3) Why don't LEGITIMATE scientists consider it authentic?
No offense, but who cares what they think?!? At best, they are typically 50 years behind the curve and at worst they're claiming that 96% of the universe is made of two magical substances nobody has any direct evidence for whatsoever, nor has either been directly observed, tested, or studied. I mean, seriously, scientists were giving housewives lobotomies to make them more docile as recently as the sixties! And you need these guys to give you their official seal of approval before you actually wonder if something is possible/plausible?
4) Why have all previous tests come back saying it's human?
Doesn't the scientific community's lack of interest in the subject make you wonder just a bit? Look at homo floresiensis. It's possibly a deformed human. Or it's a new species. (The latter seeming fairly likely at this point, BTW.) Why not the same approach to the SC skull? Could it be another hominid? Could it be something else? Either way, why not lots and lots of scientific testing? Instead of a smattering of general tests and then these scientists go right back to making artificial meat from stem cells for Monsanto or whoever...
Stop kidding yourself, Richard. You've been suckered.
Umm... Yeah, Richard. Don't you know there's people who will do the thinking for you? No need to question the paradigm and be open-minded about anything. Besides, we've got this whole sixth Great Extinction thingy finally under control. Just keep consuming! And remember, thinking is for suckers!
Post Edited (24-Jan-13 03:00)