Mysteries :
The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board).
BobbyH wrote:
> Ouch!! I understood it wasn't the Whole Human Genome.
>
> If they compared the same amount of base pairs and found that
> many variations, doesn't that show it is something different?
No. See Andy's posts in the threads I posted. He explains it very well, and so does Houcad. It is a HUMAN gene--a deformed one, but still human.
For the record, FoxP2 is found in all mammals (that we have genome sequences for).
Post Edited (22-Jan-13 20:01)
> Ouch!! I understood it wasn't the Whole Human Genome.
>
> If they compared the same amount of base pairs and found that
> many variations, doesn't that show it is something different?
No. See Andy's posts in the threads I posted. He explains it very well, and so does Houcad. It is a HUMAN gene--a deformed one, but still human.
For the record, FoxP2 is found in all mammals (that we have genome sequences for).
Post Edited (22-Jan-13 20:01)
1984 was a warning, not a how-to guide.
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.