Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Thanos5150 wrote:

> carolb wrote:
>
> > Carol: Why are you assuming the moon was ‘placed’ in orbit
> by
> > an extraterrestrial agency? Which is more likely to have
> > happened – a group of aliens maneuvered a 2,160-mile
> diameter
> > body into orbit around earth, or it was formed by collision
> > with a Mars-sized body early in the history of the solar
> > system, when such collisions were commonplace, as evidenced
> by
> > the pock-marked surfaces of all the rocky planets, moons and
> > asteroids?
>
> I am not "assuming" anything, so please do not put words in my
> mouth.

Carol: I’m not ‘putting words into your mouth’. I’m paraphrasing your argument. After all, it was you, not me who stated: “how would one put an orbiting body around a planet?” This suggests you assume it was indeed placed there, and is not natural.

I am offering an alternative hypothesis to the woefully
> inadequate explanation offered by science.
> A collision from a double mass Mars size body (Theia) that hit
> perfectly once, swung back in the reverse direction and hit
> perfectly again leaving no trace of its existence on the Moon,
> Earth, or neighboring space, despite this theory requiring at
> least 40% of the Moon to be made up of this body. If another
> body was responsible for the Moon it would have its own unique
> material signature but it is simply not there.
> [news.uchicago.edu].
> The Giant Impact theory is all but dead leaving no viable
> scientific explanation. If there is a perfectly natural
> explanation for the moon, the "Big Whack" theory is not it.

Carol: It’s still a theory, but it’s the one that best suits the facts as they are known at present. It’ll be refined as more knowledge comes to light, as is always the case in astronomy. Just because it’s not 100% accurate right now doesn’t mean that it never will be, nor that the extraterrestrial hypothesis is the right one.

> What is more likely; that the Earth is the center of the solar
> system or the Sun?
> What is more likely; that megalithic culture dates back to at
> least 9,000BC or is "impossible" it existed prior to 3,500BC?
>
> > As the moon’s composition is similar to earth’s, though in
> > different distributions, are we to assume the aliens knew
> the
> > earth’s composition beforehand, and manufactured or found a
> > moon that would match the earth in composition?
>
> Why would they need to know "beforehand"? It was obviously
> formed from material in the Earth zone so I'm not sure what you
> are asking unless you are putting words in my mouth again
> assuming it was towed in from outside the solar system.

Carol: I’m not ‘putting words into your mouth’. I’m paraphrasing your argument. It was you, not I that suggested “the introduction of the Moon into Earth’s orbit, …..the product of a concerted extraterrestrial effort to terraform the Earth.” That would suggest ‘towing’.

> > Are you sure that Mars is going to be ‘terraformed’ 100
> years
> > from now? Are you sure we have anything like the
> technologies,
> > resources or will to do such a thing? Mars orbit is already
> > stable – why would it need another moon to stabilize what is
> > already stable? Where would we get a large moon from?
>
> Are you sure it won't be? Are you sure we won't have this
> technology in 100yrs? What would you have said 100yrs ago when
> you were driving into town on your horse and buggy because you
> couldn't afford one of them newfangled Ford Model T "motor
> cars" if I told you 60yrs later man would be walking on the
> Moon? And don't forget that the first Wright brothers flight
> was only 10yrs earlier and that Model T you couldn't afford was
> only available 5yrs before. You would have thought I was crazy.
> Why don't you educate yourself and look back 100-150yrs ago and
> see what advancements are possible so that you won't make such
> shallow arguments. Regardless, I give "100yrs" as an example,
> but once again you focus on the straw-man argument. Make it
> 200yrs if that makes you feel better. You do know that
> scientists theorize this same exact scenario right? This isn't
> science fiction.

Carol: I wouldn’t hold my breath. We haven’t been back to the moon in over 40 years, and there’s no intention of putting a man on Mars, let alone terraforming the planet, anytime soon. There’s a vast difference between modernizing modes of transport here on earth over a 100 year period, and developing, testing, inventing, experimenting, running trials, etc. on something as daring as sending a group of astronauts on a dangerous journey of six months’ duration to another planet….and that’s only the first visit I’m talking about.

Terraforming a planet one-third the size of Earth is an undertaking far greater than that. I still find it hard to imagine there’s the will, the resources and, most important, the money to do such a thing, given the economic dire straits of most countries here on Earth. What would be the point of it?

It’s funding that’s keeping us from returning to the moon. Where’s the funding going to come from to terraform Mars, an undertaking vastly more demanding and expensive?

> Sorry, but Mars has a very eccentric orbit, though it is the
> rotation that is relevant here not orbit; but an adequately
> sized moon is required to terraform Mars for the same reasons
> the Earth is required to have such a moon. Life can't exist on
> Earth as we know it without the Moon and yet you can't
> understand if we terraformed Mars why it would need to have a
> moon?
>
> > As for ‘who’ maneuvered the moon into position, no, I didn’t
> > expect you knew who did.
>
> So I was right to question your motives.

Carol: If you suggest something as ‘Hoaglandesque’ as steering a giant moon into orbit, it’s not unreasonable to ask who you thought did it.

> > Carol: The point of what?
>
> Oyyy.

Carol: I have no idea what that means.

> > Carol: Yes, a total eclipse, but not an annular one.
>
> So what? Who said anything about it needing to be annular?

Carol: You originally said: “it is this phenomenon (the phenomenon of the moon and the sun being approximately the same angular size) that allows the Moon to perfectly cover the Sun during an eclipse allowing us to view the corona.”

You didn’t specify what type of eclipse you meant, and didn’t mention (or didn’t know) that the ‘cover’ isn’t perfect during an annular eclipse. As the moon continues to recede from earth, there’ll come a time when total eclipses will no longer be visible. Annular and partial will be the only types we see.

> > Carol: The moon’s albedo is only about 7% - it’s not really
> > very reflective at all.
>
> Yes, but its proximity to Earth makes it very "luminous", a
> better choice of words, to us down here which is a great
> benefit to life.

Carol: A full moon, yes, but the other phases aren’t all that luminous.

> > The Moon is in the exact spot it is required to be, no
> > > other place it could be, for Earth to be what it is. The
> Moon
> > > is also the only orbiting body in the solar system with a
> > > stationary ( one side perpetually facing its host) and
> > > near-perfect circular orbit.
> >
> >
> > Carol: No, not true. Most moons are in synchronous orbit
> > around their parent planet. The exceptions are the
> irregular
> > outer moons of the giant planets. And the moon's orbit is
> > elliptical, not near-perfectly circular.
>
> Who said synchronous? I said "stationary" meaning only one side
> faces Earth.

Carol: The correct term to describe the rotation of a moon that presents the same face to its parent planet is indeed ‘synchronous’.

A stationary orbit is something different – it’s also called a geostationary orbit. It refers to a body, such as a satellite, that orbits the earth in the same period as the earth rotates, thus appearing to hover above the same location on earth all the time: [www.thefreedictionary.com] The moon doesn't do this.

And you’ve ignored the fact that the moon is not unique in having a synchronous orbit. I pointed out to you that all the moons of the planets, with the exception of the outer, irregular moons of the giant planets, have synchronous orbits.

And no, wrong again, the Moon's orbit is "nearly
> circular"
> [www.windows2universe.org]

Carol: OK, but ‘nearly circular’ is still elliptical. When I wrote that I had in mind the fact that apogee and perigee moons are notably different in size to an astronomer, and the ‘supermoon’ phenomenon that gets the media all excited each year wouldn’t make the news if the orbit were circular.

> > Carol: The origins of life on earth aren’t dependent only on
> > the moon. Conditions on earth itself have to be taken into
> > account.
>
> Oyyy. At best life as was present prior to 600,000,000yrs could
> exist without the Moon, which is the point I am making which
> you ignore, but complex life as it exists after the
> Pre-Cambrian explosion could not.

Carol: I won’t argue that point, as I don’t know enough about biology to do so.

> > Carol: Which law of the universe is earth breaking by being
> > alone among the rocky planets in having such a moon?
>
> I never said it was breaking the laws of physics, once again
> putting words in my mouth, but obviously it is highly unusual
> isn't it? Hmmm, gas giants all have many moons, but except for
> Earth rocky planets have none. Aren't we lucky.

Carol: I didn’t put words into your mouth, and didn’t even mention the word ‘physics’. I could say that it’s you that’s putting words in my mouth! Again, I was paraphrasing your argument.

So what if we’re the only rocky planet with a large moon? Your sense of incredulity that we do have such a moon seems to suggest you think there was design and intent in placing it there, rather than it happening naturally.

> > Carol: It’s complex, but not impossible, and although it
> leaves
> > some questions unanswered, it’s a lot more plausible than
> > ‘aliens did it’. Some supporting evidence:
> >
> >
> [en.wikipedia.org]
>
> Yes, I like to say "aliens did it" for every anomaly because
> I'm just a dumb alien lover. Give me a moment while I adjust my
> tin-foil hat.
> Wikipedia-that explains a lot.

Carol: Sneering sarcasm doesn’t advance your argument one bit. In fact, it does the opposite. It weakens it, and makes the arguer look foolish.

> But here is direct evidence (again) against
> it:[news.uchicago.edu]
>
>
> > Carol: But you're suggesting that the aliens set it up for
> > capture. How did they push it there then, slow it down and
> > make sure earth captured it and held it in its present orbit?
>
> > Its sheer size would make this difficult, if not impossible,
> > according to what you’ve just quoted above.
>
> How do we do it with any object? Its only a matter of scale. In
> reference to Asimov's statement, which is true, this excludes a
> "controlled" capture, i.e. placement. But once again you limit
> your thinking to what is possible based on what we are capable
> of doing today as if this is just it and yet scientists as we
> speak are theorizing how to accomplish these exact same things.
> Ironic don't you think? Glad everyone doesn't think like you
> otherwise you'd still be driving around in that horse and
> buggy.

Carol: See my comment on sarcasm above.

Again, you’re assuming that the moon being where it is cannot be natural, and that someone must have ‘put’ it there, without offering any evidence that this is true, or any proposed means to do such a thing.

> Regardless, I offered an alternative hypothesis which you can
> take it for what its worth, don't really care, and as other
> posters have suggested if this discussion is to continue it
> should be done in its own thread.
>

I replied only to defend myself against your arguments and point out your errors. If you don’t want to respond any further, that’s OK with me.

Carol


Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 1680 Richard Fusniak 04-Jan-13 20:02
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 382 Citizen Attorney 05-Jan-13 00:24
Debunker debunked? 422 drrayeye 05-Jan-13 05:15
Aliens is making people re-evaluate certain paradigms 494 Ratcho 05-Jan-13 06:22
How is it possible? 378 gulsbo 05-Jan-13 16:16
Entertainment industry rules OK; thumbs down to education 323 Richard Fusniak 05-Jan-13 16:57
Re: Entertainment industry rules OK; thumbs down to education 449 gulsbo 06-Jan-13 08:03
Re: Entertainment industry rules OK; thumbs down to education 378 Richard Fusniak 06-Jan-13 08:59
Re: Entertainment industry rules OK; thumbs down to education 401 gulsbo 07-Jan-13 21:07
Re: Entertainment industry rules OK; thumbs down to education 444 Richard Fusniak 08-Jan-13 00:36
Fuzzy 330 Dan Mc F 08-Jan-13 12:49
Re: Fuzzy 423 Richard Fusniak 08-Jan-13 13:12
Re: Entertainment industry rules OK; thumbs down to education 345 gulsbo 09-Jan-13 21:36
Re: Smithsonian never lies.... 545 Thunderbird 23-Mar-13 03:39
who said aliens 396 Citizen Attorney 05-Jan-13 16:42
Re: who said aliens 383 David L 05-Jan-13 17:42
Re: who said aliens 438 Citizen Attorney 05-Jan-13 21:23
Agreed 410 NetWorkAngel 05-Jan-13 22:05
Re: Agreed 372 Citizen Attorney 06-Jan-13 19:16
Re: who said aliens 427 David L 07-Jan-13 01:16
Re: who said aliens 478 Thanos5150 06-Jan-13 18:38
Re: who said aliens 367 Citizen Attorney 06-Jan-13 19:17
Re: who said aliens 483 Thanos5150 06-Jan-13 22:45
Ancient Aliens' Debunked - Review 756 Thanos5150 07-Jan-13 02:23
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 412 MJT 08-Jan-13 13:58
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 409 Susan Doris 08-Jan-13 14:33
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 433 Richard Fusniak 08-Jan-13 15:19
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 470 Bobajot 10-Jan-13 04:01
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 464 wordsmyth 13-Jan-13 03:26
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 398 Archae Solenhofen 13-Jan-13 04:53
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 405 wordsmyth 15-Jan-13 01:44
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 447 richarddullum 15-Jan-13 03:28
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 385 wordsmyth 15-Jan-13 07:12
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 418 michael seabrook 15-Jan-13 10:48
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 439 Merrell 15-Jan-13 10:55
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 457 Archae Solenhofen 15-Jan-13 05:21
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 492 wordsmyth 15-Jan-13 08:24
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 383 Merrell 15-Jan-13 09:55
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 473 wordsmyth 15-Jan-13 10:26
Re: Archae Solenhofen = "Ancient Limestone" 498 Thanos5150 15-Jan-13 17:39
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 448 Archae Solenhofen 15-Jan-13 19:09
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 410 wordsmyth 15-Jan-13 22:26
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 382 Archae Solenhofen 16-Jan-13 03:29
Re: So...its very time consuming 361 Thunderbird 16-Jan-13 05:22
Re: So...its very time consuming 404 wordsmyth 16-Jan-13 06:32
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 468 Thunderbird 15-Jan-13 18:30
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 410 Martin Stower 23-Feb-13 15:38
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 359 wordsmyth 23-Feb-13 22:10
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 497 Thanos5150 24-Feb-13 00:33
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 435 wordsmyth 24-Feb-13 03:42
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 398 Thanos5150 24-Feb-13 06:16
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 383 wordsmyth 24-Feb-13 22:48
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 417 Scott Creighton 24-Feb-13 20:05
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 434 wordsmyth 24-Feb-13 22:36
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 423 Ratcho 24-Feb-13 22:49
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 444 Thanos5150 24-Feb-13 23:50
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 392 Scott Creighton 25-Feb-13 00:18
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 514 Martin Stower 25-Feb-13 17:57
Re: desperation.... 444 Thunderbird 25-Feb-13 21:20
Re: desperation.... 391 Martin Stower 26-Feb-13 15:47
Re: Khufu cartouche Cambell's chamber 488 Thunderbird 18-Mar-13 17:33
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 402 wordsmyth 25-Feb-13 22:25
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 426 Martin Stower 26-Feb-13 15:59
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 414 wordsmyth 26-Feb-13 21:41
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 456 Thanos5150 26-Feb-13 18:57
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 456 Martin Stower 27-Feb-13 18:46
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 377 Thanos5150 27-Feb-13 21:26
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 464 Martin Stower 28-Feb-13 16:57
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 388 Thanos5150 28-Feb-13 17:19
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 396 Martin Stower 28-Feb-13 18:08
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 430 Merrell 28-Feb-13 09:33
Re: Can we seriously believe that Alford has a clue.... 421 Thunderbird 25-Feb-13 16:41
Re: Can we seriously believe that Alford has a clue.... 473 Martin Stower 25-Feb-13 18:29
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 423 Archae Solenhofen 15-Jan-13 18:41
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 420 Thanos5150 15-Jan-13 22:13
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 388 Archae Solenhofen 15-Jan-13 22:44
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 476 Thanos5150 16-Jan-13 04:40
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 383 Archae Solenhofen 16-Jan-13 06:02
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 438 Thanos5150 16-Jan-13 06:54
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 449 Archae Solenhofen 16-Jan-13 09:09
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 380 Thanos5150 16-Jan-13 17:52
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 421 Archae Solenhofen 16-Jan-13 20:21
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 430 Thanos5150 16-Jan-13 21:21
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 342 Archae Solenhofen 17-Jan-13 04:57
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 445 Thanos5150 17-Jan-13 05:42
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 409 Archae Solenhofen 17-Jan-13 07:05
Fingerprints 1996 - 200 ton blocks 516 Merrell 17-Jan-13 11:22
Re: Fingerprints 1996 - 200 ton blocks 373 Archae Solenhofen 17-Jan-13 16:18
Re: Fingerprints 1996 - 200 ton blocks 419 Merrell 17-Jan-13 16:39
Re: Fingerprints 1996 - 200 ton blocks 429 Archae Solenhofen 17-Jan-13 17:44
Re: Fingerprints 1996 - 200 ton blocks 260 Archae Solenhofen 17-Jan-13 22:41
Re: Fingerprints 1996 - 200 ton blocks 451 Merrell 17-Jan-13 23:38
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 478 Thanos5150 17-Jan-13 23:46
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 414 wordsmyth 18-Jan-13 03:45
Mod Warning #2 > wordsmyth – Name-calling 458 Dr. Troglodyte 18-Jan-13 15:12
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 409 Archae Solenhofen 18-Jan-13 03:57
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 394 Thanos5150 18-Jan-13 05:32
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 347 Archae Solenhofen 18-Jan-13 06:04
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 366 Thanos5150 18-Jan-13 06:40
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 396 Archae Solenhofen 18-Jan-13 07:31
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 409 Thanos5150 18-Jan-13 18:02
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 307 Archae Solenhofen 18-Jan-13 18:19
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 390 Bobajot 20-Jan-13 02:08
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 387 Archae Solenhofen 20-Jan-13 03:16
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 445 Susan Doris 03-Feb-13 06:49
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 447 Thanos5150 05-Feb-13 20:00
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 452 Susan Doris 06-Feb-13 06:50
Mod Caution > Language Edit - Thanos5150 407 Dr. Troglodyte 16-Jan-13 20:39
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 359 David L 18-Jan-13 15:40
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 467 Thanos5150 18-Jan-13 17:59
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 405 wordsmyth 16-Jan-13 06:30
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 452 Thanos5150 16-Jan-13 07:03
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 380 richarddullum 17-Jan-13 03:42
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 410 Archae Solenhofen 17-Jan-13 05:10
Mod Caution > Language Edit - wordsmyth 430 Dr. Troglodyte 16-Jan-13 00:30
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 440 wordsmyth 15-Jan-13 22:23
Mod Warning #1 > wordsmyth 447 Dr. Troglodyte 16-Jan-13 00:44
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 379 Archae Solenhofen 16-Jan-13 03:11
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 414 wordsmyth 16-Jan-13 05:56
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 419 Archae Solenhofen 16-Jan-13 08:06
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 390 cladking 16-Jan-13 15:54
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 423 Archae Solenhofen 16-Jan-13 17:11
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 421 cladking 16-Jan-13 17:40
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 418 Archae Solenhofen 16-Jan-13 17:58
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 401 cladking 16-Jan-13 21:06
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 327 Archae Solenhofen 16-Jan-13 21:17
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 411 cladking 16-Jan-13 21:31
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 397 wordsmyth 20-Jan-13 01:56
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 404 Archae Solenhofen 21-Jan-13 02:36
Re: Considerations..... 396 Thunderbird 16-Jan-13 20:27
Re: Considerations..... 439 cladking 16-Jan-13 21:12
Re: Considerations..... 402 Thanos5150 16-Jan-13 21:48
Re: what bumpkins ...could do : ) 417 Thunderbird 17-Jan-13 05:05
Re: Considerations..... 467 loveritas 16-Jan-13 22:46
Re: design specs 397 Thunderbird 17-Jan-13 04:29
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 445 Anomalies 16-Jan-13 18:19
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 364 Workjay 18-Jan-13 19:16
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 397 Susan Doris 20-Jan-13 07:00
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 383 wordsmyth 20-Jan-13 08:08
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 422 Susan Doris 20-Jan-13 08:58
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 410 wordsmyth 20-Jan-13 18:31
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 421 Thanos5150 20-Jan-13 19:10
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 424 wordsmyth 22-Jan-13 16:38
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 401 Workjay 22-Jan-13 21:16
Artificial Moon 428 Thanos5150 25-Jan-13 05:28
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 367 wordsmyth 25-Jan-13 07:54
Mod Warning #1 > Language - Thanos5150 414 Dr. Troglodyte 25-Jan-13 14:04
REALLY REALLY EXCEPTIONAL POST 409 drrayeye 25-Jan-13 14:37
Re: REALLY REALLY EXCEPTIONAL POST 422 Thanos5150 25-Jan-13 19:38
Re: REALLY REALLY EXCEPTIONAL POST 501 drrayeye 26-Jan-13 07:46
Re: REALLY REALLY EXCEPTIONAL POST 462 wordsmyth 26-Jan-13 19:51
Re: REALLY REALLY EXCEPTIONAL POST 463 Thanos5150 26-Jan-13 22:27
Re: REALLY REALLY EXCEPTIONAL POST 466 wordsmyth 27-Jan-13 02:41
Re: REALLY REALLY EXCEPTIONAL POST 490 Thanos5150 27-Jan-13 05:06
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 383 carolb 25-Jan-13 21:26
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 312 Thanos5150 26-Jan-13 00:56
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 450 carolb 26-Jan-13 02:23
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 395 Thanos5150 27-Jan-13 04:50
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 565 carolb 28-Jan-13 00:31
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 368 Thanos5150 28-Jan-13 03:12
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 377 Aine 28-Jan-13 12:38
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 360 Thanos5150 28-Jan-13 20:18
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 402 Aine 28-Jan-13 20:25
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 435 Thanos5150 28-Jan-13 22:09
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 421 carolb 28-Jan-13 20:28
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 374 Thanos5150 28-Jan-13 23:41
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 419 carolb 29-Jan-13 01:23
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 439 wordsmyth 29-Jan-13 01:31
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 381 carolb 29-Jan-13 02:11
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 370 wordsmyth 29-Jan-13 03:08
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 404 wordsmyth 29-Jan-13 05:31
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 446 Thanos5150 29-Jan-13 22:53
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 426 Susan Doris 26-Jan-13 06:55
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 395 ray wakila 28-Jan-13 18:30
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 416 wordsmyth 29-Jan-13 00:39
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 369 Susan Doris 13-Feb-13 06:48
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 390 wordsmyth 13-Feb-13 23:04
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 435 Archae Solenhofen 14-Feb-13 15:37
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 391 wordsmyth 19-Feb-13 01:29
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 395 Archae Solenhofen 19-Feb-13 04:29
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 392 wordsmyth 19-Feb-13 07:25
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 376 Thanos5150 20-Feb-13 00:25
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 356 Bobajot 20-Feb-13 02:09
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 372 Archae Solenhofen 20-Feb-13 03:54
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 384 Bobajot 20-Feb-13 13:35
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 400 Archae Solenhofen 20-Feb-13 18:01
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 370 Bobajot 20-Feb-13 23:29
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 397 Archae Solenhofen 21-Feb-13 16:17
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 418 Bobajot 22-Feb-13 23:08
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 370 Archae Solenhofen 22-Feb-13 23:55
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 369 wordsmyth 23-Feb-13 00:24
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 394 cladking 23-Feb-13 00:41
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 367 wordsmyth 23-Feb-13 05:10
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 349 cladking 23-Feb-13 05:40
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 407 Bobajot 23-Feb-13 01:04
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 394 Archae Solenhofen 23-Feb-13 04:49
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 421 Bobajot 23-Feb-13 12:31
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 401 Archae Solenhofen 23-Feb-13 20:25
Science Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 406 cladking 23-Feb-13 21:29
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 392 Bobajot 24-Feb-13 02:34
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 380 Archae Solenhofen 25-Feb-13 20:21
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 383 Bobajot 26-Feb-13 03:01
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 339 wordsmyth 23-Feb-13 21:21
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 378 Thanos5150 23-Feb-13 21:32
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 345 Thanos5150 23-Feb-13 22:10
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 367 wordsmyth 23-Feb-13 22:18
We would probably be amazed 302 Ratcho 24-Feb-13 00:52
Re: We would probably be amazed 309 wordsmyth 24-Feb-13 03:48
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 374 Archae Solenhofen 24-Feb-13 01:50
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 377 wordsmyth 24-Feb-13 02:44
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 357 wordsmyth 23-Feb-13 05:18
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 343 Archae Solenhofen 23-Feb-13 04:41
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 306 Archae Solenhofen 20-Feb-13 02:11
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 406 cladking 20-Feb-13 04:08
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 428 Thanos5150 22-Feb-13 05:31
I've tried hardened steel chisels 369 Ratcho 22-Feb-13 06:15
Re: I've tried hardened steel chisels 351 Susan Doris 22-Feb-13 07:15
Re: I've tried hardened steel chisels 399 Ratcho 22-Feb-13 17:51
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 395 Archae Solenhofen 23-Feb-13 05:15
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 407 cladking 23-Feb-13 15:13
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 235 Thanos5150 23-Feb-13 20:57
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 531 Archae Solenhofen 25-Feb-13 20:14
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 385 Susan Doris 24-Feb-13 15:49
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 391 wordsmyth 24-Feb-13 22:30
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 417 wordsmyth 20-Feb-13 02:22
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 392 Archae Solenhofen 20-Feb-13 03:47
How many swings would it take 412 Ratcho 20-Feb-13 06:29
Re: How many swings would it take 362 Susan Doris 20-Feb-13 17:31
Re: How many swings would it take 393 cladking 20-Feb-13 21:24
If you have the time... 351 Ratcho 22-Feb-13 22:48
Re: How many swings would it take 416 Archae Solenhofen 20-Feb-13 18:14
Re: How many swings would it take 341 cladking 20-Feb-13 21:30
Re: How many swings would it take 430 wordsmyth 21-Feb-13 08:39
Re: How many swings would it take 431 Scott Creighton 21-Feb-13 08:45
Re: How many swings would it take 364 Archae Solenhofen 21-Feb-13 17:32
Re: How many swings would it take 385 Scott Creighton 21-Feb-13 18:04
Re: How many swings would it take 338 Archae Solenhofen 21-Feb-13 19:55
Re: How many swings would it take 357 Scott Creighton 21-Feb-13 21:40
I'd still like to know 350 Ratcho 21-Feb-13 22:02
Re: I'd still like to know 397 Archae Solenhofen 21-Feb-13 22:43
Re: I'd still like to know 348 wordsmyth 21-Feb-13 23:47
Re: I'd still like to know 357 wordsmyth 22-Feb-13 00:10
Re: I'd still like to know 381 Archae Solenhofen 22-Feb-13 00:11
Re: Unfortunately, I'd still don't care... 393 wordsmyth 22-Feb-13 00:31
Re: Unfortunately, I'd still don't care... 391 Archae Solenhofen 22-Feb-13 00:47
Re: Unfortunately, I'd still don't care... 364 wordsmyth 22-Feb-13 07:47
Re: Unfortunately, I'd still don't care... 388 Archae Solenhofen 22-Feb-13 16:42
Re: How many swings would it take 436 wordsmyth 22-Feb-13 00:20
Re: How many swings would it take 310 Susan Doris 21-Feb-13 13:44
Re: How many swings would it take 318 Archae Solenhofen 21-Feb-13 16:09
Re: How many swings would it take 370 Scott Creighton 21-Feb-13 18:59
Re: How many swings would it take 393 Archae Solenhofen 21-Feb-13 20:06
Re: How many swings would it take 366 Scott Creighton 21-Feb-13 21:43
Re: How many swings would it take 376 Archae Solenhofen 21-Feb-13 22:22
Re: How many swings would it take 386 Scott Creighton 21-Feb-13 22:30
Re: How many swings would it take 367 Archae Solenhofen 21-Feb-13 22:48
Re: How many swings would it take 388 Morten 22-Feb-13 10:52
Re: How many swings would it take 361 wordsmyth 22-Feb-13 23:30
Re: How many swings would it take 486 Scott Creighton 21-Feb-13 22:55
Mod Note > Off Topic Sub-Thread 257 Dr. Troglodyte 22-Feb-13 00:01
Re: How many swings would it take 376 richarddullum 22-Feb-13 03:20
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 321 Audrey 13-Feb-13 23:21
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 385 Susan Doris 14-Feb-13 14:59
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 327 cladking 14-Feb-13 16:07
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 389 Archae Solenhofen 14-Feb-13 15:29
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 371 cladking 14-Feb-13 16:14
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 407 Archae Solenhofen 14-Feb-13 16:41
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 352 cladking 14-Feb-13 18:57
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 387 Thanos5150 20-Jan-13 19:04
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 299 Workjay 21-Jan-13 02:42
Re: Myth and Truth 377 Thunderbird 20-Jan-13 17:33
Re: Myth and Truth 384 wordsmyth 20-Jan-13 18:34
Re: Myth and Truth 417 cladking 20-Jan-13 22:30
Re: Myth and Truth 430 Glorious 20-Jan-13 23:31
Re: Myth and Truth 400 cladking 21-Jan-13 00:26
Re: Perception 511 Thunderbird 21-Jan-13 04:15
Re: Perception 396 Glorious 21-Jan-13 05:34
Re: Perception 342 Chris Jordan 21-Jan-13 07:45
Re: Perception 384 loveritas 21-Jan-13 11:32
Re: Change of Perception 401 Chris Jordan 21-Jan-13 16:20
Re: words/music /NT 316 Thunderbird 21-Jan-13 04:45
Re: words/music /NT 395 wordsmyth 23-Jan-13 08:14
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 385 Anomalies 21-Jan-13 16:53
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 378 Workjay 21-Jan-13 17:59
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 377 Anomalies 21-Jan-13 18:13
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 433 Susan Doris 28-Jan-13 16:29
Who knew? 403 cladking 28-Jan-13 22:07
Re: Who knew? 521 Susan Doris 01-Feb-13 18:25
Re: Who knew? 362 cladking 01-Feb-13 20:42
Egyptology Debunked; they wouldn't know a snake if it bit them. 461 cladking 28-Jan-13 21:04
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 364 cladking 21-Jan-13 18:16
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 369 Anomalies 22-Jan-13 15:09
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 298 cladking 22-Jan-13 15:39
'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 388 Anomalies 22-Jan-13 15:54
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 404 Workjay 22-Jan-13 16:10
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 285 Anomalies 22-Jan-13 16:32
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 364 Workjay 22-Jan-13 21:06
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 420 Anomalies 23-Jan-13 14:53
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 378 Workjay 23-Jan-13 21:10
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 380 Anomalies 23-Jan-13 21:51
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 376 Workjay 23-Jan-13 22:58
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 331 richarddullum 24-Jan-13 02:21
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 362 Workjay 24-Jan-13 02:46
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 293 richarddullum 24-Jan-13 14:33
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 380 Aine 24-Jan-13 13:00
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 370 richarddullum 25-Jan-13 01:57
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 339 Susan Doris 27-Jan-13 13:02
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 407 Susan Doris 02-Feb-13 14:01
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 368 Anomalies 05-Feb-13 15:41
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 359 Workjay 05-Feb-13 17:39
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 388 Anomalies 05-Feb-13 21:25
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 394 Workjay 06-Feb-13 17:31
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 382 Ratcho 06-Feb-13 19:02
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 338 Anomalies 06-Feb-13 21:54
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 334 Workjay 06-Feb-13 22:19
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 274 cladking 22-Jan-13 16:29
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 268 Anomalies 21-Jan-13 16:07
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 273 Workjay 21-Jan-13 16:13
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 248 carolb 21-Jan-13 17:52
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 251 Anomalies 21-Jan-13 18:00
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 291 carolb 21-Jan-13 18:05
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 256 Anomalies 21-Jan-13 19:01
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 294 carolb 21-Jan-13 19:07
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 263 Anomalies 21-Jan-13 19:21
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 315 carolb 21-Jan-13 19:42
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 273 Anomalies 21-Jan-13 19:58
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 278 carolb 21-Jan-13 20:17
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 238 Anomalies 21-Jan-13 20:27
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 266 Susan Doris 14-Feb-13 14:42
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 284 Anomalies 22-Jan-13 14:50
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 243 wordsmyth 23-Jan-13 08:35
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 272 Workjay 22-Jan-13 02:20
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 279 richarddullum 22-Jan-13 14:31
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 299 Aine 22-Jan-13 14:49
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 286 Anomalies 22-Jan-13 14:56
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 316 Aine 22-Jan-13 15:29
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 337 Aine 22-Jan-13 15:47
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 242 Anomalies 22-Jan-13 16:08
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 345 Aine 22-Jan-13 16:23
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 325 Aine 22-Jan-13 16:24
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 302 richarddullum 23-Jan-13 04:50
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 260 wordsmyth 23-Jan-13 08:52
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 273 richarddullum 23-Jan-13 14:28
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 291 wordsmyth 23-Jan-13 15:19
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 324 Aine 23-Jan-13 15:42
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 275 richarddullum 24-Jan-13 02:03
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 286 Aine 23-Jan-13 14:39
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 297 wordsmyth 23-Jan-13 15:09
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 338 Aine 24-Jan-13 13:19
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 286 wordsmyth 25-Jan-13 05:08
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 284 Glorious 25-Jan-13 05:49
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 339 Susan Doris 25-Jan-13 06:47
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 284 wordsmyth 25-Jan-13 07:03
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 278 Glorious 25-Jan-13 07:32
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 246 wordsmyth 25-Jan-13 08:09
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 239 cladking 25-Jan-13 16:32
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 256 Susan Doris 23-Jan-13 06:54
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 284 Glorious 23-Jan-13 07:43
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 316 Aine 23-Jan-13 14:47
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 297 BobbyH 22-Jan-13 19:21
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 302 Aine 22-Jan-13 19:41
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 283 BobbyH 22-Jan-13 19:56
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 318 Aine 22-Jan-13 19:59
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 352 Aine 22-Jan-13 20:09
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 313 Glorious 22-Jan-13 20:52
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 284 BobbyH 22-Jan-13 14:57
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 272 Workjay 22-Jan-13 15:08
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 279 BobbyH 22-Jan-13 15:41
Episode: "Destination Orion" was very well done 281 David L 17-Jan-13 17:35
Re: Episode: "Destination Orion" was very well done 270 Thomas Brophy 03-Mar-13 23:30
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 168 wordsmyth 23-Jan-13 08:10
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 317 Archae Solenhofen 25-Jan-13 03:28
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 303 wordsmyth 25-Jan-13 06:32
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 384 Thanos5150 25-Jan-13 18:22
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 278 Sangreal Sea 25-Jan-13 19:11
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 292 Warwick 11-Feb-13 22:32
The latest episode "Alien Abductions" is the most absurd yet 253 David L 23-Feb-13 23:41
Re: The latest episode "Alien Abductions" is the most absurd yet 271 Anomalies 25-Feb-13 19:00
Re: The latest episode "Alien Abductions" is the most absurd yet 195 David L 26-Feb-13 01:44
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 189 LanceHall 23-Mar-13 00:28


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.