Archae Solenhofen 18-Jan-13 07:31
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 366 Thanos5150 18-Jan-13 18:02
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 266 Archae Solenhofen 18-Jan-13 18:19
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 355 Bobajot 20-Jan-13 02:08
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 348 Archae Solenhofen 20-Jan-13 03:16
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 403 Susan Doris 03-Feb-13 06:49
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 404 Thanos5150 05-Feb-13 20:00
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 410 Susan Doris 06-Feb-13 06:50
Mod Caution > Language Edit - Thanos5150 374 Dr. Troglodyte 16-Jan-13 20:39
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 324 David L 18-Jan-13 15:40
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 392 Thanos5150 18-Jan-13 17:59
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 376 wordsmyth 16-Jan-13 06:30
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 395 Thanos5150 16-Jan-13 07:03
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 358 richarddullum 17-Jan-13 03:42
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 370 Archae Solenhofen 17-Jan-13 05:10
Mod Caution > Language Edit - wordsmyth 389 Dr. Troglodyte 16-Jan-13 00:30
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 392 wordsmyth 15-Jan-13 22:23
Mod Warning #1 > wordsmyth 399 Dr. Troglodyte 16-Jan-13 00:44
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 347 Archae Solenhofen 16-Jan-13 03:11
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 366 wordsmyth 16-Jan-13 05:56
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 373 Archae Solenhofen 16-Jan-13 08:06
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 355 cladking 16-Jan-13 15:54
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 385 Archae Solenhofen 16-Jan-13 17:11
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 384 cladking 16-Jan-13 17:40
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 382 Archae Solenhofen 16-Jan-13 17:58
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 368 cladking 16-Jan-13 21:06
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 303 Archae Solenhofen 16-Jan-13 21:17
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 382 cladking 16-Jan-13 21:31
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 356 wordsmyth 20-Jan-13 01:56
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 360 Archae Solenhofen 21-Jan-13 02:36
Re: Considerations..... 352 Thunderbird 16-Jan-13 20:27
Re: Considerations..... 409 cladking 16-Jan-13 21:12
Re: Considerations..... 381 Thanos5150 16-Jan-13 21:48
Re: what bumpkins ...could do : ) 398 Thunderbird 17-Jan-13 05:05
Re: Considerations..... 442 loveritas 16-Jan-13 22:46
Re: design specs 365 Thunderbird 17-Jan-13 04:29
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 408 Anomalies 16-Jan-13 18:19
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 328 Workjay 18-Jan-13 19:16
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 368 Susan Doris 20-Jan-13 07:00
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 344 wordsmyth 20-Jan-13 08:08
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 391 Susan Doris 20-Jan-13 08:58
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 340 wordsmyth 20-Jan-13 18:31
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 367 Thanos5150 20-Jan-13 19:10
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 374 wordsmyth 22-Jan-13 16:38
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 364 Workjay 22-Jan-13 21:16
Artificial Moon 355 Thanos5150 25-Jan-13 05:28
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 343 wordsmyth 25-Jan-13 07:54
Mod Warning #1 > Language - Thanos5150 364 Dr. Troglodyte 25-Jan-13 14:04
REALLY REALLY EXCEPTIONAL POST 375 drrayeye 25-Jan-13 14:37
Re: REALLY REALLY EXCEPTIONAL POST 367 Thanos5150 25-Jan-13 19:38
Re: REALLY REALLY EXCEPTIONAL POST 474 drrayeye 26-Jan-13 07:46
Re: REALLY REALLY EXCEPTIONAL POST 440 wordsmyth 26-Jan-13 19:51
Re: REALLY REALLY EXCEPTIONAL POST 413 Thanos5150 26-Jan-13 22:27
Re: REALLY REALLY EXCEPTIONAL POST 440 wordsmyth 27-Jan-13 02:41
Re: REALLY REALLY EXCEPTIONAL POST 433 Thanos5150 27-Jan-13 05:06
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 349 carolb 25-Jan-13 21:26
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 250 Thanos5150 26-Jan-13 00:56
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 406 carolb 26-Jan-13 02:23
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 352 Thanos5150 27-Jan-13 04:50
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 528 carolb 28-Jan-13 00:31
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 348 Thanos5150 28-Jan-13 03:12
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 354 Aine 28-Jan-13 12:38
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 321 Thanos5150 28-Jan-13 20:18
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 375 Aine 28-Jan-13 20:25
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 405 Thanos5150 28-Jan-13 22:09
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 369 carolb 28-Jan-13 20:28
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 351 Thanos5150 28-Jan-13 23:41
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 375 carolb 29-Jan-13 01:23
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 400 wordsmyth 29-Jan-13 01:31
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 342 carolb 29-Jan-13 02:11
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 335 wordsmyth 29-Jan-13 03:08
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 369 wordsmyth 29-Jan-13 05:31
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 396 Thanos5150 29-Jan-13 22:53
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 390 Susan Doris 26-Jan-13 06:55
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 368 ray wakila 28-Jan-13 18:30
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 383 wordsmyth 29-Jan-13 00:39
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 327 Susan Doris 13-Feb-13 06:48
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 350 wordsmyth 13-Feb-13 23:04
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 404 Archae Solenhofen 14-Feb-13 15:37
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 369 wordsmyth 19-Feb-13 01:29
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 370 Archae Solenhofen 19-Feb-13 04:29
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 358 wordsmyth 19-Feb-13 07:25
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 352 Thanos5150 20-Feb-13 00:25
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 322 Bobajot 20-Feb-13 02:09
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 334 Archae Solenhofen 20-Feb-13 03:54
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 354 Bobajot 20-Feb-13 13:35
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 366 Archae Solenhofen 20-Feb-13 18:01
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 346 Bobajot 20-Feb-13 23:29
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 360 Archae Solenhofen 21-Feb-13 16:17
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 364 Bobajot 22-Feb-13 23:08
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 342 Archae Solenhofen 22-Feb-13 23:55
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 344 wordsmyth 23-Feb-13 00:24
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 349 cladking 23-Feb-13 00:41
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 322 wordsmyth 23-Feb-13 05:10
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 317 cladking 23-Feb-13 05:40
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 364 Bobajot 23-Feb-13 01:04
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 348 Archae Solenhofen 23-Feb-13 04:49
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 395 Bobajot 23-Feb-13 12:31
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 376 Archae Solenhofen 23-Feb-13 20:25
Science Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 366 cladking 23-Feb-13 21:29
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 359 Bobajot 24-Feb-13 02:34
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 360 Archae Solenhofen 25-Feb-13 20:21
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 366 Bobajot 26-Feb-13 03:01
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 305 wordsmyth 23-Feb-13 21:21
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 337 Thanos5150 23-Feb-13 21:32
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 303 Thanos5150 23-Feb-13 22:10
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 346 wordsmyth 23-Feb-13 22:18
We would probably be amazed 275 Ratcho 24-Feb-13 00:52
Re: We would probably be amazed 270 wordsmyth 24-Feb-13 03:48
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 349 Archae Solenhofen 24-Feb-13 01:50
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 354 wordsmyth 24-Feb-13 02:44
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 332 wordsmyth 23-Feb-13 05:18
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 319 Archae Solenhofen 23-Feb-13 04:41
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 276 Archae Solenhofen 20-Feb-13 02:11
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 362 cladking 20-Feb-13 04:08
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 396 Thanos5150 22-Feb-13 05:31
I've tried hardened steel chisels 341 Ratcho 22-Feb-13 06:15
Re: I've tried hardened steel chisels 316 Susan Doris 22-Feb-13 07:15
Re: I've tried hardened steel chisels 361 Ratcho 22-Feb-13 17:51
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 357 Archae Solenhofen 23-Feb-13 05:15
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 351 cladking 23-Feb-13 15:13
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 204 Thanos5150 23-Feb-13 20:57
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 482 Archae Solenhofen 25-Feb-13 20:14
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 352 Susan Doris 24-Feb-13 15:49
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 363 wordsmyth 24-Feb-13 22:30
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 381 wordsmyth 20-Feb-13 02:22
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 367 Archae Solenhofen 20-Feb-13 03:47
How many swings would it take 378 Ratcho 20-Feb-13 06:29
Re: How many swings would it take 317 Susan Doris 20-Feb-13 17:31
Re: How many swings would it take 368 cladking 20-Feb-13 21:24
If you have the time... 324 Ratcho 22-Feb-13 22:48
Re: How many swings would it take 382 Archae Solenhofen 20-Feb-13 18:14
Re: How many swings would it take 302 cladking 20-Feb-13 21:30
Re: How many swings would it take 386 wordsmyth 21-Feb-13 08:39
Re: How many swings would it take 397 Scott Creighton 21-Feb-13 08:45
Re: How many swings would it take 327 Archae Solenhofen 21-Feb-13 17:32
Re: How many swings would it take 352 Scott Creighton 21-Feb-13 18:04
Re: How many swings would it take 314 Archae Solenhofen 21-Feb-13 19:55
Re: How many swings would it take 335 Scott Creighton 21-Feb-13 21:40
I'd still like to know 330 Ratcho 21-Feb-13 22:02
Re: I'd still like to know 361 Archae Solenhofen 21-Feb-13 22:43
Re: I'd still like to know 321 wordsmyth 21-Feb-13 23:47
Re: I'd still like to know 319 wordsmyth 22-Feb-13 00:10
Re: I'd still like to know 351 Archae Solenhofen 22-Feb-13 00:11
Re: Unfortunately, I'd still don't care... 344 wordsmyth 22-Feb-13 00:31
Re: Unfortunately, I'd still don't care... 360 Archae Solenhofen 22-Feb-13 00:47
Re: Unfortunately, I'd still don't care... 336 wordsmyth 22-Feb-13 07:47
Re: Unfortunately, I'd still don't care... 342 Archae Solenhofen 22-Feb-13 16:42
Re: How many swings would it take 384 wordsmyth 22-Feb-13 00:20
Re: How many swings would it take 282 Susan Doris 21-Feb-13 13:44
Re: How many swings would it take 289 Archae Solenhofen 21-Feb-13 16:09
Re: How many swings would it take 335 Scott Creighton 21-Feb-13 18:59
Re: How many swings would it take 352 Archae Solenhofen 21-Feb-13 20:06
Re: How many swings would it take 336 Scott Creighton 21-Feb-13 21:43
Re: How many swings would it take 346 Archae Solenhofen 21-Feb-13 22:22
Re: How many swings would it take 338 Scott Creighton 21-Feb-13 22:30
Re: How many swings would it take 325 Archae Solenhofen 21-Feb-13 22:48
Re: How many swings would it take 348 Morten 22-Feb-13 10:52
Re: How many swings would it take 337 wordsmyth 22-Feb-13 23:30
Re: How many swings would it take 454 Scott Creighton 21-Feb-13 22:55
Mod Note > Off Topic Sub-Thread 223 Dr. Troglodyte 22-Feb-13 00:01
Re: How many swings would it take 349 richarddullum 22-Feb-13 03:20
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 290 Audrey 13-Feb-13 23:21
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 354 Susan Doris 14-Feb-13 14:59
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 305 cladking 14-Feb-13 16:07
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 360 Archae Solenhofen 14-Feb-13 15:29
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 352 cladking 14-Feb-13 16:14
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 379 Archae Solenhofen 14-Feb-13 16:41
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 326 cladking 14-Feb-13 18:57
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 346 Thanos5150 20-Jan-13 19:04
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 278 Workjay 21-Jan-13 02:42
Re: Myth and Truth 339 Thunderbird 20-Jan-13 17:33
Re: Myth and Truth 354 wordsmyth 20-Jan-13 18:34
Re: Myth and Truth 366 cladking 20-Jan-13 22:30
Re: Myth and Truth 398 Glorious 20-Jan-13 23:31
Re: Myth and Truth 362 cladking 21-Jan-13 00:26
Re: Perception 470 Thunderbird 21-Jan-13 04:15
Re: Perception 369 Glorious 21-Jan-13 05:34
Re: Perception 308 Chris Jordan 21-Jan-13 07:45
Re: Perception 352 loveritas 21-Jan-13 11:32
Re: Change of Perception 372 Chris Jordan 21-Jan-13 16:20
Re: words/music /NT 281 Thunderbird 21-Jan-13 04:45
Re: words/music /NT 355 wordsmyth 23-Jan-13 08:14
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 359 Anomalies 21-Jan-13 16:53
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 342 Workjay 21-Jan-13 17:59
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 340 Anomalies 21-Jan-13 18:13
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 393 Susan Doris 28-Jan-13 16:29
Who knew? 362 cladking 28-Jan-13 22:07
Re: Who knew? 483 Susan Doris 01-Feb-13 18:25
Re: Who knew? 342 cladking 01-Feb-13 20:42
Egyptology Debunked; they wouldn't know a snake if it bit them. 389 cladking 28-Jan-13 21:04
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 324 cladking 21-Jan-13 18:16
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 330 Anomalies 22-Jan-13 15:09
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 279 cladking 22-Jan-13 15:39
'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 345 Anomalies 22-Jan-13 15:54
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 363 Workjay 22-Jan-13 16:10
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 255 Anomalies 22-Jan-13 16:32
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 301 Workjay 22-Jan-13 21:06
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 376 Anomalies 23-Jan-13 14:53
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 340 Workjay 23-Jan-13 21:10
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 344 Anomalies 23-Jan-13 21:51
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 332 Workjay 23-Jan-13 22:58
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 300 richarddullum 24-Jan-13 02:21
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 326 Workjay 24-Jan-13 02:46
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 261 richarddullum 24-Jan-13 14:33
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 355 Aine 24-Jan-13 13:00
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 335 richarddullum 25-Jan-13 01:57
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 303 Susan Doris 27-Jan-13 13:02
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 366 Susan Doris 02-Feb-13 14:01
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 332 Anomalies 05-Feb-13 15:41
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 319 Workjay 05-Feb-13 17:39
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 347 Anomalies 05-Feb-13 21:25
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 352 Workjay 06-Feb-13 17:31
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 345 Ratcho 06-Feb-13 19:02
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 316 Anomalies 06-Feb-13 21:54
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 303 Workjay 06-Feb-13 22:19
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 233 cladking 22-Jan-13 16:29
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 236 Anomalies 21-Jan-13 16:07
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 239 Workjay 21-Jan-13 16:13
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 223 carolb 21-Jan-13 17:52
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 216 Anomalies 21-Jan-13 18:00
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 236 carolb 21-Jan-13 18:05
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 222 Anomalies 21-Jan-13 19:01
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 242 carolb 21-Jan-13 19:07
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 230 Anomalies 21-Jan-13 19:21
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 266 carolb 21-Jan-13 19:42
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 229 Anomalies 21-Jan-13 19:58
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 238 carolb 21-Jan-13 20:17
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 211 Anomalies 21-Jan-13 20:27
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 235 Susan Doris 14-Feb-13 14:42
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 223 Anomalies 22-Jan-13 14:50
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 195 wordsmyth 23-Jan-13 08:35
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 235 Workjay 22-Jan-13 02:20
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 239 richarddullum 22-Jan-13 14:31
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 271 Aine 22-Jan-13 14:49
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 235 Anomalies 22-Jan-13 14:56
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 284 Aine 22-Jan-13 15:29
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 296 Aine 22-Jan-13 15:47
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 217 Anomalies 22-Jan-13 16:08
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 307 Aine 22-Jan-13 16:23
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 287 Aine 22-Jan-13 16:24
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 276 richarddullum 23-Jan-13 04:50
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 234 wordsmyth 23-Jan-13 08:52
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 242 richarddullum 23-Jan-13 14:28
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 264 wordsmyth 23-Jan-13 15:19
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 302 Aine 23-Jan-13 15:42
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 232 richarddullum 24-Jan-13 02:03
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 267 Aine 23-Jan-13 14:39
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 259 wordsmyth 23-Jan-13 15:09
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 294 Aine 24-Jan-13 13:19
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 243 wordsmyth 25-Jan-13 05:08
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 240 Glorious 25-Jan-13 05:49
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 306 Susan Doris 25-Jan-13 06:47
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 218 wordsmyth 25-Jan-13 07:03
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 238 Glorious 25-Jan-13 07:32
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 212 wordsmyth 25-Jan-13 08:09
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 197 cladking 25-Jan-13 16:32
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 236 Susan Doris 23-Jan-13 06:54
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 247 Glorious 23-Jan-13 07:43
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 290 Aine 23-Jan-13 14:47
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 266 BobbyH 22-Jan-13 19:21
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 268 Aine 22-Jan-13 19:41
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 236 BobbyH 22-Jan-13 19:56
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 284 Aine 22-Jan-13 19:59
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 302 Aine 22-Jan-13 20:09
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 269 Glorious 22-Jan-13 20:52
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 235 BobbyH 22-Jan-13 14:57
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 234 Workjay 22-Jan-13 15:08
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 258 BobbyH 22-Jan-13 15:41
Episode: "Destination Orion" was very well done 236 David L 17-Jan-13 17:35
Re: Episode: "Destination Orion" was very well done 232 Thomas Brophy 03-Mar-13 23:30
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 146 wordsmyth 23-Jan-13 08:10
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 271 Archae Solenhofen 25-Jan-13 03:28
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 262 wordsmyth 25-Jan-13 06:32
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 328 Thanos5150 25-Jan-13 18:22
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 242 Sangreal Sea 25-Jan-13 19:11
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 245 Warwick 11-Feb-13 22:32
The latest episode "Alien Abductions" is the most absurd yet 218 David L 23-Feb-13 23:41
Re: The latest episode "Alien Abductions" is the most absurd yet 247 Anomalies 25-Feb-13 19:00
Re: The latest episode "Alien Abductions" is the most absurd yet 176 David L 26-Feb-13 01:44
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 171 LanceHall 23-Mar-13 00:28


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.