Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
wordsmyth wrote:

>
Quote

Ya, it's still in the subthread where this "millions of
>2.5 ton blocks with tolerances of .010 inch" imagination popped
>up..... so there is no "sneak it" here.

>Just scroll up, "Archae", anyone can see the post where you
>quoted something cladking said, but then replied to him about
>something I said. Here it is:

It is more then just clear in Threaded View (irrespective of the fact that you posted one of those previous reply's out of the subthread's sequence) that Cladking's post was in the same subthread as your "millions of 2.5 ton blocks with tolerances of .010 inch" nonsense and he was responding to a message of yours that contained a mentioning of it by myself. How is that sneaking it in other then in your imagination?

>I mean, seriously, why would you just randomly start arguing
>with cladking about something no one else ever said, but me?
>Are you really THAT desperate here?

BTW, how about also posting your messages properly.... because just like before this most recent post of yours appears out of order at the very bottom of this thread with now over 190 messages, and again completely out of sequence from where it actually should be.

>
Quote

Got any examples of some advanced holes in the ground to
>go along with where they got all that "gold" or whatever
>from..... we got examples of where they were mining their chert
>from 30,000 years ago (Vermeersch 1984) so where are they
>getting their advanced rock cutting materials (and the
>processing plants that produced them)... a wild
>imaginarium?

>Sorry, but thousands of years from now, nobody will be able to
>discern the level of technology used in modern day mining
>operations. It will simply be holes bored in rocks with
>thousands of years of erosion on top of it.

Certainly they won't all be....... just like we see glacial striation on hardrocks like granite from over 15,000 years ago (BTW, these were not scratch with diamonds by aliens or advanced Co-Magmens with sonic laser drills).

>
Quote

"Solid stone or solid gold" are not the only things that
>long lived....... For heaven sake we still find Cro-Magnon
>coprolites around to see what they ate

>Thanks for the laugh.

Not as funny as the laughs from the lack of evidence for advanced rabbit and reindeer farms......... no wonder they went cannibalistic in their fall from grace.

>
Quote

so did they not have advance glasses, advanced ceramics,
>advanced stainless steels capable of surviving more than a few
>years during this leave no evidence behind episode of
>Mesolithic advancedyness.

>The "unbreakable, reinforced glass" made today will still
>*eventually* weaken and break over hundreds of years.

Do you even know what obsidian is...... you do understand that this natural glass remains behind for more than just a few "hundreds of years" in the archeological record... right? Like in all the stone tools we have found made of such..... what is it about natural glass that is superior to advanced glass made of almost pure silica? Please enlighten us...............

>Ditto for
>ceramics.

Ya, there is more than a lot of ancient unadvanced ceramics around......... so much for being advanced.

>And modern day stainless, corrosion-resistant steel
>will *eventually* corrode after several centuries. Sorry.

So now these advanced ones used just "modern day... steel".... just how advanced was this Co-Magmen civilization anyway?

BTW, how long do you imagine the statue "The Thinker" will be around if today's people were to just magically disappear too? It's just made of bronze......

>
Quote

just how advanced were these lost ones (remember
>according from some on your side of the fence they can't carve
>all their rocks without something as hard as diamond (lots of
>it))?

>What is that, sixteen times now you've brought up your
>favorite, pointless red herring that no one else is discussing
>but you? Please, have some dignity and stop embarrassing
>yourself even further here.

Did you even bother to finish watching the "Ancient Aliens Debunked" video that started this thread or even the "Ancient Aliens" videos that inspired it?

>
Quote

Maybe you should watch those "After People" videos, they
>were on the same channel as the "Ancient Aliens" stuff.....
>both of those crowds are claiming/imaging advanced materials
>get left behind for thousands and thousands of years (and don't
>forget the young earth creationists, they imagine finding all
>sort of stuff all the time from before an imaginary globe
>wiping-megaflood).

>Vermeersch, P.M., Paulissen, E., Gijselings, G., Otte, M.,
>Thoma, A., Van Peer, P., Lauwers, R., Drappier, D. and
>Charlier, C. (1984) 33,000 year old chert mining site and
>related Homo in the Egyptian Nile valley. Nature, 309:
>342-4.

>(Yawn)... Irrelevant red herrings/strawmen. Sorry.

Ya, and 33,000 years of erosion still leaves ancient mines behind to be found........ so much for your above assertion about advanced Co-Magmen mines from 3 times more recent times all conveniently disappearing.

>
Quote

How about all over the place in Egypt including Giza,
>unlike for these lost ones with absolutely nothing from before,
>during, or after? Oh, except the stone blocks…… and all the
>“gross exaggerations” that went along with them.

>Dodge noted.

>But anyway, since we only have only a tiny fraction of the
>building materials used to make all the other pyramids (and
>other monuments) of Egypt (excluding G1, G2, and G3), why
>should we expect to have some left behind from an epoch at
>least *twice* as old as the rest?

Because dividing something by 2 times a previous time interval does not equal zero (thus the above 33,000 year old mine)...... unless that something was zero to begin with. All you have is stone blocks and nothing else but a bunch of fringe authors making gross exaggeration/insinuations about them.

>Even further, why would those
>artifacts have been buried in the first place? Because for
>something to be preserved in the fossil record, it either has
>to be deliberately buried there (like corpses in cemeteries),
>or some cataclysmic event has to happen (like a volcano or
>mudslide) in which things get buried.

Garbage dumps......... construction debris....... etc. etc. etc. etc. etc. etc. etc...... they did not even leave any
Co-Magman droppings around either. Apparently they wiped that all up too......

>
Quote

Oh ok, so now it's just the "tops and bottoms'....
>That's right, if first you don't succeed try try try.... and
>try again.... how do you manage to get that new, very much less
>so now, previously all encompassing "0.01" claim from something
>that looks like this on it’s measurable surfaces?

>For a starter let's take a look at the outside core masonry:

>[www.nla.gov.au]

>Photo disproves nothing I said.

Other then for a start:

"millions of 2.5 ton blocks with tolerances of .010 inch"

and

"core masonry is level on the tops and bottoms of the stone blocks to 0.01 inch"

Both are complete nonsenses.......

>
Quote

If one reads Emery (1960) it is pretty clear the exposed
>core masonry is not that pristine.

>Emery, K.O. (1960) Weathering of the Great Pyramid. Journal of
>Sedimentary Petrology, 30, 141-143.

>Three whole pages of analysis from 1960, which no one can
>evaluate. Another fail on your part...

What specifically can't "no one" evaluate? Did you not actually look closely at the photo above...... it is pretty obvious that the surface is significantly eroded like Emery (1960) states.

>
Quote

Next lets have a look at some other holes in this GP
>claim of yours.

>Vyse's hole:

>[www.world-mysteries.com]
>Image Source:[www.world-mysteries.com]
>(Photograph by Jon Bodsworth
>[www.egyptarchive.co.uk])

>Again, the photo disproves nothing I said.

Remember this:

"Here is a(nother) perfect example of your dishonest and misleading strategies designed to take something completely out of context and make it seem like it's something that it's not. For starters, those are *exposed* core blocks. And do you know how they got exposed? By earthquakes. The same earthquakes which dislodged the white limestone facing stones. Hence, those visible gaps were NOT there originally. Not to mention, as any engineer will tell you, if those gaps actually were there at that level, those tolerance errors would have multiplied as blocks were placed further up the pyramid. Hence, it wouldn't have been able to be constructed with that kind of sloppy engineering. Something which is obviously not the case."

Ya, talk about "dishonest and misleading strategies"........

>
Quote

Notch on Great Pyramid's northeast edge:

>outside
>[www.archaeology.org]
>image source
>[archive.archaeology.org]

>The first photo *might* have disproved something, but it was
>too far away to be useful.

One would think that had to be put there to show you were it actually was.......

>On the other hand, the second
>actually does disprove what I said. A photo I requested from
>you when you started changing your tune,

Changing my tune? It is your responsibility to back your own claim.... you never did. You just imagined your claim, and I had to waste my time demonstrating it was completely false. Next time I might suggest checking the validity of your own claims first before indiscriminately dishing them out.

>then ignored my
>request

Ya that's right it's my fault you don't seem to actually know what your are talking about.......

>and starting arguing with cladking about things no one
>else ever said but me.

You are not the only one making that "0.01 inch" claim...... it's been around a long time.

>And for confirmation, I looked at some
>Upuaut-2 photos on Google and could easily see where they used
>mortar between the core stones and internal masonry.

Oh so now when you originally said "millions of 2.5 ton blocks" you actually meant the more than just considerably less volumed "internal masonry" made of Tura limestone (the more expensive stuff that is only there because it can be finely dressed). Ya talk about "changing your tune", from one post to the next, it's like listening to an MP3 player on six-second-shuffle......

>And thus,
>I see now that cladking was right, less than 100,000 stones
>have those tolerances I referenced.

He is talking about Tura casing..... that is not the core masonry made of Giza limestone.

Here are some of the very few examples from the GP:

[imageshack.us]
Photograph by Jon Bodsworth [www.egyptarchive.co.uk]
Note lever socket.

Here is an example from G1c (one of the smaller Queen's pyramids):

[imageshack.us]
Photograph by Jon Bodsworth [www.egyptarchive.co.uk]

That is what these advanced "tolerances of .010 inch" on G1c actually look like close up..... note the saw mark.

BTW, the above example from G1c is dekeberatly left unfinished for some reason:

[imageshack.us]
Photograph by Jon Bodsworth [www.egyptarchive.co.uk]

[imageshack.us]
Photograph by Jon Bodsworth [www.egyptarchive.co.uk]

Ya..... really advanced for aliens and civilized cavemen, maybe they were just trying to fool us into thinking they were 4th dynasty Egyptians!

>So then it appears that I
>had mistakenly conflated two different accurate facts about the
>pyramid into one incorrect fact. My bad.

Just 2 "mistakens" and 1 "incorrects"....... do you even read and/or remember your own post? Talk about gross under-exaggerations......

>Therefore, my previous
>statement that "the crux of the matter is a basic understanding
>of engineering and mathematics, specifically the ability to
>quarry, transport, and place millions of 2.5 ton blocks with
>tolerances of .010 inch, placing a stone every 5 minutes, day
>and night, for 20 years" should be revised to read:

>"The crux of the matter is a basic understanding of engineering
>and mathematics, specifically the ability to quarry, transport,
>and place millions of 2.5 ton blocks, placing a stone every 5
>minutes, day and night, for 20 years, several tens of thousands
>of which were placed with tolerances of .010 inch."

"several tens of thousands of which were placed with tolerances of .010 inch."

There are only few casing stones left on the Great Pyramid......
It is also pretty clear from some of those photos above that there ----> might <---- be a lot of potential blocks considerably less than a ton in that "millions of 2.5 ton blocks". Maybe you should do some more imagining to get a better estimate..... or better yet actually make an effort to go and learn something that is actually real about the GP.

>And although I know you like to take minor errors out of
>context and pretend that they disprove the entire assertion
>(you know, like your favorite hobby-horses), but unfortunately,
>they don't. Thus, you still have to try and disprove the rest
>of the points made in my original statement. (And again, I
>won't hold my breath. But best of luck, nonetheless!)

It's not a "minor error" it was another example of "grossly exaggerated" fringe nonsenses, and one might expect if it was not stopped here and now it would still be out there being spread with deliberate glee..

>
Quote

Off topic, really! Did not Mr. Dunn make claims about
>only diamond could scratch some ancient rocks that were used
>and did not Mr. Bauval go on seemingly about 50-200 ton blocks
>not being able to be moved with a civilization that did not
>have the wheel and pulley in some of these "Ancient Aliens"
>videos (i.e. the one on Pumapunku and the one on Power
>Plants)?

>Yes, they are off-topic. No one in this video makes those
>claims and no one else is discussing those things but you.
>Something you've been doing for years and years now. Rather
>bizarrely, I might add...

According to the "Ancient Aliens Debunked" transcripts diamonds are discussed in the section on Pumapunku and Pyramids...... so let me get this straight...... the "Ancient Aliens" videos are off topic and anything in the "Ancient Aliens Debunked" video that you have either not watched and/or don't want to discuss are all "off-topic" too.... anything else?

Archae Solenhofen (solenhofen@hotmail.com)

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 2010 Richard Fusniak 04-Jan-13 20:02
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 468 Citizen Attorney 05-Jan-13 00:24
Debunker debunked? 503 drrayeye 05-Jan-13 05:15
Aliens is making people re-evaluate certain paradigms 575 Ratcho 05-Jan-13 06:22
How is it possible? 447 gulsbo 05-Jan-13 16:16
Entertainment industry rules OK; thumbs down to education 408 Richard Fusniak 05-Jan-13 16:57
Re: Entertainment industry rules OK; thumbs down to education 531 gulsbo 06-Jan-13 08:03
Re: Entertainment industry rules OK; thumbs down to education 459 Richard Fusniak 06-Jan-13 08:59
Re: Entertainment industry rules OK; thumbs down to education 483 gulsbo 07-Jan-13 21:07
Re: Entertainment industry rules OK; thumbs down to education 530 Richard Fusniak 08-Jan-13 00:36
Fuzzy 415 Dan Mc F 08-Jan-13 12:49
Re: Fuzzy 515 Richard Fusniak 08-Jan-13 13:12
Re: Entertainment industry rules OK; thumbs down to education 445 gulsbo 09-Jan-13 21:36
Re: Smithsonian never lies.... 638 Thunderbird 23-Mar-13 03:39
who said aliens 491 Citizen Attorney 05-Jan-13 16:42
Re: who said aliens 463 David L 05-Jan-13 17:42
Re: who said aliens 530 Citizen Attorney 05-Jan-13 21:23
Agreed 496 NetWorkAngel 05-Jan-13 22:05
Re: Agreed 455 Citizen Attorney 06-Jan-13 19:16
Re: who said aliens 515 David L 07-Jan-13 01:16
Re: who said aliens 595 Thanos5150 06-Jan-13 18:38
Re: who said aliens 473 Citizen Attorney 06-Jan-13 19:17
Re: who said aliens 576 Thanos5150 06-Jan-13 22:45
Ancient Aliens' Debunked - Review 905 Thanos5150 07-Jan-13 02:23
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 489 MJT 08-Jan-13 13:58
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 500 Susan Doris 08-Jan-13 14:33
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 509 Richard Fusniak 08-Jan-13 15:19
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 570 Bobajot 10-Jan-13 04:01
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 553 wordsmyth 13-Jan-13 03:26
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 474 Archae Solenhofen 13-Jan-13 04:53
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 486 wordsmyth 15-Jan-13 01:44
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 531 richarddullum 15-Jan-13 03:28
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 468 wordsmyth 15-Jan-13 07:12
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 500 michael seabrook 15-Jan-13 10:48
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 519 Merrell 15-Jan-13 10:55
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 553 Archae Solenhofen 15-Jan-13 05:21
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 581 wordsmyth 15-Jan-13 08:24
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 468 Merrell 15-Jan-13 09:55
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 559 wordsmyth 15-Jan-13 10:26
Re: Archae Solenhofen = "Ancient Limestone" 594 Thanos5150 15-Jan-13 17:39
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 532 Archae Solenhofen 15-Jan-13 19:09
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 542 wordsmyth 15-Jan-13 22:26
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 475 Archae Solenhofen 16-Jan-13 03:29
Re: So...its very time consuming 454 Thunderbird 16-Jan-13 05:22
Re: So...its very time consuming 524 wordsmyth 16-Jan-13 06:32
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 548 Thunderbird 15-Jan-13 18:30
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 598 Martin Stower 23-Feb-13 15:38
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 510 wordsmyth 23-Feb-13 22:10
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 587 Thanos5150 24-Feb-13 00:33
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 523 wordsmyth 24-Feb-13 03:42
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 479 Thanos5150 24-Feb-13 06:16
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 464 wordsmyth 24-Feb-13 22:48
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 502 Scott Creighton 24-Feb-13 20:05
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 534 wordsmyth 24-Feb-13 22:36
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 512 Ratcho 24-Feb-13 22:49
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 533 Thanos5150 24-Feb-13 23:50
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 476 Scott Creighton 25-Feb-13 00:18
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 626 Martin Stower 25-Feb-13 17:57
Re: desperation.... 521 Thunderbird 25-Feb-13 21:20
Re: desperation.... 482 Martin Stower 26-Feb-13 15:47
Re: Khufu cartouche Cambell's chamber 584 Thunderbird 18-Mar-13 17:33
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 501 wordsmyth 25-Feb-13 22:25
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 511 Martin Stower 26-Feb-13 15:59
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 494 wordsmyth 26-Feb-13 21:41
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 579 Thanos5150 26-Feb-13 18:57
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 553 Martin Stower 27-Feb-13 18:46
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 464 Thanos5150 27-Feb-13 21:26
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 557 Martin Stower 28-Feb-13 16:57
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 479 Thanos5150 28-Feb-13 17:19
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 483 Martin Stower 28-Feb-13 18:08
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 506 Merrell 28-Feb-13 09:33
Re: Can we seriously believe that Alford has a clue.... 514 Thunderbird 25-Feb-13 16:41
Re: Can we seriously believe that Alford has a clue.... 560 Martin Stower 25-Feb-13 18:29
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 499 Archae Solenhofen 15-Jan-13 18:41
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 514 Thanos5150 15-Jan-13 22:13
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 486 Archae Solenhofen 15-Jan-13 22:44
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 562 Thanos5150 16-Jan-13 04:40
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 460 Archae Solenhofen 16-Jan-13 06:02
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 534 Thanos5150 16-Jan-13 06:54
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 526 Archae Solenhofen 16-Jan-13 09:09
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 453 Thanos5150 16-Jan-13 17:52
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 503 Archae Solenhofen 16-Jan-13 20:21
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 518 Thanos5150 16-Jan-13 21:21
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 426 Archae Solenhofen 17-Jan-13 04:57
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 522 Thanos5150 17-Jan-13 05:42
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 499 Archae Solenhofen 17-Jan-13 07:05
Fingerprints 1996 - 200 ton blocks 611 Merrell 17-Jan-13 11:22
Re: Fingerprints 1996 - 200 ton blocks 448 Archae Solenhofen 17-Jan-13 16:18
Re: Fingerprints 1996 - 200 ton blocks 494 Merrell 17-Jan-13 16:39
Re: Fingerprints 1996 - 200 ton blocks 514 Archae Solenhofen 17-Jan-13 17:44
Re: Fingerprints 1996 - 200 ton blocks 331 Archae Solenhofen 17-Jan-13 22:41
Re: Fingerprints 1996 - 200 ton blocks 564 Merrell 17-Jan-13 23:38
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 578 Thanos5150 17-Jan-13 23:46
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 497 wordsmyth 18-Jan-13 03:45
Mod Warning #2 > wordsmyth – Name-calling 541 Dr. Troglodyte 18-Jan-13 15:12
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 492 Archae Solenhofen 18-Jan-13 03:57
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 470 Thanos5150 18-Jan-13 05:32
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 420 Archae Solenhofen 18-Jan-13 06:04
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 473 Thanos5150 18-Jan-13 06:40
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 475 Archae Solenhofen 18-Jan-13 07:31
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 484 Thanos5150 18-Jan-13 18:02
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 386 Archae Solenhofen 18-Jan-13 18:19
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 465 Bobajot 20-Jan-13 02:08
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 475 Archae Solenhofen 20-Jan-13 03:16
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 526 Susan Doris 03-Feb-13 06:49
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 586 Thanos5150 05-Feb-13 20:00
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 533 Susan Doris 06-Feb-13 06:50
Mod Caution > Language Edit - Thanos5150 476 Dr. Troglodyte 16-Jan-13 20:39
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 470 David L 18-Jan-13 15:40
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 574 Thanos5150 18-Jan-13 17:59
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 495 wordsmyth 16-Jan-13 06:30
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 590 Thanos5150 16-Jan-13 07:03
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 454 richarddullum 17-Jan-13 03:42
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 489 Archae Solenhofen 17-Jan-13 05:10
Mod Caution > Language Edit - wordsmyth 520 Dr. Troglodyte 16-Jan-13 00:30
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 535 wordsmyth 15-Jan-13 22:23
Mod Warning #1 > wordsmyth 524 Dr. Troglodyte 16-Jan-13 00:44
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 458 Archae Solenhofen 16-Jan-13 03:11
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 605 wordsmyth 16-Jan-13 05:56
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 507 Archae Solenhofen 16-Jan-13 08:06
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 461 cladking 16-Jan-13 15:54
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 504 Archae Solenhofen 16-Jan-13 17:11
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 499 cladking 16-Jan-13 17:40
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 489 Archae Solenhofen 16-Jan-13 17:58
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 483 cladking 16-Jan-13 21:06
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 457 Archae Solenhofen 16-Jan-13 21:17
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 492 cladking 16-Jan-13 21:31
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 483 wordsmyth 20-Jan-13 01:56
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 514 Archae Solenhofen 21-Jan-13 02:36
Re: Considerations..... 485 Thunderbird 16-Jan-13 20:27
Re: Considerations..... 521 cladking 16-Jan-13 21:12
Re: Considerations..... 475 Thanos5150 16-Jan-13 21:48
Re: what bumpkins ...could do : ) 487 Thunderbird 17-Jan-13 05:05
Re: Considerations..... 542 loveritas 16-Jan-13 22:46
Re: design specs 458 Thunderbird 17-Jan-13 04:29
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 630 Anomalies 16-Jan-13 18:19
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 421 Workjay 18-Jan-13 19:16
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 460 Susan Doris 20-Jan-13 07:00
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 467 wordsmyth 20-Jan-13 08:08
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 514 Susan Doris 20-Jan-13 08:58
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 501 wordsmyth 20-Jan-13 18:31
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 493 Thanos5150 20-Jan-13 19:10
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 506 wordsmyth 22-Jan-13 16:38
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 470 Workjay 22-Jan-13 21:16
Artificial Moon 543 Thanos5150 25-Jan-13 05:28
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 437 wordsmyth 25-Jan-13 07:54
Mod Warning #1 > Language - Thanos5150 507 Dr. Troglodyte 25-Jan-13 14:04
REALLY REALLY EXCEPTIONAL POST 492 drrayeye 25-Jan-13 14:37
Re: REALLY REALLY EXCEPTIONAL POST 502 Thanos5150 25-Jan-13 19:38
Re: REALLY REALLY EXCEPTIONAL POST 567 drrayeye 26-Jan-13 07:46
Re: REALLY REALLY EXCEPTIONAL POST 532 wordsmyth 26-Jan-13 19:51
Re: REALLY REALLY EXCEPTIONAL POST 527 Thanos5150 26-Jan-13 22:27
Re: REALLY REALLY EXCEPTIONAL POST 540 wordsmyth 27-Jan-13 02:41
Re: REALLY REALLY EXCEPTIONAL POST 627 Thanos5150 27-Jan-13 05:06
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 438 carolb 25-Jan-13 21:26
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 409 Thanos5150 26-Jan-13 00:56
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 516 carolb 26-Jan-13 02:23
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 461 Thanos5150 27-Jan-13 04:50
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 661 carolb 28-Jan-13 00:31
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 424 Thanos5150 28-Jan-13 03:12
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 445 Aine 28-Jan-13 12:38
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 433 Thanos5150 28-Jan-13 20:18
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 472 Aine 28-Jan-13 20:25
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 511 Thanos5150 28-Jan-13 22:09
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 506 carolb 28-Jan-13 20:28
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 445 Thanos5150 28-Jan-13 23:41
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 478 carolb 29-Jan-13 01:23
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 506 wordsmyth 29-Jan-13 01:31
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 451 carolb 29-Jan-13 02:11
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 462 wordsmyth 29-Jan-13 03:08
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 484 wordsmyth 29-Jan-13 05:31
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 564 Thanos5150 29-Jan-13 22:53
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 485 Susan Doris 26-Jan-13 06:55
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 462 ray wakila 28-Jan-13 18:30
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 484 wordsmyth 29-Jan-13 00:39
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 440 Susan Doris 13-Feb-13 06:48
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 465 wordsmyth 13-Feb-13 23:04
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 536 Archae Solenhofen 14-Feb-13 15:37
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 476 wordsmyth 19-Feb-13 01:29
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 494 Archae Solenhofen 19-Feb-13 04:29
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 455 wordsmyth 19-Feb-13 07:25
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 435 Thanos5150 20-Feb-13 00:25
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 421 Bobajot 20-Feb-13 02:09
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 449 Archae Solenhofen 20-Feb-13 03:54
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 455 Bobajot 20-Feb-13 13:35
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 457 Archae Solenhofen 20-Feb-13 18:01
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 435 Bobajot 20-Feb-13 23:29
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 462 Archae Solenhofen 21-Feb-13 16:17
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 502 Bobajot 22-Feb-13 23:08
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 549 Archae Solenhofen 22-Feb-13 23:55
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 427 wordsmyth 23-Feb-13 00:24
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 470 cladking 23-Feb-13 00:41
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 446 wordsmyth 23-Feb-13 05:10
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 448 cladking 23-Feb-13 05:40
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 492 Bobajot 23-Feb-13 01:04
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 458 Archae Solenhofen 23-Feb-13 04:49
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 485 Bobajot 23-Feb-13 12:31
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 464 Archae Solenhofen 23-Feb-13 20:25
Science Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 476 cladking 23-Feb-13 21:29
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 455 Bobajot 24-Feb-13 02:34
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 470 Archae Solenhofen 25-Feb-13 20:21
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 461 Bobajot 26-Feb-13 03:01
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 404 wordsmyth 23-Feb-13 21:21
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 449 Thanos5150 23-Feb-13 21:32
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 408 Thanos5150 23-Feb-13 22:10
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 433 wordsmyth 23-Feb-13 22:18
We would probably be amazed 363 Ratcho 24-Feb-13 00:52
Re: We would probably be amazed 398 wordsmyth 24-Feb-13 03:48
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 481 Archae Solenhofen 24-Feb-13 01:50
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 441 wordsmyth 24-Feb-13 02:44
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 423 wordsmyth 23-Feb-13 05:18
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 399 Archae Solenhofen 23-Feb-13 04:41
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 367 Archae Solenhofen 20-Feb-13 02:11
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 473 cladking 20-Feb-13 04:08
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 486 Thanos5150 22-Feb-13 05:31
I've tried hardened steel chisels 433 Ratcho 22-Feb-13 06:15
Re: I've tried hardened steel chisels 408 Susan Doris 22-Feb-13 07:15
Re: I've tried hardened steel chisels 468 Ratcho 22-Feb-13 17:51
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 452 Archae Solenhofen 23-Feb-13 05:15
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 479 cladking 23-Feb-13 15:13
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 295 Thanos5150 23-Feb-13 20:57
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 608 Archae Solenhofen 25-Feb-13 20:14
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 450 Susan Doris 24-Feb-13 15:49
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 448 wordsmyth 24-Feb-13 22:30
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 488 wordsmyth 20-Feb-13 02:22
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 464 Archae Solenhofen 20-Feb-13 03:47
How many swings would it take 486 Ratcho 20-Feb-13 06:29
Re: How many swings would it take 430 Susan Doris 20-Feb-13 17:31
Re: How many swings would it take 473 cladking 20-Feb-13 21:24
If you have the time... 418 Ratcho 22-Feb-13 22:48
Re: How many swings would it take 543 Archae Solenhofen 20-Feb-13 18:14
Re: How many swings would it take 404 cladking 20-Feb-13 21:30
Re: How many swings would it take 502 wordsmyth 21-Feb-13 08:39
Re: How many swings would it take 587 Scott Creighton 21-Feb-13 08:45
Re: How many swings would it take 424 Archae Solenhofen 21-Feb-13 17:32
Re: How many swings would it take 442 Scott Creighton 21-Feb-13 18:04
Re: How many swings would it take 406 Archae Solenhofen 21-Feb-13 19:55
Re: How many swings would it take 420 Scott Creighton 21-Feb-13 21:40
I'd still like to know 408 Ratcho 21-Feb-13 22:02
Re: I'd still like to know 454 Archae Solenhofen 21-Feb-13 22:43
Re: I'd still like to know 429 wordsmyth 21-Feb-13 23:47
Re: I'd still like to know 428 wordsmyth 22-Feb-13 00:10
Re: I'd still like to know 444 Archae Solenhofen 22-Feb-13 00:11
Re: Unfortunately, I'd still don't care... 524 wordsmyth 22-Feb-13 00:31
Re: Unfortunately, I'd still don't care... 453 Archae Solenhofen 22-Feb-13 00:47
Re: Unfortunately, I'd still don't care... 427 wordsmyth 22-Feb-13 07:47
Re: Unfortunately, I'd still don't care... 446 Archae Solenhofen 22-Feb-13 16:42
Re: How many swings would it take 512 wordsmyth 22-Feb-13 00:20
Re: How many swings would it take 369 Susan Doris 21-Feb-13 13:44
Re: How many swings would it take 386 Archae Solenhofen 21-Feb-13 16:09
Re: How many swings would it take 440 Scott Creighton 21-Feb-13 18:59
Re: How many swings would it take 464 Archae Solenhofen 21-Feb-13 20:06
Re: How many swings would it take 431 Scott Creighton 21-Feb-13 21:43
Re: How many swings would it take 437 Archae Solenhofen 21-Feb-13 22:22
Re: How many swings would it take 458 Scott Creighton 21-Feb-13 22:30
Re: How many swings would it take 429 Archae Solenhofen 21-Feb-13 22:48
Re: How many swings would it take 462 Morten 22-Feb-13 10:52
Re: How many swings would it take 426 wordsmyth 22-Feb-13 23:30
Re: How many swings would it take 560 Scott Creighton 21-Feb-13 22:55
Mod Note > Off Topic Sub-Thread 316 Dr. Troglodyte 22-Feb-13 00:01
Re: How many swings would it take 463 richarddullum 22-Feb-13 03:20
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 391 Audrey 13-Feb-13 23:21
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 441 Susan Doris 14-Feb-13 14:59
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 400 cladking 14-Feb-13 16:07
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 454 Archae Solenhofen 14-Feb-13 15:29
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 428 cladking 14-Feb-13 16:14
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 471 Archae Solenhofen 14-Feb-13 16:41
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 442 cladking 14-Feb-13 18:57
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 454 Thanos5150 20-Jan-13 19:04
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 357 Workjay 21-Jan-13 02:42
Re: Myth and Truth 438 Thunderbird 20-Jan-13 17:33
Re: Myth and Truth 442 wordsmyth 20-Jan-13 18:34
Re: Myth and Truth 488 cladking 20-Jan-13 22:30
Re: Myth and Truth 497 Glorious 20-Jan-13 23:31
Re: Myth and Truth 471 cladking 21-Jan-13 00:26
Re: Perception 661 Thunderbird 21-Jan-13 04:15
Re: Perception 463 Glorious 21-Jan-13 05:34
Re: Perception 404 Chris Jordan 21-Jan-13 07:45
Re: Perception 448 loveritas 21-Jan-13 11:32
Re: Change of Perception 463 Chris Jordan 21-Jan-13 16:20
Re: words/music /NT 399 Thunderbird 21-Jan-13 04:45
Re: words/music /NT 462 wordsmyth 23-Jan-13 08:14
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 454 Anomalies 21-Jan-13 16:53
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 441 Workjay 21-Jan-13 17:59
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 446 Anomalies 21-Jan-13 18:13
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 519 Susan Doris 28-Jan-13 16:29
Who knew? 477 cladking 28-Jan-13 22:07
Re: Who knew? 577 Susan Doris 01-Feb-13 18:25
Re: Who knew? 422 cladking 01-Feb-13 20:42
Egyptology Debunked; they wouldn't know a snake if it bit them. 539 cladking 28-Jan-13 21:04
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 464 cladking 21-Jan-13 18:16
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 447 Anomalies 22-Jan-13 15:09
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 384 cladking 22-Jan-13 15:39
'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 462 Anomalies 22-Jan-13 15:54
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 462 Workjay 22-Jan-13 16:10
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 353 Anomalies 22-Jan-13 16:32
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 443 Workjay 22-Jan-13 21:06
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 494 Anomalies 23-Jan-13 14:53
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 458 Workjay 23-Jan-13 21:10
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 449 Anomalies 23-Jan-13 21:51
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 445 Workjay 23-Jan-13 22:58
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 388 richarddullum 24-Jan-13 02:21
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 430 Workjay 24-Jan-13 02:46
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 357 richarddullum 24-Jan-13 14:33
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 450 Aine 24-Jan-13 13:00
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 433 richarddullum 25-Jan-13 01:57
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 406 Susan Doris 27-Jan-13 13:02
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 474 Susan Doris 02-Feb-13 14:01
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 431 Anomalies 05-Feb-13 15:41
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 437 Workjay 05-Feb-13 17:39
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 462 Anomalies 05-Feb-13 21:25
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 473 Workjay 06-Feb-13 17:31
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 454 Ratcho 06-Feb-13 19:02
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 417 Anomalies 06-Feb-13 21:54
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 401 Workjay 06-Feb-13 22:19
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 335 cladking 22-Jan-13 16:29
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 334 Anomalies 21-Jan-13 16:07
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 335 Workjay 21-Jan-13 16:13
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 328 carolb 21-Jan-13 17:52
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 300 Anomalies 21-Jan-13 18:00
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 351 carolb 21-Jan-13 18:05
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 346 Anomalies 21-Jan-13 19:01
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 358 carolb 21-Jan-13 19:07
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 319 Anomalies 21-Jan-13 19:21
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 385 carolb 21-Jan-13 19:42
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 336 Anomalies 21-Jan-13 19:58
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 350 carolb 21-Jan-13 20:17
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 314 Anomalies 21-Jan-13 20:27
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 324 Susan Doris 14-Feb-13 14:42
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 359 Anomalies 22-Jan-13 14:50
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 314 wordsmyth 23-Jan-13 08:35
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 353 Workjay 22-Jan-13 02:20
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 351 richarddullum 22-Jan-13 14:31
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 374 Aine 22-Jan-13 14:49
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 344 Anomalies 22-Jan-13 14:56
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 388 Aine 22-Jan-13 15:29
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 402 Aine 22-Jan-13 15:47
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 305 Anomalies 22-Jan-13 16:08
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 409 Aine 22-Jan-13 16:23
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 390 Aine 22-Jan-13 16:24
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 389 richarddullum 23-Jan-13 04:50
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 340 wordsmyth 23-Jan-13 08:52
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 333 richarddullum 23-Jan-13 14:28
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 363 wordsmyth 23-Jan-13 15:19
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 383 Aine 23-Jan-13 15:42
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 362 richarddullum 24-Jan-13 02:03
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 352 Aine 23-Jan-13 14:39
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 366 wordsmyth 23-Jan-13 15:09
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 416 Aine 24-Jan-13 13:19
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 359 wordsmyth 25-Jan-13 05:08
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 384 Glorious 25-Jan-13 05:49
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 398 Susan Doris 25-Jan-13 06:47
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 363 wordsmyth 25-Jan-13 07:03
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 355 Glorious 25-Jan-13 07:32
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 313 wordsmyth 25-Jan-13 08:09
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 294 cladking 25-Jan-13 16:32
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 317 Susan Doris 23-Jan-13 06:54
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 372 Glorious 23-Jan-13 07:43
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 378 Aine 23-Jan-13 14:47
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 362 BobbyH 22-Jan-13 19:21
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 357 Aine 22-Jan-13 19:41
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 349 BobbyH 22-Jan-13 19:56
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 394 Aine 22-Jan-13 19:59
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 460 Aine 22-Jan-13 20:09
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 385 Glorious 22-Jan-13 20:52
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 356 BobbyH 22-Jan-13 14:57
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 337 Workjay 22-Jan-13 15:08
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 356 BobbyH 22-Jan-13 15:41
Episode: "Destination Orion" was very well done 358 David L 17-Jan-13 17:35
Re: Episode: "Destination Orion" was very well done 354 Thomas Brophy 03-Mar-13 23:30
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 230 wordsmyth 23-Jan-13 08:10
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 398 Archae Solenhofen 25-Jan-13 03:28
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 400 wordsmyth 25-Jan-13 06:32
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 453 Thanos5150 25-Jan-13 18:22
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 352 Sangreal Sea 25-Jan-13 19:11
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 377 Warwick 11-Feb-13 22:32
The latest episode "Alien Abductions" is the most absurd yet 336 David L 23-Feb-13 23:41
Re: The latest episode "Alien Abductions" is the most absurd yet 333 Anomalies 25-Feb-13 19:00
Re: The latest episode "Alien Abductions" is the most absurd yet 256 David L 26-Feb-13 01:44
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 249 LanceHall 23-Mar-13 00:28


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.