Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
wordsmyth wrote:

>
Quote

Ya, it's still in the subthread where this "millions of
>2.5 ton blocks with tolerances of .010 inch" imagination popped
>up..... so there is no "sneak it" here.

>Just scroll up, "Archae", anyone can see the post where you
>quoted something cladking said, but then replied to him about
>something I said. Here it is:

It is more then just clear in Threaded View (irrespective of the fact that you posted one of those previous reply's out of the subthread's sequence) that Cladking's post was in the same subthread as your "millions of 2.5 ton blocks with tolerances of .010 inch" nonsense and he was responding to a message of yours that contained a mentioning of it by myself. How is that sneaking it in other then in your imagination?

>I mean, seriously, why would you just randomly start arguing
>with cladking about something no one else ever said, but me?
>Are you really THAT desperate here?

BTW, how about also posting your messages properly.... because just like before this most recent post of yours appears out of order at the very bottom of this thread with now over 190 messages, and again completely out of sequence from where it actually should be.

>
Quote

Got any examples of some advanced holes in the ground to
>go along with where they got all that "gold" or whatever
>from..... we got examples of where they were mining their chert
>from 30,000 years ago (Vermeersch 1984) so where are they
>getting their advanced rock cutting materials (and the
>processing plants that produced them)... a wild
>imaginarium?

>Sorry, but thousands of years from now, nobody will be able to
>discern the level of technology used in modern day mining
>operations. It will simply be holes bored in rocks with
>thousands of years of erosion on top of it.

Certainly they won't all be....... just like we see glacial striation on hardrocks like granite from over 15,000 years ago (BTW, these were not scratch with diamonds by aliens or advanced Co-Magmens with sonic laser drills).

>
Quote

"Solid stone or solid gold" are not the only things that
>long lived....... For heaven sake we still find Cro-Magnon
>coprolites around to see what they ate

>Thanks for the laugh.

Not as funny as the laughs from the lack of evidence for advanced rabbit and reindeer farms......... no wonder they went cannibalistic in their fall from grace.

>
Quote

so did they not have advance glasses, advanced ceramics,
>advanced stainless steels capable of surviving more than a few
>years during this leave no evidence behind episode of
>Mesolithic advancedyness.

>The "unbreakable, reinforced glass" made today will still
>*eventually* weaken and break over hundreds of years.

Do you even know what obsidian is...... you do understand that this natural glass remains behind for more than just a few "hundreds of years" in the archeological record... right? Like in all the stone tools we have found made of such..... what is it about natural glass that is superior to advanced glass made of almost pure silica? Please enlighten us...............

>Ditto for
>ceramics.

Ya, there is more than a lot of ancient unadvanced ceramics around......... so much for being advanced.

>And modern day stainless, corrosion-resistant steel
>will *eventually* corrode after several centuries. Sorry.

So now these advanced ones used just "modern day... steel".... just how advanced was this Co-Magmen civilization anyway?

BTW, how long do you imagine the statue "The Thinker" will be around if today's people were to just magically disappear too? It's just made of bronze......

>
Quote

just how advanced were these lost ones (remember
>according from some on your side of the fence they can't carve
>all their rocks without something as hard as diamond (lots of
>it))?

>What is that, sixteen times now you've brought up your
>favorite, pointless red herring that no one else is discussing
>but you? Please, have some dignity and stop embarrassing
>yourself even further here.

Did you even bother to finish watching the "Ancient Aliens Debunked" video that started this thread or even the "Ancient Aliens" videos that inspired it?

>
Quote

Maybe you should watch those "After People" videos, they
>were on the same channel as the "Ancient Aliens" stuff.....
>both of those crowds are claiming/imaging advanced materials
>get left behind for thousands and thousands of years (and don't
>forget the young earth creationists, they imagine finding all
>sort of stuff all the time from before an imaginary globe
>wiping-megaflood).

>Vermeersch, P.M., Paulissen, E., Gijselings, G., Otte, M.,
>Thoma, A., Van Peer, P., Lauwers, R., Drappier, D. and
>Charlier, C. (1984) 33,000 year old chert mining site and
>related Homo in the Egyptian Nile valley. Nature, 309:
>342-4.

>(Yawn)... Irrelevant red herrings/strawmen. Sorry.

Ya, and 33,000 years of erosion still leaves ancient mines behind to be found........ so much for your above assertion about advanced Co-Magmen mines from 3 times more recent times all conveniently disappearing.

>
Quote

How about all over the place in Egypt including Giza,
>unlike for these lost ones with absolutely nothing from before,
>during, or after? Oh, except the stone blocks…… and all the
>“gross exaggerations” that went along with them.

>Dodge noted.

>But anyway, since we only have only a tiny fraction of the
>building materials used to make all the other pyramids (and
>other monuments) of Egypt (excluding G1, G2, and G3), why
>should we expect to have some left behind from an epoch at
>least *twice* as old as the rest?

Because dividing something by 2 times a previous time interval does not equal zero (thus the above 33,000 year old mine)...... unless that something was zero to begin with. All you have is stone blocks and nothing else but a bunch of fringe authors making gross exaggeration/insinuations about them.

>Even further, why would those
>artifacts have been buried in the first place? Because for
>something to be preserved in the fossil record, it either has
>to be deliberately buried there (like corpses in cemeteries),
>or some cataclysmic event has to happen (like a volcano or
>mudslide) in which things get buried.

Garbage dumps......... construction debris....... etc. etc. etc. etc. etc. etc. etc...... they did not even leave any
Co-Magman droppings around either. Apparently they wiped that all up too......

>
Quote

Oh ok, so now it's just the "tops and bottoms'....
>That's right, if first you don't succeed try try try.... and
>try again.... how do you manage to get that new, very much less
>so now, previously all encompassing "0.01" claim from something
>that looks like this on it’s measurable surfaces?

>For a starter let's take a look at the outside core masonry:

>[www.nla.gov.au]

>Photo disproves nothing I said.

Other then for a start:

"millions of 2.5 ton blocks with tolerances of .010 inch"

and

"core masonry is level on the tops and bottoms of the stone blocks to 0.01 inch"

Both are complete nonsenses.......

>
Quote

If one reads Emery (1960) it is pretty clear the exposed
>core masonry is not that pristine.

>Emery, K.O. (1960) Weathering of the Great Pyramid. Journal of
>Sedimentary Petrology, 30, 141-143.

>Three whole pages of analysis from 1960, which no one can
>evaluate. Another fail on your part...

What specifically can't "no one" evaluate? Did you not actually look closely at the photo above...... it is pretty obvious that the surface is significantly eroded like Emery (1960) states.

>
Quote

Next lets have a look at some other holes in this GP
>claim of yours.

>Vyse's hole:

>[www.world-mysteries.com]
>Image Source:[www.world-mysteries.com]
>(Photograph by Jon Bodsworth
>[www.egyptarchive.co.uk])

>Again, the photo disproves nothing I said.

Remember this:

"Here is a(nother) perfect example of your dishonest and misleading strategies designed to take something completely out of context and make it seem like it's something that it's not. For starters, those are *exposed* core blocks. And do you know how they got exposed? By earthquakes. The same earthquakes which dislodged the white limestone facing stones. Hence, those visible gaps were NOT there originally. Not to mention, as any engineer will tell you, if those gaps actually were there at that level, those tolerance errors would have multiplied as blocks were placed further up the pyramid. Hence, it wouldn't have been able to be constructed with that kind of sloppy engineering. Something which is obviously not the case."

Ya, talk about "dishonest and misleading strategies"........

>
Quote

Notch on Great Pyramid's northeast edge:

>outside
>[www.archaeology.org]
>image source
>[archive.archaeology.org]

>The first photo *might* have disproved something, but it was
>too far away to be useful.

One would think that had to be put there to show you were it actually was.......

>On the other hand, the second
>actually does disprove what I said. A photo I requested from
>you when you started changing your tune,

Changing my tune? It is your responsibility to back your own claim.... you never did. You just imagined your claim, and I had to waste my time demonstrating it was completely false. Next time I might suggest checking the validity of your own claims first before indiscriminately dishing them out.

>then ignored my
>request

Ya that's right it's my fault you don't seem to actually know what your are talking about.......

>and starting arguing with cladking about things no one
>else ever said but me.

You are not the only one making that "0.01 inch" claim...... it's been around a long time.

>And for confirmation, I looked at some
>Upuaut-2 photos on Google and could easily see where they used
>mortar between the core stones and internal masonry.

Oh so now when you originally said "millions of 2.5 ton blocks" you actually meant the more than just considerably less volumed "internal masonry" made of Tura limestone (the more expensive stuff that is only there because it can be finely dressed). Ya talk about "changing your tune", from one post to the next, it's like listening to an MP3 player on six-second-shuffle......

>And thus,
>I see now that cladking was right, less than 100,000 stones
>have those tolerances I referenced.

He is talking about Tura casing..... that is not the core masonry made of Giza limestone.

Here are some of the very few examples from the GP:

[imageshack.us]
Photograph by Jon Bodsworth [www.egyptarchive.co.uk]
Note lever socket.

Here is an example from G1c (one of the smaller Queen's pyramids):

[imageshack.us]
Photograph by Jon Bodsworth [www.egyptarchive.co.uk]

That is what these advanced "tolerances of .010 inch" on G1c actually look like close up..... note the saw mark.

BTW, the above example from G1c is dekeberatly left unfinished for some reason:

[imageshack.us]
Photograph by Jon Bodsworth [www.egyptarchive.co.uk]

[imageshack.us]
Photograph by Jon Bodsworth [www.egyptarchive.co.uk]

Ya..... really advanced for aliens and civilized cavemen, maybe they were just trying to fool us into thinking they were 4th dynasty Egyptians!

>So then it appears that I
>had mistakenly conflated two different accurate facts about the
>pyramid into one incorrect fact. My bad.

Just 2 "mistakens" and 1 "incorrects"....... do you even read and/or remember your own post? Talk about gross under-exaggerations......

>Therefore, my previous
>statement that "the crux of the matter is a basic understanding
>of engineering and mathematics, specifically the ability to
>quarry, transport, and place millions of 2.5 ton blocks with
>tolerances of .010 inch, placing a stone every 5 minutes, day
>and night, for 20 years" should be revised to read:

>"The crux of the matter is a basic understanding of engineering
>and mathematics, specifically the ability to quarry, transport,
>and place millions of 2.5 ton blocks, placing a stone every 5
>minutes, day and night, for 20 years, several tens of thousands
>of which were placed with tolerances of .010 inch."

"several tens of thousands of which were placed with tolerances of .010 inch."

There are only few casing stones left on the Great Pyramid......
It is also pretty clear from some of those photos above that there ----> might <---- be a lot of potential blocks considerably less than a ton in that "millions of 2.5 ton blocks". Maybe you should do some more imagining to get a better estimate..... or better yet actually make an effort to go and learn something that is actually real about the GP.

>And although I know you like to take minor errors out of
>context and pretend that they disprove the entire assertion
>(you know, like your favorite hobby-horses), but unfortunately,
>they don't. Thus, you still have to try and disprove the rest
>of the points made in my original statement. (And again, I
>won't hold my breath. But best of luck, nonetheless!)

It's not a "minor error" it was another example of "grossly exaggerated" fringe nonsenses, and one might expect if it was not stopped here and now it would still be out there being spread with deliberate glee..

>
Quote

Off topic, really! Did not Mr. Dunn make claims about
>only diamond could scratch some ancient rocks that were used
>and did not Mr. Bauval go on seemingly about 50-200 ton blocks
>not being able to be moved with a civilization that did not
>have the wheel and pulley in some of these "Ancient Aliens"
>videos (i.e. the one on Pumapunku and the one on Power
>Plants)?

>Yes, they are off-topic. No one in this video makes those
>claims and no one else is discussing those things but you.
>Something you've been doing for years and years now. Rather
>bizarrely, I might add...

According to the "Ancient Aliens Debunked" transcripts diamonds are discussed in the section on Pumapunku and Pyramids...... so let me get this straight...... the "Ancient Aliens" videos are off topic and anything in the "Ancient Aliens Debunked" video that you have either not watched and/or don't want to discuss are all "off-topic" too.... anything else?

Archae Solenhofen (solenhofen@hotmail.com)

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 1561 Richard Fusniak 04-Jan-13 20:02
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 325 Citizen Attorney 05-Jan-13 00:24
Debunker debunked? 369 drrayeye 05-Jan-13 05:15
Aliens is making people re-evaluate certain paradigms 440 Ratcho 05-Jan-13 06:22
How is it possible? 343 gulsbo 05-Jan-13 16:16
Entertainment industry rules OK; thumbs down to education 291 Richard Fusniak 05-Jan-13 16:57
Re: Entertainment industry rules OK; thumbs down to education 379 gulsbo 06-Jan-13 08:03
Re: Entertainment industry rules OK; thumbs down to education 346 Richard Fusniak 06-Jan-13 08:59
Re: Entertainment industry rules OK; thumbs down to education 358 gulsbo 07-Jan-13 21:07
Re: Entertainment industry rules OK; thumbs down to education 391 Richard Fusniak 08-Jan-13 00:36
Fuzzy 301 Dan Mc F 08-Jan-13 12:49
Re: Fuzzy 367 Richard Fusniak 08-Jan-13 13:12
Re: Entertainment industry rules OK; thumbs down to education 298 gulsbo 09-Jan-13 21:36
Re: Smithsonian never lies.... 510 Thunderbird 23-Mar-13 03:39
who said aliens 349 Citizen Attorney 05-Jan-13 16:42
Re: who said aliens 348 David L 05-Jan-13 17:42
Re: who said aliens 383 Citizen Attorney 05-Jan-13 21:23
Agreed 369 NetWorkAngel 05-Jan-13 22:05
Re: Agreed 330 Citizen Attorney 06-Jan-13 19:16
Re: who said aliens 371 David L 07-Jan-13 01:16
Re: who said aliens 412 Thanos5150 06-Jan-13 18:38
Re: who said aliens 321 Citizen Attorney 06-Jan-13 19:17
Re: who said aliens 415 Thanos5150 06-Jan-13 22:45
Ancient Aliens' Debunked - Review 679 Thanos5150 07-Jan-13 02:23
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 377 MJT 08-Jan-13 13:58
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 371 Susan Doris 08-Jan-13 14:33
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 390 Richard Fusniak 08-Jan-13 15:19
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 423 Bobajot 10-Jan-13 04:01
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 419 wordsmyth 13-Jan-13 03:26
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 357 Archae Solenhofen 13-Jan-13 04:53
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 355 wordsmyth 15-Jan-13 01:44
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 394 richarddullum 15-Jan-13 03:28
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 327 wordsmyth 15-Jan-13 07:12
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 372 michael seabrook 15-Jan-13 10:48
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 396 Merrell 15-Jan-13 10:55
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 413 Archae Solenhofen 15-Jan-13 05:21
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 437 wordsmyth 15-Jan-13 08:24
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 353 Merrell 15-Jan-13 09:55
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 414 wordsmyth 15-Jan-13 10:26
Re: Archae Solenhofen = "Ancient Limestone" 406 Thanos5150 15-Jan-13 17:39
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 397 Archae Solenhofen 15-Jan-13 19:09
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 376 wordsmyth 15-Jan-13 22:26
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 334 Archae Solenhofen 16-Jan-13 03:29
Re: So...its very time consuming 330 Thunderbird 16-Jan-13 05:22
Re: So...its very time consuming 364 wordsmyth 16-Jan-13 06:32
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 422 Thunderbird 15-Jan-13 18:30
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 352 Martin Stower 23-Feb-13 15:38
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 323 wordsmyth 23-Feb-13 22:10
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 429 Thanos5150 24-Feb-13 00:33
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 389 wordsmyth 24-Feb-13 03:42
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 350 Thanos5150 24-Feb-13 06:16
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 352 wordsmyth 24-Feb-13 22:48
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 365 Scott Creighton 24-Feb-13 20:05
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 399 wordsmyth 24-Feb-13 22:36
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 371 Ratcho 24-Feb-13 22:49
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 386 Thanos5150 24-Feb-13 23:50
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 360 Scott Creighton 25-Feb-13 00:18
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 442 Martin Stower 25-Feb-13 17:57
Re: desperation.... 399 Thunderbird 25-Feb-13 21:20
Re: desperation.... 322 Martin Stower 26-Feb-13 15:47
Re: Khufu cartouche Cambell's chamber 410 Thunderbird 18-Mar-13 17:33
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 367 wordsmyth 25-Feb-13 22:25
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 368 Martin Stower 26-Feb-13 15:59
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 359 wordsmyth 26-Feb-13 21:41
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 379 Thanos5150 26-Feb-13 18:57
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 386 Martin Stower 27-Feb-13 18:46
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 300 Thanos5150 27-Feb-13 21:26
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 378 Martin Stower 28-Feb-13 16:57
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 347 Thanos5150 28-Feb-13 17:19
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 358 Martin Stower 28-Feb-13 18:08
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 390 Merrell 28-Feb-13 09:33
Re: Can we seriously believe that Alford has a clue.... 377 Thunderbird 25-Feb-13 16:41
Re: Can we seriously believe that Alford has a clue.... 409 Martin Stower 25-Feb-13 18:29
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 377 Archae Solenhofen 15-Jan-13 18:41
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 346 Thanos5150 15-Jan-13 22:13
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 350 Archae Solenhofen 15-Jan-13 22:44
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 430 Thanos5150 16-Jan-13 04:40
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 344 Archae Solenhofen 16-Jan-13 06:02
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 387 Thanos5150 16-Jan-13 06:54
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 409 Archae Solenhofen 16-Jan-13 09:09
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 349 Thanos5150 16-Jan-13 17:52
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 379 Archae Solenhofen 16-Jan-13 20:21
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 400 Thanos5150 16-Jan-13 21:21
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 298 Archae Solenhofen 17-Jan-13 04:57
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 380 Thanos5150 17-Jan-13 05:42
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 378 Archae Solenhofen 17-Jan-13 07:05
Fingerprints 1996 - 200 ton blocks 452 Merrell 17-Jan-13 11:22
Re: Fingerprints 1996 - 200 ton blocks 329 Archae Solenhofen 17-Jan-13 16:18
Re: Fingerprints 1996 - 200 ton blocks 316 Merrell 17-Jan-13 16:39
Re: Fingerprints 1996 - 200 ton blocks 380 Archae Solenhofen 17-Jan-13 17:44
Re: Fingerprints 1996 - 200 ton blocks 220 Archae Solenhofen 17-Jan-13 22:41
Re: Fingerprints 1996 - 200 ton blocks 386 Merrell 17-Jan-13 23:38
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 400 Thanos5150 17-Jan-13 23:46
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 381 wordsmyth 18-Jan-13 03:45
Mod Warning #2 > wordsmyth – Name-calling 417 Dr. Troglodyte 18-Jan-13 15:12
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 371 Archae Solenhofen 18-Jan-13 03:57
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 352 Thanos5150 18-Jan-13 05:32
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 272 Archae Solenhofen 18-Jan-13 06:04
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 317 Thanos5150 18-Jan-13 06:40
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 352 Archae Solenhofen 18-Jan-13 07:31
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 357 Thanos5150 18-Jan-13 18:02
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 258 Archae Solenhofen 18-Jan-13 18:19
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 347 Bobajot 20-Jan-13 02:08
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 341 Archae Solenhofen 20-Jan-13 03:16
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 396 Susan Doris 03-Feb-13 06:49
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 394 Thanos5150 05-Feb-13 20:00
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 402 Susan Doris 06-Feb-13 06:50
Mod Caution > Language Edit - Thanos5150 366 Dr. Troglodyte 16-Jan-13 20:39
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 316 David L 18-Jan-13 15:40
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 383 Thanos5150 18-Jan-13 17:59
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 368 wordsmyth 16-Jan-13 06:30
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 377 Thanos5150 16-Jan-13 07:03
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 350 richarddullum 17-Jan-13 03:42
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 357 Archae Solenhofen 17-Jan-13 05:10
Mod Caution > Language Edit - wordsmyth 382 Dr. Troglodyte 16-Jan-13 00:30
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 381 wordsmyth 15-Jan-13 22:23
Mod Warning #1 > wordsmyth 368 Dr. Troglodyte 16-Jan-13 00:44
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 339 Archae Solenhofen 16-Jan-13 03:11
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 357 wordsmyth 16-Jan-13 05:56
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 365 Archae Solenhofen 16-Jan-13 08:06
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 345 cladking 16-Jan-13 15:54
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 377 Archae Solenhofen 16-Jan-13 17:11
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 378 cladking 16-Jan-13 17:40
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 375 Archae Solenhofen 16-Jan-13 17:58
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 361 cladking 16-Jan-13 21:06
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 295 Archae Solenhofen 16-Jan-13 21:17
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 375 cladking 16-Jan-13 21:31
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 348 wordsmyth 20-Jan-13 01:56
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 352 Archae Solenhofen 21-Jan-13 02:36
Re: Considerations..... 343 Thunderbird 16-Jan-13 20:27
Re: Considerations..... 398 cladking 16-Jan-13 21:12
Re: Considerations..... 375 Thanos5150 16-Jan-13 21:48
Re: what bumpkins ...could do : ) 394 Thunderbird 17-Jan-13 05:05
Re: Considerations..... 435 loveritas 16-Jan-13 22:46
Re: design specs 358 Thunderbird 17-Jan-13 04:29
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 398 Anomalies 16-Jan-13 18:19
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 320 Workjay 18-Jan-13 19:16
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 363 Susan Doris 20-Jan-13 07:00
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 336 wordsmyth 20-Jan-13 08:08
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 384 Susan Doris 20-Jan-13 08:58
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 334 wordsmyth 20-Jan-13 18:31
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 358 Thanos5150 20-Jan-13 19:10
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 369 wordsmyth 22-Jan-13 16:38
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 359 Workjay 22-Jan-13 21:16
Artificial Moon 336 Thanos5150 25-Jan-13 05:28
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 338 wordsmyth 25-Jan-13 07:54
Mod Warning #1 > Language - Thanos5150 356 Dr. Troglodyte 25-Jan-13 14:04
REALLY REALLY EXCEPTIONAL POST 366 drrayeye 25-Jan-13 14:37
Re: REALLY REALLY EXCEPTIONAL POST 358 Thanos5150 25-Jan-13 19:38
Re: REALLY REALLY EXCEPTIONAL POST 468 drrayeye 26-Jan-13 07:46
Re: REALLY REALLY EXCEPTIONAL POST 432 wordsmyth 26-Jan-13 19:51
Re: REALLY REALLY EXCEPTIONAL POST 406 Thanos5150 26-Jan-13 22:27
Re: REALLY REALLY EXCEPTIONAL POST 425 wordsmyth 27-Jan-13 02:41
Re: REALLY REALLY EXCEPTIONAL POST 427 Thanos5150 27-Jan-13 05:06
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 344 carolb 25-Jan-13 21:26
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 243 Thanos5150 26-Jan-13 00:56
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 396 carolb 26-Jan-13 02:23
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 346 Thanos5150 27-Jan-13 04:50
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 522 carolb 28-Jan-13 00:31
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 341 Thanos5150 28-Jan-13 03:12
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 347 Aine 28-Jan-13 12:38
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 314 Thanos5150 28-Jan-13 20:18
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 368 Aine 28-Jan-13 20:25
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 399 Thanos5150 28-Jan-13 22:09
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 361 carolb 28-Jan-13 20:28
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 344 Thanos5150 28-Jan-13 23:41
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 368 carolb 29-Jan-13 01:23
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 396 wordsmyth 29-Jan-13 01:31
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 336 carolb 29-Jan-13 02:11
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 322 wordsmyth 29-Jan-13 03:08
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 364 wordsmyth 29-Jan-13 05:31
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 391 Thanos5150 29-Jan-13 22:53
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 380 Susan Doris 26-Jan-13 06:55
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 363 ray wakila 28-Jan-13 18:30
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 377 wordsmyth 29-Jan-13 00:39
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 321 Susan Doris 13-Feb-13 06:48
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 343 wordsmyth 13-Feb-13 23:04
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 395 Archae Solenhofen 14-Feb-13 15:37
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 361 wordsmyth 19-Feb-13 01:29
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 364 Archae Solenhofen 19-Feb-13 04:29
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 351 wordsmyth 19-Feb-13 07:25
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 348 Thanos5150 20-Feb-13 00:25
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 317 Bobajot 20-Feb-13 02:09
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 328 Archae Solenhofen 20-Feb-13 03:54
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 341 Bobajot 20-Feb-13 13:35
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 359 Archae Solenhofen 20-Feb-13 18:01
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 340 Bobajot 20-Feb-13 23:29
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 356 Archae Solenhofen 21-Feb-13 16:17
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 358 Bobajot 22-Feb-13 23:08
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 337 Archae Solenhofen 22-Feb-13 23:55
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 339 wordsmyth 23-Feb-13 00:24
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 342 cladking 23-Feb-13 00:41
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 314 wordsmyth 23-Feb-13 05:10
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 311 cladking 23-Feb-13 05:40
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 356 Bobajot 23-Feb-13 01:04
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 329 Archae Solenhofen 23-Feb-13 04:49
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 383 Bobajot 23-Feb-13 12:31
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 371 Archae Solenhofen 23-Feb-13 20:25
Science Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 360 cladking 23-Feb-13 21:29
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 350 Bobajot 24-Feb-13 02:34
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 348 Archae Solenhofen 25-Feb-13 20:21
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 356 Bobajot 26-Feb-13 03:01
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 301 wordsmyth 23-Feb-13 21:21
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 330 Thanos5150 23-Feb-13 21:32
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 298 Thanos5150 23-Feb-13 22:10
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 342 wordsmyth 23-Feb-13 22:18
We would probably be amazed 269 Ratcho 24-Feb-13 00:52
Re: We would probably be amazed 264 wordsmyth 24-Feb-13 03:48
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 333 Archae Solenhofen 24-Feb-13 01:50
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 349 wordsmyth 24-Feb-13 02:44
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 327 wordsmyth 23-Feb-13 05:18
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 314 Archae Solenhofen 23-Feb-13 04:41
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 270 Archae Solenhofen 20-Feb-13 02:11
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 355 cladking 20-Feb-13 04:08
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 389 Thanos5150 22-Feb-13 05:31
I've tried hardened steel chisels 336 Ratcho 22-Feb-13 06:15
Re: I've tried hardened steel chisels 311 Susan Doris 22-Feb-13 07:15
Re: I've tried hardened steel chisels 354 Ratcho 22-Feb-13 17:51
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 353 Archae Solenhofen 23-Feb-13 05:15
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 346 cladking 23-Feb-13 15:13
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 193 Thanos5150 23-Feb-13 20:57
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 442 Archae Solenhofen 25-Feb-13 20:14
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 345 Susan Doris 24-Feb-13 15:49
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 354 wordsmyth 24-Feb-13 22:30
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 373 wordsmyth 20-Feb-13 02:22
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 362 Archae Solenhofen 20-Feb-13 03:47
How many swings would it take 373 Ratcho 20-Feb-13 06:29
Re: How many swings would it take 311 Susan Doris 20-Feb-13 17:31
Re: How many swings would it take 352 cladking 20-Feb-13 21:24
If you have the time... 320 Ratcho 22-Feb-13 22:48
Re: How many swings would it take 371 Archae Solenhofen 20-Feb-13 18:14
Re: How many swings would it take 296 cladking 20-Feb-13 21:30
Re: How many swings would it take 381 wordsmyth 21-Feb-13 08:39
Re: How many swings would it take 391 Scott Creighton 21-Feb-13 08:45
Re: How many swings would it take 320 Archae Solenhofen 21-Feb-13 17:32
Re: How many swings would it take 345 Scott Creighton 21-Feb-13 18:04
Re: How many swings would it take 307 Archae Solenhofen 21-Feb-13 19:55
Re: How many swings would it take 326 Scott Creighton 21-Feb-13 21:40
I'd still like to know 324 Ratcho 21-Feb-13 22:02
Re: I'd still like to know 354 Archae Solenhofen 21-Feb-13 22:43
Re: I'd still like to know 312 wordsmyth 21-Feb-13 23:47
Re: I'd still like to know 314 wordsmyth 22-Feb-13 00:10
Re: I'd still like to know 345 Archae Solenhofen 22-Feb-13 00:11
Re: Unfortunately, I'd still don't care... 336 wordsmyth 22-Feb-13 00:31
Re: Unfortunately, I'd still don't care... 355 Archae Solenhofen 22-Feb-13 00:47
Re: Unfortunately, I'd still don't care... 331 wordsmyth 22-Feb-13 07:47
Re: Unfortunately, I'd still don't care... 335 Archae Solenhofen 22-Feb-13 16:42
Re: How many swings would it take 377 wordsmyth 22-Feb-13 00:20
Re: How many swings would it take 275 Susan Doris 21-Feb-13 13:44
Re: How many swings would it take 285 Archae Solenhofen 21-Feb-13 16:09
Re: How many swings would it take 325 Scott Creighton 21-Feb-13 18:59
Re: How many swings would it take 346 Archae Solenhofen 21-Feb-13 20:06
Re: How many swings would it take 330 Scott Creighton 21-Feb-13 21:43
Re: How many swings would it take 341 Archae Solenhofen 21-Feb-13 22:22
Re: How many swings would it take 328 Scott Creighton 21-Feb-13 22:30
Re: How many swings would it take 319 Archae Solenhofen 21-Feb-13 22:48
Re: How many swings would it take 341 Morten 22-Feb-13 10:52
Re: How many swings would it take 332 wordsmyth 22-Feb-13 23:30
Re: How many swings would it take 450 Scott Creighton 21-Feb-13 22:55
Mod Note > Off Topic Sub-Thread 219 Dr. Troglodyte 22-Feb-13 00:01
Re: How many swings would it take 335 richarddullum 22-Feb-13 03:20
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 285 Audrey 13-Feb-13 23:21
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 347 Susan Doris 14-Feb-13 14:59
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 301 cladking 14-Feb-13 16:07
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 356 Archae Solenhofen 14-Feb-13 15:29
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 347 cladking 14-Feb-13 16:14
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 372 Archae Solenhofen 14-Feb-13 16:41
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 320 cladking 14-Feb-13 18:57
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 341 Thanos5150 20-Jan-13 19:04
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 272 Workjay 21-Jan-13 02:42
Re: Myth and Truth 331 Thunderbird 20-Jan-13 17:33
Re: Myth and Truth 347 wordsmyth 20-Jan-13 18:34
Re: Myth and Truth 360 cladking 20-Jan-13 22:30
Re: Myth and Truth 388 Glorious 20-Jan-13 23:31
Re: Myth and Truth 348 cladking 21-Jan-13 00:26
Re: Perception 460 Thunderbird 21-Jan-13 04:15
Re: Perception 360 Glorious 21-Jan-13 05:34
Re: Perception 301 Chris Jordan 21-Jan-13 07:45
Re: Perception 346 loveritas 21-Jan-13 11:32
Re: Change of Perception 368 Chris Jordan 21-Jan-13 16:20
Re: words/music /NT 275 Thunderbird 21-Jan-13 04:45
Re: words/music /NT 349 wordsmyth 23-Jan-13 08:14
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 355 Anomalies 21-Jan-13 16:53
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 329 Workjay 21-Jan-13 17:59
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 333 Anomalies 21-Jan-13 18:13
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 387 Susan Doris 28-Jan-13 16:29
Who knew? 354 cladking 28-Jan-13 22:07
Re: Who knew? 472 Susan Doris 01-Feb-13 18:25
Re: Who knew? 338 cladking 01-Feb-13 20:42
Egyptology Debunked; they wouldn't know a snake if it bit them. 368 cladking 28-Jan-13 21:04
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 312 cladking 21-Jan-13 18:16
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 324 Anomalies 22-Jan-13 15:09
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 273 cladking 22-Jan-13 15:39
'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 338 Anomalies 22-Jan-13 15:54
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 356 Workjay 22-Jan-13 16:10
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 246 Anomalies 22-Jan-13 16:32
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 295 Workjay 22-Jan-13 21:06
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 368 Anomalies 23-Jan-13 14:53
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 334 Workjay 23-Jan-13 21:10
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 339 Anomalies 23-Jan-13 21:51
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 326 Workjay 23-Jan-13 22:58
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 293 richarddullum 24-Jan-13 02:21
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 297 Workjay 24-Jan-13 02:46
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 256 richarddullum 24-Jan-13 14:33
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 348 Aine 24-Jan-13 13:00
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 329 richarddullum 25-Jan-13 01:57
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 298 Susan Doris 27-Jan-13 13:02
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 362 Susan Doris 02-Feb-13 14:01
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 325 Anomalies 05-Feb-13 15:41
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 309 Workjay 05-Feb-13 17:39
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 341 Anomalies 05-Feb-13 21:25
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 343 Workjay 06-Feb-13 17:31
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 336 Ratcho 06-Feb-13 19:02
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 309 Anomalies 06-Feb-13 21:54
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 296 Workjay 06-Feb-13 22:19
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 227 cladking 22-Jan-13 16:29
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 221 Anomalies 21-Jan-13 16:07
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 229 Workjay 21-Jan-13 16:13
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 202 carolb 21-Jan-13 17:52
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 212 Anomalies 21-Jan-13 18:00
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 228 carolb 21-Jan-13 18:05
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 218 Anomalies 21-Jan-13 19:01
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 235 carolb 21-Jan-13 19:07
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 224 Anomalies 21-Jan-13 19:21
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 247 carolb 21-Jan-13 19:42
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 217 Anomalies 21-Jan-13 19:58
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 223 carolb 21-Jan-13 20:17
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 207 Anomalies 21-Jan-13 20:27
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 228 Susan Doris 14-Feb-13 14:42
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 210 Anomalies 22-Jan-13 14:50
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 190 wordsmyth 23-Jan-13 08:35
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 227 Workjay 22-Jan-13 02:20
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 232 richarddullum 22-Jan-13 14:31
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 258 Aine 22-Jan-13 14:49
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 230 Anomalies 22-Jan-13 14:56
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 275 Aine 22-Jan-13 15:29
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 280 Aine 22-Jan-13 15:47
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 211 Anomalies 22-Jan-13 16:08
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 296 Aine 22-Jan-13 16:23
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 282 Aine 22-Jan-13 16:24
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 270 richarddullum 23-Jan-13 04:50
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 227 wordsmyth 23-Jan-13 08:52
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 222 richarddullum 23-Jan-13 14:28
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 257 wordsmyth 23-Jan-13 15:19
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 288 Aine 23-Jan-13 15:42
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 211 richarddullum 24-Jan-13 02:03
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 261 Aine 23-Jan-13 14:39
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 255 wordsmyth 23-Jan-13 15:09
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 290 Aine 24-Jan-13 13:19
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 237 wordsmyth 25-Jan-13 05:08
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 235 Glorious 25-Jan-13 05:49
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 298 Susan Doris 25-Jan-13 06:47
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 208 wordsmyth 25-Jan-13 07:03
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 231 Glorious 25-Jan-13 07:32
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 207 wordsmyth 25-Jan-13 08:09
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 192 cladking 25-Jan-13 16:32
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 232 Susan Doris 23-Jan-13 06:54
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 240 Glorious 23-Jan-13 07:43
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 283 Aine 23-Jan-13 14:47
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 245 BobbyH 22-Jan-13 19:21
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 261 Aine 22-Jan-13 19:41
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 227 BobbyH 22-Jan-13 19:56
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 273 Aine 22-Jan-13 19:59
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 292 Aine 22-Jan-13 20:09
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 261 Glorious 22-Jan-13 20:52
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 228 BobbyH 22-Jan-13 14:57
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 225 Workjay 22-Jan-13 15:08
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 242 BobbyH 22-Jan-13 15:41
Episode: "Destination Orion" was very well done 225 David L 17-Jan-13 17:35
Re: Episode: "Destination Orion" was very well done 212 Thomas Brophy 03-Mar-13 23:30
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 141 wordsmyth 23-Jan-13 08:10
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 258 Archae Solenhofen 25-Jan-13 03:28
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 252 wordsmyth 25-Jan-13 06:32
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 315 Thanos5150 25-Jan-13 18:22
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 236 Sangreal Sea 25-Jan-13 19:11
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 240 Warwick 11-Feb-13 22:32
The latest episode "Alien Abductions" is the most absurd yet 213 David L 23-Feb-13 23:41
Re: The latest episode "Alien Abductions" is the most absurd yet 215 Anomalies 25-Feb-13 19:00
Re: The latest episode "Alien Abductions" is the most absurd yet 168 David L 26-Feb-13 01:44
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 154 LanceHall 23-Mar-13 00:28


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.