Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
wordsmyth wrote:

>
Quote

Ya, it's still in the subthread where this "millions of
>2.5 ton blocks with tolerances of .010 inch" imagination popped
>up..... so there is no "sneak it" here.

>Just scroll up, "Archae", anyone can see the post where you
>quoted something cladking said, but then replied to him about
>something I said. Here it is:

It is more then just clear in Threaded View (irrespective of the fact that you posted one of those previous reply's out of the subthread's sequence) that Cladking's post was in the same subthread as your "millions of 2.5 ton blocks with tolerances of .010 inch" nonsense and he was responding to a message of yours that contained a mentioning of it by myself. How is that sneaking it in other then in your imagination?

>I mean, seriously, why would you just randomly start arguing
>with cladking about something no one else ever said, but me?
>Are you really THAT desperate here?

BTW, how about also posting your messages properly.... because just like before this most recent post of yours appears out of order at the very bottom of this thread with now over 190 messages, and again completely out of sequence from where it actually should be.

>
Quote

Got any examples of some advanced holes in the ground to
>go along with where they got all that "gold" or whatever
>from..... we got examples of where they were mining their chert
>from 30,000 years ago (Vermeersch 1984) so where are they
>getting their advanced rock cutting materials (and the
>processing plants that produced them)... a wild
>imaginarium?

>Sorry, but thousands of years from now, nobody will be able to
>discern the level of technology used in modern day mining
>operations. It will simply be holes bored in rocks with
>thousands of years of erosion on top of it.

Certainly they won't all be....... just like we see glacial striation on hardrocks like granite from over 15,000 years ago (BTW, these were not scratch with diamonds by aliens or advanced Co-Magmens with sonic laser drills).

>
Quote

"Solid stone or solid gold" are not the only things that
>long lived....... For heaven sake we still find Cro-Magnon
>coprolites around to see what they ate

>Thanks for the laugh.

Not as funny as the laughs from the lack of evidence for advanced rabbit and reindeer farms......... no wonder they went cannibalistic in their fall from grace.

>
Quote

so did they not have advance glasses, advanced ceramics,
>advanced stainless steels capable of surviving more than a few
>years during this leave no evidence behind episode of
>Mesolithic advancedyness.

>The "unbreakable, reinforced glass" made today will still
>*eventually* weaken and break over hundreds of years.

Do you even know what obsidian is...... you do understand that this natural glass remains behind for more than just a few "hundreds of years" in the archeological record... right? Like in all the stone tools we have found made of such..... what is it about natural glass that is superior to advanced glass made of almost pure silica? Please enlighten us...............

>Ditto for
>ceramics.

Ya, there is more than a lot of ancient unadvanced ceramics around......... so much for being advanced.

>And modern day stainless, corrosion-resistant steel
>will *eventually* corrode after several centuries. Sorry.

So now these advanced ones used just "modern day... steel".... just how advanced was this Co-Magmen civilization anyway?

BTW, how long do you imagine the statue "The Thinker" will be around if today's people were to just magically disappear too? It's just made of bronze......

>
Quote

just how advanced were these lost ones (remember
>according from some on your side of the fence they can't carve
>all their rocks without something as hard as diamond (lots of
>it))?

>What is that, sixteen times now you've brought up your
>favorite, pointless red herring that no one else is discussing
>but you? Please, have some dignity and stop embarrassing
>yourself even further here.

Did you even bother to finish watching the "Ancient Aliens Debunked" video that started this thread or even the "Ancient Aliens" videos that inspired it?

>
Quote

Maybe you should watch those "After People" videos, they
>were on the same channel as the "Ancient Aliens" stuff.....
>both of those crowds are claiming/imaging advanced materials
>get left behind for thousands and thousands of years (and don't
>forget the young earth creationists, they imagine finding all
>sort of stuff all the time from before an imaginary globe
>wiping-megaflood).

>Vermeersch, P.M., Paulissen, E., Gijselings, G., Otte, M.,
>Thoma, A., Van Peer, P., Lauwers, R., Drappier, D. and
>Charlier, C. (1984) 33,000 year old chert mining site and
>related Homo in the Egyptian Nile valley. Nature, 309:
>342-4.

>(Yawn)... Irrelevant red herrings/strawmen. Sorry.

Ya, and 33,000 years of erosion still leaves ancient mines behind to be found........ so much for your above assertion about advanced Co-Magmen mines from 3 times more recent times all conveniently disappearing.

>
Quote

How about all over the place in Egypt including Giza,
>unlike for these lost ones with absolutely nothing from before,
>during, or after? Oh, except the stone blocks…… and all the
>“gross exaggerations” that went along with them.

>Dodge noted.

>But anyway, since we only have only a tiny fraction of the
>building materials used to make all the other pyramids (and
>other monuments) of Egypt (excluding G1, G2, and G3), why
>should we expect to have some left behind from an epoch at
>least *twice* as old as the rest?

Because dividing something by 2 times a previous time interval does not equal zero (thus the above 33,000 year old mine)...... unless that something was zero to begin with. All you have is stone blocks and nothing else but a bunch of fringe authors making gross exaggeration/insinuations about them.

>Even further, why would those
>artifacts have been buried in the first place? Because for
>something to be preserved in the fossil record, it either has
>to be deliberately buried there (like corpses in cemeteries),
>or some cataclysmic event has to happen (like a volcano or
>mudslide) in which things get buried.

Garbage dumps......... construction debris....... etc. etc. etc. etc. etc. etc. etc...... they did not even leave any
Co-Magman droppings around either. Apparently they wiped that all up too......

>
Quote

Oh ok, so now it's just the "tops and bottoms'....
>That's right, if first you don't succeed try try try.... and
>try again.... how do you manage to get that new, very much less
>so now, previously all encompassing "0.01" claim from something
>that looks like this on it’s measurable surfaces?

>For a starter let's take a look at the outside core masonry:

>[www.nla.gov.au]

>Photo disproves nothing I said.

Other then for a start:

"millions of 2.5 ton blocks with tolerances of .010 inch"

and

"core masonry is level on the tops and bottoms of the stone blocks to 0.01 inch"

Both are complete nonsenses.......

>
Quote

If one reads Emery (1960) it is pretty clear the exposed
>core masonry is not that pristine.

>Emery, K.O. (1960) Weathering of the Great Pyramid. Journal of
>Sedimentary Petrology, 30, 141-143.

>Three whole pages of analysis from 1960, which no one can
>evaluate. Another fail on your part...

What specifically can't "no one" evaluate? Did you not actually look closely at the photo above...... it is pretty obvious that the surface is significantly eroded like Emery (1960) states.

>
Quote

Next lets have a look at some other holes in this GP
>claim of yours.

>Vyse's hole:

>[www.world-mysteries.com]
>Image Source:[www.world-mysteries.com]
>(Photograph by Jon Bodsworth
>[www.egyptarchive.co.uk])

>Again, the photo disproves nothing I said.

Remember this:

"Here is a(nother) perfect example of your dishonest and misleading strategies designed to take something completely out of context and make it seem like it's something that it's not. For starters, those are *exposed* core blocks. And do you know how they got exposed? By earthquakes. The same earthquakes which dislodged the white limestone facing stones. Hence, those visible gaps were NOT there originally. Not to mention, as any engineer will tell you, if those gaps actually were there at that level, those tolerance errors would have multiplied as blocks were placed further up the pyramid. Hence, it wouldn't have been able to be constructed with that kind of sloppy engineering. Something which is obviously not the case."

Ya, talk about "dishonest and misleading strategies"........

>
Quote

Notch on Great Pyramid's northeast edge:

>outside
>[www.archaeology.org]
>image source
>[archive.archaeology.org]

>The first photo *might* have disproved something, but it was
>too far away to be useful.

One would think that had to be put there to show you were it actually was.......

>On the other hand, the second
>actually does disprove what I said. A photo I requested from
>you when you started changing your tune,

Changing my tune? It is your responsibility to back your own claim.... you never did. You just imagined your claim, and I had to waste my time demonstrating it was completely false. Next time I might suggest checking the validity of your own claims first before indiscriminately dishing them out.

>then ignored my
>request

Ya that's right it's my fault you don't seem to actually know what your are talking about.......

>and starting arguing with cladking about things no one
>else ever said but me.

You are not the only one making that "0.01 inch" claim...... it's been around a long time.

>And for confirmation, I looked at some
>Upuaut-2 photos on Google and could easily see where they used
>mortar between the core stones and internal masonry.

Oh so now when you originally said "millions of 2.5 ton blocks" you actually meant the more than just considerably less volumed "internal masonry" made of Tura limestone (the more expensive stuff that is only there because it can be finely dressed). Ya talk about "changing your tune", from one post to the next, it's like listening to an MP3 player on six-second-shuffle......

>And thus,
>I see now that cladking was right, less than 100,000 stones
>have those tolerances I referenced.

He is talking about Tura casing..... that is not the core masonry made of Giza limestone.

Here are some of the very few examples from the GP:

[imageshack.us]
Photograph by Jon Bodsworth [www.egyptarchive.co.uk]
Note lever socket.

Here is an example from G1c (one of the smaller Queen's pyramids):

[imageshack.us]
Photograph by Jon Bodsworth [www.egyptarchive.co.uk]

That is what these advanced "tolerances of .010 inch" on G1c actually look like close up..... note the saw mark.

BTW, the above example from G1c is dekeberatly left unfinished for some reason:

[imageshack.us]
Photograph by Jon Bodsworth [www.egyptarchive.co.uk]

[imageshack.us]
Photograph by Jon Bodsworth [www.egyptarchive.co.uk]

Ya..... really advanced for aliens and civilized cavemen, maybe they were just trying to fool us into thinking they were 4th dynasty Egyptians!

>So then it appears that I
>had mistakenly conflated two different accurate facts about the
>pyramid into one incorrect fact. My bad.

Just 2 "mistakens" and 1 "incorrects"....... do you even read and/or remember your own post? Talk about gross under-exaggerations......

>Therefore, my previous
>statement that "the crux of the matter is a basic understanding
>of engineering and mathematics, specifically the ability to
>quarry, transport, and place millions of 2.5 ton blocks with
>tolerances of .010 inch, placing a stone every 5 minutes, day
>and night, for 20 years" should be revised to read:

>"The crux of the matter is a basic understanding of engineering
>and mathematics, specifically the ability to quarry, transport,
>and place millions of 2.5 ton blocks, placing a stone every 5
>minutes, day and night, for 20 years, several tens of thousands
>of which were placed with tolerances of .010 inch."

"several tens of thousands of which were placed with tolerances of .010 inch."

There are only few casing stones left on the Great Pyramid......
It is also pretty clear from some of those photos above that there ----> might <---- be a lot of potential blocks considerably less than a ton in that "millions of 2.5 ton blocks". Maybe you should do some more imagining to get a better estimate..... or better yet actually make an effort to go and learn something that is actually real about the GP.

>And although I know you like to take minor errors out of
>context and pretend that they disprove the entire assertion
>(you know, like your favorite hobby-horses), but unfortunately,
>they don't. Thus, you still have to try and disprove the rest
>of the points made in my original statement. (And again, I
>won't hold my breath. But best of luck, nonetheless!)

It's not a "minor error" it was another example of "grossly exaggerated" fringe nonsenses, and one might expect if it was not stopped here and now it would still be out there being spread with deliberate glee..

>
Quote

Off topic, really! Did not Mr. Dunn make claims about
>only diamond could scratch some ancient rocks that were used
>and did not Mr. Bauval go on seemingly about 50-200 ton blocks
>not being able to be moved with a civilization that did not
>have the wheel and pulley in some of these "Ancient Aliens"
>videos (i.e. the one on Pumapunku and the one on Power
>Plants)?

>Yes, they are off-topic. No one in this video makes those
>claims and no one else is discussing those things but you.
>Something you've been doing for years and years now. Rather
>bizarrely, I might add...

According to the "Ancient Aliens Debunked" transcripts diamonds are discussed in the section on Pumapunku and Pyramids...... so let me get this straight...... the "Ancient Aliens" videos are off topic and anything in the "Ancient Aliens Debunked" video that you have either not watched and/or don't want to discuss are all "off-topic" too.... anything else?

Archae Solenhofen (solenhofen@hotmail.com)

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 1680 Richard Fusniak 04-Jan-13 20:02
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 382 Citizen Attorney 05-Jan-13 00:24
Debunker debunked? 422 drrayeye 05-Jan-13 05:15
Aliens is making people re-evaluate certain paradigms 494 Ratcho 05-Jan-13 06:22
How is it possible? 378 gulsbo 05-Jan-13 16:16
Entertainment industry rules OK; thumbs down to education 323 Richard Fusniak 05-Jan-13 16:57
Re: Entertainment industry rules OK; thumbs down to education 449 gulsbo 06-Jan-13 08:03
Re: Entertainment industry rules OK; thumbs down to education 378 Richard Fusniak 06-Jan-13 08:59
Re: Entertainment industry rules OK; thumbs down to education 401 gulsbo 07-Jan-13 21:07
Re: Entertainment industry rules OK; thumbs down to education 444 Richard Fusniak 08-Jan-13 00:36
Fuzzy 330 Dan Mc F 08-Jan-13 12:49
Re: Fuzzy 423 Richard Fusniak 08-Jan-13 13:12
Re: Entertainment industry rules OK; thumbs down to education 345 gulsbo 09-Jan-13 21:36
Re: Smithsonian never lies.... 545 Thunderbird 23-Mar-13 03:39
who said aliens 396 Citizen Attorney 05-Jan-13 16:42
Re: who said aliens 383 David L 05-Jan-13 17:42
Re: who said aliens 438 Citizen Attorney 05-Jan-13 21:23
Agreed 410 NetWorkAngel 05-Jan-13 22:05
Re: Agreed 372 Citizen Attorney 06-Jan-13 19:16
Re: who said aliens 427 David L 07-Jan-13 01:16
Re: who said aliens 478 Thanos5150 06-Jan-13 18:38
Re: who said aliens 367 Citizen Attorney 06-Jan-13 19:17
Re: who said aliens 483 Thanos5150 06-Jan-13 22:45
Ancient Aliens' Debunked - Review 756 Thanos5150 07-Jan-13 02:23
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 412 MJT 08-Jan-13 13:58
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 409 Susan Doris 08-Jan-13 14:33
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 433 Richard Fusniak 08-Jan-13 15:19
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 470 Bobajot 10-Jan-13 04:01
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 464 wordsmyth 13-Jan-13 03:26
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 398 Archae Solenhofen 13-Jan-13 04:53
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 405 wordsmyth 15-Jan-13 01:44
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 447 richarddullum 15-Jan-13 03:28
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 385 wordsmyth 15-Jan-13 07:12
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 418 michael seabrook 15-Jan-13 10:48
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 439 Merrell 15-Jan-13 10:55
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 457 Archae Solenhofen 15-Jan-13 05:21
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 492 wordsmyth 15-Jan-13 08:24
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 383 Merrell 15-Jan-13 09:55
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 473 wordsmyth 15-Jan-13 10:26
Re: Archae Solenhofen = "Ancient Limestone" 498 Thanos5150 15-Jan-13 17:39
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 448 Archae Solenhofen 15-Jan-13 19:09
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 410 wordsmyth 15-Jan-13 22:26
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 382 Archae Solenhofen 16-Jan-13 03:29
Re: So...its very time consuming 361 Thunderbird 16-Jan-13 05:22
Re: So...its very time consuming 404 wordsmyth 16-Jan-13 06:32
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 468 Thunderbird 15-Jan-13 18:30
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 410 Martin Stower 23-Feb-13 15:38
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 359 wordsmyth 23-Feb-13 22:10
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 497 Thanos5150 24-Feb-13 00:33
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 434 wordsmyth 24-Feb-13 03:42
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 398 Thanos5150 24-Feb-13 06:16
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 383 wordsmyth 24-Feb-13 22:48
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 417 Scott Creighton 24-Feb-13 20:05
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 434 wordsmyth 24-Feb-13 22:36
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 423 Ratcho 24-Feb-13 22:49
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 444 Thanos5150 24-Feb-13 23:50
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 392 Scott Creighton 25-Feb-13 00:18
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 514 Martin Stower 25-Feb-13 17:57
Re: desperation.... 444 Thunderbird 25-Feb-13 21:20
Re: desperation.... 391 Martin Stower 26-Feb-13 15:47
Re: Khufu cartouche Cambell's chamber 488 Thunderbird 18-Mar-13 17:33
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 402 wordsmyth 25-Feb-13 22:25
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 426 Martin Stower 26-Feb-13 15:59
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 414 wordsmyth 26-Feb-13 21:41
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 456 Thanos5150 26-Feb-13 18:57
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 456 Martin Stower 27-Feb-13 18:46
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 377 Thanos5150 27-Feb-13 21:26
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 464 Martin Stower 28-Feb-13 16:57
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 388 Thanos5150 28-Feb-13 17:19
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 396 Martin Stower 28-Feb-13 18:08
Re: Vyse Good.....alternative....Evil 430 Merrell 28-Feb-13 09:33
Re: Can we seriously believe that Alford has a clue.... 421 Thunderbird 25-Feb-13 16:41
Re: Can we seriously believe that Alford has a clue.... 473 Martin Stower 25-Feb-13 18:29
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 423 Archae Solenhofen 15-Jan-13 18:41
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 420 Thanos5150 15-Jan-13 22:13
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 388 Archae Solenhofen 15-Jan-13 22:44
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 476 Thanos5150 16-Jan-13 04:40
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 383 Archae Solenhofen 16-Jan-13 06:02
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 438 Thanos5150 16-Jan-13 06:54
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 449 Archae Solenhofen 16-Jan-13 09:09
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 380 Thanos5150 16-Jan-13 17:52
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 421 Archae Solenhofen 16-Jan-13 20:21
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 430 Thanos5150 16-Jan-13 21:21
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 342 Archae Solenhofen 17-Jan-13 04:57
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 445 Thanos5150 17-Jan-13 05:42
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 409 Archae Solenhofen 17-Jan-13 07:05
Fingerprints 1996 - 200 ton blocks 516 Merrell 17-Jan-13 11:22
Re: Fingerprints 1996 - 200 ton blocks 373 Archae Solenhofen 17-Jan-13 16:18
Re: Fingerprints 1996 - 200 ton blocks 419 Merrell 17-Jan-13 16:39
Re: Fingerprints 1996 - 200 ton blocks 429 Archae Solenhofen 17-Jan-13 17:44
Re: Fingerprints 1996 - 200 ton blocks 260 Archae Solenhofen 17-Jan-13 22:41
Re: Fingerprints 1996 - 200 ton blocks 451 Merrell 17-Jan-13 23:38
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 478 Thanos5150 17-Jan-13 23:46
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 414 wordsmyth 18-Jan-13 03:45
Mod Warning #2 > wordsmyth – Name-calling 457 Dr. Troglodyte 18-Jan-13 15:12
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 409 Archae Solenhofen 18-Jan-13 03:57
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 394 Thanos5150 18-Jan-13 05:32
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 347 Archae Solenhofen 18-Jan-13 06:04
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 366 Thanos5150 18-Jan-13 06:40
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 396 Archae Solenhofen 18-Jan-13 07:31
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 409 Thanos5150 18-Jan-13 18:02
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 307 Archae Solenhofen 18-Jan-13 18:19
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 390 Bobajot 20-Jan-13 02:08
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 387 Archae Solenhofen 20-Jan-13 03:16
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 445 Susan Doris 03-Feb-13 06:49
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 447 Thanos5150 05-Feb-13 20:00
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 452 Susan Doris 06-Feb-13 06:50
Mod Caution > Language Edit - Thanos5150 407 Dr. Troglodyte 16-Jan-13 20:39
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 359 David L 18-Jan-13 15:40
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 467 Thanos5150 18-Jan-13 17:59
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 405 wordsmyth 16-Jan-13 06:30
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 452 Thanos5150 16-Jan-13 07:03
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 380 richarddullum 17-Jan-13 03:42
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 410 Archae Solenhofen 17-Jan-13 05:10
Mod Caution > Language Edit - wordsmyth 430 Dr. Troglodyte 16-Jan-13 00:30
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 440 wordsmyth 15-Jan-13 22:23
Mod Warning #1 > wordsmyth 447 Dr. Troglodyte 16-Jan-13 00:44
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 379 Archae Solenhofen 16-Jan-13 03:11
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 414 wordsmyth 16-Jan-13 05:56
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 419 Archae Solenhofen 16-Jan-13 08:06
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 390 cladking 16-Jan-13 15:54
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 423 Archae Solenhofen 16-Jan-13 17:11
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 421 cladking 16-Jan-13 17:40
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 418 Archae Solenhofen 16-Jan-13 17:58
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 401 cladking 16-Jan-13 21:06
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 327 Archae Solenhofen 16-Jan-13 21:17
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 411 cladking 16-Jan-13 21:31
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 397 wordsmyth 20-Jan-13 01:56
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 403 Archae Solenhofen 21-Jan-13 02:36
Re: Considerations..... 396 Thunderbird 16-Jan-13 20:27
Re: Considerations..... 439 cladking 16-Jan-13 21:12
Re: Considerations..... 402 Thanos5150 16-Jan-13 21:48
Re: what bumpkins ...could do : ) 417 Thunderbird 17-Jan-13 05:05
Re: Considerations..... 467 loveritas 16-Jan-13 22:46
Re: design specs 397 Thunderbird 17-Jan-13 04:29
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 445 Anomalies 16-Jan-13 18:19
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 364 Workjay 18-Jan-13 19:16
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 397 Susan Doris 20-Jan-13 07:00
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 383 wordsmyth 20-Jan-13 08:08
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 422 Susan Doris 20-Jan-13 08:58
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 410 wordsmyth 20-Jan-13 18:31
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 421 Thanos5150 20-Jan-13 19:10
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 424 wordsmyth 22-Jan-13 16:38
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 401 Workjay 22-Jan-13 21:16
Artificial Moon 427 Thanos5150 25-Jan-13 05:28
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 366 wordsmyth 25-Jan-13 07:54
Mod Warning #1 > Language - Thanos5150 414 Dr. Troglodyte 25-Jan-13 14:04
REALLY REALLY EXCEPTIONAL POST 409 drrayeye 25-Jan-13 14:37
Re: REALLY REALLY EXCEPTIONAL POST 422 Thanos5150 25-Jan-13 19:38
Re: REALLY REALLY EXCEPTIONAL POST 501 drrayeye 26-Jan-13 07:46
Re: REALLY REALLY EXCEPTIONAL POST 462 wordsmyth 26-Jan-13 19:51
Re: REALLY REALLY EXCEPTIONAL POST 463 Thanos5150 26-Jan-13 22:27
Re: REALLY REALLY EXCEPTIONAL POST 466 wordsmyth 27-Jan-13 02:41
Re: REALLY REALLY EXCEPTIONAL POST 490 Thanos5150 27-Jan-13 05:06
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 383 carolb 25-Jan-13 21:26
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 312 Thanos5150 26-Jan-13 00:56
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 450 carolb 26-Jan-13 02:23
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 395 Thanos5150 27-Jan-13 04:50
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 565 carolb 28-Jan-13 00:31
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 368 Thanos5150 28-Jan-13 03:12
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 377 Aine 28-Jan-13 12:38
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 360 Thanos5150 28-Jan-13 20:18
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 402 Aine 28-Jan-13 20:25
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 435 Thanos5150 28-Jan-13 22:09
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 421 carolb 28-Jan-13 20:28
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 373 Thanos5150 28-Jan-13 23:41
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 419 carolb 29-Jan-13 01:23
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 439 wordsmyth 29-Jan-13 01:31
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 381 carolb 29-Jan-13 02:11
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 369 wordsmyth 29-Jan-13 03:08
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 404 wordsmyth 29-Jan-13 05:31
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 446 Thanos5150 29-Jan-13 22:53
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 426 Susan Doris 26-Jan-13 06:55
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 395 ray wakila 28-Jan-13 18:30
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 416 wordsmyth 29-Jan-13 00:39
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 369 Susan Doris 13-Feb-13 06:48
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 390 wordsmyth 13-Feb-13 23:04
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 435 Archae Solenhofen 14-Feb-13 15:37
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 391 wordsmyth 19-Feb-13 01:29
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 395 Archae Solenhofen 19-Feb-13 04:29
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 392 wordsmyth 19-Feb-13 07:25
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 376 Thanos5150 20-Feb-13 00:25
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 356 Bobajot 20-Feb-13 02:09
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 372 Archae Solenhofen 20-Feb-13 03:54
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 384 Bobajot 20-Feb-13 13:35
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 400 Archae Solenhofen 20-Feb-13 18:01
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 370 Bobajot 20-Feb-13 23:29
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 397 Archae Solenhofen 21-Feb-13 16:17
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 418 Bobajot 22-Feb-13 23:08
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 370 Archae Solenhofen 22-Feb-13 23:55
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 369 wordsmyth 23-Feb-13 00:24
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 394 cladking 23-Feb-13 00:41
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 367 wordsmyth 23-Feb-13 05:10
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 349 cladking 23-Feb-13 05:40
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 407 Bobajot 23-Feb-13 01:04
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 394 Archae Solenhofen 23-Feb-13 04:49
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 421 Bobajot 23-Feb-13 12:31
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 401 Archae Solenhofen 23-Feb-13 20:25
Science Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 406 cladking 23-Feb-13 21:29
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 392 Bobajot 24-Feb-13 02:34
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 380 Archae Solenhofen 25-Feb-13 20:21
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 383 Bobajot 26-Feb-13 03:01
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 339 wordsmyth 23-Feb-13 21:21
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 378 Thanos5150 23-Feb-13 21:32
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 345 Thanos5150 23-Feb-13 22:10
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 367 wordsmyth 23-Feb-13 22:18
We would probably be amazed 302 Ratcho 24-Feb-13 00:52
Re: We would probably be amazed 309 wordsmyth 24-Feb-13 03:48
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 374 Archae Solenhofen 24-Feb-13 01:50
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 376 wordsmyth 24-Feb-13 02:44
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 357 wordsmyth 23-Feb-13 05:18
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 343 Archae Solenhofen 23-Feb-13 04:41
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 306 Archae Solenhofen 20-Feb-13 02:11
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 406 cladking 20-Feb-13 04:08
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 428 Thanos5150 22-Feb-13 05:31
I've tried hardened steel chisels 369 Ratcho 22-Feb-13 06:15
Re: I've tried hardened steel chisels 351 Susan Doris 22-Feb-13 07:15
Re: I've tried hardened steel chisels 399 Ratcho 22-Feb-13 17:51
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 395 Archae Solenhofen 23-Feb-13 05:15
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 407 cladking 23-Feb-13 15:13
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 235 Thanos5150 23-Feb-13 20:57
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 531 Archae Solenhofen 25-Feb-13 20:14
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 385 Susan Doris 24-Feb-13 15:49
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 391 wordsmyth 24-Feb-13 22:30
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 417 wordsmyth 20-Feb-13 02:22
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 392 Archae Solenhofen 20-Feb-13 03:47
How many swings would it take 412 Ratcho 20-Feb-13 06:29
Re: How many swings would it take 362 Susan Doris 20-Feb-13 17:31
Re: How many swings would it take 393 cladking 20-Feb-13 21:24
If you have the time... 350 Ratcho 22-Feb-13 22:48
Re: How many swings would it take 416 Archae Solenhofen 20-Feb-13 18:14
Re: How many swings would it take 341 cladking 20-Feb-13 21:30
Re: How many swings would it take 430 wordsmyth 21-Feb-13 08:39
Re: How many swings would it take 431 Scott Creighton 21-Feb-13 08:45
Re: How many swings would it take 364 Archae Solenhofen 21-Feb-13 17:32
Re: How many swings would it take 385 Scott Creighton 21-Feb-13 18:04
Re: How many swings would it take 338 Archae Solenhofen 21-Feb-13 19:55
Re: How many swings would it take 357 Scott Creighton 21-Feb-13 21:40
I'd still like to know 350 Ratcho 21-Feb-13 22:02
Re: I'd still like to know 397 Archae Solenhofen 21-Feb-13 22:43
Re: I'd still like to know 347 wordsmyth 21-Feb-13 23:47
Re: I'd still like to know 357 wordsmyth 22-Feb-13 00:10
Re: I'd still like to know 381 Archae Solenhofen 22-Feb-13 00:11
Re: Unfortunately, I'd still don't care... 393 wordsmyth 22-Feb-13 00:31
Re: Unfortunately, I'd still don't care... 391 Archae Solenhofen 22-Feb-13 00:47
Re: Unfortunately, I'd still don't care... 364 wordsmyth 22-Feb-13 07:47
Re: Unfortunately, I'd still don't care... 388 Archae Solenhofen 22-Feb-13 16:42
Re: How many swings would it take 436 wordsmyth 22-Feb-13 00:20
Re: How many swings would it take 310 Susan Doris 21-Feb-13 13:44
Re: How many swings would it take 318 Archae Solenhofen 21-Feb-13 16:09
Re: How many swings would it take 370 Scott Creighton 21-Feb-13 18:59
Re: How many swings would it take 393 Archae Solenhofen 21-Feb-13 20:06
Re: How many swings would it take 366 Scott Creighton 21-Feb-13 21:43
Re: How many swings would it take 376 Archae Solenhofen 21-Feb-13 22:22
Re: How many swings would it take 386 Scott Creighton 21-Feb-13 22:30
Re: How many swings would it take 366 Archae Solenhofen 21-Feb-13 22:48
Re: How many swings would it take 388 Morten 22-Feb-13 10:52
Re: How many swings would it take 361 wordsmyth 22-Feb-13 23:30
Re: How many swings would it take 486 Scott Creighton 21-Feb-13 22:55
Mod Note > Off Topic Sub-Thread 257 Dr. Troglodyte 22-Feb-13 00:01
Re: How many swings would it take 376 richarddullum 22-Feb-13 03:20
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 321 Audrey 13-Feb-13 23:21
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 385 Susan Doris 14-Feb-13 14:59
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 326 cladking 14-Feb-13 16:07
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 389 Archae Solenhofen 14-Feb-13 15:29
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 371 cladking 14-Feb-13 16:14
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 406 Archae Solenhofen 14-Feb-13 16:41
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 351 cladking 14-Feb-13 18:57
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 387 Thanos5150 20-Jan-13 19:04
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 299 Workjay 21-Jan-13 02:42
Re: Myth and Truth 377 Thunderbird 20-Jan-13 17:33
Re: Myth and Truth 384 wordsmyth 20-Jan-13 18:34
Re: Myth and Truth 417 cladking 20-Jan-13 22:30
Re: Myth and Truth 430 Glorious 20-Jan-13 23:31
Re: Myth and Truth 400 cladking 21-Jan-13 00:26
Re: Perception 511 Thunderbird 21-Jan-13 04:15
Re: Perception 395 Glorious 21-Jan-13 05:34
Re: Perception 342 Chris Jordan 21-Jan-13 07:45
Re: Perception 384 loveritas 21-Jan-13 11:32
Re: Change of Perception 401 Chris Jordan 21-Jan-13 16:20
Re: words/music /NT 316 Thunderbird 21-Jan-13 04:45
Re: words/music /NT 395 wordsmyth 23-Jan-13 08:14
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 385 Anomalies 21-Jan-13 16:53
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 378 Workjay 21-Jan-13 17:59
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 377 Anomalies 21-Jan-13 18:13
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 433 Susan Doris 28-Jan-13 16:29
Who knew? 403 cladking 28-Jan-13 22:07
Re: Who knew? 521 Susan Doris 01-Feb-13 18:25
Re: Who knew? 362 cladking 01-Feb-13 20:42
Egyptology Debunked; they wouldn't know a snake if it bit them. 461 cladking 28-Jan-13 21:04
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 364 cladking 21-Jan-13 18:16
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 369 Anomalies 22-Jan-13 15:09
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 298 cladking 22-Jan-13 15:39
'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 388 Anomalies 22-Jan-13 15:54
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 404 Workjay 22-Jan-13 16:10
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 285 Anomalies 22-Jan-13 16:32
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 364 Workjay 22-Jan-13 21:06
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 420 Anomalies 23-Jan-13 14:53
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 378 Workjay 23-Jan-13 21:10
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 380 Anomalies 23-Jan-13 21:51
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 376 Workjay 23-Jan-13 22:58
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 331 richarddullum 24-Jan-13 02:21
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 362 Workjay 24-Jan-13 02:46
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 293 richarddullum 24-Jan-13 14:33
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 380 Aine 24-Jan-13 13:00
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 370 richarddullum 25-Jan-13 01:57
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 339 Susan Doris 27-Jan-13 13:02
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 407 Susan Doris 02-Feb-13 14:01
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 368 Anomalies 05-Feb-13 15:41
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 359 Workjay 05-Feb-13 17:39
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 388 Anomalies 05-Feb-13 21:25
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 394 Workjay 06-Feb-13 17:31
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 382 Ratcho 06-Feb-13 19:02
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 337 Anomalies 06-Feb-13 21:54
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 333 Workjay 06-Feb-13 22:19
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' - Why crazy now? 274 cladking 22-Jan-13 16:29
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 268 Anomalies 21-Jan-13 16:07
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 273 Workjay 21-Jan-13 16:13
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 248 carolb 21-Jan-13 17:52
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 251 Anomalies 21-Jan-13 18:00
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 291 carolb 21-Jan-13 18:05
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 256 Anomalies 21-Jan-13 19:01
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 294 carolb 21-Jan-13 19:07
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 263 Anomalies 21-Jan-13 19:21
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 315 carolb 21-Jan-13 19:42
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 273 Anomalies 21-Jan-13 19:58
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 278 carolb 21-Jan-13 20:17
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 238 Anomalies 21-Jan-13 20:27
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 266 Susan Doris 14-Feb-13 14:42
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 284 Anomalies 22-Jan-13 14:50
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 243 wordsmyth 23-Jan-13 08:35
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 272 Workjay 22-Jan-13 02:20
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 279 richarddullum 22-Jan-13 14:31
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 298 Aine 22-Jan-13 14:49
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 286 Anomalies 22-Jan-13 14:56
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 316 Aine 22-Jan-13 15:29
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 337 Aine 22-Jan-13 15:47
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 242 Anomalies 22-Jan-13 16:08
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 345 Aine 22-Jan-13 16:23
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 325 Aine 22-Jan-13 16:24
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 302 richarddullum 23-Jan-13 04:50
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 260 wordsmyth 23-Jan-13 08:52
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 273 richarddullum 23-Jan-13 14:28
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 290 wordsmyth 23-Jan-13 15:19
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 323 Aine 23-Jan-13 15:42
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 275 richarddullum 24-Jan-13 02:03
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 286 Aine 23-Jan-13 14:39
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 297 wordsmyth 23-Jan-13 15:09
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 338 Aine 24-Jan-13 13:19
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 286 wordsmyth 25-Jan-13 05:08
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 284 Glorious 25-Jan-13 05:49
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 339 Susan Doris 25-Jan-13 06:47
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 284 wordsmyth 25-Jan-13 07:03
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 278 Glorious 25-Jan-13 07:32
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 246 wordsmyth 25-Jan-13 08:09
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 239 cladking 25-Jan-13 16:32
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 256 Susan Doris 23-Jan-13 06:54
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 284 Glorious 23-Jan-13 07:43
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 315 Aine 23-Jan-13 14:47
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 297 BobbyH 22-Jan-13 19:21
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 302 Aine 22-Jan-13 19:41
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 283 BobbyH 22-Jan-13 19:56
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 318 Aine 22-Jan-13 19:59
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 352 Aine 22-Jan-13 20:09
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 313 Glorious 22-Jan-13 20:52
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 284 BobbyH 22-Jan-13 14:57
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 272 Workjay 22-Jan-13 15:08
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 279 BobbyH 22-Jan-13 15:41
Episode: "Destination Orion" was very well done 281 David L 17-Jan-13 17:35
Re: Episode: "Destination Orion" was very well done 270 Thomas Brophy 03-Mar-13 23:30
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 168 wordsmyth 23-Jan-13 08:10
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 316 Archae Solenhofen 25-Jan-13 03:28
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 303 wordsmyth 25-Jan-13 06:32
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 384 Thanos5150 25-Jan-13 18:22
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 278 Sangreal Sea 25-Jan-13 19:11
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 292 Warwick 11-Feb-13 22:32
The latest episode "Alien Abductions" is the most absurd yet 253 David L 23-Feb-13 23:41
Re: The latest episode "Alien Abductions" is the most absurd yet 271 Anomalies 25-Feb-13 19:00
Re: The latest episode "Alien Abductions" is the most absurd yet 195 David L 26-Feb-13 01:44
Re: 'Ancient Aliens' Debunked - how Megalithic sites were built 189 LanceHall 23-Mar-13 00:28


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.