Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
wordsmyth wrote:

>
Quote

Ya, it's still in the subthread where this "millions of
>2.5 ton blocks with tolerances of .010 inch" imagination popped
>up..... so there is no "sneak it" here.

>Just scroll up, "Archae", anyone can see the post where you
>quoted something cladking said, but then replied to him about
>something I said. Here it is:

It is more then just clear in Threaded View (irrespective of the fact that you posted one of those previous reply's out of the subthread's sequence) that Cladking's post was in the same subthread as your "millions of 2.5 ton blocks with tolerances of .010 inch" nonsense and he was responding to a message of yours that contained a mentioning of it by myself. How is that sneaking it in other then in your imagination?

>I mean, seriously, why would you just randomly start arguing
>with cladking about something no one else ever said, but me?
>Are you really THAT desperate here?

BTW, how about also posting your messages properly.... because just like before this most recent post of yours appears out of order at the very bottom of this thread with now over 190 messages, and again completely out of sequence from where it actually should be.

>
Quote

Got any examples of some advanced holes in the ground to
>go along with where they got all that "gold" or whatever
>from..... we got examples of where they were mining their chert
>from 30,000 years ago (Vermeersch 1984) so where are they
>getting their advanced rock cutting materials (and the
>processing plants that produced them)... a wild
>imaginarium?

>Sorry, but thousands of years from now, nobody will be able to
>discern the level of technology used in modern day mining
>operations. It will simply be holes bored in rocks with
>thousands of years of erosion on top of it.

Certainly they won't all be....... just like we see glacial striation on hardrocks like granite from over 15,000 years ago (BTW, these were not scratch with diamonds by aliens or advanced Co-Magmens with sonic laser drills).

>
Quote

"Solid stone or solid gold" are not the only things that
>long lived....... For heaven sake we still find Cro-Magnon
>coprolites around to see what they ate

>Thanks for the laugh.

Not as funny as the laughs from the lack of evidence for advanced rabbit and reindeer farms......... no wonder they went cannibalistic in their fall from grace.

>
Quote

so did they not have advance glasses, advanced ceramics,
>advanced stainless steels capable of surviving more than a few
>years during this leave no evidence behind episode of
>Mesolithic advancedyness.

>The "unbreakable, reinforced glass" made today will still
>*eventually* weaken and break over hundreds of years.

Do you even know what obsidian is...... you do understand that this natural glass remains behind for more than just a few "hundreds of years" in the archeological record... right? Like in all the stone tools we have found made of such..... what is it about natural glass that is superior to advanced glass made of almost pure silica? Please enlighten us...............

>Ditto for
>ceramics.

Ya, there is more than a lot of ancient unadvanced ceramics around......... so much for being advanced.

>And modern day stainless, corrosion-resistant steel
>will *eventually* corrode after several centuries. Sorry.

So now these advanced ones used just "modern day... steel".... just how advanced was this Co-Magmen civilization anyway?

BTW, how long do you imagine the statue "The Thinker" will be around if today's people were to just magically disappear too? It's just made of bronze......

>
Quote

just how advanced were these lost ones (remember
>according from some on your side of the fence they can't carve
>all their rocks without something as hard as diamond (lots of
>it))?

>What is that, sixteen times now you've brought up your
>favorite, pointless red herring that no one else is discussing
>but you? Please, have some dignity and stop embarrassing
>yourself even further here.

Did you even bother to finish watching the "Ancient Aliens Debunked" video that started this thread or even the "Ancient Aliens" videos that inspired it?

>
Quote

Maybe you should watch those "After People" videos, they
>were on the same channel as the "Ancient Aliens" stuff.....
>both of those crowds are claiming/imaging advanced materials
>get left behind for thousands and thousands of years (and don't
>forget the young earth creationists, they imagine finding all
>sort of stuff all the time from before an imaginary globe
>wiping-megaflood).

>Vermeersch, P.M., Paulissen, E., Gijselings, G., Otte, M.,
>Thoma, A., Van Peer, P., Lauwers, R., Drappier, D. and
>Charlier, C. (1984) 33,000 year old chert mining site and
>related Homo in the Egyptian Nile valley. Nature, 309:
>342-4.

>(Yawn)... Irrelevant red herrings/strawmen. Sorry.

Ya, and 33,000 years of erosion still leaves ancient mines behind to be found........ so much for your above assertion about advanced Co-Magmen mines from 3 times more recent times all conveniently disappearing.

>
Quote

How about all over the place in Egypt including Giza,
>unlike for these lost ones with absolutely nothing from before,
>during, or after? Oh, except the stone blocks…… and all the
>“gross exaggerations” that went along with them.

>Dodge noted.

>But anyway, since we only have only a tiny fraction of the
>building materials used to make all the other pyramids (and
>other monuments) of Egypt (excluding G1, G2, and G3), why
>should we expect to have some left behind from an epoch at
>least *twice* as old as the rest?

Because dividing something by 2 times a previous time interval does not equal zero (thus the above 33,000 year old mine)...... unless that something was zero to begin with. All you have is stone blocks and nothing else but a bunch of fringe authors making gross exaggeration/insinuations about them.

>Even further, why would those
>artifacts have been buried in the first place? Because for
>something to be preserved in the fossil record, it either has
>to be deliberately buried there (like corpses in cemeteries),
>or some cataclysmic event has to happen (like a volcano or
>mudslide) in which things get buried.

Garbage dumps......... construction debris....... etc. etc. etc. etc. etc. etc. etc...... they did not even leave any
Co-Magman droppings around either. Apparently they wiped that all up too......

>
Quote

Oh ok, so now it's just the "tops and bottoms'....
>That's right, if first you don't succeed try try try.... and
>try again.... how do you manage to get that new, very much less
>so now, previously all encompassing "0.01" claim from something
>that looks like this on it’s measurable surfaces?

>For a starter let's take a look at the outside core masonry:

>[www.nla.gov.au]

>Photo disproves nothing I said.

Other then for a start:

"millions of 2.5 ton blocks with tolerances of .010 inch"

and

"core masonry is level on the tops and bottoms of the stone blocks to 0.01 inch"

Both are complete nonsenses.......

>
Quote

If one reads Emery (1960) it is pretty clear the exposed
>core masonry is not that pristine.

>Emery, K.O. (1960) Weathering of the Great Pyramid. Journal of
>Sedimentary Petrology, 30, 141-143.

>Three whole pages of analysis from 1960, which no one can
>evaluate. Another fail on your part...

What specifically can't "no one" evaluate? Did you not actually look closely at the photo above...... it is pretty obvious that the surface is significantly eroded like Emery (1960) states.

>
Quote

Next lets have a look at some other holes in this GP
>claim of yours.

>Vyse's hole:

>[www.world-mysteries.com]
>Image Source:[www.world-mysteries.com]
>(Photograph by Jon Bodsworth
>[www.egyptarchive.co.uk])

>Again, the photo disproves nothing I said.

Remember this:

"Here is a(nother) perfect example of your dishonest and misleading strategies designed to take something completely out of context and make it seem like it's something that it's not. For starters, those are *exposed* core blocks. And do you know how they got exposed? By earthquakes. The same earthquakes which dislodged the white limestone facing stones. Hence, those visible gaps were NOT there originally. Not to mention, as any engineer will tell you, if those gaps actually were there at that level, those tolerance errors would have multiplied as blocks were placed further up the pyramid. Hence, it wouldn't have been able to be constructed with that kind of sloppy engineering. Something which is obviously not the case."

Ya, talk about "dishonest and misleading strategies"........

>
Quote

Notch on Great Pyramid's northeast edge:

>outside
>[www.archaeology.org]
>image source
>[archive.archaeology.org]

>The first photo *might* have disproved something, but it was
>too far away to be useful.

One would think that had to be put there to show you were it actually was.......

>On the other hand, the second
>actually does disprove what I said. A photo I requested from
>you when you started changing your tune,

Changing my tune? It is your responsibility to back your own claim.... you never did. You just imagined your claim, and I had to waste my time demonstrating it was completely false. Next time I might suggest checking the validity of your own claims first before indiscriminately dishing them out.

>then ignored my
>request

Ya that's right it's my fault you don't seem to actually know what your are talking about.......

>and starting arguing with cladking about things no one
>else ever said but me.

You are not the only one making that "0.01 inch" claim...... it's been around a long time.

>And for confirmation, I looked at some
>Upuaut-2 photos on Google and could easily see where they used
>mortar between the core stones and internal masonry.

Oh so now when you originally said "millions of 2.5 ton blocks" you actually meant the more than just considerably less volumed "internal masonry" made of Tura limestone (the more expensive stuff that is only there because it can be finely dressed). Ya talk about "changing your tune", from one post to the next, it's like listening to an MP3 player on six-second-shuffle......

>And thus,
>I see now that cladking was right, less than 100,000 stones
>have those tolerances I referenced.

He is talking about Tura casing..... that is not the core masonry made of Giza limestone.

Here are some of the very few examples from the GP:

[imageshack.us]
Photograph by Jon Bodsworth [www.egyptarchive.co.uk]
Note lever socket.

Here is an example from G1c (one of the smaller Queen's pyramids):

[imageshack.us]
Photograph by Jon Bodsworth [www.egyptarchive.co.uk]

That is what these advanced "tolerances of .010 inch" on G1c actually look like close up..... note the saw mark.

BTW, the above example from G1c is dekeberatly left unfinished for some reason:

[imageshack.us]
Photograph by Jon Bodsworth [www.egyptarchive.co.uk]

[imageshack.us]
Photograph by Jon Bodsworth [www.egyptarchive.co.uk]

Ya..... really advanced for aliens and civilized cavemen, maybe they were just trying to fool us into thinking they were 4th dynasty Egyptians!

>So then it appears that I
>had mistakenly conflated two different accurate facts about the
>pyramid into one incorrect fact. My bad.

Just 2 "mistakens" and 1 "incorrects"....... do you even read and/or remember your own post? Talk about gross under-exaggerations......

>Therefore, my previous
>statement that "the crux of the matter is a basic understanding
>of engineering and mathematics, specifically the ability to
>quarry, transport, and place millions of 2.5 ton blocks with
>tolerances of .010 inch, placing a stone every 5 minutes, day
>and night, for 20 years" should be revised to read:

>"The crux of the matter is a basic understanding of engineering
>and mathematics, specifically the ability to quarry, transport,
>and place millions of 2.5 ton blocks, placing a stone every 5
>minutes, day and night, for 20 years, several tens of thousands
>of which were placed with tolerances of .010 inch."

"several tens of thousands of which were placed with tolerances of .010 inch."

There are only few casing stones left on the Great Pyramid......
It is also pretty clear from some of those photos above that there ----> might <---- be a lot of potential blocks considerably less than a ton in that "millions of 2.5 ton blocks". Maybe you should do some more imagining to get a better estimate..... or better yet actually make an effort to go and learn something that is actually real about the GP.

>And although I know you like to take minor errors out of
>context and pretend that they disprove the entire assertion
>(you know, like your favorite hobby-horses), but unfortunately,
>they don't. Thus, you still have to try and disprove the rest
>of the points made in my original statement. (And again, I
>won't hold my breath. But best of luck, nonetheless!)

It's not a "minor error" it was another example of "grossly exaggerated" fringe nonsenses, and one might expect if it was not stopped here and now it would still be out there being spread with deliberate glee..

>
Quote

Off topic, really! Did not Mr. Dunn make claims about
>only diamond could scratch some ancient rocks that were used
>and did not Mr. Bauval go on seemingly about 50-200 ton blocks
>not being able to be moved with a civilization that did not
>have the wheel and pulley in some of these "Ancient Aliens"
>videos (i.e. the one on Pumapunku and the one on Power
>Plants)?

>Yes, they are off-topic. No one in this video makes those
>claims and no one else is discussing those things but you.
>Something you've been doing for years and years now. Rather
>bizarrely, I might add...

According to the "Ancient Aliens Debunked" transcripts diamonds are discussed in the section on Pumapunku and Pyramids...... so let me get this straight...... the "Ancient Aliens" videos are off topic and anything in the "Ancient Aliens Debunked" video that you have either not watched and/or don't want to discuss are all "off-topic" too.... anything else?

Archae Solenhofen (solenhofen@hotmail.com)

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 1480 Richard Fusniak 04-Jan-13 20:02
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 297 Citizen Attorney 05-Jan-13 00:24
Debunker debunked? 336 drrayeye 05-Jan-13 05:15
Aliens is making people re-evaluate certain paradigms 406 Ratcho 05-Jan-13 06:22
How is it possible? 313 gulsbo 05-Jan-13 16:16
Entertainment industry rules OK; thumbs down to education 265 Richard Fusniak 05-Jan-13 16:57
Re: Entertainment industry rules OK; thumbs down to education 349 gulsbo 06-Jan-13 08:03
Re: Entertainment industry rules OK; thumbs down to education 311 Richard Fusniak 06-Jan-13 08:59
Re: Entertainment industry rules OK; thumbs down to education 325 gulsbo 07-Jan-13 21:07
Re: Entertainment industry rules OK; thumbs down to education 354 Richard Fusniak 08-Jan-13 00:36
Fuzzy 276 Dan Mc F 08-Jan-13 12:49
Re: Fuzzy 330 Richard Fusniak 08-Jan-13 13:12
Re: Entertainment industry rules OK; thumbs down to education 266 gulsbo 09-Jan-13 21:36
Re: Smithsonian never lies.... 477 Thunderbird 23-Mar-13 03:39
who said aliens 305 Citizen Attorney 05-Jan-13 16:42
Re: who said aliens 310 David L 05-Jan-13 17:42
Re: who said aliens 351 Citizen Attorney 05-Jan-13 21:23
Agreed 340 NetWorkAngel 05-Jan-13 22:05
Re: Agreed 301 Citizen Attorney 06-Jan-13 19:16
Re: who said aliens 339 David L 07-Jan-13 01:16
Re: who said aliens 368 Thanos5150 06-Jan-13 18:38
Re: who said aliens 289 Citizen Attorney 06-Jan-13 19:17
Re: who said aliens 380 Thanos5150 06-Jan-13 22:45
Ancient Aliens' Debunked - Review 619 Thanos5150 07-Jan-13 02:23
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 351 MJT 08-Jan-13 13:58
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 326 Susan Doris 08-Jan-13 14:33
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 351 Richard Fusniak 08-Jan-13 15:19
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 395 Bobajot 10-Jan-13 04:01
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 375 wordsmyth 13-Jan-13 03:26
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 327 Archae Solenhofen 13-Jan-13 04:53
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 320 wordsmyth 15-Jan-13 01:44
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 359 richarddullum 15-Jan-13 03:28
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 294 wordsmyth 15-Jan-13 07:12
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 342 michael seabrook 15-Jan-13 10:48
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 340 Merrell 15-Jan-13 10:55
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 372 Archae Solenhofen 15-Jan-13 05:21
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 403 wordsmyth 15-Jan-13 08:24
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 321 Merrell 15-Jan-13 09:55
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 381 wordsmyth 15-Jan-13 10:26
Re: Archae Solenhofen = "Ancient Limestone" 369 Thanos5150 15-Jan-13 17:39
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 340 Archae Solenhofen 15-Jan-13 19:09
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 344 wordsmyth 15-Jan-13 22:26
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 299 Archae Solenhofen 16-Jan-13 03:29
Re: So...its very time consuming 305 Thunderbird 16-Jan-13 05:22
Re: So...its very time consuming 327 wordsmyth 16-Jan-13 06:32
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 390 Thunderbird 15-Jan-13 18:30
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 323 Martin Stower 23-Feb-13 15:38
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 290 wordsmyth 23-Feb-13 22:10
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 389 Thanos5150 24-Feb-13 00:33
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 354 wordsmyth 24-Feb-13 03:42
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 320 Thanos5150 24-Feb-13 06:16
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 323 wordsmyth 24-Feb-13 22:48
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 324 Scott Creighton 24-Feb-13 20:05
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 364 wordsmyth 24-Feb-13 22:36
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 343 Ratcho 24-Feb-13 22:49
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 354 Thanos5150 24-Feb-13 23:50
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 325 Scott Creighton 25-Feb-13 00:18
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 399 Martin Stower 25-Feb-13 17:57
Re: desperation.... 364 Thunderbird 25-Feb-13 21:20
Re: desperation.... 297 Martin Stower 26-Feb-13 15:47
Re: Khufu cartouche Cambell's chamber 374 Thunderbird 18-Mar-13 17:33
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 334 wordsmyth 25-Feb-13 22:25
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 340 Martin Stower 26-Feb-13 15:59
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 328 wordsmyth 26-Feb-13 21:41
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 344 Thanos5150 26-Feb-13 18:57
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 345 Martin Stower 27-Feb-13 18:46
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 263 Thanos5150 27-Feb-13 21:26
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 342 Martin Stower 28-Feb-13 16:57
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 310 Thanos5150 28-Feb-13 17:19
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 327 Martin Stower 28-Feb-13 18:08
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 353 Merrell 28-Feb-13 09:33
Re: Can we seriously believe that Alford has a clue.... 340 Thunderbird 25-Feb-13 16:41
Re: Can we seriously believe that Alford has a clue.... 361 Martin Stower 25-Feb-13 18:29
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 338 Archae Solenhofen 15-Jan-13 18:41
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 309 Thanos5150 15-Jan-13 22:13
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 323 Archae Solenhofen 15-Jan-13 22:44
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 395 Thanos5150 16-Jan-13 04:40
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 315 Archae Solenhofen 16-Jan-13 06:02
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 353 Thanos5150 16-Jan-13 06:54
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 372 Archae Solenhofen 16-Jan-13 09:09
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 303 Thanos5150 16-Jan-13 17:52
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 339 Archae Solenhofen 16-Jan-13 20:21
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 361 Thanos5150 16-Jan-13 21:21
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 263 Archae Solenhofen 17-Jan-13 04:57
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 338 Thanos5150 17-Jan-13 05:42
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 340 Archae Solenhofen 17-Jan-13 07:05
Fingerprints 1996 - 200 ton blocks 413 Merrell 17-Jan-13 11:22
Re: Fingerprints 1996 - 200 ton blocks 296 Archae Solenhofen 17-Jan-13 16:18
Re: Fingerprints 1996 - 200 ton blocks 272 Merrell 17-Jan-13 16:39
Re: Fingerprints 1996 - 200 ton blocks 334 Archae Solenhofen 17-Jan-13 17:44
Re: Fingerprints 1996 - 200 ton blocks 193 Archae Solenhofen 17-Jan-13 22:41
Re: Fingerprints 1996 - 200 ton blocks 348 Merrell 17-Jan-13 23:38
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 363 Thanos5150 17-Jan-13 23:46
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 337 wordsmyth 18-Jan-13 03:45
Mod Warning #2 > wordsmyth – Name-calling 383 Dr. Troglodyte 18-Jan-13 15:12
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 342 Archae Solenhofen 18-Jan-13 03:57
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 313 Thanos5150 18-Jan-13 05:32
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 237 Archae Solenhofen 18-Jan-13 06:04
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 289 Thanos5150 18-Jan-13 06:40
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 310 Archae Solenhofen 18-Jan-13 07:31
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 322 Thanos5150 18-Jan-13 18:02
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 232 Archae Solenhofen 18-Jan-13 18:19
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 308 Bobajot 20-Jan-13 02:08
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 301 Archae Solenhofen 20-Jan-13 03:16
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 354 Susan Doris 03-Feb-13 06:49
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 348 Thanos5150 05-Feb-13 20:00
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 355 Susan Doris 06-Feb-13 06:50
Mod Caution > Language Edit - Thanos5150 329 Dr. Troglodyte 16-Jan-13 20:39
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 278 David L 18-Jan-13 15:40
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 335 Thanos5150 18-Jan-13 17:59
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 333 wordsmyth 16-Jan-13 06:30
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 344 Thanos5150 16-Jan-13 07:03
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 316 richarddullum 17-Jan-13 03:42
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 319 Archae Solenhofen 17-Jan-13 05:10
Mod Caution > Language Edit - wordsmyth 347 Dr. Troglodyte 16-Jan-13 00:30
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 347 wordsmyth 15-Jan-13 22:23
Mod Warning #1 > wordsmyth 336 Dr. Troglodyte 16-Jan-13 00:44
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 298 Archae Solenhofen 16-Jan-13 03:11
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 322 wordsmyth 16-Jan-13 05:56
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 329 Archae Solenhofen 16-Jan-13 08:06
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 312 cladking 16-Jan-13 15:54
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 338 Archae Solenhofen 16-Jan-13 17:11
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 345 cladking 16-Jan-13 17:40
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 346 Archae Solenhofen 16-Jan-13 17:58
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 328 cladking 16-Jan-13 21:06
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 263 Archae Solenhofen 16-Jan-13 21:17
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 343 cladking 16-Jan-13 21:31
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 316 wordsmyth 20-Jan-13 01:56
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 318 Archae Solenhofen 21-Jan-13 02:36
Re: Considerations..... 311 Thunderbird 16-Jan-13 20:27
Re: Considerations..... 344 cladking 16-Jan-13 21:12
Re: Considerations..... 345 Thanos5150 16-Jan-13 21:48
Re: what bumpkins ...could do : ) 358 Thunderbird 17-Jan-13 05:05
Re: Considerations..... 388 loveritas 16-Jan-13 22:46
Re: design specs 326 Thunderbird 17-Jan-13 04:29
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 364 Anomalies 16-Jan-13 18:19
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 285 Workjay 18-Jan-13 19:16
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 332 Susan Doris 20-Jan-13 07:00
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 304 wordsmyth 20-Jan-13 08:08
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 352 Susan Doris 20-Jan-13 08:58
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 308 wordsmyth 20-Jan-13 18:31
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 322 Thanos5150 20-Jan-13 19:10
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 336 wordsmyth 22-Jan-13 16:38
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 326 Workjay 22-Jan-13 21:16
Artificial Moon 298 Thanos5150 25-Jan-13 05:28
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 314 wordsmyth 25-Jan-13 07:54
Mod Warning #1 > Language - Thanos5150 323 Dr. Troglodyte 25-Jan-13 14:04
REALLY REALLY EXCEPTIONAL POST 339 drrayeye 25-Jan-13 14:37
Re: REALLY REALLY EXCEPTIONAL POST 326 Thanos5150 25-Jan-13 19:38
Re: REALLY REALLY EXCEPTIONAL POST 423 drrayeye 26-Jan-13 07:46
Re: REALLY REALLY EXCEPTIONAL POST 390 wordsmyth 26-Jan-13 19:51
Re: REALLY REALLY EXCEPTIONAL POST 358 Thanos5150 26-Jan-13 22:27
Re: REALLY REALLY EXCEPTIONAL POST 385 wordsmyth 27-Jan-13 02:41
Re: REALLY REALLY EXCEPTIONAL POST 381 Thanos5150 27-Jan-13 05:06
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 317 carolb 25-Jan-13 21:26
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 209 Thanos5150 26-Jan-13 00:56
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 364 carolb 26-Jan-13 02:23
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 299 Thanos5150 27-Jan-13 04:50
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 477 carolb 28-Jan-13 00:31
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 314 Thanos5150 28-Jan-13 03:12
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 313 Aine 28-Jan-13 12:38
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 285 Thanos5150 28-Jan-13 20:18
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 328 Aine 28-Jan-13 20:25
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 364 Thanos5150 28-Jan-13 22:09
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 330 carolb 28-Jan-13 20:28
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 306 Thanos5150 28-Jan-13 23:41
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 338 carolb 29-Jan-13 01:23
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 348 wordsmyth 29-Jan-13 01:31
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 305 carolb 29-Jan-13 02:11
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 286 wordsmyth 29-Jan-13 03:08
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 330 wordsmyth 29-Jan-13 05:31
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 362 Thanos5150 29-Jan-13 22:53
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 347 Susan Doris 26-Jan-13 06:55
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 329 ray wakila 28-Jan-13 18:30
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 341 wordsmyth 29-Jan-13 00:39
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 275 Susan Doris 13-Feb-13 06:48
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 306 wordsmyth 13-Feb-13 23:04
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 362 Archae Solenhofen 14-Feb-13 15:37
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 328 wordsmyth 19-Feb-13 01:29
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 334 Archae Solenhofen 19-Feb-13 04:29
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 312 wordsmyth 19-Feb-13 07:25
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 326 Thanos5150 20-Feb-13 00:25
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 280 Bobajot 20-Feb-13 02:09
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 283 Archae Solenhofen 20-Feb-13 03:54
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 316 Bobajot 20-Feb-13 13:35
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 329 Archae Solenhofen 20-Feb-13 18:01
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 299 Bobajot 20-Feb-13 23:29
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 325 Archae Solenhofen 21-Feb-13 16:17
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 334 Bobajot 22-Feb-13 23:08
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 307 Archae Solenhofen 22-Feb-13 23:55
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 318 wordsmyth 23-Feb-13 00:24
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 303 cladking 23-Feb-13 00:41
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 289 wordsmyth 23-Feb-13 05:10
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 280 cladking 23-Feb-13 05:40
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 330 Bobajot 23-Feb-13 01:04
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 300 Archae Solenhofen 23-Feb-13 04:49
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 357 Bobajot 23-Feb-13 12:31
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 340 Archae Solenhofen 23-Feb-13 20:25
Science Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 326 cladking 23-Feb-13 21:29
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 314 Bobajot 24-Feb-13 02:34
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 315 Archae Solenhofen 25-Feb-13 20:21
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 327 Bobajot 26-Feb-13 03:01
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 265 wordsmyth 23-Feb-13 21:21
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 301 Thanos5150 23-Feb-13 21:32
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 274 Thanos5150 23-Feb-13 22:10
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 311 wordsmyth 23-Feb-13 22:18
We would probably be amazed 245 Ratcho 24-Feb-13 00:52
Re: We would probably be amazed 241 wordsmyth 24-Feb-13 03:48
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 307 Archae Solenhofen 24-Feb-13 01:50
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 328 wordsmyth 24-Feb-13 02:44
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 303 wordsmyth 23-Feb-13 05:18
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 289 Archae Solenhofen 23-Feb-13 04:41
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 240 Archae Solenhofen 20-Feb-13 02:11
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 320 cladking 20-Feb-13 04:08
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 351 Thanos5150 22-Feb-13 05:31
I've tried hardened steel chisels 310 Ratcho 22-Feb-13 06:15
Re: I've tried hardened steel chisels 282 Susan Doris 22-Feb-13 07:15
Re: I've tried hardened steel chisels 315 Ratcho 22-Feb-13 17:51
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 320 Archae Solenhofen 23-Feb-13 05:15
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 310 cladking 23-Feb-13 15:13
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 173 Thanos5150 23-Feb-13 20:57
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 397 Archae Solenhofen 25-Feb-13 20:14
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 313 Susan Doris 24-Feb-13 15:49
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 326 wordsmyth 24-Feb-13 22:30
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 343 wordsmyth 20-Feb-13 02:22
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 327 Archae Solenhofen 20-Feb-13 03:47
How many swings would it take 342 Ratcho 20-Feb-13 06:29
Re: How many swings would it take 278 Susan Doris 20-Feb-13 17:31
Re: How many swings would it take 320 cladking 20-Feb-13 21:24
If you have the time... 292 Ratcho 22-Feb-13 22:48
Re: How many swings would it take 335 Archae Solenhofen 20-Feb-13 18:14
Re: How many swings would it take 269 cladking 20-Feb-13 21:30
Re: How many swings would it take 350 wordsmyth 21-Feb-13 08:39
Re: How many swings would it take 359 Scott Creighton 21-Feb-13 08:45
Re: How many swings would it take 299 Archae Solenhofen 21-Feb-13 17:32
Re: How many swings would it take 311 Scott Creighton 21-Feb-13 18:04
Re: How many swings would it take 284 Archae Solenhofen 21-Feb-13 19:55
Re: How many swings would it take 288 Scott Creighton 21-Feb-13 21:40
I'd still like to know 294 Ratcho 21-Feb-13 22:02
Re: I'd still like to know 327 Archae Solenhofen 21-Feb-13 22:43
Re: I'd still like to know 286 wordsmyth 21-Feb-13 23:47
Re: I'd still like to know 294 wordsmyth 22-Feb-13 00:10
Re: I'd still like to know 316 Archae Solenhofen 22-Feb-13 00:11
Re: Unfortunately, I'd still don't care... 304 wordsmyth 22-Feb-13 00:31
Re: Unfortunately, I'd still don't care... 333 Archae Solenhofen 22-Feb-13 00:47
Re: Unfortunately, I'd still don't care... 304 wordsmyth 22-Feb-13 07:47
Re: Unfortunately, I'd still don't care... 305 Archae Solenhofen 22-Feb-13 16:42
Re: How many swings would it take 355 wordsmyth 22-Feb-13 00:20
Re: How many swings would it take 253 Susan Doris 21-Feb-13 13:44
Re: How many swings would it take 269 Archae Solenhofen 21-Feb-13 16:09
Re: How many swings would it take 296 Scott Creighton 21-Feb-13 18:59
Re: How many swings would it take 315 Archae Solenhofen 21-Feb-13 20:06
Re: How many swings would it take 297 Scott Creighton 21-Feb-13 21:43
Re: How many swings would it take 298 Archae Solenhofen 21-Feb-13 22:22
Re: How many swings would it take 293 Scott Creighton 21-Feb-13 22:30
Re: How many swings would it take 292 Archae Solenhofen 21-Feb-13 22:48
Re: How many swings would it take 313 Morten 22-Feb-13 10:52
Re: How many swings would it take 300 wordsmyth 22-Feb-13 23:30
Re: How many swings would it take 414 Scott Creighton 21-Feb-13 22:55
Mod Note > Off Topic Sub-Thread 196 Dr. Troglodyte 22-Feb-13 00:01
Re: How many swings would it take 301 richarddullum 22-Feb-13 03:20
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 260 Audrey 13-Feb-13 23:21
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 313 Susan Doris 14-Feb-13 14:59
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 259 cladking 14-Feb-13 16:07
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 312 Archae Solenhofen 14-Feb-13 15:29
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 323 cladking 14-Feb-13 16:14
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 345 Archae Solenhofen 14-Feb-13 16:41
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 291 cladking 14-Feb-13 18:57
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 314 Thanos5150 20-Jan-13 19:04
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 249 Workjay 21-Jan-13 02:42
Re: Myth and Truth 291 Thunderbird 20-Jan-13 17:33
Re: Myth and Truth 322 wordsmyth 20-Jan-13 18:34
Re: Myth and Truth 336 cladking 20-Jan-13 22:30
Re: Myth and Truth 350 Glorious 20-Jan-13 23:31
Re: Myth and Truth 318 cladking 21-Jan-13 00:26
Re: Perception 434 Thunderbird 21-Jan-13 04:15
Re: Perception 330 Glorious 21-Jan-13 05:34
Re: Perception 283 Chris Jordan 21-Jan-13 07:45
Re: Perception 317 loveritas 21-Jan-13 11:32
Re: Change of Perception 341 Chris Jordan 21-Jan-13 16:20
Re: words/music /NT 243 Thunderbird 21-Jan-13 04:45
Re: words/music /NT 313 wordsmyth 23-Jan-13 08:14
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 328 Anomalies 21-Jan-13 16:53
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 296 Workjay 21-Jan-13 17:59
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 302 Anomalies 21-Jan-13 18:13
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 337 Susan Doris 28-Jan-13 16:29
Who knew? 321 cladking 28-Jan-13 22:07
Re: Who knew? 435 Susan Doris 01-Feb-13 18:25
Re: Who knew? 306 cladking 01-Feb-13 20:42
Egyptology Debunked; they wouldn't know a snake if it bit them. 343 cladking 28-Jan-13 21:04
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 279 cladking 21-Jan-13 18:16
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 296 Anomalies 22-Jan-13 15:09
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 233 cladking 22-Jan-13 15:39
'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 311 Anomalies 22-Jan-13 15:54
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 329 Workjay 22-Jan-13 16:10
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 217 Anomalies 22-Jan-13 16:32
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 267 Workjay 22-Jan-13 21:06
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 335 Anomalies 23-Jan-13 14:53
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 290 Workjay 23-Jan-13 21:10
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 301 Anomalies 23-Jan-13 21:51
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 292 Workjay 23-Jan-13 22:58
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 266 richarddullum 24-Jan-13 02:21
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 268 Workjay 24-Jan-13 02:46
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 232 richarddullum 24-Jan-13 14:33
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 314 Aine 24-Jan-13 13:00
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 300 richarddullum 25-Jan-13 01:57
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 268 Susan Doris 27-Jan-13 13:02
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 324 Susan Doris 02-Feb-13 14:01
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 300 Anomalies 05-Feb-13 15:41
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 279 Workjay 05-Feb-13 17:39
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 313 Anomalies 05-Feb-13 21:25
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 314 Workjay 06-Feb-13 17:31
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 297 Ratcho 06-Feb-13 19:02
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 268 Anomalies 06-Feb-13 21:54
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 262 Workjay 06-Feb-13 22:19
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 192 cladking 22-Jan-13 16:29
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 186 Anomalies 21-Jan-13 16:07
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 189 Workjay 21-Jan-13 16:13
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 178 carolb 21-Jan-13 17:52
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 177 Anomalies 21-Jan-13 18:00
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 173 carolb 21-Jan-13 18:05
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 192 Anomalies 21-Jan-13 19:01
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 202 carolb 21-Jan-13 19:07
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 185 Anomalies 21-Jan-13 19:21
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 211 carolb 21-Jan-13 19:42
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 173 Anomalies 21-Jan-13 19:58
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 198 carolb 21-Jan-13 20:17
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 177 Anomalies 21-Jan-13 20:27
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 199 Susan Doris 14-Feb-13 14:42
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 184 Anomalies 22-Jan-13 14:50
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 159 wordsmyth 23-Jan-13 08:35
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 193 Workjay 22-Jan-13 02:20
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 195 richarddullum 22-Jan-13 14:31
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 227 Aine 22-Jan-13 14:49
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 195 Anomalies 22-Jan-13 14:56
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 241 Aine 22-Jan-13 15:29
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 243 Aine 22-Jan-13 15:47
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 179 Anomalies 22-Jan-13 16:08
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 265 Aine 22-Jan-13 16:23
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 254 Aine 22-Jan-13 16:24
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 240 richarddullum 23-Jan-13 04:50
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 183 wordsmyth 23-Jan-13 08:52
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 195 richarddullum 23-Jan-13 14:28
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 222 wordsmyth 23-Jan-13 15:19
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 254 Aine 23-Jan-13 15:42
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 178 richarddullum 24-Jan-13 02:03
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 242 Aine 23-Jan-13 14:39
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 224 wordsmyth 23-Jan-13 15:09
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 256 Aine 24-Jan-13 13:19
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 203 wordsmyth 25-Jan-13 05:08
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 204 Glorious 25-Jan-13 05:49
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 243 Susan Doris 25-Jan-13 06:47
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 182 wordsmyth 25-Jan-13 07:03
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 181 Glorious 25-Jan-13 07:32
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 167 wordsmyth 25-Jan-13 08:09
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 169 cladking 25-Jan-13 16:32
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 189 Susan Doris 23-Jan-13 06:54
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 206 Glorious 23-Jan-13 07:43
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 249 Aine 23-Jan-13 14:47
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 215 BobbyH 22-Jan-13 19:21
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 233 Aine 22-Jan-13 19:41
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 192 BobbyH 22-Jan-13 19:56
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 240 Aine 22-Jan-13 19:59
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 244 Aine 22-Jan-13 20:09
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 220 Glorious 22-Jan-13 20:52
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 188 BobbyH 22-Jan-13 14:57
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 192 Workjay 22-Jan-13 15:08
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 206 BobbyH 22-Jan-13 15:41
Episode: "Destination Orion" was very well done 190 David L 17-Jan-13 17:35
Re: Episode: "Destination Orion" was very well done 170 Thomas Brophy 03-Mar-13 23:30
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 123 wordsmyth 23-Jan-13 08:10
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 224 Archae Solenhofen 25-Jan-13 03:28
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 220 wordsmyth 25-Jan-13 06:32
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 276 Thanos5150 25-Jan-13 18:22
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 208 Sangreal Sea 25-Jan-13 19:11
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 197 Warwick 11-Feb-13 22:32
The latest episode "Alien Abductions" is the most absurd yet 181 David L 23-Feb-13 23:41
Re: The latest episode "Alien Abductions" is the most absurd yet 180 Anomalies 25-Feb-13 19:00
Re: The latest episode "Alien Abductions" is the most absurd yet 140 David L 26-Feb-13 01:44
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 124 LanceHall 23-Mar-13 00:28


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.