Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
wordsmyth wrote:

>
Quote

Ya, it's still in the subthread where this "millions of
>2.5 ton blocks with tolerances of .010 inch" imagination popped
>up..... so there is no "sneak it" here.

>Just scroll up, "Archae", anyone can see the post where you
>quoted something cladking said, but then replied to him about
>something I said. Here it is:

It is more then just clear in Threaded View (irrespective of the fact that you posted one of those previous reply's out of the subthread's sequence) that Cladking's post was in the same subthread as your "millions of 2.5 ton blocks with tolerances of .010 inch" nonsense and he was responding to a message of yours that contained a mentioning of it by myself. How is that sneaking it in other then in your imagination?

>I mean, seriously, why would you just randomly start arguing
>with cladking about something no one else ever said, but me?
>Are you really THAT desperate here?

BTW, how about also posting your messages properly.... because just like before this most recent post of yours appears out of order at the very bottom of this thread with now over 190 messages, and again completely out of sequence from where it actually should be.

>
Quote

Got any examples of some advanced holes in the ground to
>go along with where they got all that "gold" or whatever
>from..... we got examples of where they were mining their chert
>from 30,000 years ago (Vermeersch 1984) so where are they
>getting their advanced rock cutting materials (and the
>processing plants that produced them)... a wild
>imaginarium?

>Sorry, but thousands of years from now, nobody will be able to
>discern the level of technology used in modern day mining
>operations. It will simply be holes bored in rocks with
>thousands of years of erosion on top of it.

Certainly they won't all be....... just like we see glacial striation on hardrocks like granite from over 15,000 years ago (BTW, these were not scratch with diamonds by aliens or advanced Co-Magmens with sonic laser drills).

>
Quote

"Solid stone or solid gold" are not the only things that
>long lived....... For heaven sake we still find Cro-Magnon
>coprolites around to see what they ate

>Thanks for the laugh.

Not as funny as the laughs from the lack of evidence for advanced rabbit and reindeer farms......... no wonder they went cannibalistic in their fall from grace.

>
Quote

so did they not have advance glasses, advanced ceramics,
>advanced stainless steels capable of surviving more than a few
>years during this leave no evidence behind episode of
>Mesolithic advancedyness.

>The "unbreakable, reinforced glass" made today will still
>*eventually* weaken and break over hundreds of years.

Do you even know what obsidian is...... you do understand that this natural glass remains behind for more than just a few "hundreds of years" in the archeological record... right? Like in all the stone tools we have found made of such..... what is it about natural glass that is superior to advanced glass made of almost pure silica? Please enlighten us...............

>Ditto for
>ceramics.

Ya, there is more than a lot of ancient unadvanced ceramics around......... so much for being advanced.

>And modern day stainless, corrosion-resistant steel
>will *eventually* corrode after several centuries. Sorry.

So now these advanced ones used just "modern day... steel".... just how advanced was this Co-Magmen civilization anyway?

BTW, how long do you imagine the statue "The Thinker" will be around if today's people were to just magically disappear too? It's just made of bronze......

>
Quote

just how advanced were these lost ones (remember
>according from some on your side of the fence they can't carve
>all their rocks without something as hard as diamond (lots of
>it))?

>What is that, sixteen times now you've brought up your
>favorite, pointless red herring that no one else is discussing
>but you? Please, have some dignity and stop embarrassing
>yourself even further here.

Did you even bother to finish watching the "Ancient Aliens Debunked" video that started this thread or even the "Ancient Aliens" videos that inspired it?

>
Quote

Maybe you should watch those "After People" videos, they
>were on the same channel as the "Ancient Aliens" stuff.....
>both of those crowds are claiming/imaging advanced materials
>get left behind for thousands and thousands of years (and don't
>forget the young earth creationists, they imagine finding all
>sort of stuff all the time from before an imaginary globe
>wiping-megaflood).

>Vermeersch, P.M., Paulissen, E., Gijselings, G., Otte, M.,
>Thoma, A., Van Peer, P., Lauwers, R., Drappier, D. and
>Charlier, C. (1984) 33,000 year old chert mining site and
>related Homo in the Egyptian Nile valley. Nature, 309:
>342-4.

>(Yawn)... Irrelevant red herrings/strawmen. Sorry.

Ya, and 33,000 years of erosion still leaves ancient mines behind to be found........ so much for your above assertion about advanced Co-Magmen mines from 3 times more recent times all conveniently disappearing.

>
Quote

How about all over the place in Egypt including Giza,
>unlike for these lost ones with absolutely nothing from before,
>during, or after? Oh, except the stone blocks…… and all the
>“gross exaggerations” that went along with them.

>Dodge noted.

>But anyway, since we only have only a tiny fraction of the
>building materials used to make all the other pyramids (and
>other monuments) of Egypt (excluding G1, G2, and G3), why
>should we expect to have some left behind from an epoch at
>least *twice* as old as the rest?

Because dividing something by 2 times a previous time interval does not equal zero (thus the above 33,000 year old mine)...... unless that something was zero to begin with. All you have is stone blocks and nothing else but a bunch of fringe authors making gross exaggeration/insinuations about them.

>Even further, why would those
>artifacts have been buried in the first place? Because for
>something to be preserved in the fossil record, it either has
>to be deliberately buried there (like corpses in cemeteries),
>or some cataclysmic event has to happen (like a volcano or
>mudslide) in which things get buried.

Garbage dumps......... construction debris....... etc. etc. etc. etc. etc. etc. etc...... they did not even leave any
Co-Magman droppings around either. Apparently they wiped that all up too......

>
Quote

Oh ok, so now it's just the "tops and bottoms'....
>That's right, if first you don't succeed try try try.... and
>try again.... how do you manage to get that new, very much less
>so now, previously all encompassing "0.01" claim from something
>that looks like this on it’s measurable surfaces?

>For a starter let's take a look at the outside core masonry:

>[www.nla.gov.au]

>Photo disproves nothing I said.

Other then for a start:

"millions of 2.5 ton blocks with tolerances of .010 inch"

and

"core masonry is level on the tops and bottoms of the stone blocks to 0.01 inch"

Both are complete nonsenses.......

>
Quote

If one reads Emery (1960) it is pretty clear the exposed
>core masonry is not that pristine.

>Emery, K.O. (1960) Weathering of the Great Pyramid. Journal of
>Sedimentary Petrology, 30, 141-143.

>Three whole pages of analysis from 1960, which no one can
>evaluate. Another fail on your part...

What specifically can't "no one" evaluate? Did you not actually look closely at the photo above...... it is pretty obvious that the surface is significantly eroded like Emery (1960) states.

>
Quote

Next lets have a look at some other holes in this GP
>claim of yours.

>Vyse's hole:

>[www.world-mysteries.com]
>Image Source:[www.world-mysteries.com]
>(Photograph by Jon Bodsworth
>[www.egyptarchive.co.uk])

>Again, the photo disproves nothing I said.

Remember this:

"Here is a(nother) perfect example of your dishonest and misleading strategies designed to take something completely out of context and make it seem like it's something that it's not. For starters, those are *exposed* core blocks. And do you know how they got exposed? By earthquakes. The same earthquakes which dislodged the white limestone facing stones. Hence, those visible gaps were NOT there originally. Not to mention, as any engineer will tell you, if those gaps actually were there at that level, those tolerance errors would have multiplied as blocks were placed further up the pyramid. Hence, it wouldn't have been able to be constructed with that kind of sloppy engineering. Something which is obviously not the case."

Ya, talk about "dishonest and misleading strategies"........

>
Quote

Notch on Great Pyramid's northeast edge:

>outside
>[www.archaeology.org]
>image source
>[archive.archaeology.org]

>The first photo *might* have disproved something, but it was
>too far away to be useful.

One would think that had to be put there to show you were it actually was.......

>On the other hand, the second
>actually does disprove what I said. A photo I requested from
>you when you started changing your tune,

Changing my tune? It is your responsibility to back your own claim.... you never did. You just imagined your claim, and I had to waste my time demonstrating it was completely false. Next time I might suggest checking the validity of your own claims first before indiscriminately dishing them out.

>then ignored my
>request

Ya that's right it's my fault you don't seem to actually know what your are talking about.......

>and starting arguing with cladking about things no one
>else ever said but me.

You are not the only one making that "0.01 inch" claim...... it's been around a long time.

>And for confirmation, I looked at some
>Upuaut-2 photos on Google and could easily see where they used
>mortar between the core stones and internal masonry.

Oh so now when you originally said "millions of 2.5 ton blocks" you actually meant the more than just considerably less volumed "internal masonry" made of Tura limestone (the more expensive stuff that is only there because it can be finely dressed). Ya talk about "changing your tune", from one post to the next, it's like listening to an MP3 player on six-second-shuffle......

>And thus,
>I see now that cladking was right, less than 100,000 stones
>have those tolerances I referenced.

He is talking about Tura casing..... that is not the core masonry made of Giza limestone.

Here are some of the very few examples from the GP:

[imageshack.us]
Photograph by Jon Bodsworth [www.egyptarchive.co.uk]
Note lever socket.

Here is an example from G1c (one of the smaller Queen's pyramids):

[imageshack.us]
Photograph by Jon Bodsworth [www.egyptarchive.co.uk]

That is what these advanced "tolerances of .010 inch" on G1c actually look like close up..... note the saw mark.

BTW, the above example from G1c is dekeberatly left unfinished for some reason:

[imageshack.us]
Photograph by Jon Bodsworth [www.egyptarchive.co.uk]

[imageshack.us]
Photograph by Jon Bodsworth [www.egyptarchive.co.uk]

Ya..... really advanced for aliens and civilized cavemen, maybe they were just trying to fool us into thinking they were 4th dynasty Egyptians!

>So then it appears that I
>had mistakenly conflated two different accurate facts about the
>pyramid into one incorrect fact. My bad.

Just 2 "mistakens" and 1 "incorrects"....... do you even read and/or remember your own post? Talk about gross under-exaggerations......

>Therefore, my previous
>statement that "the crux of the matter is a basic understanding
>of engineering and mathematics, specifically the ability to
>quarry, transport, and place millions of 2.5 ton blocks with
>tolerances of .010 inch, placing a stone every 5 minutes, day
>and night, for 20 years" should be revised to read:

>"The crux of the matter is a basic understanding of engineering
>and mathematics, specifically the ability to quarry, transport,
>and place millions of 2.5 ton blocks, placing a stone every 5
>minutes, day and night, for 20 years, several tens of thousands
>of which were placed with tolerances of .010 inch."

"several tens of thousands of which were placed with tolerances of .010 inch."

There are only few casing stones left on the Great Pyramid......
It is also pretty clear from some of those photos above that there ----> might <---- be a lot of potential blocks considerably less than a ton in that "millions of 2.5 ton blocks". Maybe you should do some more imagining to get a better estimate..... or better yet actually make an effort to go and learn something that is actually real about the GP.

>And although I know you like to take minor errors out of
>context and pretend that they disprove the entire assertion
>(you know, like your favorite hobby-horses), but unfortunately,
>they don't. Thus, you still have to try and disprove the rest
>of the points made in my original statement. (And again, I
>won't hold my breath. But best of luck, nonetheless!)

It's not a "minor error" it was another example of "grossly exaggerated" fringe nonsenses, and one might expect if it was not stopped here and now it would still be out there being spread with deliberate glee..

>
Quote

Off topic, really! Did not Mr. Dunn make claims about
>only diamond could scratch some ancient rocks that were used
>and did not Mr. Bauval go on seemingly about 50-200 ton blocks
>not being able to be moved with a civilization that did not
>have the wheel and pulley in some of these "Ancient Aliens"
>videos (i.e. the one on Pumapunku and the one on Power
>Plants)?

>Yes, they are off-topic. No one in this video makes those
>claims and no one else is discussing those things but you.
>Something you've been doing for years and years now. Rather
>bizarrely, I might add...

According to the "Ancient Aliens Debunked" transcripts diamonds are discussed in the section on Pumapunku and Pyramids...... so let me get this straight...... the "Ancient Aliens" videos are off topic and anything in the "Ancient Aliens Debunked" video that you have either not watched and/or don't want to discuss are all "off-topic" too.... anything else?

Archae Solenhofen (solenhofen@hotmail.com)

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 1511 Richard Fusniak 04-Jan-13 20:02
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 310 Citizen Attorney 05-Jan-13 00:24
Debunker debunked? 350 drrayeye 05-Jan-13 05:15
Aliens is making people re-evaluate certain paradigms 422 Ratcho 05-Jan-13 06:22
How is it possible? 331 gulsbo 05-Jan-13 16:16
Entertainment industry rules OK; thumbs down to education 277 Richard Fusniak 05-Jan-13 16:57
Re: Entertainment industry rules OK; thumbs down to education 365 gulsbo 06-Jan-13 08:03
Re: Entertainment industry rules OK; thumbs down to education 325 Richard Fusniak 06-Jan-13 08:59
Re: Entertainment industry rules OK; thumbs down to education 343 gulsbo 07-Jan-13 21:07
Re: Entertainment industry rules OK; thumbs down to education 371 Richard Fusniak 08-Jan-13 00:36
Fuzzy 288 Dan Mc F 08-Jan-13 12:49
Re: Fuzzy 348 Richard Fusniak 08-Jan-13 13:12
Re: Entertainment industry rules OK; thumbs down to education 279 gulsbo 09-Jan-13 21:36
Re: Smithsonian never lies.... 494 Thunderbird 23-Mar-13 03:39
who said aliens 320 Citizen Attorney 05-Jan-13 16:42
Re: who said aliens 329 David L 05-Jan-13 17:42
Re: who said aliens 367 Citizen Attorney 05-Jan-13 21:23
Agreed 355 NetWorkAngel 05-Jan-13 22:05
Re: Agreed 316 Citizen Attorney 06-Jan-13 19:16
Re: who said aliens 357 David L 07-Jan-13 01:16
Re: who said aliens 386 Thanos5150 06-Jan-13 18:38
Re: who said aliens 304 Citizen Attorney 06-Jan-13 19:17
Re: who said aliens 398 Thanos5150 06-Jan-13 22:45
Ancient Aliens' Debunked - Review 646 Thanos5150 07-Jan-13 02:23
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 364 MJT 08-Jan-13 13:58
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 342 Susan Doris 08-Jan-13 14:33
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 368 Richard Fusniak 08-Jan-13 15:19
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 409 Bobajot 10-Jan-13 04:01
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 390 wordsmyth 13-Jan-13 03:26
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 344 Archae Solenhofen 13-Jan-13 04:53
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 335 wordsmyth 15-Jan-13 01:44
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 376 richarddullum 15-Jan-13 03:28
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 309 wordsmyth 15-Jan-13 07:12
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 357 michael seabrook 15-Jan-13 10:48
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 358 Merrell 15-Jan-13 10:55
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 388 Archae Solenhofen 15-Jan-13 05:21
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 420 wordsmyth 15-Jan-13 08:24
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 338 Merrell 15-Jan-13 09:55
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 396 wordsmyth 15-Jan-13 10:26
Re: Archae Solenhofen = "Ancient Limestone" 387 Thanos5150 15-Jan-13 17:39
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 356 Archae Solenhofen 15-Jan-13 19:09
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 361 wordsmyth 15-Jan-13 22:26
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 316 Archae Solenhofen 16-Jan-13 03:29
Re: So...its very time consuming 318 Thunderbird 16-Jan-13 05:22
Re: So...its very time consuming 345 wordsmyth 16-Jan-13 06:32
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 409 Thunderbird 15-Jan-13 18:30
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 337 Martin Stower 23-Feb-13 15:38
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 306 wordsmyth 23-Feb-13 22:10
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 407 Thanos5150 24-Feb-13 00:33
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 371 wordsmyth 24-Feb-13 03:42
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 336 Thanos5150 24-Feb-13 06:16
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 337 wordsmyth 24-Feb-13 22:48
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 343 Scott Creighton 24-Feb-13 20:05
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 381 wordsmyth 24-Feb-13 22:36
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 358 Ratcho 24-Feb-13 22:49
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 372 Thanos5150 24-Feb-13 23:50
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 341 Scott Creighton 25-Feb-13 00:18
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 421 Martin Stower 25-Feb-13 17:57
Re: desperation.... 382 Thunderbird 25-Feb-13 21:20
Re: desperation.... 310 Martin Stower 26-Feb-13 15:47
Re: Khufu cartouche Cambell's chamber 391 Thunderbird 18-Mar-13 17:33
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 350 wordsmyth 25-Feb-13 22:25
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 355 Martin Stower 26-Feb-13 15:59
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 346 wordsmyth 26-Feb-13 21:41
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 360 Thanos5150 26-Feb-13 18:57
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 363 Martin Stower 27-Feb-13 18:46
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 280 Thanos5150 27-Feb-13 21:26
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 361 Martin Stower 28-Feb-13 16:57
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 329 Thanos5150 28-Feb-13 17:19
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 342 Martin Stower 28-Feb-13 18:08
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 373 Merrell 28-Feb-13 09:33
Re: Can we seriously believe that Alford has a clue.... 360 Thunderbird 25-Feb-13 16:41
Re: Can we seriously believe that Alford has a clue.... 380 Martin Stower 25-Feb-13 18:29
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 357 Archae Solenhofen 15-Jan-13 18:41
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 326 Thanos5150 15-Jan-13 22:13
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 335 Archae Solenhofen 15-Jan-13 22:44
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 415 Thanos5150 16-Jan-13 04:40
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 330 Archae Solenhofen 16-Jan-13 06:02
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 369 Thanos5150 16-Jan-13 06:54
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 391 Archae Solenhofen 16-Jan-13 09:09
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 320 Thanos5150 16-Jan-13 17:52
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 354 Archae Solenhofen 16-Jan-13 20:21
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 380 Thanos5150 16-Jan-13 21:21
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 279 Archae Solenhofen 17-Jan-13 04:57
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 356 Thanos5150 17-Jan-13 05:42
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 359 Archae Solenhofen 17-Jan-13 07:05
Fingerprints 1996 - 200 ton blocks 428 Merrell 17-Jan-13 11:22
Re: Fingerprints 1996 - 200 ton blocks 311 Archae Solenhofen 17-Jan-13 16:18
Re: Fingerprints 1996 - 200 ton blocks 289 Merrell 17-Jan-13 16:39
Re: Fingerprints 1996 - 200 ton blocks 351 Archae Solenhofen 17-Jan-13 17:44
Re: Fingerprints 1996 - 200 ton blocks 206 Archae Solenhofen 17-Jan-13 22:41
Re: Fingerprints 1996 - 200 ton blocks 367 Merrell 17-Jan-13 23:38
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 382 Thanos5150 17-Jan-13 23:46
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 354 wordsmyth 18-Jan-13 03:45
Mod Warning #2 > wordsmyth – Name-calling 400 Dr. Troglodyte 18-Jan-13 15:12
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 355 Archae Solenhofen 18-Jan-13 03:57
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 329 Thanos5150 18-Jan-13 05:32
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 255 Archae Solenhofen 18-Jan-13 06:04
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 303 Thanos5150 18-Jan-13 06:40
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 327 Archae Solenhofen 18-Jan-13 07:31
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 337 Thanos5150 18-Jan-13 18:02
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 244 Archae Solenhofen 18-Jan-13 18:19
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 327 Bobajot 20-Jan-13 02:08
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 322 Archae Solenhofen 20-Jan-13 03:16
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 369 Susan Doris 03-Feb-13 06:49
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 368 Thanos5150 05-Feb-13 20:00
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 374 Susan Doris 06-Feb-13 06:50
Mod Caution > Language Edit - Thanos5150 351 Dr. Troglodyte 16-Jan-13 20:39
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 298 David L 18-Jan-13 15:40
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 354 Thanos5150 18-Jan-13 17:59
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 352 wordsmyth 16-Jan-13 06:30
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 360 Thanos5150 16-Jan-13 07:03
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 335 richarddullum 17-Jan-13 03:42
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 339 Archae Solenhofen 17-Jan-13 05:10
Mod Caution > Language Edit - wordsmyth 363 Dr. Troglodyte 16-Jan-13 00:30
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 365 wordsmyth 15-Jan-13 22:23
Mod Warning #1 > wordsmyth 352 Dr. Troglodyte 16-Jan-13 00:44
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 315 Archae Solenhofen 16-Jan-13 03:11
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 340 wordsmyth 16-Jan-13 05:56
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 346 Archae Solenhofen 16-Jan-13 08:06
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 327 cladking 16-Jan-13 15:54
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 354 Archae Solenhofen 16-Jan-13 17:11
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 363 cladking 16-Jan-13 17:40
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 361 Archae Solenhofen 16-Jan-13 17:58
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 344 cladking 16-Jan-13 21:06
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 281 Archae Solenhofen 16-Jan-13 21:17
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 359 cladking 16-Jan-13 21:31
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 330 wordsmyth 20-Jan-13 01:56
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 338 Archae Solenhofen 21-Jan-13 02:36
Re: Considerations..... 326 Thunderbird 16-Jan-13 20:27
Re: Considerations..... 375 cladking 16-Jan-13 21:12
Re: Considerations..... 358 Thanos5150 16-Jan-13 21:48
Re: what bumpkins ...could do : ) 378 Thunderbird 17-Jan-13 05:05
Re: Considerations..... 405 loveritas 16-Jan-13 22:46
Re: design specs 340 Thunderbird 17-Jan-13 04:29
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 381 Anomalies 16-Jan-13 18:19
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 299 Workjay 18-Jan-13 19:16
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 347 Susan Doris 20-Jan-13 07:00
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 319 wordsmyth 20-Jan-13 08:08
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 370 Susan Doris 20-Jan-13 08:58
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 320 wordsmyth 20-Jan-13 18:31
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 337 Thanos5150 20-Jan-13 19:10
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 349 wordsmyth 22-Jan-13 16:38
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 343 Workjay 22-Jan-13 21:16
Artificial Moon 314 Thanos5150 25-Jan-13 05:28
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 325 wordsmyth 25-Jan-13 07:54
Mod Warning #1 > Language - Thanos5150 342 Dr. Troglodyte 25-Jan-13 14:04
REALLY REALLY EXCEPTIONAL POST 353 drrayeye 25-Jan-13 14:37
Re: REALLY REALLY EXCEPTIONAL POST 340 Thanos5150 25-Jan-13 19:38
Re: REALLY REALLY EXCEPTIONAL POST 442 drrayeye 26-Jan-13 07:46
Re: REALLY REALLY EXCEPTIONAL POST 411 wordsmyth 26-Jan-13 19:51
Re: REALLY REALLY EXCEPTIONAL POST 374 Thanos5150 26-Jan-13 22:27
Re: REALLY REALLY EXCEPTIONAL POST 406 wordsmyth 27-Jan-13 02:41
Re: REALLY REALLY EXCEPTIONAL POST 406 Thanos5150 27-Jan-13 05:06
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 332 carolb 25-Jan-13 21:26
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 225 Thanos5150 26-Jan-13 00:56
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 381 carolb 26-Jan-13 02:23
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 322 Thanos5150 27-Jan-13 04:50
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 501 carolb 28-Jan-13 00:31
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 328 Thanos5150 28-Jan-13 03:12
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 327 Aine 28-Jan-13 12:38
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 302 Thanos5150 28-Jan-13 20:18
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 346 Aine 28-Jan-13 20:25
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 378 Thanos5150 28-Jan-13 22:09
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 345 carolb 28-Jan-13 20:28
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 317 Thanos5150 28-Jan-13 23:41
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 354 carolb 29-Jan-13 01:23
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 360 wordsmyth 29-Jan-13 01:31
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 321 carolb 29-Jan-13 02:11
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 300 wordsmyth 29-Jan-13 03:08
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 346 wordsmyth 29-Jan-13 05:31
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 379 Thanos5150 29-Jan-13 22:53
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 365 Susan Doris 26-Jan-13 06:55
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 340 ray wakila 28-Jan-13 18:30
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 356 wordsmyth 29-Jan-13 00:39
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 289 Susan Doris 13-Feb-13 06:48
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 321 wordsmyth 13-Feb-13 23:04
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 377 Archae Solenhofen 14-Feb-13 15:37
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 346 wordsmyth 19-Feb-13 01:29
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 348 Archae Solenhofen 19-Feb-13 04:29
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 329 wordsmyth 19-Feb-13 07:25
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 336 Thanos5150 20-Feb-13 00:25
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 293 Bobajot 20-Feb-13 02:09
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 295 Archae Solenhofen 20-Feb-13 03:54
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 328 Bobajot 20-Feb-13 13:35
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 344 Archae Solenhofen 20-Feb-13 18:01
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 311 Bobajot 20-Feb-13 23:29
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 342 Archae Solenhofen 21-Feb-13 16:17
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 346 Bobajot 22-Feb-13 23:08
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 317 Archae Solenhofen 22-Feb-13 23:55
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 325 wordsmyth 23-Feb-13 00:24
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 321 cladking 23-Feb-13 00:41
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 299 wordsmyth 23-Feb-13 05:10
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 297 cladking 23-Feb-13 05:40
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 343 Bobajot 23-Feb-13 01:04
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 312 Archae Solenhofen 23-Feb-13 04:49
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 368 Bobajot 23-Feb-13 12:31
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 357 Archae Solenhofen 23-Feb-13 20:25
Science Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 342 cladking 23-Feb-13 21:29
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 331 Bobajot 24-Feb-13 02:34
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 332 Archae Solenhofen 25-Feb-13 20:21
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 344 Bobajot 26-Feb-13 03:01
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 278 wordsmyth 23-Feb-13 21:21
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 316 Thanos5150 23-Feb-13 21:32
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 286 Thanos5150 23-Feb-13 22:10
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 325 wordsmyth 23-Feb-13 22:18
We would probably be amazed 256 Ratcho 24-Feb-13 00:52
Re: We would probably be amazed 254 wordsmyth 24-Feb-13 03:48
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 318 Archae Solenhofen 24-Feb-13 01:50
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 337 wordsmyth 24-Feb-13 02:44
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 315 wordsmyth 23-Feb-13 05:18
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 301 Archae Solenhofen 23-Feb-13 04:41
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 255 Archae Solenhofen 20-Feb-13 02:11
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 334 cladking 20-Feb-13 04:08
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 369 Thanos5150 22-Feb-13 05:31
I've tried hardened steel chisels 322 Ratcho 22-Feb-13 06:15
Re: I've tried hardened steel chisels 297 Susan Doris 22-Feb-13 07:15
Re: I've tried hardened steel chisels 331 Ratcho 22-Feb-13 17:51
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 339 Archae Solenhofen 23-Feb-13 05:15
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 326 cladking 23-Feb-13 15:13
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 183 Thanos5150 23-Feb-13 20:57
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 417 Archae Solenhofen 25-Feb-13 20:14
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 331 Susan Doris 24-Feb-13 15:49
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 341 wordsmyth 24-Feb-13 22:30
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 359 wordsmyth 20-Feb-13 02:22
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 341 Archae Solenhofen 20-Feb-13 03:47
How many swings would it take 359 Ratcho 20-Feb-13 06:29
Re: How many swings would it take 294 Susan Doris 20-Feb-13 17:31
Re: How many swings would it take 329 cladking 20-Feb-13 21:24
If you have the time... 303 Ratcho 22-Feb-13 22:48
Re: How many swings would it take 351 Archae Solenhofen 20-Feb-13 18:14
Re: How many swings would it take 281 cladking 20-Feb-13 21:30
Re: How many swings would it take 365 wordsmyth 21-Feb-13 08:39
Re: How many swings would it take 374 Scott Creighton 21-Feb-13 08:45
Re: How many swings would it take 310 Archae Solenhofen 21-Feb-13 17:32
Re: How many swings would it take 323 Scott Creighton 21-Feb-13 18:04
Re: How many swings would it take 295 Archae Solenhofen 21-Feb-13 19:55
Re: How many swings would it take 303 Scott Creighton 21-Feb-13 21:40
I'd still like to know 309 Ratcho 21-Feb-13 22:02
Re: I'd still like to know 340 Archae Solenhofen 21-Feb-13 22:43
Re: I'd still like to know 299 wordsmyth 21-Feb-13 23:47
Re: I'd still like to know 305 wordsmyth 22-Feb-13 00:10
Re: I'd still like to know 331 Archae Solenhofen 22-Feb-13 00:11
Re: Unfortunately, I'd still don't care... 319 wordsmyth 22-Feb-13 00:31
Re: Unfortunately, I'd still don't care... 345 Archae Solenhofen 22-Feb-13 00:47
Re: Unfortunately, I'd still don't care... 320 wordsmyth 22-Feb-13 07:47
Re: Unfortunately, I'd still don't care... 319 Archae Solenhofen 22-Feb-13 16:42
Re: How many swings would it take 367 wordsmyth 22-Feb-13 00:20
Re: How many swings would it take 263 Susan Doris 21-Feb-13 13:44
Re: How many swings would it take 276 Archae Solenhofen 21-Feb-13 16:09
Re: How many swings would it take 309 Scott Creighton 21-Feb-13 18:59
Re: How many swings would it take 329 Archae Solenhofen 21-Feb-13 20:06
Re: How many swings would it take 311 Scott Creighton 21-Feb-13 21:43
Re: How many swings would it take 312 Archae Solenhofen 21-Feb-13 22:22
Re: How many swings would it take 307 Scott Creighton 21-Feb-13 22:30
Re: How many swings would it take 303 Archae Solenhofen 21-Feb-13 22:48
Re: How many swings would it take 329 Morten 22-Feb-13 10:52
Re: How many swings would it take 314 wordsmyth 22-Feb-13 23:30
Re: How many swings would it take 432 Scott Creighton 21-Feb-13 22:55
Mod Note > Off Topic Sub-Thread 205 Dr. Troglodyte 22-Feb-13 00:01
Re: How many swings would it take 315 richarddullum 22-Feb-13 03:20
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 271 Audrey 13-Feb-13 23:21
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 329 Susan Doris 14-Feb-13 14:59
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 274 cladking 14-Feb-13 16:07
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 331 Archae Solenhofen 14-Feb-13 15:29
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 336 cladking 14-Feb-13 16:14
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 359 Archae Solenhofen 14-Feb-13 16:41
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 305 cladking 14-Feb-13 18:57
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 326 Thanos5150 20-Jan-13 19:04
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 261 Workjay 21-Jan-13 02:42
Re: Myth and Truth 304 Thunderbird 20-Jan-13 17:33
Re: Myth and Truth 336 wordsmyth 20-Jan-13 18:34
Re: Myth and Truth 348 cladking 20-Jan-13 22:30
Re: Myth and Truth 367 Glorious 20-Jan-13 23:31
Re: Myth and Truth 333 cladking 21-Jan-13 00:26
Re: Perception 449 Thunderbird 21-Jan-13 04:15
Re: Perception 343 Glorious 21-Jan-13 05:34
Re: Perception 291 Chris Jordan 21-Jan-13 07:45
Re: Perception 330 loveritas 21-Jan-13 11:32
Re: Change of Perception 355 Chris Jordan 21-Jan-13 16:20
Re: words/music /NT 254 Thunderbird 21-Jan-13 04:45
Re: words/music /NT 330 wordsmyth 23-Jan-13 08:14
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 342 Anomalies 21-Jan-13 16:53
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 312 Workjay 21-Jan-13 17:59
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 317 Anomalies 21-Jan-13 18:13
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 359 Susan Doris 28-Jan-13 16:29
Who knew? 337 cladking 28-Jan-13 22:07
Re: Who knew? 453 Susan Doris 01-Feb-13 18:25
Re: Who knew? 324 cladking 01-Feb-13 20:42
Egyptology Debunked; they wouldn't know a snake if it bit them. 352 cladking 28-Jan-13 21:04
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 292 cladking 21-Jan-13 18:16
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 310 Anomalies 22-Jan-13 15:09
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 246 cladking 22-Jan-13 15:39
'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 326 Anomalies 22-Jan-13 15:54
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 341 Workjay 22-Jan-13 16:10
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 228 Anomalies 22-Jan-13 16:32
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 279 Workjay 22-Jan-13 21:06
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 350 Anomalies 23-Jan-13 14:53
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 305 Workjay 23-Jan-13 21:10
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 315 Anomalies 23-Jan-13 21:51
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 308 Workjay 23-Jan-13 22:58
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 282 richarddullum 24-Jan-13 02:21
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 282 Workjay 24-Jan-13 02:46
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 244 richarddullum 24-Jan-13 14:33
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 330 Aine 24-Jan-13 13:00
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 313 richarddullum 25-Jan-13 01:57
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 281 Susan Doris 27-Jan-13 13:02
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 338 Susan Doris 02-Feb-13 14:01
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 313 Anomalies 05-Feb-13 15:41
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 294 Workjay 05-Feb-13 17:39
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 328 Anomalies 05-Feb-13 21:25
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 328 Workjay 06-Feb-13 17:31
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 310 Ratcho 06-Feb-13 19:02
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 280 Anomalies 06-Feb-13 21:54
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 276 Workjay 06-Feb-13 22:19
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 210 cladking 22-Jan-13 16:29
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 204 Anomalies 21-Jan-13 16:07
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 206 Workjay 21-Jan-13 16:13
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 189 carolb 21-Jan-13 17:52
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 196 Anomalies 21-Jan-13 18:00
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 187 carolb 21-Jan-13 18:05
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 206 Anomalies 21-Jan-13 19:01
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 217 carolb 21-Jan-13 19:07
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 200 Anomalies 21-Jan-13 19:21
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 225 carolb 21-Jan-13 19:42
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 188 Anomalies 21-Jan-13 19:58
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 210 carolb 21-Jan-13 20:17
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 195 Anomalies 21-Jan-13 20:27
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 215 Susan Doris 14-Feb-13 14:42
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 196 Anomalies 22-Jan-13 14:50
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 174 wordsmyth 23-Jan-13 08:35
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 208 Workjay 22-Jan-13 02:20
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 207 richarddullum 22-Jan-13 14:31
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 242 Aine 22-Jan-13 14:49
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 210 Anomalies 22-Jan-13 14:56
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 255 Aine 22-Jan-13 15:29
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 260 Aine 22-Jan-13 15:47
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 197 Anomalies 22-Jan-13 16:08
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 280 Aine 22-Jan-13 16:23
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 266 Aine 22-Jan-13 16:24
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 256 richarddullum 23-Jan-13 04:50
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 203 wordsmyth 23-Jan-13 08:52
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 208 richarddullum 23-Jan-13 14:28
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 235 wordsmyth 23-Jan-13 15:19
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 270 Aine 23-Jan-13 15:42
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 194 richarddullum 24-Jan-13 02:03
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 251 Aine 23-Jan-13 14:39
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 234 wordsmyth 23-Jan-13 15:09
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 271 Aine 24-Jan-13 13:19
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 222 wordsmyth 25-Jan-13 05:08
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 219 Glorious 25-Jan-13 05:49
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 256 Susan Doris 25-Jan-13 06:47
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 195 wordsmyth 25-Jan-13 07:03
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 198 Glorious 25-Jan-13 07:32
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 185 wordsmyth 25-Jan-13 08:09
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 179 cladking 25-Jan-13 16:32
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 205 Susan Doris 23-Jan-13 06:54
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 221 Glorious 23-Jan-13 07:43
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 267 Aine 23-Jan-13 14:47
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 228 BobbyH 22-Jan-13 19:21
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 251 Aine 22-Jan-13 19:41
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 209 BobbyH 22-Jan-13 19:56
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 255 Aine 22-Jan-13 19:59
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 265 Aine 22-Jan-13 20:09
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 233 Glorious 22-Jan-13 20:52
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 205 BobbyH 22-Jan-13 14:57
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 206 Workjay 22-Jan-13 15:08
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 219 BobbyH 22-Jan-13 15:41
Episode: "Destination Orion" was very well done 206 David L 17-Jan-13 17:35
Re: Episode: "Destination Orion" was very well done 187 Thomas Brophy 03-Mar-13 23:30
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 131 wordsmyth 23-Jan-13 08:10
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 243 Archae Solenhofen 25-Jan-13 03:28
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 235 wordsmyth 25-Jan-13 06:32
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 293 Thanos5150 25-Jan-13 18:22
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 219 Sangreal Sea 25-Jan-13 19:11
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 216 Warwick 11-Feb-13 22:32
The latest episode "Alien Abductions" is the most absurd yet 194 David L 23-Feb-13 23:41
Re: The latest episode "Alien Abductions" is the most absurd yet 194 Anomalies 25-Feb-13 19:00
Re: The latest episode "Alien Abductions" is the most absurd yet 153 David L 26-Feb-13 01:44
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 135 LanceHall 23-Mar-13 00:28


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.